Police Service Strength - Home Affairs Committee Contents


Joint memorandum submitted by Derbyshire Police Authority & Derbyshire Constabulary

  Derbyshire Police faces particular problems due to the way funding is distributed. Currently we lose out on funding of some £5m per annum, due to the cost of providing floor protection within the funding formula. This means that we lose out on funding for some 160 police officers. In addition Derbyshire Police Authority has the lowest level of PCSO funding nationally (per head of population) and was adversely affected by the Government's decision to halt the final tranche of PCSO funding.

  Over recent years, there has been little change in our Police Officer numbers. (2,100 fte in September 2009, compared to 2,071 fte in September 2004). Our Police Staff numbers have increased during this period (1,205 fte in September 2004 to 1,615 fte in September 2009). This increase in police staff has mainly been due to funding for PCSOs and the civilianisation of custody detention officers.

  As one of the lowest spending forces nationally, we have had to find innovative ways to save money and redirect our resources towards new policing risks. Our Closing the Risk Gap Project is a good example. The Chief Constable has reorganised the Section Structure and changed the make up of Safer Neighbourhood Teams to release Police Officers for Public Protection (eg Domestic Violence, Child Protection & Dangerous Persons Management).

  We have already made effective use of our resources and delivered substantial efficiency savings of over £40 million.

  In 2009, the Secretary of State called in the budget set by our Authority, when the Authority decided it had no option but to increase it's spending by some 4.99%. The Secretary of State decided not to cap Derbyshire and on appeal decided to relax the restrictions placed on our future spending plans. Nevertheless, Derbyshire still faces tighter spending restrictions than most other forces next year. We have already introduced a tight system of vacancy control and are holding a number of police staff posts vacant. Nevertheless we may well be forced to implement further job losses to balance our budget in 2010.

  We know that the position will be even more challenging in 2011. At the same time the Authority and Chief Constable are committed to delivering a quality policing service. A Moving Forward Project has started to identify further savings and look at new ways of working that will release police officers to meet new policing risks. Our current funding position, as a result of Government decisions around floor protection, means that we will undoubtedly need to make further reductions in the number of police staff that we employ and may have little option but to reduce our police officer numbers.

November 2009

APPENDIX

POLICE OFFICER AND STAFF NUMBERS

  The number of police officers and staff currently employed by the Force are shown in table 1. Table 2 shows the comparison to five years previously.

Table 1—As at 30 September 2009

POLICE OFFICERS

HeadcountFTE
2,1362,100


POLICE STAFF

Type of StaffHeadcount FTE
Designated Investigative Officer 8681
Detention Officer58 57.2
PCSO195193.8
Police Staff1,4611,283
Traffic Warden00
Total1,8001,615


Figures taken from half year PP01 data return for Home Office—October 2009


Table 2—As at 30 September 2004

POLICE OFFICERS

HeadcountFTE
2,0932,071


POLICE STAFF

Type of StaffHeadcount FTE
Designated Investigative Officer 00
Detention Officer00
PCSO00
Police Staff1,3231,163.3
Traffic Warden4342.04
Total1,3661,205.3


Figures taken from quarter 2 PP01 data return for Home Office—October 2004


  In general police growth has occurred in the areas of Crime Support and Regional Units ie East Midlands Special Operational Unit (EMSOU) and the East Midlands CTIU, Derbyshire acts as the lead force for the latter. This has been partly due to the risks identified in the HMIC "Closing the Gap" report and partly due to the increasing regional collaboration in the fight against terrorism.

  Police Staff increases can be seen in the table above. Specific areas for the increase include the introduction to the force of PCSOs, Detention Officers and Designated Investigative Offices which did not exist five years ago. Further increases have occurred within the departments of crime support and regional units for the reasons identified above. In addition the area of Professional Standards has seen an increase in police staff due to the growth of CRB checks, Mope and Freedom of Information. In addition there is now a Confidence and Equality Unit which did not exist five years ago employing seven members of staff.

  Police Staff reductions have occurred with the movement of Traffic Wardens to local authorities.

IMPLICATIONS OF FUNDING SETTLEMENT

  Derbyshire Police continues to lose out on funding of some £5 million per annum during the current three-year CSR settlement. This is due to the operation of grant floors which protect a number of Authorities at the expense of Derbyshire Police. This loss of funding has been equivalent to some 160 Police Officers or over 200 PCSOs which would have been available to Derbyshire to address the significant Policing Risks that the Force and Authority have identified.

  The implications for Derbyshire, along with other forces within the East Midlands Region, are shown in the attached paper, which was produced for the East Midlands Regional Select Committee on Public Sector Funding.

  Despite this under-funding, Derbyshire Police implemented a major project in 2008 to "Close the Risk Gap" within protective services. This project provided an extra 100 police officers/staff to address key public protection risks around Domestic Violence, Dangerous Persons Management and Child Protection. The force achieved this through a combination of reorganising and refocusing the work of some 50 officers as a result of changes to section structures and increasing the use of PCSOs within Safer Neighbourhood Teams. At the same time the Police Authority, through sound financial management, provided funding for a further 50 Police Officers/Staff.

CURRENT POSITION 2009-10 & 2010-11

  This year, the Secretary of State chose to call in the budget for Derbyshire Police. Although he did not decide to cap the Authority he has set tight spending limits for next year 2010-11, which were subsequently increased on appeal.

  This has meant that the Authority has already had to plan to deliver savings for next year and projects a budget gap of some £3 million for 2009-10. As a result, the Authority has implemented a system of vacancy control, which means the force is currently holding some xx police staff posts vacant. We do not expect to be able to fill these posts in the short or medium term.

  The Authority is currently reviewing savings proposals to meet its £3 million savings target, although it is already clear that these cannot be delivered without a further loss of Police Staff posts.

LONGER TERMS PLANS

  Derbyshire Police realises that our Financial Position will become even more challenging in 2011. We have commenced a wider "Moving Forward" project aimed at delivering savings for next year and looking at more fundamental changes to service delivery.

  At this stage the Derbyshire is identifying a programme of work to both look at how we can reshape the way we deliver our service and achieve the more substantial savings that we predict we need to make in the future.

  Although the Authority will do all it can to protect "front-line" services, there is absolutely no guarantee that it will be able to maintain the current police officer establishment. Indeed if our funding shortfall is more than predicted then Derbyshire Police will be forced to cut police officer recruitment to close any immediate budget gap.

  This will be a tough challenge for our Authority, one of the lowest spending Police Authorities nationally and one that continues to lose out on funding through the funding formula.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 26 January 2010