The Cocaine Trade - Home Affairs Committee Contents


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 340 - 359)

TUESDAY 10 NOVEMBER 2009

HIS EXCELLENCY MR MAURICIO RODRIGUEZ MUNERA

  Q340  Mr Streeter: During our visit to Holland last week it was suggested to us that many people in Colombia work in the cocaine trade—and you have just give us a figure and that is very helpful, thank you—but in their mindset they are not necessarily doing anything wrong, and in their eyes it is a normal nine to five job. Is that a fair reflection, do you think, of what people do think in Colombia and why is that and what could the government do about that?

  HE Rodriguez: I think that is a fair statement. Of these 263,000 people that are involved in the production they do not really do it because they are into drug trading or they are trying to become drug barons, whatever, but most of them are just peasants that do not have any other alternative—no good alternative—and they need to pay for their needs. So they are given the seeds, the fertilisers and somebody will come six months later to buy their crops and so for them it is just subsistence. If somebody comes with another kind of crop, the government, and gives them the same help, the same assistance they will—and in fact it has been proven in the past years—move into another crop. But they are not aware of the damage that this is causing; they do not know what they are doing. In most cases they are peasants in isolated areas; they do not have any kind of education and they do not have many alternatives for their subsistence. So they are in the hands of these drug barons that are very effective in convincing them to produce these coca leaves and they will do it because they need to feed their children.

  Q341  Mr Streeter: So is it illegal to grow cocaine in Colombia?

  HE Rodriguez: Absolutely, it is completely illegal and that is why the government is eradicating these crops and offering alternatives to the peasants. If I may complement that question: I think that there is a very important, disturbing element in all this cocaine production in Colombia, which is the role played by the FARC guerrilla. The FARC guerrilla is the main producer and trader of cocaine in Colombia and in the rest of the world. It is very important to understand that.

  Chairman: We will be moving on to the FARC a little later on.

  Q342  David Davies: Your Excellency, obviously this is polite speaking but do you ever get frustrated that people, perhaps even British members of Parliament obviously seem to think that Colombia is the problem here; the cocaine comes from Colombia, therefore we will send MPs out to Colombia and we will ask the Ambassador what is being done in Colombia. Whereas, in actual fact could it not be argued that the problem is entirely in Western Europe where the demand for these drugs exist and that perhaps you should be sending your MPs to find out what we are doing to stop people buying these drugs, which are ruining your environment, your economy, corrupting your country and causing all sorts of problems. Is it not us who should be apologising to you for allowing drug dealers in this country and drug takers to basically get away with it with just a slap on the wrist?

  HE Rodriguez: Sir, thank you very much for that question and for that comment. Yes, sometimes we are very frustrated and we feel that we are the victims and that the treatment that the world gives us is unjust, pointing fingers at Colombia and blaming us for the whole problem. But we cannot go to the other extreme and say it is the consumers that are to blame. I think that we have to share responsibility; I think that is the problem both of producers and consumers and we have to work together to fight against that drug trade. We should not see other countries as enemies but as allies in this fight against drug production and consumption. Each of us has to do whatever we need to do in our countries to make sure that drug production and consumption comes down, and I believe that that is the best way to solve the problem instead of trying to blame it only on one country or one single nation as being responsible.

  Q343  Chairman: Mr Davies and I and other members of the Committee went to Rotterdam, as I have said, and we saw the physical pain that people have when the barons make them swallow pellets of cocaine and a young woman of 19, who had a very large container, about half the size of this bottle, inserted in her vagina and she travelled to Holland and almost died because of the fact that she was going through such pain. So what is your view about the drugs mules; what can we do more in order to try and stop people acting as drugs mules?

  HE Rodriguez: The mules are a terrible, horrible nightmare and it is very negative that this happens. Unfortunately these mules can make a big amount of money—some informal estimates describe those mules as making $5000 per trip if they are successful.

  Q344  Chairman: How does $5000 compare to the annual income of a Colombian?

  HE Rodriguez: That is a very good point.

  Q345  Chairman: What is the annual income?

  HE Rodriguez: The minimum wage in Colombia is approximately $200 a month, so this would be the equivalent of almost two years of income.

  Q346  Chairman: For one visit.

  HE Rodriguez: For only one visit. So you find, unfortunately, desperate people, in some cases unemployed, need an alternative income. It does not justify what they are doing because what they are doing is illegal and immoral but this explains why they do it. Sometimes they are desperate. In other cases they are not just victims—they want to make money, to make a lot of money, taking a small risk and trying to have a lucrative business and to have a profit. Just to complete the answer, there are more than 8000 Colombian mules in prisons all over the world.

  Q347  Chairman: How many in the United Kingdom, do you know?

  HE Rodriguez: I do not have the number in the United Kingdom.

  Q348  Chairman: We will find out. Taking up Mr Davies' very, very important point what is your government doing in making representations to the British Government and saying, "Why are you not doing more to stop the consumption of cocaine?" Are you making any representations of that kind?

  HE Rodriguez: We are permanently talking to the UK Government and I must say that we do have cooperation and support and we appreciate that cooperation and that support. Obviously we would like more and more to be done in many areas, in terms of financial resources, to increase the fight against the eradication.

  Q349  Chairman: We will come on to that in a minute.

  HE Rodriguez: But we do have a good relationship and we are permanently in contact—almost every day we have some kind of discussion in that area.

  Chairman: Excellent.

  Q350  Ms Buck: Could you tell us a little about the government strategy for disrupting the smugglers' networks and in particular whether the government has a strategy for seizing financial assets where they can?

  HE Rodriguez: Thank you very much for the question. The total seizure of assets in the last eight years accounts to 32,000. These are frozen bank accounts, real estate, vehicles, farms—30,352 properties have been seized by the government in the last eight years. In addition to this there is a seizure of assets and another effective way of fighting the drug barons. This is very effective because they are afraid of this other tool to fight their drug trafficking, which is the extradition of drug barons to other countries. In the past ten years we have extradited 942 Colombians to countries with which we have extradition treaties and that have been requested by the local judicial authorities. And this has been increasing in the last ten years. In 1999 the extraditions were 25, last year they were almost 250; so year after year we have been increasing this judicial cooperation with the other nations that request the drug barons to be judged in the countries where they are taking the drugs.

  Q351  Ms Buck: Thank you very much for that. Given the distorting effect upon the country's economy and society of the trade it would be utterly remarkable if there was not some impact in terms of corruption and obviously the money involved is so great. Are you able to give us any idea of what the scale is of investigations currently going on against people in government and other enforcement agencies, and what resources are dedicated to actually pursuing that challenge?

  HE Rodriguez: That is a good point. It is very difficult if not impossible to estimate the impact of the drug business in corruption, but we continuously have had in Colombia in the past 40 years the cases of politicians being bribed by the drug barons, of judges being bribed by the drug barons, of journalists being bribed, and that is destroying and destabilising the Colombian democracy and Colombian institutions. So we do not have any specific calculation of that impact but I can tell you that living in my country for this past 40 years it is a daily reality in our country to see the immense power of the drug barons because they have plenty of money to buy the minds of politicians, journalists, Congress members. It is all over the place and it has been a very difficult battle to win over them because they have too much money.

  Q352  Ms Buck: It is a tragedy and it is the fear and the money together.

  HE Rodriguez: It is a tragedy, it is a disaster and we have been fighting very hard against this. We have been successful—and this is very important—in destroying the main cartels in Columbia. You remember the Pablo Escobar cartel.

  Q353  Chairman: Yes.

  HE Rodriguez: The famous Pablo Escobar; he was killed 15 years ago; and the Cali cartel. The big cartels have been destroyed but they have been replaced by plenty of small cartels.

  Chairman: Your Excellency, what you say is absolutely fascinating; it is just that we need to vacate the room shortly, so if you could make your answers briefer I would be most grateful; and to the members of the Committee if you could questions briefer that would help the Ambassador, I know.

  Q354  Patrick Mercer: Your Excellency, how do the guerrilla fighters hamper efforts to tackle cocaine production and trading?

  HE Rodriguez: It is very important to understand this connection between the guerrilla and the drug production. Let me quote another report from the Drug Enforcement Agency Chief of Operations. It says: "Nine out of every ten grams of cocaine sent to the US have passed through the FARC at some point." So they are really a cartel. The FARC are the most important cartel in producing and trading cocaine in Colombia. There is another report by the US State Department that says that the Colombian Police have been able to eradicate 130,000 acres of coca through aerial spraying and 96,000 hectares through manual eradication, "despite entrenched armed resistance by the FARC, a drug trafficking organisation that is also a designated foreign terrorist organisation. If harvested and refined this eradicated coca could have yielded hundreds of metric tonnes of cocaine worth millions of dollars on US streets". So I think it is very important, and there are some other estimates that confirm the total connection between guerrillas and drug production. That is why it is so important to fight the guerrillas in Columbia; it is not just because they are illegal armed groups, it is because they are producing and trading cocaine and they are doing terrorism with the money that they get from the cocaine trade.

  Q355  Martin Salter: Your Excellency, I am looking at the amount of money that has been pumped into Colombia and Peru and Bolivia from the USA and from the European Union for alternative development programmes and to assist with the war on drugs, but you are very keen to point the finger—and quite rightly so—at FARC, the guerrilla group; but should we as British parliamentarians and people responsible for part of that aid that is flowing into that region not be concerned with the fact that, as I understand it at the moment, senior Columbian officials, also the Vice President and over 70 members of Congress and senior Colombian army officials are being investigated for links to FARC. How endemic, how entrenched is the narcotics corruption at the highest levels of the Colombian Government? One assumes it must be otherwise these investigations would not be taking place.

  HE Rodriguez: Unfortunately there have been cases in which members of Congress have been found to have relations with drug barons. There have been cases of members of the armed forces involved in drug dealing but they are isolated cases, and specifically for the armed forces it is absolutely clear that the immense majority of the armed forces are heroes and actually fighting a very difficult war against drug traffickers. Therefore, I would not be concerned in supporting the armed forces of Colombia because even though there have been some cases they are completely isolated cases. In relation to other cases of corruption there has been a significant increase in prosecution in Colombia against the corruption related to the drug trade.

  Martin Salter: How is the investigation going against the Vice President and the members of Congress? 70 members of Congress do not sound like isolated—that sounds pretty wholesale to me.

  Q356  Chairman: How big is the Congress?

  HE Rodriguez: But they are not related to the drug trade.

  Q357  Martin Salter: Their links with FARC.

  HE Rodriguez: In most cases they are related to paramilitaries—ties with the militaries. The congressmen are being investigated because of their ties to the paramilitaries, not because of their ties to the drug trade. The majority of them are indicated of being helpful of the paramilitaries which have been demobilised by President Uribe's Government, but when President Uribe arrived to power in the year 2002 one of his promises and his commitments was to demobilise the paramilitary so that the state, the armed forces could recover the control of the territory without the need, without the support of the paramilitary forces. In fact more than 52,000 paramilitaries and guerrillas have demobilised in the country in the past seven years—52,000. This is one of the most successful demobilisation programmes in history.

  Q358  Martin Salter: Can I follow up on that point because I am getting confused? You said quite clearly that there is a distinct link between paramilitary groups and the drugs trade and then on the other hand you said that you have 70-odd members of Congress being investigated for links to the paramilitaries and you said that that is nothing to do with the drug trade. Surely any link with the paramilitary is also linked back into the drugs trade.

  HE Rodriguez: There is a indirect link in the sense that some of those paramilitaries have financed their legal activities through the drug trade, but for the members of Parliament that are being investigated at this moment it is not because they are trading in drugs and making money in drugs, but just because they have supported politically the activities of the paramilitaries defending people against the guerrilla, which is of course wrong; the paramilitaries are as bad for Colombian democracy as the guerrillas. And this is as a response to the lack of efficiency of the state and the armed forces in controlling the security province of Colombia. But when President Uribe arrived to power he said that the paramilitaries are not the solution; we need to strengthen the armed forces and we need to demobilise the paramilitary so that we can fight against the guerrillas and drug traffickers, but with the legitimate tools which is the law and the armed forces.

  Q359  Mr Winnick: As far as the UK Serious and Organised Crime Agency is concerned, Ambassador, they have powers given, presumably by your government, to arrest drug traffickers; is that so? They have powers to arrest in your country?

  HE Rodriguez: No; you mean if the SOCA has any authority to arrest? It does not have.

  Chairman: It does not have any powers.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 3 March 2010