The Cocaine Trade - Home Affairs Committee Contents


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 360 - 375)

TUESDAY 10 NOVEMBER 2009

HIS EXCELLENCY MR MAURICIO RODRIGUEZ MUNERA

  Q360  Mr Winnick: But they have arrested drug traffickers, have they not?

  HE Rodriguez: I have their statement here. SOCA has no judicial or policing faculties in Colombia.

  Q361  Mr Winnick: So as far as UK and Colombian law enforcement agencies are concerned, they work together in certain circumstances.

  HE Rodriguez: Yes, we have the support of the intelligence; the UK Government is providing intelligence, specifically to Colombian officials so that they can fight against narco traffic.

  Q362  Mr Winnick: So when it comes to the sovereignty of your country, just the same as in Britain that outside police forces would have no obvious powers to arrest then the same applies in Colombia?

  HE Rodriguez: Yes, sir, absolutely the same. But we do have an extradition treaty and in fact there has been one Colombian extradited to the UK under this extradition treaty; so we have this cooperation, but within Colombia the UK authorities have no judicial or policing faculties within Colombia.

  Q363  Mr Winnick: But clearly the intelligence provided from other countries, including Britain, comes in very useful.

  HE Rodriguez: Very useful and we appreciate it and we would like to have more of that kind of support because the UK intelligence is very well appreciate; it is one of the best in the world and it has been effective in the past, and we hope to have more of this kind of cooperation.

  Q364  Chairman: On that, what we saw in Amsterdam Airport, in the Schiphol Airport, was the arrival of mules who had swallowed pellets containing cocaine. One way in which we can try and resolve this matter is if certain countries had the right, in cooperation with your government, to scan people before they actually left their country of origin. Would you consider that; that this equipment is given to you so that you can do the scanning in Colombia, or indeed in Peru because the people we saw had come from Peru and Curaçao, so that the problem is dealt with in the country where it is created. Would that be a consideration?

  HE Rodriguez: Absolutely. Any measure geared to reduce the trade in production and consumption of drugs is welcome and in fact in Colombia there is scanning actually. If you leave the country there is some mechanical equipment checking that and there is even a physical check to try to identify and many of those mules are detained before they are able to travel. But if something else can be done I am sure that the Colombian Government will be open to any suggestions in that sense.

  Q365  Chairman: Would you be able to give us the statistics of how many people are detained before boarding because we have only seen it from the other point of view, after people arrive in Europe and they are scanned.

  HE Rodriguez: Yes.

  Q366  Mr Streeter: A slightly different point, your Excellency. Based on what you have told us about the rain forests being cut down, one of the problems with cocaine in this country is that it is seen as a recreational drug taken by lots of people who are celebrities and in the media—left wing luvvies as we call them over here. Do you think it is an important message that we could send because these people, these celebrities are also of course very concerned about the rain forests? Is it legitimate for us to say over here and as part of our report that actually people who take cocaine are helping to damage the rain forests in South America and that one way they could help is to stop taking this awful drug? Do you agree with that, sir?

  HE Rodriguez: Absolutely and let me give you some statistics. Each gram of cocaine destroys four square metres of tropical forests.

  Q367  Chairman: A very interesting statistic.

  HE Rodriguez: We have a programme set up with Minister Campbell, a shared responsibilities programme whereby we are trying to educate consumers all over the world in this connection between drug consumption and the destruction of our environment. Our Environment Minister was here two weeks ago and we met with Minister Campbell. We handed him some material for training—virtual lessons—to be distributed in the schools in the UK. And our Minister made an interview with Pablo, the dog that acts—

  Chairman: I am told that Mr Campbell appreciated that training that you gave him. Ann Cryer has the final question.

  Mrs Cryer: Your Excellency, I am sorry I was late; I had to go to another meeting and I just could not get away. The final question: could you talk us through the relationship between Colombia and the United States as far as the movement of cocaine is concerned. And is there anything in that cooperation that could perhaps apply to Colombia and this country?

  Q368  Chairman: If you could tell us statistics. We have statistics about Colombian cocaine coming to Europe but we have not had statistics of cocaine going from Colombia to the United States. Do we have any statistics on this?

  HE Rodriguez: Yes. 80% of the cocaine consumed in that country comes from Colombia. The US has supplied Colombia in the last eight years with $5.5 billion dollars of aid to fight against the drug trade in Colombia. It is a huge amount of money. Colombia has invested $10 billion in fighting drug production; so for every dollar we received from the US we have invested $2.

  Q369  Chairman: Just on that point what is the value of the cocaine that enters the United States? Do we know? You have given us the value of how much they have given you, but do you know the value of the cocaine—what that 80% represents in terms of billions of dollars?

  HE Rodriguez: I have seen some estimates of the global—I do not have the exact number for the US—and the global trade is close to $400 billion—global.

  Q370  Chairman: From Colombia?

  HE Rodriguez: No. This is a very important point and I want to emphasise this—it is very important to understand this. Those numbers are calculated on the basis of the price of a gram of cocaine in the streets of New York or London or Berlin. But Colombia does not give that money; that does not enter Colombia. Colombia will only receive a very small fraction of that money. The real money is that made in the production of cocaine; the real money is made in the trafficking—not from the Colombian jungles to the coast or whatever, but within Europe or the US, that is where the big amount of money is made.

  Q371  Chairman: The final answer to Mrs Cryer? What is the cooperation like between the USA and Colombia?

  HE Rodriguez: So we have plenty of money—$5 billion in eight years, that is a huge amount of money—and that money is spent in eradication, in alternative development programmes, which is very important; also in social investments, money invested in these marginal communities that lack a lot of needs in terms of infrastructure, health and education. We have received 5.6 billion in aid from the year 2002 to the year 2008. 4.4 billion has been invested into military programmes fighting drug traffic, and 1.3 billion in non-military aid, like alternative development and also to support displaced persons. Cocaine production and trade displaces a lot of Colombians—they need to escape from these areas because their safety is in jeopardy. The Colombian Government would like to see the UK supporting Colombia in the fight against production of cocaine as much as the US in proportion to the size of the impact that it has in the UK.

  Q372  Mrs Cryer: Those are all very good points you have made, about transferring people from production of cocaine to other things and people moving to other areas, but what are you doing and what could you do for the United Kingdom in the same way about stopping shipments going from Colombia to the United States or to the UK? Stopping mules boarding planes with pellets inside them. What is being done about that?

  HE Rodriguez: We have to increase intervention, eradication, prosecution; we need to have more and more resources to fight against that.

  Q373  Chairman: Indeed. I think Mrs Cryer missed the earlier part of your evidence where you set out very clearly what you thought we should do. Your Excellency, thank you very much. Muchas gracias for coming in today; we are very grateful.

  HE Rodriguez: 15 seconds, last message?

  Q374  Chairman: 30 seconds.

  HE Rodriguez: One last message. Free trade agreement; it is very important. If I could ask something special in addition to these funds and these programmes—free trade agreement. The free trade agreement of the European Union with Colombia will give the Colombian economy an opportunity to generate employment, an opportunity to produce goods and services that can be exported to these markets. That is why I take this opportunity to ask for your support in this free trade agreement.

  Q375  Chairman: Very important. And if there is anything that you wish to add further to what you have said, especially those statistics, please feel free to write to me.

  HE Rodriguez: Thank you for your invitation and thank you for your support.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 3 March 2010