The work of the Committee in 2008-09 - Health Committee Contents


1  Introduction


1.  The Health Committee consists of eleven Members of Parliament: ten drawn from the three largest parties and one Independent Member.[1] The Committee's role is to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Department of Health (DH) and its associated public bodies. This is a considerable task: the Department is responsible for the stewardship of nearly £100 billion of public funds; most of this money is spent by the National Health Service (NHS), which employs 1.3 million staff in more than 300 organisations.[2] The Department is also responsible for a range of other activities, including oversight of a number of important Non-Departmental Public Bodies and other arm's length bodies.

2.  In carrying out our work we aim to undertake detailed inquiries into major policy issues, examine how the DH spends its vast budget, and retain the flexibility to respond to emerging developments in health policy. Some of our inquiries examine Government proposals, others seek to set the agenda, looking at neglected topics. Our work on these areas is discussed below in Chapter 2 (under the heading Objective A).

3.  During 2009 we published the following Reports at the conclusion of our inquiries (the Government responses are shown in brackets):
First Report

Second Report

Third Report

Fourth Report

Fifth Report

Sixth Report

Seventh Report

NHS Next Stage Review

Work of the Committee 2007-08

Health Inequalities

Top-up fees

The use of management consultants by the NHS and the Department of Health

Patient Safety

The Appointment of the Chair of the Foods Standards Agency

HC 53 (Cm 7558)

HC 193

HC 286 (Cm 7621)

HC 194 (Cm 7649)

HC 28 (Cm 7683)

HC 151 (Cm 7709)

HC 856

4.  We also hold one-off evidence sessions with ministers and officials. For instance, in March 2009 we took evidence from the then Secretary of State for Health, Alan Johnson MP, together with the Chief Executive of the NHS and the DH Permanent Secretary. The session focused on the operating framework for the NHS in England, allowing the Committee the opportunity to pose questions on a number of different policy areas.

5.  Financial scrutiny of health expenditure is a major part of our work. Our annual inquiry based on our Public Expenditure Questionnaire (PEQ), which includes an evidence session with senior officials, remains at the heart of this scrutiny. However, we also look at expenditure in other inquiries such as our scrutiny of the use of management consultants by the NHS and the DH, and our examination of top-up fees. This aspect of our work is outlined below under Objective B in Chapter Two.

6.  In undertaking our work we pay careful attention to examining the administration of the Department. We look at its effectiveness in meeting Public Service Agreements (PSAs) and targets. We monitor its associated public bodies, examine the implementation of major policy initiatives and scrutinise major appointments. For instance, in July 2009 we held a pre-appointment hearing with the Chair-elect of the Food Standards Agency, Lord Rooker. This was our second pre-appointment hearing since the mechanism for Select Committees to scrutinise key public appointments was established by the Liaison Committee in 2008.[3] This is discussed further under Objective C below.

7.  An important part of our work is assisting the House in its role in holding the Government to account. A number of debates on our reports were held both on the floor of the House and in Westminster Hall. More information on this is provided below under Objective D.

8.  While inquiries into specific topics form the bulk of the Committee's work, the scope of our activity is wider. On Monday afternoons the Chairman and other Members of the Committee meet informally with a wide range of people and organisations with an interest in health-related subjects.[4] In addition, the Committee has undertaken a number of visits to health establishments both in the UK and overseas to receive briefings from relevant experts, and to assess the quality of services first hand.

9.  We are keen to follow-up recommendations made in reports in previous sessions and we often do this during our one-off evidence sessions, such as the one with the then Secretary of State, Alan Johnson MP, in March 2009. In this session we sought updates on progress in a number of different policy areas. It is our intention to hold similar one-off evidence sessions in 2010, subject to there being sufficient time before the General Election. In addition, progress on implementing recommendations is pursued during major inquiries (for example, in our health inequalities inquiry we followed recommendations about obesity and food labelling made in previous reports), and in subsequent correspondence with the Department. Our methods of working are outlined in Chapter Three.

10.  We received help in our inquiries from the National Audit Office, and the House of Commons Library and Scrutiny Unit. We are grateful to Imperial College London, from whom we commissioned a survey on Patient Safety and we have benefited enormously from the expertise of our specialist advisers.

11.  We have also continued to enjoy positive relations with the Department of Health. Ministers and officials have been helpful and attended evidence sessions when requested. We are particularly grateful to Tim Elms and his colleagues who work in the parliamentary section of the Department, and all those officials who worked on the compilation of the PEQ. However, we have had some concerns about the Government's news management; on the day we published our report on Health inequalities, the Chief Medical Officer's report which recommended introducing a minimum price for alcohol was leaked to the press and the proposal was immediately condemned by a member of the Cabinet, prompting a great deal of news coverage. This may have been a coincidence; we hope so.

12.  Statistical information about the Committee's work is published in Annex 3.


1   Committee membership is comprised of six Labour, three Conservative, one Liberal Democrat, and the Independent Member for Wyre Forest. Back

2   Department of Health Departmental Report 2009 (CM 7593) Back

3   Liaison Committee, First report of Session 2007-08, Pre-appointment hearing by select committees, HC 384 Back

4   A list of the meetings is shown in Annex 4. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 16 December 2009