DFID's Programme in Nepal - International Development Committee Contents


Supplementary written evidence submitted by the Department for International Development

NEPAL BACKGROUND: PEACE PROCESS AND POLITICS

    — Progress on peace: The peace process has made significant gains; successful elections, the formation of an inclusive Constituent Assembly (CA), the peaceful removal of the monarchy, and almost no ceasefire violations. — It's stalled: The peace process has been stalled for some time, and political parties have become increasingly polarised. Parliament is largely paralysed, the constitution making process has effectively halted, and no practical progress has been made on the integration and rehabilitation of Maoist ex-combatants. — New consensus needed: A "new" political consensus is required to break the deadlock and is being actively sought by political parties.

    — Poor public security: Public security is very poor across many parts of the country. Central and eastern Tarai are of particular concern, where over 100 armed groups currently operate. In recent months the security situation is perceived to have improved marginally as a result of the government's special security plan. However, political protest programmes repeatedly act as potential flashpoints; for example, six people were killed in one clash with the police in early December.

    — Impunity and human rights: Impunity for past and present human rights abuses and criminal activity remains high.

    — Rise of identity based politics: In the past two years there has been a strong move towards identity based politics and accompanying violent protest. Expectations of ethnic federal states are high, but potentially unworkable. What is required (and has been agreed by the parties) is an inclusive constitution providing for the rights of all citizens. The Maoists have recently unilaterally declared five "federal republic states", but other parties have opposed this as a breach of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement and one that undermines the CA.

The new government

  After nine months in power, the Maoists resigned from government in early May this year. Following protracted negotiations over two weeks, Madhav Kumar Nepal, of CPN UML, took charge of the 19th government since 1990. He leads a 22-party coalition, with some 44 ministers.

  The parties in government have agreed a Common Minimum Programme with six top priorities: building political consensus; addressing impunity and promoting the rule of law; implementing peace agreements; restructuring the state and writing a new constitution; providing immediate relief to the people; and promoting economic growth. However, these priorities are backed by a long list of activities, and implementation will be difficult.

The Maoist challenge

  The Maoist government's relationship with the Nepal Army was highly problematic, in particular around the approach to "integration" of Maoist combatants into the Army. Unhappy with the Chief of Army Staff and his resistance to integration, the Prime Minister decided to sack him. The President revoked this decision, citing constitutional reasons, which led to the fall of the Government. The Maoists have been protesting against the President's decision in Parliament by blocking House business, and through street demonstrations. Protests have been stepped up from sit-ins to general strikes to declaration of "federal states". So far the Maoists have declared five "federal states", based on ethnicity. But other parties have opposed this as a breach of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement and one that undermines the CA.

  A Special Committee and Technical Committee have been working for some months towards finding a solution to the issue of the integration/rehabilitation of the Maoist Army. However, agreement is yet to be reached. The Maoists have committed to unilaterally discharging their 4,000 minors and late recruits from the cantonments in mid December, but tangible action has yet to begin.

The Madhesi challenge

  The five Madhesi parties (people from the southern Tarai plains) are divided within themselves despite their common position on autonomy for the Madhesh. The Tharu people, categorised as Madhesis so far, are now asserting their own identity. A newly formed group—OBC (other backward classes)—is also seeking special treatment from the state.

Rise of identity politics

  Nepal is emerging from a painful 10 year conflict driven to a large extent by inequality and exclusion (based on gender, caste, religion, identity, and place of residence). A key challenge is to peacefully re-negotiate the relationship between citizens and state, in particular in relation to inclusion of previously excluded communities. As this process takes place, identity politics has come to the fore. Following the Madhesh uprising in early 2008 the government recognised the Madhesi identity and introduced new constitutional and legal measures to reflect this. For example, state institutions at different levels are required to reserve some seats for Madhesis. Apart from this, the Government's reservation policy covers women, ethnic/indigenous groups and Dalits. But new identity claims are now being made on the State. The Tharus in the Tarai and the Limbus in the east are examples. Ideally, these claims should be negotiated in the CA, but are being taken forward outside of the CA process.

The CA process

  The CA is mandated to both draft the new constitution, and act as legislature for two years. The CA is made up of 601 members from 25 parties and is more representative than any previous state body in Nepal's history. For example, women members account for 33% of the CA, and Janajati (ethnic) groups now outnumber the traditionally dominant elite Brahmin/Chetri castes. However, some of the CA membership is inexperienced and greater capacity is needed in order to deal with legislative and constitutional issues. There is also a risk that the CA will not be able to play its role effectively, with major political decisions being taken by the top political leaders outside of the CA process, potentially based on short-term deals. Also, despite the rhetoric on inclusion, all political parties are still dominated by mostly male, high-caste elites.

  The CA has set an ambitious timetable with the final constitution to be agreed by May 2010, however drafting is yet to start. Frustration is building both among the general public, and the CA members themselves, at the lack of progress. The political party leaders are being blamed for not giving the drafting process priority. The 10 thematic CA committees, have spent some time at the constituency-level, discussing constitutional issues, but responding to public comments and submissions will be a huge challenge. Agreeing a form of federalism is emerging as one of the most difficult issues to address.

Impunity and human rights

  Impunity for past and present human rights abuses and criminal activity remains high. Neither of the two transitional justice bodies promised in the Comprehensive Peace Agreement have yet been set up, and the National Human Rights Commission continues to be largely ignored. One year on from the publication of OHCHR's report on 170 instances of conflict-related disappearances in Bardiya, the Nepal Government has yet to respond to its recommendations.

  The pending promotion of General Toran Singh—implicated in grave human rights abuses during the conflict—to Deputy Chief of Army Staff, has sent a particularly negative signal regarding the government's intentions to address past abuse. But the Prime Minister's subsequent order to the Nepal Army to hand over to the police Major Basnet—also accused of grave human rights abuses—may represent the first steps towards addressing such impunity.

EXAMPLES OF DFID'S WORK IN NEPAL VISITED BY THE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE—OCTOBER 2009

Strategic Partnership Agreement with Helvetas Nepal

  DFID Nepal is supporting Helvetas through a Strategic Partnership Agreement (SPA) between April 2006 and December 2009. DFID's contribution of £9.4 million was allocated to five key areas of support:

    — skills training;

    — sustainable management of natural resources;

    — improved access to market and service centres;

    — provision of safe drinking water;

    — non-farm employment generation; and

    — linking deprived communities to market.

Start/End date: April 2006 to December 2009.

Funding: £9.4 million.

Purpose: To improve livelihoods through strengthened service systems and equitable access to resources and opportunities for the poor and excluded.

Location: National Programme.

Key outcomes:

    — Out of the total of £9.4 million that DFID has provided, £3 million was used to support short-term skills training to 13,200 young people through the Helvetas Employment Fund. This is a private sector-led scheme, whereby small businesses employ and train people, and are provided incentives for employing people from disadvantaged groups—60% of these were women, and 80% were from disadvantaged groups in total.

    — As a result of this support, 80% of the trainees were in gainful employment (both self and wage employment) with a minimum income of NRs 3,000 per month (£24), following the training. Most trainees doubled or trebled their income. The cost is £320 per person into employment, an investment which is covered by increased earnings by around a year, representing very good value for money.

    — In addition to the above, other initiatives under the SPA resulted in employment opportunities of 18,000 person days, of which 20% was for women.

    — 825,000 people given access to 275 new pedestrian bridges, and 184 bridges completed detailed survey and design by 2009.

    — 50,000 people benefited from a motorable suspension bridge by 2009.

    — 52,600 people in rural areas accessed water supply and sanitation facilities through 127 schemes.

    — More than three-quarters of households in programme districts earned an average additional income of £100 annually, by selling vegetables, fruits and livestock products.

  DFID Nepal will continue its support to skills training through the Helvetas Employment Fund and will provide £9 million over a period of four years (December 2009 to November 2013) to deliver skills training to 35,000 young women and men from disadvantaged groups.

Gurkha Welfare Scheme

  The Rural Water & Sanitation Programme is a component of the Gurkha Welfare Scheme (GWS) funded by DFID and the Gurkha Welfare Trust (UK). DFID has contributed more than £14 million during the last 20 years. Since the beginning of 1989 to the end of June 2008, a total of 919 water supply schemes (714 New and 205 Rehabilitation) have been completed. A total of 22,044 households and 200,693 people from 33 districts have benefited from safe drinking water and improved hygiene and sanitation practices. A total of 295 latrines were constructed for schools and health posts. At present, 160 water supply and sanitation schemes are in various stages of construction under Phase 4 which will end in March 2010 with a total allocation of £1.5 million. DFID is considering an extension of Phase 4 to 2012.

Start/End date: April 2008 to March 2010 (GWS phase IV).

Funding: £1.5 million (£11.7 million since 1999 to date).

Purpose: Beneficiary communities managing and using improved water supply and sanitation facilities effectively.

Location: 18 districts (six in the East; four in the Mid West; seven in the West and one in the Central Region).

Key outcomes:

    — Major outbreaks of water-borne diseases have been fully controlled in all beneficiary areas. Before intervention, the average prevalence rate of water borne diseases was 50%.

    — Water collection time of women and children reduced by three hours on average per day per household, which has directly contributed to an increase in enrolment of girls in school by 17%, and reduced women's drudgery drastically.

    — A third of positions on the user committees are occupied by women and 60% by excluded groups, giving them greater influence over community decisions.

Community Support Programme

  The DFID Community Support Programme (CSP) was initiated as a development strategy targeting conflict affected people and to provide community development needs when the formal agencies and institutions were increasingly isolated to small pockets during the conflict.

CSP has five components: (a) Community infrastructure development (b) Capacity enhancement of partner organizations, (c) Increased access to non-formal technical and vocational education (d) Strengthened assets of poor and excluded to sustain and benefit from basic services, and (e) Enhanced relations with local government bodies.

  The project also focuses on awareness raising of excluded groups for increased access to political participation and representation. This support is also on literacy, income generation and access to credit.

  The Madarasa Madina Primary School was established in 2006 and has 79 Muslim students, around six to nine years in age, of whom around 44% are girls.

Start/End date: 2003-09.

Funding: £17.5 million.

Purpose: Improved access to basic services for the conflict affected people particularly poor and excluded.

Location: 39 Districts (16 in the East, one in the West, 13 in the Mid-West and nine in the Far-West).

Key outcomes:

    — 2,500 school buildings constructed.

    — Almost 70,000 households with clean water supply.

    — Almost 18,000 households with sanitation.

    — Electricity installed in 7,700 rural households.

    — 26,000 hectares of land irrigated.

    — 200km rural roads and foot trails constructed.

    — 5 million days of employment.

    — At least one fulltime job has been created in around 10,000 households through skills development and Income Generating Activities.

    — Anecdotal evidence that Muslim women appear to have been empowered to voice their opinions, have increased their involvement in savings and credit schemes, and girls enrolment in school has increased.

    — At the national level, along with achievements in enrolment and gender parity, DFID has also supported the development of the Ministry of Education's highly disaggregated (social group, sex and poverty) data collection and analysis system, which is aiding targeting of excluded groups.

Livelihoods and Forestry Programme

  DFID is investing £19.9 million over 10 years (2001-11) in community forestry through its Livelihoods and Forestry Programme (LFP), which will help almost one fifth of the population of Nepal to make a better and more sustainable living from forest resources.

  We are also developing the community forest work to reverse Nepal's high forest degradation emissions, improve watershed management, and attract carbon finance.

  LFP has been supporting enhanced capacity of users to manage their resources themselves in partnership with Government/non-government organisations and other stakeholders at the local level. The programme also works at the national level to address policy issues. LFP works with 5,000 Community Forest User Groups in 15 districts across the country aiming to reduce vulnerability and improve the Livelihoods of poor rural people through increasing their assets. These community forests lock up around 1.2 million tonnes of carbon each year. LFP is already helping communities access carbon funds for the trees they grow and the national forestry programme which DFID will contribute from 2011 to aims to take this work further so that communities can access at least £10m from international carbon funds per year.

Start/End date: April 2001 to April 2011.

Funding: £19.9 million.

Purpose: Assets of rural communities enhanced through more equitable, efficient, and sustainable use of forest.

Location: 15 districts (four in the East, three in the Tarai region, three in the West and five in the Mid-West).

Key outcomes:

    — Forest user group incomes increased by 61% from 2003-08 with over a quarter of this being directly attributable to DFID's Livelihood Forestry Programme (LFP) and community forestry. For excluded groups (eg Dalits) incomes nearly doubled.

    — 433,000 people came out of poverty in seven LFP supported districts over the same period. For those districts during that period, it is estimated that for every £35 spent by LFP, one person permanently left poverty.

    — Within all 15 LFP districts, about 1.5 million person days of employment (equivalent to about 7,500 full time jobs) are created annually either directly or indirectly by forestry groups.

Rural Access Programme

  In Nepal, 10 million people are outside of the target of four hours in the hills, and two hours in the Tarai plains, from a road. The Rural Access Programme (RAP) is designed to build road infrastructure as a means of improving the livelihoods, and economic development, of the poorest people in seven out of 75 districts in Nepal. The second phase of RAP employs over 15,000 workers of which 33% are women. All are from the poorest and most disadvantaged groups.

The programme improves livelihoods by increasing accessibility, community awareness, basic skills, and has given hope of a better future to the poorest. It also provides complementary activities and training, setting it apart from most other road construction projects in developing countries. The programme is essentially by the people for the people, using replicable, innovative and secure financial and technical management systems.

Start/End date: November 2007 to December 2010.

Funding: £22 million.

Purpose: Improved connectivity of rural communities, enhanced economic and employment opportunities and increased access to market and social services for the rural poor and disadvantaged.

Location: Seven districts (four in the East, one the Mid-West and two in the Far-West).

Key outcomes:

    — Better infrastructure support to the government helped to reduce poverty from 42% to 31% in the last decade.

    — Between 2000 and 2008 DFID spent £42 million on rural road programmes, connecting over 2.4 million people in remote districts to the national road network, to markets and services, through the construction of 1,500km of rural roads and 1,200 pedestrian bridges.

    — In doing so, it provided 17.5 million days of employment for poor and disadvantaged people.

Nepal Peace Trust Fund

  The Nepal Peace Trust Fund (NPTF) is a government-led and managed multi-donor trust fund, established to support the implementation of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement in 2007. The UK is one of the Fund's founding donors and the largest external contributor (other donors include Denmark, Finland, Norway and Switzerland; Germany is providing technical assistance).

The NPTF provides a mechanism to channel and coordinate resources in eight areas of work focused on maintaining peace and bringing stability to Nepal. These are:

    — Management of cantonments and rehabilitation of the Maoist combatants.

    — Rehabilitation of the displaced.

    — Elections to the Constituent Assembly and other entities.

    — Promotion and strengthening of peace and security.

    — Rehabilitation of conflict-affected individuals and families.

    — Mine action.

    — Reconstruction and maintenance of conflict-damaged public physical infrastructure.

    — Support to the peace process, implementation of the CPA and other CPA-related agreements.

  DFID also supports the UN Peace Fund, which complements the NPTF, to fund the UN to register and verify the combatants within the cantonments, support de-mining operations, winterisation and preparations for discharge of minors.

NPTF: Start/End date: April 2007 to February 2010.

Funding: £13 million.

Purpose: To provide budget support to the Government to implement the Peace Agreement in the five areas described in the comprehensive Peace Agreement.

Location: National Programme.

Key outcomes:

  The NPTF has supported two of the key achievements of the peace process:

    — Management of the Maoist army and the constituent assembly elections in 2008.

    — It is also supporting on-going management of the cantonments, including provision of health services, water and sanitation, reconstruction of police posts, and preparations for the elections planned for 2010-11.

Health Sector

  DFID is the lead bilateral donor in the government's health sector programme. DFID, World Bank and AusAid provide sector budget support through a pooled funding arrangement. DFID also provides technical assistance to help strengthen health systems and policy. DFID has a long established role and many successes in the development and implementation of policies such as free health care and safe abortion. Nepal signed the International Health Partnership (IHP) in September 2007.

DFID's investment in the health sector over the past six years has been £71 million divided among the Nepal Health Sector Programme (£33.5 million), support to the Safe Motherhood Programme (£23 million) and HIV/AIDS(£15 million, where support is channelled through UNDP). DFID is considering future support to the health sector.

  DFID's support to the health sector has contributed to halving child mortality over 15 years, and halving maternal mortality over the past decade. DFID has been the major donor champion of Safe Motherhood in Nepal. It has taken the lead on moving forward policies on increasing access of poor women to skilled birth attendants, safe delivery incentives whereby mothers are provided financial support if they give birth in a health post, and recently providing additional support for the newly established Aama Programme (which provides for free national maternal care). It provides earmarked funding for Safe Motherhood and provides technical assistance to the Family Health Division.

  Nepal signed the national health compact in February 2009 and all relevant development partners, and government, are working to improve governance and make aid more effective in the health sector.

Key outcomes (which DFID has contributed to):

    — Nearly 1 in 2 women use a modern method of family planning, but unmet need for family planning method is still around 25%.

    — 3 of 10 women are assisted by a trained health worker during delivery.

    — Deliveries by health workers has increased from 4.8% in 2000 to 32.8% in 2008.

    — Two-thirds of women now receive antenatal care, but only one-third of women receive a full four antenatal care visits.

    — Around 90,000 women received free delivery care from January 2009 and 400,000 women received the safe delivery cash incentive in the last four years under DFID supported programmes.

Climate Change

  Nepal lies at the heart of the Greater Himalayan region, the water tower of Asia and the source of the nine largest rivers in Asia and home to over 1.3 billion people. The glaciers in Nepal feed not only Nepal but also contribute 40% of the annual water flowing through the Ganges and, importantly, provide over 70% of the flow in the dry season. Without these flows the 500 million people living in the Ganges Basin will face severe droughts and food shortages. About 10 million poor people are directly vulnerable to climatic changes, making Nepal one of the most vulnerable countries in the world.

While Nepal's emissions of greenhouse gases are negligible, it has limited capacity to adapt to climate change. However Nepal is well placed to adopt a low carbon growth development path, with its large hydropower resources and good track record of reducing deforestation. Nepal has a good case to seek climate change financing at international negotiations, but needs support to articulate them.

  UK departments are working closely together to ensure Nepal's case is heard at Copenhagen in December 2009, as part of the UK "Equity Campaign". A regional Climate Change Conference held in Nepal, that DFID co-sponsored, raised awareness of the scale of the issues facing the region and set out the region's demands from a global climate deal. DFID is also developing a £10 million programme to help Nepal tackle Climate Change which will work closely with a new DFID forestry programme (building on previous work), and with regional efforts with the World Bank through the South Asia Water Initiative.

  DFID is supporting work in four areas, all of which are part of the 4th White Paper commitments—closely working with other UK departments and multi-laterals:

    1. DFID support to enable Nepal to effectively influence climate change negotiations and help achieve an ambitious global deal. This work includes capacity building for Nepal's negotiating team and awareness raising such as the cabinet meeting at Everest Base camp, a regional journalists journey and the government delegation at Copenhagen. (£1 million)

    2. Supporting Nepal to develop a framework for action on climate change—the National Adaptation Programme of Action—and helping donors coordinate their support through the signing of 14 donor compact to work together on climate change. (£10 million)

    3. Increasing our support to the forestry sector which will attract carbon financing. (£40 million)

    4. Support to the South Asia Water Initiative (SAWI) to help Nepal develop its water and hydro power resource for the benefit of the region. (£2.6 million)

Key Outcomes:

    — Nepal is already selected to receive support from adaptation, forestry and renewable climate funds, worth between $30-60 million over the next five years.

    — The Prime Minister formed a climate change council and led a strong and influential delegation of Nepali government, academic and civil society to the COP 15 climate change negotiations in Copenhagen.

    — DFID's Livelihoods and Forestry Programme sequesters over 1.2 million tonnes of Carbon each year—carbon which LFP pilots have shown are suitable for climate financing for which Nepal is now applying.

World Food Programme Activities

  Food insecurity is a chronic problem in Nepal with the most vulnerable 40% of the population unable to meet their full food requirements. Across Nepal, around 50% of children are malnourished, and even in the Tarai plains where food is freely available, 20% of children are severely malnourished. Last year the price of rice rose 30%. The likelihood of continued price volatility remains high. Women and children are the most affected.

  While there is a need to address short term, acute food insecurity, the long term solution is to address chronic food insecurity and malnutrition. To do this means giving poor people better access to economic opportunities and reducing their vulnerability to economic and climatic shocks. It also means addressing the complex interactions between health status, education of girls, and women's status and income—all of which impact on the nutritional status of children.

  DFID has already been addressing immediate food security needs, having given £5.4 million to the World Food Programme over the last year. We are also building rural infrastructure, creating jobs, and providing skills training for disadvantaged groups to improve economic opportunity, and this is complemented by work on social protection. DFID is developing a nutrition strategy with government and other donors to assess which interventions will be most effective.

  DFID is currently developing joint work with World Food Programme to support government in more effective targeting of social protection programmes to support increased food security, and with the UN Capital Development Fund on a social protection pilot to support better nutrition. At the same time we are working with other donors and government to agree a common cross sectoral approach to improving nutritional outcomes in Nepal.

  We are closely monitoring the current situation. Summer harvest stocks are now dwindling in many areas signalling the start of the winter hunger period. WFP estimates that 1.2-1.6m people are in immediate need of assistance—with another 2m people at risk. We are examining options for providing short term support.

Key outcomes:

  DFID support of £5.4 million provided food and cash assistance to over 400,000 food insecure and malnourished people from Jan to June 2009. This total includes:

    — Over 236,000 food insecure people assisted through food for work, enough to meet basic food needs over hunger season at the start of 2009.

    — Nearly 18,000 people assisted with cash for work pilots in flood affected areas in the Mid and Far-West, enabling them to start rebuilding their lives.

    — Nearly 14,000 victims of the Koshi floods provided with food and rehabilitated to their homes.

    — Over 112,000 children benefiting from school feeding programmes in food insecure areas that give incentives for girls attendance.

CURRENT DFID NEPAL PROGRAMMES


S No


Project Name


Project Objectives


Start Date


End Date
Amount
Committed
(£ in million)
1National HIV/AIDS Programme Optimise prevention and reduce social impact of HIV/AIDS transmission among young people aged 10-24 years, labour, migrants, MSW, MSM, IDUs and PLHA through the provision of advocacy and preventive services. 06/10/200531/03/2011 15.00
2Community Support Programme (CSP) Improved access to basic services for the conflict affected people particularly poor and excluded. 17/05/200531/12/2009 17.50
3Social Inclusion Action Plan To increase the ability of key formal institutions to effectively address gender equity and social inclusion issues and the ability of excluded groups to influence institutions and access resources and services. 03/10/200631/03/2009 2.70
4Enabling State Programme (ESP) Relationship between state institutions and citizens strengthened to promote inclusive policies and programmes. 05/11/199731/12/2012 27.50
5Nepal Health Sector Programme To improve the health status of the Nepalese population through increased utilisation of quality essential services delivered by a well managed and health sector. 01/02/200501/07/2009 33.50
6Support to Safe Motherhood Programme To improve maternal and neonatal health and survival especially among poor and socially excluded communities. 01/12/200401/12/2009 23.00
7Local Governance and Community Development Programme (LGCDP) Design To provide support to the local Governance and Community Development Programme implementation. 01/10/200730/06/2010 0.15
8Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability To strengthen Nepal's Public Financial Management and Accountability (PFMA) systems. 01/02/200901/04/2014 0.10
9Strategic Partnership Agreement Helvetas To improve livelihoods through strengthened service systems and equitable access to resources and opportunities, for the poor and excluded. 01/04/200631/12/2009 9.40
10Livelihood Forestry Programme (LFP) Assets of rural communities enhanced through more equitable, efficient and sustainable use of forest resources. 01/04/200101/12/2010 18.67
11Ghurkha Welfare Phase 4 Beneficiary communities managing and using improved water supply and sanitation facilities effectively. 01/04/200831/03/2010 1.50
12Rural Access Programme Phase II (RAP II) Improved connectivity of rural communities, enhanced economic and employment opportunities and increased access to market and social services for the rural poor and disadvantaged. 01/11/200731/12/2010 22.00
13Agriculture Perspective Plan Support (APPSP) Deliver appropriate agricultural support services to the rural poor through improved policy and institutional arrangements 01/12/2002 30/06/2009 10.32 14 Financial Sector Technical Assistance Central bank operates in an independent way and effectively regulates the banking sector to ensure that commercial banks operate on a prudent and commercial basis 01/06/2003 01/06/2012 5.40 15 Rural Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Sector Development Programme Reduce Poverty through improved Rural infrastructure. 01/05/200701/12/2010 10.08
16National Adaptation Plan—Climate Change To prepare a strategic framework of action on climate change behind which stakeholders can align their response. 01/10/200831/03/2010 0.66
17Support to Inclusive Growth To design DFID Nepal support to inclusive growth in the areas of economic reform, social protection and support to the Private sector and to fund the initial cost of support on economic reform. 01/06/200830/04/2010 0.75
18Centre for Inclusive Growth—Design + Implementation To support the creation of an enabling environment for high level policy reform to increase the rate of inclusive economic growth. 01/11/200931/12/2011 1.20
19Interim project to support inclusive growth To support the creation of an enabling environment for high level policy reform to increase the rate of inclusive economic growth. 01/08/200931/07/2010 0.80
20SDC AgricultureDeliver appropriate agricultural support services to the rural poor through improved policy and institutional arrangements. 01/04/200931/03/2011 1.50
21Nepal Peace Trust Fund (NPTF) To provide budget support to the Government to implement the Peace Agreement in the five areas described in the comprehensive Peace Agreement 11/04/200701/01/2010 13.00
22Risk Management Office To manage and reduce risk to DFID and GTZ staff, programmes/projects. 29/11/200201/10/2009 1.49
23Peace and Development Strategy National Peace and Development, and aid effectiveness strategies, effectively guide government and international community programming. 01/01/200901/12/2010 0.95





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 28 March 2010