Progress on the Implementation of DFID's HIV/AIDS Strategy - International Development Committee Contents


Written evidence submitted by RAISE

October 2009

  The Reproductive Health Access, Information and Services in Emergencies (RAISE) is developed by Columbia University's Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health in the Mailman School of Public Health and Marie Stopes International (MSI). The initiative aims to address the full range of RH needs for refugees and internally displaced persons (IDPs) by building partnerships with humanitarian and development agencies, governments, United Nations (UN) bodies, advocacy agencies and academic institutions. This enquiry provides us the opportunity to address the pressing reproductive health (including HIV/AIDS prevention, care and support) needs of refugees and Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs).

1.  INTRODUCTION

  1.1  In 2006 there were 24.7 million people with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa, the region of the world experiencing the highest concentration of global emergencies.[33] In sub-Saharan Africa, 57% of adults with HIV are women, and young women aged 15 to 24 are more than three times as likely to be infected as young men.[34]

  1.2  HIV and STIs spread—and kill—most quickly in populations affected by poverty, social unrest and lack of health infrastructure; factors commonly present in humanitarian emergencies. There may be an increased vulnerability of refugees and Internally displaced persons (IDPs) to HIV/AIDS due to specific factors such as:

    — movement of people and mix with populations with high and low prevalence;

    — opportunistic infections are unlikely to be treated when health resources are lacking;

    — urgent needs for blood transfusions and lack of universal precautions;

    — scarce health resources and supplies; and

    — increased sexual violence that enhance the risk of HIV and STI transmission.

  1.3  Studies have shown that the risk of HIV among women who have experienced intimate partner violence may be up to three times higher than among those who have not.[35] According to UNAIDS, in the Democratic Republic of Congo, HIV prevalence "varies from 1.7% to 7.6% depending on the region, and may be as high as 20% among women who have suffered sexual violence in areas of armed conflict.[36]

  1.4  For people living in emergency settings, services for prevention and treatment of HIV/AIDS are often limited. Antiretroviral therapy (ARV) and Prevention of Mother to Child Transition (PMTCT) programs for HIV positive pregnant women can be harder to access or unavailablein humanitarian settings, which increases the risks of childbirth for the woman and the risk of transmission to the child.

  1.5  Male and female condoms can prevent unwanted pregnancy and protect against the transmission of HIV/STIs. Access to condoms and family planning services allow those affected and unaffected by HIV to prevent unwanted pregnancies, reduce further HIV transmission.

  1.6  Skilled attendance at delivery is one of the indicators of progress towards achieving MDG5, the most off track of all MDGs. Encouraging women to deliver in a health facility to ensure access to PMTCT may increase the number of institutional deliveries and hence contribute to efforts to reduce maternal morality.

2.  POLICY AND FUNDING ENVIRONMENT FOR RH INCLUDING HIV/AIDS IN EMERGENCIES

  2.1  According to a study of disbursements of official development aid (ODA) for RH activities in 18 conflict-affected countries between 2003 and 2006, there is an inequity of RH ODA disbursement between conflict-affected and non-conflict-affected countries. An annual average of 4.4% of all ODA disbursed to sampled conflict-affected "least-developed countries" (LDCs) was allocated to RH activities, compared to 8.9% in sampled non-conflict affected.[37]

  2.2  Of the annual average of $509.3 million ODA for RH, only 1.7% was disbursed to support family planning activities compared to 46.7% to support HIV/AIDS control efforts.[38]

  2.3  A review of the policy environment of RH in emergencies showed that policies related to gender-based violence and HIV/AIDS are well represented, compared to those related to family planning and emergency obstetric care.[39]

  2.4  The Ugandan Policy for the Reduction of Mother-to-Child HIV transmission in Uganda (May 2003)[40] refers to the following:

    (a) Women with HIV infection who are pregnant should be treated with either: Nevirapine at the onset of labour and Nevirapine syrup to the baby within 72 hours of birth; Zidovudine from 36 weeks of gestation until one week after delivery and syrup to the baby for the first week after birth.

    (b) Voluntary Counselling and HIV Testing within the antenatal clinic is recommended for pregnant women, with at least two laboratory tests: one for screening and another for confirmation.

  2.5  The SRH policy of Congo (2004)[41] refers to PMTCT. The more recent Congolese SRH policy (2008) is very strong on PMTCT especially in well equipped facilities.

  2.6  The National RH strategy of Sudan (2006) refers to PMTCT, one of the objectives is scaling up PMTCT services from 5 to 45 sites by 2010.[42]

3.  PMTCT IN CONFLICT AFFECTED SETTINGS—FINDINGS FROM SELECTED FACILITIES

  3.1  Although there is a "facilitating" policy and funding environment for HIV/AIDS services in conflict affected settings (see point 2 above) a baseline study of selected service delivery sites in 2007 showed VCT and PMTCT services were severely lacking. As part of baseline activities, RAISE supported partners conducted assessments of the status of health services available at all sites identified for support through the RAISE Initiative. Assessments were conducted in Uganda, DRC and Sudan.

  3.2  In the 60 facilities in the three countries assessed:

    — Only six women with unknown HIV status had been tested in the past 12 months in the maternity/labour ward in 60 facilities:

    — In the 10 facilities in Uganda, four women had been tested in the past 12 months.

    — In the 29 facilities in DR Congo, two women had been tested in the past 12 months.

    — In the 21 facilities in Sudan, no women had been tested in the past 12 months.

    — Only nine mothers and nine newborns received PMTCT during the last 12 months in the 60 facilities:

    — In the 10 facilities in Uganda, five women received PMTCT during the last 12 months.

    — In the 29 facilities in DR Congo, four women received PMTCT during the last 12 months.

    — In the 21 facilities in Sudan, no women received PMTCT during the last 12 months.

    — In the 60 facilities a total of 60 staff to provide pre and post-HIV counselling was available and in total 40 staff for PMTCT provision:

    — The 10 facilities assessed in Uganda had in total 26 staff available to provide pre and post-test counselling and in total 14 staff to provide PMTCT.

    — The 29 facilities assessed in DRC had 21 staff available to provide pre and post- test counselling and 16 staff available for PMTCT.

    — The 21 facilities in Sudan had 13 staff available for pre- and post-test counselling and 10 staff available for PMTCT.

    — Only five of the 60 facilities assessed had nevirapine (200 mg tablets) available and only four facilities had nevirapine (liquid/suspension) available:

    — Only gwo of the 10 sites in Uganda had Nevirapine tablets available and only two sites had nevirapine (liquid/suspension) available.

    — Only three of the 29 facilities in Congo had Nevirapine tablets available and onltwo 2 sites had nevirapine (liquid/suspension) available.

    — In Sudan neviripine (tablets or liquid) was not available at all.

    - HIV rapid testing kits were available in 12 of the 60 facilities:

    — Two of the 10 sites in Uganda had HIV rapid testing kits available.

    — Six of the 29 facilities in Congo had HIV rapid testing available.

    — Four of the 21 facilities in Sudan had HIV rapid testing available.

    — Lack of supplies, training, policy and management issues were the main -reasons mentioned for the lack of testing and PMTCT services.

4.  DFID

  4.1  DFID recognises the importance of HIVAIDS prevention and treatment in emergency situations, noting that the proportion of People Living With HIV (PLWH) is four times higher in fragile states than in other low income countries, and the capacity of these states to respond is lower (DFID 2006). The same document highlights the need for post-conflict states to ensure due attention is paid to HIV in both humanitarian relief settings and during longer-term development processes.

  4.2  DFID HIV/AIDS Strategy, Achieving Universal Access (June 2008) refers to AIDS responses in fragile states and humanitarian contexts and also refers to the DFID White Paper (2006) in this regard. The HIV/AIDS strategy recognises the fact that "women and children caught up in conflict face increased risk of abuse, violence and trafficking and are at higher risk of HIV infection".

  4.3  Whilst the 2009 DFID White Paper—Building Our Common Future makes reference to HIV/AIDS, it does not specifically reference the need to address the challenge of HIV/AIDS in humanitarian settings or fragile states.

5.  RECOMMENDATIONS

  5.1  We urge the IDC to prioritise an examination of DFID's track record on supporting capacity building for delivering HIV/AIDS and other essential reproductive health services in humanitarian settings since the publication of the 2008 AIDS strategy.

  5.2  DFID must support and encourage humanitarian agencies to develop the skills and capacity required to address the paucity of HIV/AIDS and integrated RH services in humanitarian settings as shown by the RAISE baseline study.






33   UNAIDS/WHO (2006). "AIDS Epidemic update: December 2006". Back

34   Ibid. Back

35   The Global Coalition on Women and AIDS (2004). Violence against Women and HIV/AIDS: Critical intersections, Intimate Partner Violence and HIV/AIDS, WHO. Back

36   UNAIDS. "Congo". http://www.unaids.org/en/CountryResponses/Countries/congo.asp Back

37   Patel, P et al. (2009). Tracking Official Development Assistance for Reproductive health in Conflict-Affected countries. Plos Medicine. Back

38   Ibid. Back

39   Ettema, L, Tanabe, M et al, Determining Donor Commitment Through Policy Analysis: Examining the Policy Environment for Reproductive Health in Crisis Settings. RAISE RH in emergencies conference, Kampala, Uganda, 2008. http://www.raiseinitiative.org/conf2008/raise_book_of_abstracts.pdf Back

40   The Ugandan Policy for the Reduction of Mother-to-Child HIV transmission in Uganda (May 2003) http://www.aidsuganda.org/npdf/PMTCT%20Policy.pdf Back

41   Republique Democratique du Congo Ministere de La Politique Nationale et Plan Directeur de Development de la Sante de la Reproduction a Sante Publique. Programme National de Sante de La Reproduction PNSR (Juin 2004). Back

42   Republic of Sudan Federal Ministry of health The National Strategy for Reproductive Health 2006-10 (August 2006). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 1 December 2009