Police Searches on the Parliamentary Estate - Committee on the Issue of Privilege Contents


Examination of Witnesses (Questin Numbers 20-39)

DAMIAN GREEN MP

19 OCTOBER 2009

  Q20  Ms Hewitt: I have just one factual point going right back to your opening statement. Would you just be very helpful and show me in which bit of the Johnston report does he conclude that the procedures followed in your case were not consistent with the Police and Criminal Evidence Act? I found the bits in his report where he says your arrest was lawful but disproportionate, in his view, and the search was both lawful and proportionate, but I have not found the bit that you referred to in your opening statement.

  Damian Green: I seem to be the world's greatest expert! It related, I think, very specifically to the fact that—

  Q21  Ms Hewitt: Or if you would like to send us a note afterwards if that would be easier.

  Damian Green: I assume it is somewhere on page 35.

  Q22  Ms Hewitt: I do not want to take up time now.

  Damian Green: It is the top paragraph on page 36: "While the form makes clear she is giving consent it does not make clear that the person is not obliged to consent. The codes of practice state that a person should be informed that they are not obliged to consent, but failure to comply with the codes of practice does not make the search unlawful". I think that was the point that was being made.

  Ms Hewitt: Thank you. I had focused on a later section of the report.

  Q23  Ann Coffey: Christopher Galley was arrested on 19 November and when you heard he had been arrested did you think you might be arrested?

  Damian Green: Yes. I thought, "Well, that's interesting".

  Q24  Chairman: Interesting!

  Damian Green: He phoned me the following day. That was why I was surprised by much of the things that happened. I was not sure that I was going to be arrested, I was sure that the police would want to talk to me since it is widely agreed now that it would have been more sensible for the police to have phoned me up and said, "Would you like to turn up for an interview". I actually collected together the bits and pieces of material that I thought would be relevant to show them and kept them together in a drawer in my office. As the days passed it became less and less likely since, as I say, Mr Galley phoned me the day after to say that he had spent the previous day in Paddington Green Police Station being interviewed for 18 hours or so. Since a week had gone by, by then I assumed that, as it were, a leak inquiry would take its normal course.

  Q25  Ann Coffey: In gathering the bits of material that you thought the police might be interested in, what sort of material did you think they would be interested in? What did you extract that you thought might be of interest to them?

  Damian Green: Any letters or copies of letters I still had to and from him seemed to me to be relevant. I think it was mostly that, if not entirely that. There was nothing else to hide because anything he had sent me that exposed failings in the Home Office was in the public domain by definition.

  Q26  Ann Coffey: Did you take any legal advice?

  Damian Green: No, not at that stage.

  Q27  Ann Coffey: The timing of your arrest was interesting because on 26 November, the evening before, Parliament had been prorogued and then at nine o'clock the next morning the police came to arrest you but they failed to do that, although I think they arrested you later in that day. How did the police actually find you?

  Damian Green: That is a good question which I do not know the answer to because it says in the Johnston report rather blandly that they failed to arrest me at nine o'clock. There is lots of circumstantial evidence that they were simply surrounding the wrong house. I say this because I was at a meeting elsewhere in Kent and they arrested me when I came out of the building and they said, "We want to take you back to your home", so I took them back there. About 200 yards before we got there, they said, "It's here, isn't it?", and I said, "No, you go up to the top of the hill" and I eventually directed them in. When I let them in they looked at me and said, "So, this is your home, is it?" I decided that in the circumstances sarcasm was probably the wrong response but there was quite a lot of circumstantial evidence that it was my home: I know where I live; I had let them in with a house key and I do not carry other people's house keys around with me.

  Q28  Sir Alan Beith: Not all Members seem to do so!

  Damian Green: Indeed. The policeman who had arrested me went outside, went on his mobile and five minutes later eight other police turned up, all the searching party. It is perfectly clear that was why they did not arrest me at nine in the morning, which they had intended to, they had just been round the wrong house. I should remind the Committee this is the anti-terrorist police: they cannot find a Member of Parliament at home at an address that is published every five years. I never find newspapers have any difficulty finding my home, and photographers when they need to take pictures of me, so I was quite surprised at the police.

  Q29  Chairman: Sarcasm is a very dangerous weapon.

  Damian Green: That was why I did not use it in that period but I feel now reasonably able to do so. It was not a triumph. That is why they did not arrest me at nine in the morning.

  Q30  Ann Coffey: It was a week after they had arrested Mr Galley?

  Damian Green: Yes, sorry, that was the original point. I diverted myself. The significance of that was two-fold: the point you make that that was the first day Parliament was in recess, which has always struck me as significant in that they would not want to do it while the House would be here to protest, as it were; but secondly, of course, and again as made very clear by the Johnston report, it completely blows apart any suggestion that security was at risk. If national security had been at risk—the police had arrested Galley, Galley had told them that he had given the information to me and it took them another week to arrest me—then they were being appallingly negligent. From that fact alone it seems to me that the police knew there were no security implications in anything that I had done.

  Q31  Ann Coffey: Why do you think they timed the arrest in that way?

  Damian Green: The only conclusion I can come to is that was the first day Parliament was in recess.

  Q32  Ann Coffey: Do you see a connection in that? It was not that it took them a week to get their evidence together or were perhaps being a little bit sensitive how they did it in terms of your family, you definitely saw that was a connection?

  Damian Green: Nothing else changed in that week. They arrested Galley on the previous Thursday and interviewed him all day so they could have arrested me the previous Friday morning.

  Q33  Chairman: You were not away, for example? You were at home?

  Damian Green: I was at home and here during the day when Parliament was sitting. As I say, I can see no reason other than the fact that Parliament had gone into recess.

  Q34  Ann Coffey: What do you think they were concerned about if they had arrested you during Parliament sitting?

  Damian Green: Parliament collectively was quite angry when I was arrested and I suspect had it happened while Parliament was sitting then that anger would have been much more palpable. I suppose physically they might have thought there would have been something even more difficult to sell, that they would presumably have had to arrest me when I was leaving home on my way into Parliament or do it inside the Parliamentary Estate, either of which I think would have been quite sensitive.

  Q35  Ann Coffey: Do you think the police could justifiably argue that the reason they did it was to save you that high profile embarrassment, that they just came and arrested you quietly the next day when everybody had gone home to avoid scenes of you being arrested outside your House or dragged from this place your career in ruins?

  Damian Green: It is possible, but since they could not find my home it is all slightly irrelevant. To be honest, I am not the person to answer what was in the police's mind at the time. All I can say with certainty is they clearly were not taking any considerations of national security in mind by leaving it a week to do so.

  Q36  Ann Coffey: Were you present when your London home was searched?

  Damian Green: No. My wife was very unusually at home that day.

  Q37  Ann Coffey: Was she the only person who was present?

  Damian Green: She was for the first few hours and then one of my daughters came home from school.

  Q38  Ann Coffey: You talked about the week after Christopher Galley was arrested but were you aware of any surveillance during that week by the police?

  Damian Green: No.

  Q39  Ann Coffey: Have you ever been aware of any surveillance by the police?

  Damian Green: Subsequently or during?



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 22 March 2010