Cutting crime: the case for justice reinvestment - Justice Committee Contents


Memorandum submitted by Leicester City Council

1.  PURPOSE OF REPORT

  1.1  To outline the work of Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Sub-Regional partnership in developing a business case for reducing re-offending and the development of a toolkit to calculate the costs of re-offending in any local area.

1.2  To illustrate the way the costs were calculated in the Sub-Region, how this information was used to engage partners and reinforce the need to focus on offending behaviour in order to work towards sustaining reducing re-offending.

1.3  Outline work undertaken to reduce re-offending as a result of these findings.

2.  SUMMARY

  2.1  Leicestershire Beacon Partnership calculated the cost of re-offending to the Sub Region at over £146 million per year. The methodology for calculating the costs is presented in this paper. In order to make the figure more meaningful the costs were equated to Local authority expenditure on specific services, as described in the report below.

2.2  In 2006, as part of its work as the Civic Society Alliance national demonstration project the Partnership undertook an audit of work in the region and produced a web-based toolkit—"Local Solutions to Reduce Re-offending by Adult and Young Offenders—which draws on the experience and the wealth of excellent practice across the region. The business case, including calculating the cost of re-offending to the Leicestershire Sub-Region, was carried out and used to gain high-level support from Members and Chief Officer/Executive level.

  2.3  A sub-regional Reducing Re-offending Board was set up for Leicester City, Leicestershire County and partners in order to facilitate a strategic sub-regional partnership approach in delivering an agenda aimed at reducing re-offending. Its membership includes senior level staff from of Local Authorities, the Local Primary Care Trust and agencies within the Criminal Justice System (CJS).

  2.4  This effective joint strategic approach across the sub-region is symbolised by the joint application and success in achieving Beacon Status in 2008-09 for the Reducing Re-offending Theme. The five authorities are Leicester City Council (Lead), Leicestershire County Council, Melton Mowbray, Hinckley and Bosworth, Oadby and Wigston Borough Councils.

  2.6  Our strong partnership approach, supported by a range of innovative reducing re-offending initiatives, was responsible for Leicestershire achieving Beacon Status. This paper will draw on some of these initiatives to illustrate that a range of provision is needed to reduce re-offending.

  2.5  The dissemination process for achieving Beacon Status will further embed the work of reducing re-offending across the region as well as nationally. The cost of reducing re-offending is being used as a key factor to maintain engagement with this agenda as well as engagement with other authorities within the sub-region.

3.  RECOMMENDATIONS

  3.1  To recognise the issue of re-offending cannot be solely addressed by agencies in the Criminal Justice System (CJS). It is an issue for all public agencies to contribute towards this work. Private sector organisation, the third sector and local communities also have a vital role to play in this work.

3.2  Recognition of offenders as a socially excluded group and addressing issues such as accommodation, employability etc are key to breaking the cycle of re-offending.

  3.3  To support and recognise the important contribution Local Authorities can make in the agenda around reducing re-offending.

  3.4  To note the contents of this paper.

4.  REPORT

  Having already been recognised nationally for innovative practice in working with offenders—Leicestershire, Leicester City and Rutland, and the District Councils—have been working in partnership to address reducing re-offending.

4.1  In order to progress and develop a joint strategic approach to reducing re-offending, the Sub-Regional Reducing Re-offending Board was set up in recognition of the fact that:

    —  Crime has a devastating affect on the lives of victims, offenders, families and on communities; and that,

    —  People who have already been through the Criminal Justice System commit more than half of all crime.

  4.2  The Social Exclusion report (SEU 2002) highlighted offenders as a socially excluded group and identified the seven pathways out of offending which need to be addressed in order to break the cycle of re-offending. (The pathways are, Accommodation, Education, training and employment, Health, Drugs and alcohol, finance, benefit and debt, children and families, Attitudes, thinking and behaviour.) These pathways have been used as useful tool to engage Local Authorities, which recognise the contribution they can make to addressing social exclusion by helping resettle and rehabilitate offenders.

5.  THE TOOLKIT

  A web-based toolkit was developed—"Local Solutions to Reduce Re-offending by Adult and Young Offenders"—which draws on the experience of the region and encapsulates the wealth of excellent practice across the region. It provides guidance to other local public service providers (e.g. Local Authorities, housing providers, and health service providers) and also local partnerships such as Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnerships. Civic Alliance Toolkit Link

5.1  The toolkit seeks to help practitioners understand why the contribution of non criminal justice agencies and communities in tackling re-offending is so important as part of the package of work to support the management of offenders who are serving, or have served, either custodial or community sentences.

  5.2  Tool kit 2: "How to Use the Costing Re-offending Spreadsheet" is designed to provide an indication of the cost of re-offending for Local Authorities. The National Offender Management Service (NOMS) developed the tool in conjunction with the Home office's Research Development and Statistics Unit. It uses the Home Office's Cost of Crime Survey and then makes some assumptions such as 50% of crime being committed by offenders with previous convictions. (The template used and the caveats/assumptions made in the calculations are attached at Annexes A and B).

  5.3  The Costs of Re-offending in Leicester City and Leicestershire—In order to make this meaningful and to engage with Local Authorities the estimated costs to the region were calculated and these costs were equated to expenditure on specific services.

  5.4  The figures are based on 2005-06 data both for the recorded crimes and the costs of crime. Both the City and County Council finance departments converted the costs developed into costs of services in the respective authorities in order to give an understanding of what the actual cost was and to encourage work on the reducing re-offending pathways.

  5.5  Despite the limitations (See Caveats Sheet—Annexe B) of such a tool, it has been possible to make a strong economic case to local partners, Elected Members and communities to develop a strategic approach to address re-offending.

  5.6  Total estimated cost for Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland—£146 million—For Leicester City the cost was £74 million, Leicestershire County Council £68 million, and Melton Borough Council 4.5 million

  In Leicester City the £74 million annual cost equates to:

    (a)  The annual running costs of 86 Primary Schools or 20 Secondary Schools.

    (b)  The annual running costs of 270 libraries.

    (c)  The provision of nearly 3.4 million hours of Home Care (assuming no contribution from the client).

    (d)  The annual revenue costs associated with the residential care of 2,873 elderly people in homes.

    (e)  The provision of nearly 16 million mobile meals (assuming no contribution from the client).

    (f)  The annual running costs of 317 Family Centres.

6.  WORK UNDERTAKEN IN LEICESTERSHIRE

  The work of the Sub-Region is quite extensive and addresses issues for young and adult offenders, including:

6.1  The strategic approach of the Sub-Regional Board who have produced a plan to develop the reducing re-offending agenda and join the work of Local Authorities, Health and Criminal Justice Agencies.

  6.2  Re-offending for adults and young people is a significant priority, with national indicators to measure reducing in offending across the three Local Area Authorities (LAA's) that encompass the region. This will be a responsibility and challenge for all agencies to bring down the rate of re-offending.

  6.3  MAPPOM (Multi-agency, Prolific and Priority Offender Management) has demonstrated the benefits of multi-agency approaches targeted on prolific offenders. This is heralded as a good practice model of surveillance and supervision of offenders, incorporating a service that addresses mental health, substance misuse and employability issues.

  6.4  MAPPOM services have also demonstrated a reduction in re-offending as a result of their intervention and have related this to the reduction in costs. They tracked a number (32) of their client group, and assessed their offences prior to MAPPOM intervention and for the following year. This study, completed in September 07 shows an overall reduction of 240 offences (78%) and put into context of the cost of crime, the savings are of £700,000.

  6.5  To maintain this work all local authorities in partnership with Leicestershire Probation Trust have given a commitment to fund this work in order to continue to reduce re-offending of the most prolific offenders in Leicestershire.

7.  EMPLOYABILITY

  As a group, ex-offenders have low levels of literacy and numeracy and few skills and qualifications. This fact remains a barrier to offenders getting into sustainable employment. A large proportion of offenders need a range of support in order that they can enter the competitive work environment, and also for them to gain the motivation to do so.

7.1  As part of Section 17 work of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, Leicester City Council, in partnership with the Youth Offending Service (YOS) and the Probation Services, has been developing Council Reparation Placements for young and adult offenders as part of their community punishment orders. Offenders have been given placements working with Council Departments, namely Parks and Open Spaces, Housing Renewals, Landlord Services and Sports Services.

  7.2  This provides offenders with opportunities to gain structured work experience as part of community payback. In 2008 Leicester City Council offered over 2,000 unpaid work placement days to offenders.

  7.3  Leicestershire County Council has worked with Leicestershire Cares, a voluntary project made up of employers in the Sub-Region. Leicestershire Cares works with employees in the city and county to create opportunities for ex-offenders to experience a `mentored' work placement. Many of these offenders do not have a work history. This work has made a clear contribution to the Reducing Re-offending agenda and has led to a 70% success rate of offenders gaining employment. Plans are being developed to work with other authorities across the sub-region in 2009.

8.  MELTON PATHWAYS PROJECT

  The purpose of this will be to develop a package of support services (across the full range of Local Authority and Community Services), which can be tailored to the needs of individuals when they are released from custody and so reduce the likelihood of re-offending.

8.1  Melton has developed a pilot scheme addressing cultural change in council service provision. Early results in the pilot are that it is providing a process and clarity to understanding the Local Authority role in the reducing re-offending agenda.

  8.2  It aims to create a "one team" culture around the needs of an individual, highlighting how Housing Department, Benefits, Economic Development and Leisure can work together. It is also alerting the authority to the complex needs of offenders and the need for intensive support to offenders.

  8.3  This pilot will be used to address change across all partnerships and will report to the sub-regional reducing re-offending board. It was - for example to help access support, addressing the intensive support needed for prisoners.

9.  REPORT AUTHOR

  Susan Holden

Beacon Co-ordinator, Reducing Re-offending

  On behalf of Leicester City Council, Leicestershire County Council, Hinckley & Bosworth, Oadby and Wigston and Melton Borough Councils

Susan Holden

Community Safety Team

January 2009



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 14 January 2010