Cutting crime: the case for justice reinvestment - Justice Committee Contents


Memorandum submitted by Sarah Pearce, University Hospital of North Durham

INFLUENCE OF PUBLIC OPINION ON PENAL POLICY

  I write as an experienced magistrate and also a senior consultant physician in a small city (Durham) with three prisons. Thus I have practical knowledge and experience of justice issues. I have also researched aspects of prison and prisoner health.

During the past 10-12 years penal policy has become heavily politicised, starting with the slogan "prison works". It has become clear that the two larger political parties have each made penal policy a vote-catching issue and the media have magnified this. High profile single cases have been used by the media to stir up public feeling. Prison numbers are rising steadily (and cost, I believe, £35k per prisoner pa) and likely to result in overcrowding even when "titan prisons" have been built. This reduces the resources for rehabilitation and prevention of re-offending. The evidence for all this is already in your hands. It is also well-recognised that socio-economic factors, substance abuse and mental health are the major underlying issues which need to be addressed by means other than locking people up.

The issues are closely analysed in The Prisoner's Dilemma: Political Economy and Punishment in Contemporary Democracies by Nicola Lacey, (Cambridge University Press 2007). She has researched public attitudes to sentencing and has compared our situation with that in other European countries and the USA. She makes the case that as long as sentencing is a major political issue it seems unlikely that we shall be able to change the direction of travel. Instead penal populism will hold sway. In the long term the effect will be greatly to the detriment of our society, not only because of the economic cost but also the human cost of wasted young lives. There is the real risk that mass incarceration (as in the USA) will result.

  I strongly suggest, therefore, that sentencing and criminal justice should be made a non-partisan issue—perhaps under the oversight of a Royal Commission as suggested by Lord Ramsbotham (House of Lords, 26 June Hansard). This should oversee sentencing as well as prisons. It is possible that such a development might be a relief to both major parties and could help us again to take a more humane attitude to penal policy. This would be in tune with Dr Lacey's analysis. The present crisis may allow this move to take place.

  Education of the public should be a priority (involving the media if they will co-operate). If the public were aware of the cost of imprisonment (less resources for other sectors of the public services) it might have some effect.

Sarah Pearce, M.B., Ch.B., FRCP, Cert. Med. Ed., J.P.

Consultant physician, University Hospital of North Durham

Hon Senior Lecturer

August 2008






 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 14 January 2010