The Omagh bombing: some remaining questions - Northern Ireland Affairs Committee Contents


Submission from the Omagh Support Group

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  In support of an Oral Evidence Session given to The Northern Ireland Affairs Select Committee on 16 March 2009 at Stormont Belfast

A CALL FOR A FULL CROSS BORDER PUBLIC INQUIRY INTO THE OMAGH BOMBING

  We do not consider Omagh to be part of the history of the troubles Omagh happened in peace times. The then Sectary of State Mo Mowlam stated that those responsible would not be given any special treatment because this atrocity happened after the Good Friday Agreement was signed. We believe the only way forward for the families is for the Irish and British governments to grant a full cross border public inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the Omagh Bombing.

The purpose for the production of this document is to provide an overview of the atrocity, identifying actions taken operational strengths, weaknesses and failings.

  The Omagh Bombing is an event, which is unique in history of our country murdering 31 innocent men women and children and injuring hundreds from three nations.

  The Omagh bomb happened at a time when we were all looking to the future. Many families thanked God that they had survived the 30 years of the troubles and were untouched by terrorism. That illusion was to shatter for many hundreds of innocent people on that sunny Saturday afternoon. From that day many of us have made it part of our lives and our reason for living. The most important thing is to get the truth and establish the facts. We were never left in any doubt of as to who was responsible for this wicked and evil act! It was the so-called real IRA. They proudly announced that an active service unit from their group had parked the explosive laden car in market street, Omagh. Without proper warning they returned over the border to safety before it exploded with horrific consequences. The innocent men women and children of Omagh, Buncranna and Madrid were left to pick up the pieces. There still remain many unanswered questions about how much intelligence was available and how it was used by both authorities. It has now emerged that the Irish government was in secret talks with the RIRA at the highest level. The RUC murder investigation teams failure as identified by the McVicar review and the damming report by the Police Ombudsman. The Garda investigation south of the border also failed to charge one single person with murder at Omagh. Despite a confession by the person who stole the car in Carrickmacross used in the Omagh bombing. He was not even charged with car theft considering he was the person who proved the murder weapon used at Omagh. It has also emerged that the Garda had well placed informants close to and at the top of the RIRA leadership.The bomb attack was launched from the republic and the bomb team spent less than 40 minutes in Northern Ireland. The Irish government has repeatedly failed to assist the PSNI investigation team in Omagh with DNA profiles which they have repeated requested. This matter was raised with the Irish Justice Minister Michael McDowell by the Omagh relatives and the leader opposition Enda Kenny. The Garda have also refused access to the PSNI to interview an informed witness called Paddy Dixon. He is on a witness protection program run by the Irish government. The PSNI investigation team north believe this man could be a crucial witness but wasn't being made available. After several formal requests the SIO finally interview him. The Ombudsman's office investigated allegations by Detective Sgn. John White's claims about having vital information regarding the RIRA and the Omagh bomb. The Ombudsman's office carried out a thorough investigation and believed these claims to have substance. Nuala O'Lone personally delivered her finding to the Irish Foreign Affairs Minister Brian Cowan. The Irish government appointed three seniors retired civil servants to carry out the inquiry. None of these three individuals had any investigative skills. One was a former DPP and may have made decisions about Omagh. This was known as the Nally inquiry. It was selective in the witness's that they selected for interview. Paddy Dixon was not interviewed by this team despite the fact that he was the central figure in this case. John White's telephone records were not examined even though he gave permission for them to be acquired. Norman Baxter (SIO, Omagh) was not interviewed or other potential witnesses who made themselves available. This report completely exonerated the Garda of all blame. The report was considered not to be independent and had no judicial powers or powers of investigation and the report was not fully published.

UPDATE

  January 2002. The trial of the man accused of conspiring with the Omagh Bombers Colin Murphy was sentenced to 14½ years in the Special Criminal Court in Dublin but on appeal was granted a retrial when it was found that Det Garda Liam Donnelly and Det Garda John Fathy was engaged in persistent lying on oath in the course of cross-examination said the Judge Mr Justice Barr.

On 18 January 2005 John White was acquitted of six charges in Letterkenny courthouse in Co Donegal.

  On 21 January 2005 Colm Murphy successfully appealed his conviction for conspiracy in the Omagh bombing and is still free awaiting a re-trial.

  On 22 February 2006 PSNI Assistant Chief Constable informed the families that MI5 helped to stop a plot to leave a car bomb in Omagh or Derry in April 1998 this happened four months before the Omagh bomb, the Police in Northern Ireland was not informed until January 2006. Some of those involved live in the Omagh area.

  MI5 also learned from their Agent that the dissidents had decided to shorten their bomb warning time. The Omagh investigation Team was never told about this information.

  At the same meeting the families where told that a substantial part of the testimony of Garda Det Sgn. John White was researched and found to be true and he is considered a credible witness.

  The Police Ombudsman's Office is currently investigating a Special Branch Officer who it is alleged made an anonymous phone call to Omagh Police Station on 4 August 1998 stating that a terrorist attack would take place on 15 August 1998 in Omagh town amazing and tragically that is what happened.

  The Sub Divisional Commander was not informed about this call until two and a half years later.The serious threat book which records such calls has gone missing for this period and has not been found to date.

  September 2006. Sean Hoey went on trial in the High Court in Belfast facing 58 Terrorist charges including the murders of 29 people in Omagh after 56 days in Court the Judge retired to make his judgment, which we received 11 months later. Mr Justice Weir took an hour and fifteen minutes in which he condemned Police Officers, Forensic Scientists and Scenes of Crime Officers he had nothing positive to say about the investigation. The Police Ombudsman has been called in to investigate the conduct of at least two Officers who give evidence in this trial.

  20 December 2007. Sean Hoey acquitted of all charges.

  21 December 2007. In a public statement Sir Hugh Orde stated that it is highly unlikely that anyone will ever be convicted in connection with the Omagh Bombing. You can now murder 31 people in our country and get away with it.

  3 July 2008. Policing Boards Independent External Review into the Omagh Bomb Investigation by Sir Dan Crompton was published and it appeared to blame the Judge for the outcome of the trial.

  15 September 2008. The BBC Current Affairs program Panorama entitled Omagh What The Police Were Never Told claimed that GCHQ had been monitoring and recording the voices of some of the RIRA As they drove 500 pounds of explosives to Omagh on 15 August 1998. Within 36 hours of the broadcast the PM Gordon Brown ordered a review of intelligence intercepts.

  16 January 2009. Sir Peter Gibson intelligence Services Commissioner delivered his review into intercepted intelligence material relating to the Omagh Bombing. The Families received a 16 page document outlining the findings of Sir Peter we where not allowed to have any input into this inquiry despite making ourselves available and requesting the terms of reference which we never received. The conclusion was that no one done anything wrong but nowhere in the document does it indicate that intercepts did not take place and fails to say why intelligence leads where not passed on to the investigating Officer.

  19 February 2009. The Police Ombudsman meet with the Families to share their finding into the conduct of Police Officers in the Hoey trial and found no misconduct with these Officers.

  27 February 2009. In an affidavit on behalf of the Plaintiffs in the Omagh Civil Action against the RIRA it was alleged that the PSNI, Special Branch and/or Security Services have in there possession a recording and transcripts relating to conversations which indicate that some individuals had planted a recording device in the car that delivered the bomb to Omagh.

  We have experienced nothing but failure and excuses. We were promised both publicly and privately that those responsible would be brought before the courts yet nothing is further from the truth. In this file you will see monumental failures of intelligence, investigative and administrative mishandling which undoubtedly minimized the chances of a successful prosecution of those responsible for the worst atrocity of the troubles.

  When people ask why do we require an enquiry into the Omagh bombing the answer is:

    — to establish the facts and the circumstances surrounding the Omagh bombing;

    — to review and revise standards and procedures;

    — to improve security readiness and crisis management;

    — to access the efficiency and effectiveness of intelligence surrounding Omagh;

    — to determine the adequacy of coordination of intelligence and anti terrorism counter measures amongst northern Irelands security services, Republic of Ireland security and business organizations generally;

    — to access issues of personal accountability for security; and

    — to provide recommendations on how to prevent new attacks or minimize the damage of successful attacks.

  We must make sure that the lessons of Omagh are learnt. So that mistakes can never happen and what is done well is past on so that others can learn from our tragedy. Never has so much been known about an atrocity and yet so little done to stop it or catch those responsible. Surely that's the least we owe to the 31 innocent people of who lost their lives in such a cruel way.

  The terms and powers of any new inquiry would need to be such as to inspire widespread public confidence that it would have access to all the relevant official material and otherwise enjoy full official support and cooperation, that it would operate independently, that it would investigate thoroughly and comprehensively, and would genuinely and impartially seek to establish what happened at Omagh why it happened and those who must bear the responsibility for it.

  This type of inquiry will end all inquiries into Omagh we urge the Sectary of State and the Irish Government to work with the Omagh Support and Self Help Group to achieve public closure.

March 2009






 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 16 March 2010