Work of the Committee 2008-09 - Northern Ireland Affairs Committee Contents


2  The Committee's activities in relation to the 'core tasks'

10.   In 2002, a list of ten 'core tasks' for departmental select committees was drawn up by the Liaison Committee as an aid by which select committees might manage their work in scrutinising the expenditure, administration and policy of the office to which they relate. As the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee scrutinises the Northern Ireland Office, which has had a reduced remit since the Northern Ireland Act 1998, these ten 'core tasks' do not fit exactly with the remit of the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee. However, we report below on how our activities during the 2008-09 parliamentary Session related to these core tasks.

To consider major policy initiatives

POLITICAL DEVELOPMENTS

11.  On 1 April 2009 we held a public evidence session with the Secretary of State, Rt Hon Shaun Woodward MP, the first of two during the Session, and with senior officials from the Northern Ireland Office, during which we questioned the Northern Ireland Office on recent political developments in Northern Ireland and the work of the Northern Ireland Office with respect to these developments. Committee members were also active in debates in the House, asking Parliamentary Questions on Northern Ireland and issues affecting Northern Ireland. We also sought written evidence on a number of issues from the Secretary of State and the Minister of State, Paul Goggins MP, from whom we also received oral evidence on cross-border co-operation.

CROSS-BORDER CO-OPERATION BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM AND THE REPUBLIC OF IRELAND

12.  We launched our inquiry in July 2008, focusing on cross-border co-operation between the agencies responsible for law enforcement and criminal justice in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. We examined policing and co-operation, both formal and informal, criminal justice and co-operation, and areas for closer co-operation, including sex offenders and public safety. In accordance with these lines of inquiry, we took oral evidence from Paul Goggins MP, Minister of State and Peter May, Director of Policing and Security, from the Northern Ireland Office. Evidence was also taken from representatives of the Northern Ireland Prison Service, Serious Organised Crime Agency, NSPCC Northern Ireland, Probation Board for Northern Ireland and Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland

13.  As part of our visit to Dublin in January 2009, we held discussions with officials of An Garda Síochána, the Irish Revenue Commissioners, the Oireachtas Justice Committee and Diageo as well as the British Ambassador to Ireland, Mr David Reddaway, the Irish Minister for Justice, Mr Dermot Ahern and the Irish Foreign Minister, Mr Michéal Martin.

14.  During this inquiry we saw first hand the courage shown by those who have lost loved ones to terrorism, and those who continue to fight terrorism on a daily basis. Northern Ireland is unique in being the only part of the United Kingdom that shares a land border with another country. The work of the PSNI in patrolling this border was shown to us in considerable detail during our tour of the border area of South Armagh, and our recommendations reflected the specific need for funding and co-operation to ensure the safety and security of the people of both the UK and the Republic of Ireland. We looked not only at the operation to fight crime, but also the punishments for such crimes, and the penal system. The Committee's Report was published on 18 June 2009. The Committee concluded the following:

  • We recommended that the two Governments explore every avenue towards establishing an information-sharing regime that acts as an effective register of sex offenders across the island of Ireland. (Paragraph 99)
  • We noted that the PSNI's budget was considerably greater per officer than that of any other United Kingdom police service, and there are regular calls for it to be reduced. We urged the Government to ensure that the service remains fully funded to cope with the unique challenges facing the PSNI. (Paragraph 24)
  • We noted a clear perception amongst law-enforcement agents on both sides of the border that criminals are not being adequately punished for their crimes. We recommend that the NIO press the Government to review sentencing guidelines relating to the serious organised crimes that have blighted Northern Ireland society for decades. (Paragraph 77)
  • We recommended that reciprocal legislation allowing some offences committed in the UK to be tried in the Republic of Ireland and vice versa should be extended and modernised to cover offences that have emerged since the original legislation was drafted in response to the Troubles in the mid-1970s. Such offences could include rape and electronic crimes, such as fraud. (Paragraph 91)

15.  The Government's response, published on 19 October 2009, was mainly positive, welcoming many of our recommendations. In particular:

  • The Government argued that the memoranda of understanding in place between the authorities in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland to facilitate exchange of information on sex offenders "in effect establishes information-sharing that acts as an effective register of sex offenders across the island of Ireland". This explicit statement of the present position met our recommendation.
  • The Government was considering our recommendation that offences covered under reciprocal criminal jurisdiction legislation in the UK and the Republic of Ireland should be extended. We expect to seek an update in the new year on progress towards the identification and incorporation of new offences under this legislation.
  • The Government noted that An Garda Síochána would fund deployment of Barracuda radios within the Republic of Ireland, meeting our concern that the PSNI alone was carrying the cost.
  • The response did not, however, address our Report's points about perceptions that organised criminals are not receiving sufficient sentences for their crimes. It noted instead merely that sentencing is a matter for judges.

We shall continue to monitor the situation and will refer back to those matters during our forthcoming visits to Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.

CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON THE PAST

16.  On 28 January 2009, the Consultative Group on the Past, an independent group, published its report, commissioned to consider how best Northern Ireland could deal with the legacy of the past. Understandably, publication resulted in controversy and debate, and perhaps to a greater degree than had been anticipated. We undertook an inquiry into the findings of the report and held evidence sessions with the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland as well as representatives from the Northern Ireland Office, the Commission for Victims and Survivors, the Northern Ireland Retired Police Officers' Association, and Lord Eames and Mr Denis Bradley, Co-Chairmen of the Consultative Group on the Past. We expect to publish our own Report early in 2010.

A BILL OF RIGHTS FOR NORTHERN IRELAND

17.  We are currently inquiring into progress towards a Bill of Rights for Northern Ireland. Oral evidence sessions have been held with Commissioners from the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission and with Lady Trimble, a Commissioner who dissented from the advice the Commission has given to the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland on the matter. We have also heard from representatives of Amnesty International, the Children's Law Centre, Save the Children, and the Northern Ireland Human Rights Consortium. We met informally the Chairman of the Republic of Ireland's Human Rights Commission, Dr Maurice Manning, in Dublin in January 2009. Our Report is due to be published in 2010.

TELEVISION BROADCASTING IN NORTHERN IRELAND

18.  In March 2009 we launched an inquiry into television broadcasting in Northern Ireland, looking specifically at the role of public service TV broadcasting, the challenges of digital switchover, the importance of local programming on news and current affairs, and the place of broadcasting in a devolved nation. During our visit to Belfast in October 2009, we held oral evidence sessions with representatives from BBC Northern Ireland, UTV, Channel 4, Ofcom, the National Union of Journalists and the Producers Alliance for Cinema and Television. We have since seen the Minister for Creative Industries, Siôn Simon MP, and will hold at least one further session in 2009-10. We expect to report shortly.

OMAGH: 10 YEARS ON

19.  We have also inquired into circumstances surrounding the Omagh bombing, the worst single atrocity committed in Northern Ireland during the period known as the Troubles. The inquiry has presented us with difficult questions, most notably about whether certain actions could, if taken at the time, have resulted in the prosecution and conviction of those responsible. It is important to state that responsibility for the deaths of 29 people on August 15 1998—one of whom was pregnant with twins—rests with those among the membership of the Real IRA who planned and committed the crime, and with them alone. During our inquiry, we have travelled to Belfast to meet representatives of the Omagh Support and Self Help Group. We had the opportunity to speak to families and friends of those killed and injured, and we pay tribute to their strength and bravery. In London, we heard evidence from John Ware, whose Panorama documentary instigated an inquiry by the Intelligence and Security Commissioner, Sir Peter Gibson. We heard, too, from Mr Jason McCue solicitor for the Omagh families support group, from Baroness O'Loan, the former Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland, and from former members of the Omagh bomb investigation team for both the Royal Ulster Constabulary and the Police Service of Northern Ireland.

20.  In spite of the Government's stated policy of being "as open and helpful as possible with Select Committees"[3], the Committee has been refused access to Sir Peter Gibson's full, classified report, even under supervision. We note our continued disappointment at the repeated refusal to allow our Chairman to see this document on our behalf, and we continue to press the Government to reconsider that decision.

THE SAVILLE INQUIRY INTO BLOODY SUNDAY

21.  We last year noted our disappointment at repeated delays in the publication of the final report into the events of Bloody Sunday—30 January 1972. We had hoped that the report would be published in late 2009, but Lord Saville, the tribunal's chairman, has announced that this will not be the case. The most recent delay, thought to be owing to technical difficulties, pushes the date of publication back to the week beginning 22 March 2010. We again express our frustration that the inquiry, now in its 11th year, has had such repeated delay. Lord Saville has twice been invited to meet us to explain the reason for the continued delay, which continues to cost the taxpayer vast sums of money. He has twice declined. To date, the report has cost almost £200 million.

To conduct scrutiny of draft bills

22.  The Northern Ireland Office published no draft bills in 2008-09, and once again no Bills relating exclusively to Northern Ireland were introduced.

23.  The NIO did, however, publish a Command Paper shortly before the House rose for Christmas recess 2008, providing post-legislative scrutiny of the Electoral Registration Act of 2005. This was the first such paper produced by any department following a recommendation by the House last year that Government should provide such updates three to five years after Acts are made. The NIO, having led the way, then published a second paper, covering four Orders in Council made during the period of the Northern Ireland Assembly's suspension from 2002. Having considered both papers, we considered that no further action was necessary, but commend the NIO on acting more swiftly than other governmental departments in providing to Parliament these useful updates on what legislation has achieved and whether it has done what it was meant to do.

To examine and report on main Estimates, annual expenditure plans and annual resource accounts

24.  The Committee has received memoranda on the NIO's Autumn Performance Report 2008 and winter, spring and autumn estimates. We have also requested written evidence from the NIO on its Annual Report 2009. These are included as annexes to this Report.

Follow-up of previous recommendations

ORGANISED CRIME

25.  We have requested information from the National Audit Office and the Northern Ireland Audit Office on Organised Crime in Northern Ireland, as a follow-up to the Organised Crime report of 2006. We expect to consider this early in the new session.

26.  The Committee has a continuing interest in policing and justice, as evidenced by our Report Policing and Criminal Justice in Northern Ireland: the Cost of Policing the Past, published on 7 July 2009, and our interest in the planned devolution of policing and justice powers to the Northern Ireland Assembly. As part of our visit to Belfast in October 2009 we visited the Forensic Service Northern Ireland, Police Training College Belfast, Northern Ireland Retired Police Officers Association and Police Retraining and Rehabilitation Trust. These sessions proved invaluable in allowing us to learn more about the work done there. We also held a valedictory oral evidence session with Sir Hugh Orde in July 2009, shortly before his retirement, focusing on the achievements over the last seven years, and the challenges still facing Northern Ireland, and we expect soon to meet his successor.


3   Osmotherly rules paragraph 68 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 15 December 2009