Maintaining financial stability across the United Kingdom's banking system - Public Accounts Committee Contents


Supplementary memorandum from HM Treasury

  I am writing to provide the information requested by Committee members at the PAC hearing on maintaining financial stability across the United Kingdom's banking system of 14 December.

Question 81 (Dr Pugh): asked for details of UKFI's bonus arrangements and whether any bonuses have yet been paid.

  Specific remuneration arrangements within UKFI are a matter for the UKFI Board. As stated in UKFI's Framework Agreement with HM Treasury, we expect all such remuneration arrangements, including any incentivisation packages, to be developed and recommended by the Board's Remuneration Committee for directors and senior management, and to be in line with the FSA's code. HM Treasury has authorisation over the terms on which each director is appointed, remunerated and incentivised.

  HM Treasury's interest is primarily in ensuring that remuneration levels:

    — are sufficient to attract and motivate high calibre individuals to drive the delivery of the activities and objectives described or set out in the Framework Document;

    — are tied closely to performance, as measured by compliance with the Investment Mandate (and implementation of the Company's investment strategy), adherence to the UKFI Business Plan and delivery of the objectives in the Framework Document;

    — are aligned with the objectives set out in the Framework Document; and

    — deliver value for money.

  In addition, HM Treasury does not condone rewards for failure, and would expect the Board to support the removal of any director or member of senior management responsible for a failure to adhere to the UKFI Business Plan, comply with the Investment Mandate or for any other serious failure.

  I am informed by UKFI that no bonuses have yet been paid to UKFI staff, that any bonuses will be paid as a proportion of salary (not multiples), and that even if maximum payouts were made they would only be in aggregate up to 20% of total staff costs. UKFI has some civil servants on secondment who are eligible, like all civil servants, for modest bonuses. Employees from the private sector are earning substantially less than they have earned and could earn elsewhere. In addition, UKFI's Chief Executive has agreed not to receive any bonus.

Question 73 (Dr Pugh): asked whether the £25 billion raised by businesses from equity markets and corporate issuance, has been used to repay debt through choice or because banks have called in loans. You asked that the Treasury present the Committee with the work undertaken on that matter.

  Data on repayments includes both the roll-off of existing debt and repayments by customers. Information we have from the Bank of England Trends in Lending report covering the whole banking sector (not just the lending commitment banks) indicates that the total level of repayments has been £16bn greater than the total level of new lending for quarters 2 and 3 of 2009. Information from the lending commitment banks shows a pattern in line with this market.

  Survey evidence from BCC and Deloitte suggests that apart from perceptions around access to finance, businesses have stated tough economic conditions and a lack of customer demand as key challenges to growth and investment decisions. In line with this, independent survey evidence by BIS reflect steps by SMEs and Mid Caps to cut costs and manage debt by reducing dependency on bank finance and seeking alternative sources of funding.

  Also, the Bank of England's Agents have described banks as being unwilling to foreclose in the face of breached loan covenants, in response to low collateral values, suggesting that repayment levels may be less driven by banks demanding repayment and more so by businesses' restructuring decisions.

Question 66 (Dr Pugh): that I clarify a statement made by the Chancellor on the Pre-Budget Report, in the context of Figure 14 from the NAO Report (page 34). I believe he was referring to this exchange

    Official Record 15 Dec 2009 : Column 782

    Mr Michael Fallon (Sevenoaks) (Con): Is not the reality that businesses in our constituencies still cannot access the credit that they need, and that all this newly printed money is being siphoned off into purchasing gilts to finance the extra borrowing that is a direct result of the Chancellor's failure to come up with a proper fiscal plan to reduce the deficit?

    15 Dec 2009 : Column 783

    Mr Darling: No. I believe that the quantitative easing measures taken by the Monetary Policy Committee of the Bank of England are helping the process of recovery. The hon. Gentleman has a point, however, about bank lending. As I have said before, the stock of lending is broadly similar to what it was before the crisis. In addition, the banks in which we have major shareholdings—RBS and Lloyds—have lent an additional £50 billion. At the same time, however, there has been a repayment of lending by other businesses, which is why the net figure looks so low. As I said last week, it is necessary that the deficit be reduced, and we will halve it over a four-year period once recovery has been established-but it is important to ensure that we get that recovery established.

  Analysis of past financial crises by the Bank of England in their July 2009 Financial Stability Report shows that in the aftermath of a credit crisis real credit growth turns positive several quarters after the resumption of output growth. However, whilst monthly flows of net lending to private non-financial corporations have been volatile over the past two years, the total stock of lending to private non-financial corporations has remained broadly stable. For example, the total stock of lending to private non-financial corporations was £494 billion in November 2009 as compared to £492 billion in November 2007.

Sir Nick Macpherson

Permanent Secretary

13 January 2010


  Following my previous letter, this note addresses the request for information regarding bonus arrangements for Asset Protection Agency staff.

  No bonuses have yet been paid in respect of Asset Protection Agency staff, and there will be very few staff eligible for payments covering the period to March 2010. Eligibility and payment of any performance bonuses are fully in accordance with approved practice for civil servants, and will be disclosed in the APA annual report in due course.

Sir Nick Macpherson

Permanent Secretary

15 January 2010





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 9 February 2010