HM Revenue and Customs: Handling telephone enquiries - Public Accounts Committee Contents


Memorandum from The Chartered Institute of Taxation Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG)

HANDLING TELEPHONE ENQUIRIES TO HMRC:

SUMMARY AND LIST OF RECOMMENDATIONS

  1. The Report by the NAO has identified the main failings of the telephone service offered by HMRC to the public:

    — 43% of calls were not answered;

    — 6.8 million callers did not receive advice which met internal accuracy standards; and

    — The staff utilisation rate was only 38%.

  2. In this submission we draw the attention of the Committee to simple things HMRC could do, at no or negligible expense, to make the experience of telephoning HMRC less costly and frustrating for the customer.

The customer needs to know whom to phone to deal with their problem.

  3. There is an alphabetical list of 50 helplines on a page on the HMRC website. This page needs to be re-designed around the priority needs of customers as identified in the NAO Report (p 15, fig 1).

The customer needs to know how to find the number

  4. Most HMRC factsheets and forms refer customers to their "local tax office", even though most customers no longer have a "local tax office" and the nearest enquiry centre cannot be telephoned directly (a call-back option is offered).

  5. The list of HMRC helplines does not state what issues are dealt with by each. So if a Self Assessment taxpayer rang the Self Assessment helpline to ask for time to pay a bill, they would be directed to ring the Self Assessment payment helpline instead—but only after having gone through all the options and waited to speak to the operator. This information needs to be clearly identified in all appropriate places.

The cost of calling HMRC falls disproportionately on people with low incomes

  6. HMRC's policy of using 0845 numbers makes calling the Department particularly expensive for users of pay-as-you-go mobile phones. Those who rely on such phones—predominantly those on the lowest incomes—are consequently the most disadvantaged by HMRC's policy.

  7. By contrast, the DWP have introduced 0800 helpline numbers and ensure that mobile phone users get free calls too.

  8. HMRC do sometimes use call-back systems, yet people are often refused a call back even though the credit on their mobile phone has been exhausted by making contact in the first place.

  9. HMRC should learn from a body such as Bristol City Council which offers the option of waiting in a queue or receiving an automatic call-back within a stated time.

  10. If all lines are busy, the message should be given out at the start of the call. At present, callers' costs are increased by having to listen to all recorded messages and call options before they are either put on hold for an operator, or told that the lines are busy.

The "contact us" page on HMRC's website

  11. If you follow directions to "contact us" on HMRC's website, you will normally be given a variety of options, all of which take time to follow up, but all lead ultimately to the centralised Contact Centre Service. This is a circuitous route which is unnecessarily frustrating for the customer.

HMRC should give the Contact Centre Service number in the first place.

  12. If however your call is about tax credits or child benefit, you are directed straight away to the appropriate helpline and even, for child benefit, an email facility.

Inaccurate information at point of delivery

  13. The NAO Report confirms that 11% of calls may result in the caller being given inaccurate advice. But our mystery shopping shows that error levels are almost certainly much higher in the more difficult areas of advice, such as childcare or disability in tax credits or age allowances or pension commutation for pensioners.

  14. We recommend that HMRC separate out those difficult questions and route them to specialist staff as soon as the call is received.

  15. We also recommend that a new system of call guidance and retrieval is trialled.

1.  ABOUT THE LOW INCOMES TAX REFORM GROUP (LITRG)

  1.1 LITRG is an initiative of the Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) to give a voice to the unrepresented. Since 1998 LITRG has been working to improve the policy and processes of the tax, tax credits and associated welfare systems for the benefit of those on low incomes.

  1.2 The CIOT is a charity and the leading professional body in the United Kingdom concerned solely with taxation. The CIOT's primary purpose is to promote education and study of the administration and practice of taxation. One of the key aims is to achieve a better, more efficient, tax system for all affected by it—taxpayers, advisers and the authorities.

2.  THE NAO REPORT

  2.1 The NAO Report analyses the difficulties that HMRC face in operating their telephone systems at acceptable levels for the general public. The Report clearly sets out the deficiencies in stark terms:

    — 43% of calls were not answered;

    — 6.8 million callers did not receive advice which met internal accuracy standards; and

    — the staff utilisation rate was only 38%.

  2.2 What perhaps the Report cannot do is to translate some of the frustration, cost and feelings of powerlessness which these failures visit upon the most vulnerable of HMRC's customers.

  2.3 Ever since the formation of LITRG we have pressed for better telephone services and indeed previous NAO reports have highlighted the same issues. There is always a promise of better things tomorrow.

  2.4 Undoubtedly the Committee's examination of the senior HMRC officials who "own" the Contact Centres will focus, in the limited time available, upon the remedial action to be taken at a strategic level. However, we want to draw the attention of the PAC to simple things with no (or negligible) cost implications that should be done to make people's lives easier, but due to structural barriers within HMRC seem impossible to achieve. In our view this arises for two reasons:

    — lack of a complete view of the customer perspective, and

    — lack of ownership of a problem which crosses two or more HMRC "organisational silos".

3.  LITRG'S "SIMPLE THINGS LIST"

Who do I phone?

  3.1 The vulnerable customer does not recognise the silos of HMRC (tax credits, PAYE, Self Assessment, Child Trust Fund, National Insurance etc.) and when they have an issue, they need to know who to speak to.

    It took the voluntary sector nearly six years to persuade tax credits officials involved in tax credit overpayment disputes to put a name and telephone number on letters, so that customers could avoid making fruitless calls to the Contact Centre Helpline.

  3.2 HMRC themselves estimate they have 139 "customer facing" 0845 numbers. Nearly half relate to income tax alone. This is not necessarily a bad thing if it means the people answering the phone are more expert about what people are calling to discuss.

  3.3 But the signposting and the explanations, whether on forms, leaflets or the web, are inconsistent, vague and generally very poor. This in itself creates avoidable traffic as people go from pillar to post.

  3.4 Why have a confusing alphabetical listing of around 50 Helplines on the HMRC website: http://tiny.cc/zwthf ? The page needs to be designed around the priority needs of customers contacting HMRC by phone, which is clearly identified in the NAO Report (Figure 1 on page 15). The listing also needs to show the opening hours of the various Helplines, which vary enormously.

  3.5 Many HMRC communications do not refer to the Helplines, they just refer to the HMRC website and leave the customer to navigate unaided to the appropriate Helpline.

How do I find the number?

  3.6 Most HMRC factsheets, forms etc suggest that customers should `contact your local tax office' by telephone, using the Phone Book. This is becoming impossible, because individuals no longer have a "local tax office" and progressively fewer people have a Phone Book with the growth of mobile phones.

  3.7 When you have found the HMRC page it will typically list a range of Helplines by name and say when they are open, but will not indicate what types of issues are covered by each. This makes the customer journey needlessly long. For example, you might assume that you should ring the Self Assessment helpline to ask about Self Assessment. However, if you telephone that number to arrange extra time to pay your Self Assessment bill, you will not know it is the wrong number until you have listened to five options and waited to speak to an operator. You will then be directed to the Self Assessment payment helpline and as there is no facility available for the advisor to transfer the call, you must go through the whole process again.

  3.8 Additionally, although the Phone Book lists a number against each office, if you ring the number of the office nearest to you, you will not be put through to that office, nor are you given an option to speak to the nearest Enquiry Centre. If you persist you will be told to provide your details, including a call-back telephone number. This is needed so that the local Enquiry Centre can ring you, at their convenience, to arrange an appointment. You will be advised not to visit the Enquiry Centre unannounced. Is it any wonder the footfall in Enquiry Centres has dropped?

  3.9 Furthermore, not one typetalk/textphone number is listed in these Phone Book pages, even though the standard HMRC dedicated page carries the message "Positive about disabled people". HMRC have 14 dedicated numbers for deaf or hearing/speech impaired customers, none of which are mentioned.

Cost of calls

  3.10 You may note that the only 0800 numbers on the Phone Book page are for when you want to inform on your neighbours and friends.

  3.11 Unfortunately, HMRC have not taken the initiative for their low income customers, as have the Department for Work & Pensions, not only to introduce 0800 Helpline numbers but also to ensure that mobile phones users get free calls. A recent CAB survey showed that of 82 clients questioned, 56 had been unable at some point to call Government because they had no money on their mobile phone.[12]

  3.12 There are now more mobile phones than people in the UK.[13] The poorest people are the most likely to rely exclusively on their mobile phone with restricted contracts such as Pay as You Go, and are therefore the most disadvantaged by the current HMRC policy of using 0845 numbers.

  3.13 With no geographical number option provided by HMRC alongside the 0845 number option, the caller is unable to choose the most cost effective route for themselves. A report[14] from the Social Security Advisory Committee found that a 45 minute call to an 0845 number can cost as much as £18 (equivalent to one-third of someone's weekly income if they are on Income Support).

  3.14 Many will incur charges simply to listen to a range of recorded messages and call options, and only when they have chosen a call option will they be advised whether the lines are engaged, whether they need to call back or whether they are in a queue of an indefinite length. Towards the busiest peaks, the HMRC automated system will tell you that everyone is very busy and will then cut you off.

  3.15 Without a clear HMRC call-back policy customers will often be refused such a call-back, even though the little credit they may have had on their mobile telephone has been exhausted in establishing contact in the first place.

  3.16 We recommend HMRC consider an innovative use of call back facilities, such as set by Bristol City Council (and the Australian tax authorities), which offers the option of waiting on the line in a queue or receiving an automatic call back in a stated time. This call back is free of charge, and the caller can ask to be rung back on another day or time convenient to them.

    One adviser in TaxHelp for Older People,[15] the advice charity for low income pensioners, recorded 65 instances of pensioners calling her in January 2010 solely because they could not get through on the telephone to the HMRC Contact Centres.

When HMRC tell me to visit www.hmrc.gov.uk what do I find?

  3.17 It is likely that if you are reading an HMRC publication or holding on the phone you will be directed to the HMRC website at www.hmrc.gov.uk. There is undoubtedly good material now on HMRC's website. Your challenge is to find it.

  3.18 If you want to communicate with HMRC you are directed from most pages on their website to "Contact Us". The NAO report shows that most contact by far comes from tax credits claimants and PAYE/Self Assessment payers. But HMRC treats different groups very differently under the Contact Us section. If you want to find how to contact HMRC on tax credits or child benefit you are directed to appropriate telephone numbers and even an email facility (for child benefit).

  3.19 However, if you are a pensioner with a PAYE question, you are given a complex list of options, the first two being Bereavement and the Deceased Estates Helpline. If you progress further to Income Tax Enquiries you are sent, eventually, to a "find your tax office" page. You will then spend some considerable time putting in postcodes or your pension payer's reference; if you succeed you will be given a number to ring.

  3.20 The irony is that this journey through the pages is totally unnecessary. All the pensioner needs to be told at the outset is to ring 0845 3000 627. The miscellany of telephone numbers lead to the same place, the centralised Contact Centre service. HMRC should give the Contact Centre Service number in the first place.

  3.21 There are many similar experiences scattered through the HMRC website, but they go unnoticed and untreated because it seems that no-one has the responsibility to follow the customer journey.

Accuracy of information at point of delivery

  3.22 The tax charities (LITRG, TaxAid and TaxHelp for Older People) see the fall-out which occurs from inaccurate information given by the Contact Centre Helplines. Sometimes, the effect on a family can be devastating, particularly through receiving inaccurate tax credit information.

  3.23 The NAO report confirms that 11 out of every 100 calls made may result in the caller being given inaccurate advice. We believe that the levels of error are almost certainly much higher in the more difficult areas of advice, for example, childcare or disability in tax credits or age allowances or pension commutation for pensioners.

    LITRG's mystery shopping of Contact Centres in relation to specific areas of advice consistently shows mistakes well above 11%, sometimes as high as 80%.

  3.24 This places the customer in an exceptionally vulnerable position, especially as HMRC will often not accept the taxpayer's word that they have received wrong advice, requiring the taxpayer to produce evidence. The position for tax credit claimants is somewhat better, as the normal practice is to make a recording of all telephone calls, but this only helps with the most confident of HMRC's customers who are prepared to challenge authority.

  3.25 We would need a full report to elaborate upon our recommendations for improving HMRC accuracy, but one clear move we would make is to separate out the difficult questions and escalate them to specialist staff as soon as they arrive at the Contact Centre. Tax and tax credits are often complex and need experienced professionals to give accurate and comprehensive advice.

  3.26 Retrieving the evidence of the advice the individual receives in a call to HMRC is dependent upon the subject matter of the call. Not all calls are recorded. In addition, where calls are recorded and the evidence needs to be retrieved, the procedures are cumbersome. We recommend that the guidance given to callers be reviewed and that alternative systems of information recording be piloted for the benefit of both HMRC and the customer.

16 February 2010









12   Hungup report Leeds CAB. Back

13   Research report by OFCOM: The consumer experience 2008 (25 November 2008). Back

14   SSAC (occasional paper no 3): Telephony in DWP and its agencies: call costs and equality of access. Back

15   Tax Volunteers, registered charity no 1102276, www.taxvol.org.uk Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 25 March 2010