HM Revenue and Customs: Handling telephone enquiries - Public Accounts Committee Contents


Memorandum from Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS)

  The Public and Commercial Services Union represents 300,000 members in the civil service and related areas including over 80,000 who are employed by HM Revenue and Customs.

  PCS welcomes the PAC's timely meeting on "Dealing with Telephone Enquiries" and would be grateful if the committee would consider this memorandum and suggested questions.

  PCS has concerns over HMRC's increasing reliance on telecommunications as their preferred method of communication. We believe this is having a disproportionately negative impact on their service to vulnerable areas of society for example the elderly; hearing impaired and other disabled people; and people whose first language is not English making communication very difficult.

  The intitial formation of the telephone communication centres happened prior to HMRC having to take consideration of these groups as would be required today under equality duties. However, PCS believes HMRC must now do more to make better provision for these areas of society. Given the current cost cutting environment we are in, PCS does not envisage this happening.

  HMRC are currently undergoing a workforce change programme which could see 25,000 job cuts and over 200 office closures by 2011. We have serious concerns about the effect this is having on our members' ability to continue delivering a quality service to the public, especially as the section responsible for managing calls has informed PCS of a 15% cut in the work force by the end of 2011.

  Services are already suffering with 43% of the 103 million calls received going unanswered last year leading to criticism from the National Audit Office[16]. The new MPPA system has also generated additional calls due to system errors. We are concerned that the "channelling strategy" introduced by HMRC to reduce the number of face to face enquiries has resulted in an astonishing increase in the number of calls being received at their contact centres.

  HMRC themselves have used the increase of 3 million additional calls into the contact centres as proof that `channelling' works. However, this has seen an increase in the number of calls going unanswered. To assist with the volume of calls, staffing has been increased by a total of only three. We are concerned that HMRC's priority seems to be the number of calls received rather than the quality of the information provided.

  Customers with little or no English struggle with the press button procedures, resorting to family or enquiry centres staff making the call on their behalf to secure a translator to then deal with their query. Our members in contacts centres have reported to us that previously they were unable to go through security questions with a third party assisting the customers. However, due to cost cutting they can now offer this for non-English speaking customers rather than using the translation service.

  The elderly and disabled people all too often find the system difficult to use—either in following the verbal instructions, or the physical key strokes required; for many in these categories. PCS believe that face to face would be a better solution but that that this is being considerably reduced due to the programme of office closures.

  PCS are extremely concerned at inferences made at recent management road shows that some UK contact centres may close with the possibility that work may transfer overseas.

  We are also concerned that staff moving from different businesses, for example personal income tax to tax credits, without the proper training. We question how staff can therefore be expected to deliver the best possible service.

  PCS members advise that many customers want to use "lo-cal numbers" as they are free on talk plans rather than 0845 numbers. These are available and classified for International callers only. Members are also being advised to keep customers on the phone whilst dealing with all the work involved in the call. HMRC always states that they do not make money on these calls but this is factually incorrect with income being received both directly and also through VAT receipts from the telecoms providers.

  Call Centre staff are being instructed to call tax credit claimants to ask awkward and probing questions on subjects like living together and childcare arrangements. This bypasses the legal requirements to "Open" and Examination of Enquiry and does not give the customer a chance to seek advice if required. We are concerned as to the legality of this practice.

  The Union is also concerned at press reports surrounding the newly appointed head of the HMRC East Kilbride contact centre[17]. The position has been filled by Robert Bowering despite him being declared bankrupt only a month previously over £75,000 of unpaid tax debts. We are concerned as to impact this will have on HMRC's public reputation.

SUGGESTED QUESTIONS

  1.  It appears that HMRC security procedures have been relaxed solely to save the department money—is that the case?

  2.  Does the increased reliance of service by telephone not unfairly discriminate against customers such as those who are elderly, partially deaf and with other disabilities?

  3.  What measures are in place to help this section of the public accessing the service and what analysis has been made of the demographics of those accessing these services?

  4.  Has the off-shoring of contact centre work been a consideration of HMRC management and if so, has this been the subject of discussions with Ministers?

  5.  How can the performance expect to improve from "unacceptable" if staff levels are to be reduced by 20-30%? How can the Department expect to realise their commitment to answering 90% of calls with 30% less staff by March 2012?

  6.  What number of calls being received from taxpayers/agents into the various Corporation Tax sites and how many of thse calls are being answered?

  7.  What call waiting systems, if any, are being applied to help customers know when their call will be answered?

  8.  Is the income generated the reason behind the decision to use 0845 numbers?

  9.  Is there a methodology used by HMRC to determine the number of calls being abandoned and can they throw light on why calls are being abandoned?

  10.  Have bonuses been set for management in contact centres and if so, what targets are being set to achieve this?

  11.  Does HMRC employ staff solely to monitor and/or report on the daily activities of telephone advisors and if so, can they say what percentage of staff undertake this role?

  12.  What is the procedure for operators when dealing with a call in terms of logging the details and taking ownership for the information provided to the customer?

  13.  Is it true that call centre staff are cold calling tax credit claimants are asking security questions while it is accepted practice not to give out security information on the phone?






16   National Audit Office-HM Revenue and Customs: Handling telephone enquiries, 15 January 2010 Back

17   The Sun-Tax bosses give £70k job to bankrupt, 10 February 2010 Back


 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 25 March 2010