Preparations for the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games - Public Accounts Committee Contents


3  Delivering a lasting legacy

15. The prospect of the legacy the Games would bring was an important element of London's bid, in particular that the Olympic Park will be a blueprint for sustainable living and help transform the heart of London.[27] The Department told us that three-quarters of the Olympic Delivery Authority's construction budget is contributing directly to this regeneration aspiration.[28]

16. The Olympic Park Legacy Company was established in May 2009 to assume responsibility from the London Development Agency for securing a positive legacy from the Olympic Park. Accounting Officer responsibility for the Legacy Company within Government rests with Communities and Local Government.[29] The Legacy Company will be responsible for the long-term development and regeneration of the Olympic Park land and venues over the next 10-20 years, including plans for further housing. It is responsible for finding end users for the Olympic Park venues after the Games and for generating revenues from the sale of Olympic Park land and assets after the Games in 2012.[30]

17. Despite our previous recommendations it is still unclear how publicly funded venues will be used after the Games, and if unused how their upkeep will be funded. The Legacy Company is currently in the process of putting together a business plan setting out how it plans to develop the Park and manage the revenues and costs of running the Park after 2012, with the intention of maximising the return for the taxpayer. The Department told us that the Legacy Company will have to meet the bill for any costs associated with unused venues.[31]

18. The Media Centre is forecast to cost the taxpayer £334 million, yet there are no firm plans for its use after the Games.[32] The Department's ambition for the Media Centre is the creation of new job opportunities, in Hackney in particular, with a focus on the creative, media and 'sunrise' (new) industries. The decision to locate the Media Centre in the North West corner of the Olympic Park, away from the main public transport hub at Stratford and within the security perimeter, was determined by security, cost and operational considerations.[33] It is located close to the A12, but of the 1,300 car parking spaces available during the Games, as a condition of planning approval, only 220 will be available to commercial users of the Media Centre after the Games. The Media Centre's location makes it potentially less attractive to commercial users increasing the risk that it will remain vacant after the Games.[34]

19. The Main Stadium will seat 80,000 during the Games and is forecast to cost £537 million.[35] The Olympic Delivery Authority has designed the stadium with flexibility in mind in line with the original intention for its capacity to be reduced after the Games from 80,000 to 25,000. Despite the commitment in London's bid for the Games that the Stadium will be used as an athletics venue it is unclear what the plans are for the Stadium after the Games and who will be responsible for running it. The Olympic Park Legacy Company will soon provide the opportunity for interested parties, for example West Ham United Football Club, to put forward proposals for the Stadium's future use.[36]

20. The National Lottery is contributing £2,175 million to the £9,325 million budget for the Games and we have previously highlighted our concerns about the impact of this on other National Lottery funded good causes. The Government aims to repay £675 million to the National Lottery from a share of the future profits from the sale of Olympic Park land and assets owned by the London Development Agency, as set out in a 2007 Memorandum of Understanding between the Government and the Mayor of London. We pressed the Department on whether, in light of the current economic situation, it could guarantee the reimbursement of the National Lottery. While the Department provided us with a guarantee that it would make no further calls on the National Lottery, it did not provide any guarantee about the future revenues from land and assets or the value and timing of the return on the National Lottery's investment.[37]

21. The Olympic Village is part of the wider Stratford City regeneration in East London and is situated outside, but adjacent to, the Olympic Park land. The Olympic Delivery Authority's budget is dependent on receiving some £600 million from the sale of the Village units after the Games and from a share of future profits from further post-Games development. The Delivery Authority's objective is to achieve at least £500 million in sales from the Village units, in part to meet its commitment to repay £324 million of contingency funds provided by the Ministerial Funders Group. The Department has proposed a strategy for how any excess sale receipts from the Village will be redistributed to funders. The Olympic Lottery Distributor will receive a proportionate share of the receipts arising from its share of funding for the Village, based on a January 2010 Memorandum of Understanding with the Department.[38]

22. As part of London 2012's long-term legacy the Olympic Delivery Authority has targets for the creation of new training and employment opportunities for local people during the construction of the venues and infrastructure.[39] There is a target to recruit 15% of the construction workforce from the five host boroughs, but the Olympic Delivery Authority has encountered difficulty in accurately determining whether a worker is a long-term local resident or is counted against the target only because they moved to the area to work on the Olympic Park.[40] The Delivery Authority is also unable accurately to determine whether local residents in the workforce were previously unemployed.[41]

23. The Olympic Delivery Authority has secured from its contractors a commitment that 3% of the workforce will be apprentices, which appears an excellent idea in principle. However, given the scale of the London 2012 construction programme and the desire to leave a lasting legacy the target does not seem very ambitious. Nor was the target included in the initial contracts for the site preparation works.[42] The Delivery Authority has also reported that since 2008 some 2,400 workers have attended training courses at the National Skills Academy for Construction.[43] During the next phase of the Delivery Authority's construction programme there will be a need for large numbers of skilled trades people such as electricians and plumbers, and therefore an opportunity to increase the numbers of apprentices working on site.[44]

24. The Olympic Delivery Authority's spending power is being used to promote good practice in the construction industry, but it is less clear how the lessons are being shared more widely with other public organisations. The Department told us that the Office of Government Commerce is one way the Government tries to ensure lessons are learned from projects. The Office of Government Commerce has reviewed the Delivery Authority's major procurements and will be reviewing aspects of the wider London 2012 programme.[45]


27   HC (2007-08) 890; C&AG's Report, para 3.9 Back

28   Q 7 Back

29   C&AG's Report, paras 3.9 and 3.10  Back

30   Qq 7, 50 and 59 Back

31   Qq 58-59 and 112;, HC (2007-08) 890; C&AG's Report, para 5 Back

32   Qq 11-12 and 31; C&AG's Report, Figure 2 Back

33   Qq 32 and 48-49 Back

34   Qq 34 and 99-103 Back

35   Department for Culture, Media and Sport, London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games Annual Report, February 2010 Back

36   Qq 31 and 112-113; London 2012 Candidate File Back

37   Qq 5, 7-8, 38 and 54-55; C&AG's Report, paras 1.2 and 4.13 Back

38   Qq 5-7; C&AG's Report, paras 2.7 and 4.10-4.12 Back

39   Q 65; www.london2012.com Back

40   Qq 65-67 Back

41   Qq 71 and 72 Back

42   Qq 78-79 and 84 Back

43   Qq 88 and 89 Back

44   Q 81 Back

45   Q 109 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 31 March 2010