Scrutiny of value for money at the BBC - Public Accounts Committee Contents


5  Improving the BBC's accountability to Parliament

32. The current arrangements for the Comptroller and Auditor General to examine value for money at the BBC arise from a 2006 agreement between the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport and the BBC, which replaced a similar agreement made in 2003. Under the agreement the BBC Trust can ask the Comptroller and Auditor General and others to conduct value for money reviews, but it has the final say as to which subjects are examined and by whom. The BBC Trust also decides what information is made available. The reports go to the BBC Trust and are subsequently laid before Parliament by the Secretary of State.[39]

33. Table 1 summarises the differences between the Comptroller and Auditor General's statutory powers to carry out value for money work in other organisations and the arrangements for his work at the BBC, where he has no powers. Table 1: Statutory value for money audit compared to the arrangements for the Comptroller and Auditor General's work at the BBC
THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL'S STATUTORY AUDIT AGREEMENT-BASED WORK AT THE BBC PRACTICAL CONSEQUENCE OF THE DIFFERENCE
The Comptroller and Auditor General has full discretion to decide the subjects for value for money examinations The BBC Trust has the final say as to which subjects are examined, and which subjects are offered to the Comptroller and Auditor General. The Comptroller and Auditor General is not in a position to insist on examining and reporting on those activities where he considers value for money is most at risk.
The Comptroller and Auditor General has the right of access to the information he considers necessary to complete his work. The Comptroller and Auditor General has no right of access to BBC information. The BBC Trust decides what he can see. The Comptroller and Auditor General is reliant on the BBC's willingness to share information, and is not as well informed as he would be if he audited the BBC's accounts.

The Comptroller and Auditor General's value for money work for the BBC Trust is limited by barriers to access such as the Data Protection Act and confidentiality clauses in contracts with, for example, presenters and contractors.

The Comptroller and Auditor General determines the timing and content of what he publishes. The Comptroller and Auditor General's work is commissioned by the BBC Trust and published by the Trust, in conjunction with the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, which lays the reports before Parliament. The Comptroller and Auditor General does not have the final word on the content of his reports and when they are published.

34. We have noted a number of practical ways in which the absence of statutory powers for the Comptroller and Auditor General's value for money work of the BBC has hampered both his access to information and his ability to report his findings.

  • In his review of the BBC's management of its coverage of major sporting and music events, the Comptroller and Auditor General was not in a position to judge for himself whether the BBC's arguments against disclosing the total costs of talent for individual events would have constituted a breach of the Data Protection Act, as he had no right of access to the primary data. As a matter of prudence, in the light of representations by the BBC Trust who were responsible for publishing his report, he published combined figures for staff and talent costs, with the result that even aggregated talent costs for individual events were not published.[40]
  • The Comptroller and Auditor General was not able to develop a complete understanding of the costs of making radio programmes as he did not have a right of access to the breakdown of programme costs, including those for talent. He was not prepared to sign the agreement offered to him by the BBC to give him access because of the constraints it would have placed on his discretion to report his findings.[41]
  • Confidentiality clauses in the contracts between the BBC and some presenters have prevented the Comptroller and Auditor General's full access to the information he considered necessary to complete his audits of the efficiency of the BBC's radio production and of its coverage of major sporting and music events. By entering into confidentiality agreements with some presenters the BBC is putting public money beyond the scrutiny of the Comptroller and Auditor General and Parliament.[42]

35. If the Comptroller and Auditor General had been able to act under his statutory powers of audit in the above instances he would have been able to use his professional judgement to balance the public interest in disclosure against the impact such disclosure might have.

36. The BBC has also been less than transparent in the information it has offered to this Committee on several occasions.

  • In our hearing on The BBC's management of risk we identified talent costs as area of the BBC's expenditure in which we were interested.[43] The BBC Trust chose to commission an examination of this subject from a private sector consultant. The BBC Trust decides what is published, and in this instance published a report with many figures redacted. This redacted report is what the BBC offered us in response to our interest in talent costs. Box 1 makes clear the inadequacy of this document, offered to this Committee, as a basis for public accountability.[44]

Box 1: Extract from Oliver & Ohlbaum report On-screen and on-air talent to the BBC Trust, May 2008

  • At our hearing on the BBC's management of its coverage of major events in February 2010, we asked the BBC to provide a breakdown of the aggregate figures for staff and talent costs for each of the six events in the report. The BBC Trust refused to provide this information, which it had already shared with the Comptroller and Auditor General, unless this Committee confirmed in writing it would not disclose those costs.
  • At the same hearing on major events, we asked the BBC for a breakdown of the market for outside broadcast providers. In its subsequent note the BBC Executive simply refused to provide the specific value of individual contractual elements or the bids of individual parties, citing commercial confidentiality.

37. This Committee represents Parliament in examining how public money is spent. On issues from national security to commercial contracts of great sensitivity we have examined contracts and sensitive material. It beggars belief that the BBC Trust refuses to provide, or attaches strings to, information required by the Committee to examine the BBC's use of public money.

38. In October 2009 the Government agreed that the National Audit Office's access to the BBC should be unrestricted, but left the BBC to discuss with the National Audit Office how this could be achieved.[45] This is unsatisfactory in that the Government is willing the end without providing the necessary means to that end. Neither the National Audit Office nor the BBC can legislate to give the Comptroller and Auditor General the statutory right to audit the BBC that this Committee has been demanding, so the Government cannot be neutral in that discussion.

39. The BBC Trust has since committed to using its best endeavours to provide the Comptroller and Auditor General with improved access to the BBC's information and agreed with the Comptroller and Auditor General arrangements improving access. This is helpful but it falls short of, and is by no means a substitute for, the full statutory access rights the Committee of Public Accounts is seeking. The fact remains that the BBC retains discretion over the information the Comptroller Auditor General has access to and publishes.

40. In October 2009, the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport told the Committee of Culture, Media and Sport that if the National Audit Office and the BBC were unable to arrive at satisfactory access arrangements, the next charter review, in 2016, would be the time to address the issue.[46] Putting proper accountability to Parliament on hold for six years, is unacceptable.

41. As a matter of principle, the BBC's use of public money should be subject to the same statutory audit of its financial statements and value for money scrutiny by the Comptroller and Auditor General as is the case for other publicly funded organisations. The BBC has not accepted this, arguing that Parliament has set up the BBC Trust with an explicit duty to scrutinise the BBC's expenditure, which it has done in part by commissioning reports from the Comptroller and Auditor General and others and by appointing private sector accountancy firms as the BBC's external auditors. The BBC has offered no convincing argument as to why the Comptroller and Auditor General could not be the external auditor of the BBC.

42. In November 2009, the Chairman of this Committee wrote to the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport setting out why access which is at the BBC's discretion rather than through statutory right, cannot deliver satisfactory accountability for the use of billions of pounds of public money the BBC receives and then spends each year. He did not reply.

43. At our hearing on the BBC's management of three estates renewal projects in March 2010 the Treasury confirmed that there is a very powerful case for the public audit of public resources to make sure that the public and Parliament can be assured that resources are being used as Parliament intended. The Treasury also confirmed that extending the scope of public audit to this end was the clear direction of travel. The BBC Trust's rearguard offer to allow the Comptroller and Auditor General to tender for the audit of the BBC misses the point. Public audit of public money should be a right, not a possible outcome of commercial considerations.[47]





39   Broadcasting: An Agreement between the BBC and the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, July 2006 (Cm 6872) Back

40   C&AG's Report, The BBC's management of its coverage of major sporting and music events, December 2009, para 46; Q 11 Back

41   Committee of Public Accounts, Twenty­fifth Report of Session 2008­09, The efficiency of radio production at the BBC, HC 285, para 2 and 13  Back

42   Committee of Public Accounts Twenty­fifth Report, para 16 Back

43   Committee of Public Accounts, Sixty­sixth Report of Session 2006­07, The BBC's management of risk, HC 643 Back

44   Committee of Public Accounts, Twenty­fifth Report of Session 2008­09, The efficiency of radio production at the BBC, HC 285, Q 38; BBC Trust Report, On-screen and On-air Talent including an independent assessment and report, Oliver and Ohlbaum and Associates, May 2008 Back

45   Treasury Minutes on the Twenty Fourth to the Thirtieth, the Thirty Second to the Thirty Ninth, the Forty Fifth, and the Forty Seventh to the Forty Eighth Reports from the Committee of Public Accounts Session 2008-09, paras 4 and 6  Back

46   Oral evidence given on 20 October 2009 by Rt. Hon. Ben Bradshaw MP, Secretary of State Back

47   Q 152 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 7 April 2010