A second progress update on the administration of the Single Payment Scheme by the Rural Payments Agency - Public Accounts Committee Contents


Examination of Witnesses (Question Numbers 160-161)

DEPARTMENT FOR ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS AND RURAL PAYMENTS AGENCY

  Q160 Chairman: Dame Helen, a last question for you. We obviously cannot wait for the outcome of another review; tell us how you are going to sort out this mess for the next three months.

  Dame Helen Ghosh: As I half said earlier, we have Deloitte working in particular on the overpayment issue but also other elements of financial management, including FRS23. We will take action as we go along. In particular in relation to the three-month review, we will come back to the Committee with the outcome of that review in the three months that we promised and with an action plan for how we are going to recover, or adjust as appropriate, the conclusions that we reach.

  Q161 Chairman: A last question for you, Mr Cooper. Normally I deprecate parliamentary committees criticising named civil servants, but this is clearly a very serious situation. Do you wish to say anything in your defence before the Committee publishes its Report?

  Mr Cooper: As I have already said, we have made a lot of progress since 2005-06. I am comfortable with that progress which has been made. Where we have not given sufficient attention is to overpayments.

  Chairman: Thank you. To sum up, the Rural Payments Agency's administration of the Single Payment Scheme for paying EU grants to farmers has been a master-class of misadministration. The £304 million additional staff costs, £280 million set aside to pay the European Commission and £38 million overpayments—a massive £622 million in total—are unlikely to be recovered and all fall to the taxpayer to pay. And we have still ended up with a clunky patched together IT system. Initially farmers, many of whom rely on the payments, were paid the wrong amounts late; the Agency then had to claw back the millions of pounds which had been overpaid. Because of its shoddy bookkeeping, it does not actually know the extent of these overpayments which could be somewhere between £55 million and £90 million. Thank you very much.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 16 December 2009