Work of the Charity Commission in 2008-09 - Public Administration Committee Contents


Memorandum from the Charity Commission

  We are looking forward to appearing before PASC on 10 December; as you know, we feel that Parliamentary scrutiny is of vital importance to us as an independent regulator.

  You will have received our annual report which was published in July. Because this was some time ago, and in order to maximise the effectiveness of the session in December, we thought it would be useful to submit an update on major areas of activity which have taken place in the meantime.

CHARITIES ACT 2006

  We have continued to implement a number of provisions of the Charities Act, including the registration of exempt and excepted charities.

Excepted Charities

  An estimated 2,400 excepted charities were due to register as a result of the Charities Act 2006. These are charities connected with churches and chapels belonging to various Christian denominations; charitable service funds of the armed forces; and scout and guide groups. Initially only those with an income above £100,000 are being required to register. To date 1,034 excepted charities have been registered; 897 are being processed by the registration team; and 478 have indicated their intention to apply and are submitting final documentation. We anticipate that the majority of previously excepted charities will be registered by the end of this month.

Exempt Charities

  The first tranche of exempt charities to be registered will include the colleges of Oxford, Cambridge and Durham, the schools of Eton and Winchester, universities in Wales (higher education corporations) and student unions in England and Wales. Approximately 400 charities fall within this category. Registration of this group of charities was to begin from 30 November. However, there has been a delay in laying the Statutory Instruments which are needed to enable this. We hope that there will not be a significant delay to the proposed registration timetable. A second tranche of exempt charities, likely to be able to register from next summer, includes further education corporations, charitable industrial and provident societies, and the governing bodies of voluntary aided schools. This is a larger group of registration, with about 4,000 Industrial and Provident Societies alone. Some issues around potential principal regulators and changes to accounting and reporting provisions require resolution before the Commencement Order is drafted and in force.

  The Children, Schools and Families Bill which has recently been published contains a provision for academy schools, which are currently subject to registration by the Commission, to be automatically designated as exempt charities, with the Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) as their principal regulator. We are asking DCSF for further information about the background to this proposal, as it appears to indicate a reversal of the approach taken by 2006 Charities Act, which was to address the anomalies and reduce the public confusion about the position of exempt charities.

  On public benefit, you will be aware that we published the conclusions of our initial assessments of 12 charities in July. The four charities which we assessed as not currently meeting the requirement have all confirmed to us that they will draw up plans to address this. You will recall that under the Act, we have statutory objectives to raise awareness and understanding of the operation of the public benefit requirement. We are currently completing research among charity trustees to provide a snapshot of levels of awareness, understanding and attitudes towards the public benefit requirement amongst charity trustees. We will be able to use this research as a benchmark for the future, and as a valuable tool for informing our work as we continue to support and communicate with charities in meeting the public benefit requirement. We anticipate publishing a report of this research, along with our initial response to the findings, in advance of the hearing on 10 December and will send copies to you and the Committee as soon as it is available. By the time we see you, we also expect to have announced the small group of charities which will take part in the next round of public benefit assessments.

CHARITIES AND THE ECONOMIC DOWNTURN

  In September we published Charities and the Economic Downturn, drawing on the results of our third survey asking charities how they were being affected. The survey found that despite a slight increase in the number of charities being affected by the recession (56%, compared with 52% at the beginning of the year), over two thirds (71%) of the charities surveyed said that they felt optimistic about the outlook for the next six months. We have enclosed a copy of this research. The survey found that just 9% of charities had considered merging, collaborating or forming a consortium with another charity. We very much want to encourage charities to work together in order to maximise the impact for beneficiaries. We therefore published two new toolkits, Choosing to Collaborate and Making Mergers Work. The toolkits provide charities with a clear framework within which to decide whether collaborative working or merging would help them and their beneficiaries, with practical tips and case studies. Earlier in the year we also published Big Board Talk: the conversation all charities need to have, which asks 15 questions to help trustee boards look at both the options and opportunities available to them in the current circumstances.

COMPLIANCE WORK

  Of course, ensuring effective compliance is at the core of our regulatory role. Making sure that charities operate within the law and meet their statutory requirements is a vital part of maintaining and building public trust and confidence in the sector.

Back on Track

  We recently published Back on Track, which complements our annual report but focuses on the most serious abuse cases with which we deal, highlighting the key themes and wider issues for charities arising from the Commission's compliance work. This report, our second, covers the period from April 2008 to March 2009. Using case studies, we aim to improve trustees' awareness of how to avoid similar situations in their charities, and highlight what they need to do to ensure they fulfil their legal duties in exercising control and management in the administration of charities. Key issues highlighted by the report include:

    — serious financial mismanagement;

    — serious harm to beneficiaries, in particular vulnerable beneficiaries; and

    — threats to national security, specifically terrorism.

  The impact of the work detailed in the report directly protected over £47 million of charitable assets at risk. We also produce reports on statutory inquiries, and non-statutory investigations where we feel there is a public interest, and examples of these are on our website here:

  http://www.charitycommission.gov.uk/investigations/inquiryreports/inqreps.asp7

Handling serious complaints about charities

  We have modernised and refocused our investigatory compliance work and now deal with it in a very different way. We use a thorough assessment process to identify cases which can be dealt with quickly and effectively through the provision of advice and guidance. We also have a monitoring function, which deals with cases where the evidence is not sufficient to launch an investigation, but the concerns are serious enough to prevent us from disengaging completely. This more sophisticated and effective approach means we can target our resources where they are most needed. As a result the majority of our investigations are now non-statutory investigations (regulatory compliance cases, which make up 89% of all new investigations opened in 2008-09). It is important to note that often concerns are raised with us by other regulators and law enforcement agencies, particularly where their remit is relevant to charities. We also often share information or refer cases to these bodies, and have developed an extensive network of collaborative arrangements with them.

New Key Performance Indicator

  Following on from the changes in our approach to compliance cases, we now have a new Key Performance Indicator (KPI) in this area, which better reflects the broader range of our compliance activity. It focuses on effectiveness and quality outcomes, as well as the timeliness of investigations (excluding statutory inquiries, where we do not believe a target based on time taken is appropriate).

  The new KPI is in line with a recognised standard used across the regulatory industry, draws on the principles of the National Intelligence Model, and has been agreed with HM Treasury. It remains stretching. The new KPI focuses on three core areas of the Commission's compliance work (each with two measures):

    — detection;

    — investigation, sanction and redress; and

    — prevention and deterrence.

  A copy of the full wording of the new KPI is enclosed.

INDEPENDENCE OF NHS CHARITIES

  The Commission has recently expressed some concerns that new international financial reporting standards may be interpreted by government auditors as requiring consolidation of NHS charities' accounts with those of NHS trusts. This could undermine the perception of those charities' independence from the state, and ability to fundraise. As we have discussed with the Committee before, independence is at the heart of what it means to be a charity and one of our key roles as a regulator is to uphold this. We have enclosed a short Parliamentary briefing explaining the position and the steps we have taken to protect the independence of this type of charity. We have raised our concerns with the NHS Financial Controller and with HM Treasury. Discussions are ongoing and as at the time of writing our concerns remain.

ONLINE SERVICES

  As the Committee is aware, the Commission is already facing a year-on-year funding reduction of 5% as a result of the Spending Review settlement 2008-09 to 2010-11. Like all departments, we expect further reductions in the next spending round. Over the last few years, facing the reality of funding reductions, we have worked hard to ensure that we continue to provide an excellent standard of regulation, maintaining public trust and confidence in charities, whilst making financial savings year on year. We are concerned that further reductions in our resources will now begin to affect core regulatory functions and services, and are anxious that these consequences are fully understood before funding decisions are made. However, we are looking at innovative ways to deliver more for less, by improving our performance whilst reducing costs. Our website has been a key tool: in 2008-09 we had over 30 million page views of the site, of which 25% were made up of members of the public looking for information about charities. Building on this success, we intend to launch a new website in January, which will have an improved and streamlined structure, making it easier for web users to find the key information they're looking for. The site will also have a refreshed and redesigned home page which takes users straight to the most important information and most popular tools. Among the most popular functions is the online Register of Charities, which was relaunched last year; it will have further new features including an improved search and tools making it easier to compare charities and understand sector trends.

  One particular success story in this area has been the high take-up by charities themselves of our online services, such as registering online and submitting annual reports and accounts via our website, and the new design will make it even easier for them to do this. This will give us the basis for developing more online services and user-specific content for different types of charities, for specialist users like charity lawyers or accountants, and for members of the public. By the time of the hearing we should be at the stage of carrying out usability testing, so should be able to share more details of new features with the Committee.

  With an election approaching, it is clear that all political parties are envisaging a key role for the charitable sector. We are very much looking forward to continuing to provide the strong and effective independent regulation which will enable charities to succeed.

November 2009

APPENDIX

NEW KPI 4

  Detection:

    — complete 90% of compliance assessments correctly in 30 working days; and

    — carry out a minimum of 20 compliance visits annually to charities which are subject to monitoring, correctly identified for a visit following an appropriate risk assessment.

  Investigation, Sanction and Redress:

    — complete all regulatory compliance cases within an average of six months;

    — ensure 90% of all investigations result in at least one of the specified beneficial impacts which protect charities from mismanagement, misconduct or abuse, namely:

    —  the value of charity assets protected and/or recovered;

    —  vulnerable beneficiaries protected;

    —  reputation protected (for the charity and/or the charity sector);

    —  disputes resolved;

    —  charity governance restored to a proper standard;

    —  conflicts of interest resolved; and

    —  fundraising concerns resolved.

  Prevention and Deterrence:

    — publish 90% of statutory inquiry reports within three months of completing the proactive investigation process; and

    — publish an annual report on the Themes and Lessons from the Charity Commission's Compliance Work (Charities Back on Track), showing the durations of each statutory inquiry, their impact, the use of sanctions (including legal powers of remedy and protection), and the operation of our compliance work.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 18 January 2010