The Government's review of the principles applying to the treatment of independent scientific advice provided to government - Science and Technology Committee Contents

Letter from The Rt Hon Lord Drayson, Minister for Science and Technology and Professor John Beddington, Government Chief Scientific Adviser, to the Chairman of the Committee, 24 March 2010

  Scientific advice is valued by the Government in every area. For this reason, and to ensure Government receives the best possible advice, it is vital to promote an effective relationship between Ministers and the independent experts that advise them. With that in mind, in November 2009, the Government committed to publish a set of Principles for engagement between Government and its Independent Scientific Advisers. These were published for consultation before Christmas and this consultation closed on 9 February 2010.

  We believe the finalised Principles, enclosed, appropriately reflect the responses, received from the scientific community and colleagues from across Government. We hope you will agree that they set out a solid framework for future engagement between Government and its Independent Scientific Advisers.

  We would like to take this opportunity to thank the Committee for its input throughout the process of drafting these principles.

Lord Drayson

Minister for Science and Innovation

Professor John Beddington

Government Chief Scientific Adviser

March 2010



  The Principles of Scientific Advice set out the rules of engagement between Government and those who provide independent scientific and engineering advice. They provide a foundation on which independent scientific advisers and government departments should base their operations and interactions.

The Principles apply to Ministers and Government departments, all members of Scientific Advisory Committees and Councils (the membership of which often includes statisticians, social researchers and lay members) and other independent scientific and engineering advice to Government. They do not apply to employed advisers, departmental Chief Scientific Advisers or other civil servants who provide scientific or analytical advice, as other codes of professional conduct apply.


    — Government should respect and value the academic freedom, professional status and expertise of its independent scientific advisers.

    — Scientific advisers should respect the democratic mandate of the Government to take decisions based on a wide range of factors and recognise that science is only part of the evidence that Government must consider in developing policy.

    — Government and its scientific advisers should not act to undermine mutual trust.

    — Chairs of Scientific Advisory Committees and Councils have a particular responsibility to maintain open lines of communication with their sponsor department and its Ministers.


    — Scientific advisers should be free from political interference with their work.

    — Scientific advisers are free to publish and present their research.

    — Scientific advisers are free to communicate publicly their advice to Government, subject to normal confidentiality restrictions, including when it appears to be inconsistent with Government policy.

     — Scientific advisers have the right to engage with the media and public independently of the Government and should seek independent media advice on substantive pieces of work.

    — Scientific advisers should make clear in what capacity they are communicating.


    — Scientific advice to Government should be made publicly available unless there are over-riding reasons, such as national security or the facilitation of a crime, for not doing so.

    — Any requirement for independent advisers to sign non-disclosure agreements, for example for reasons of national security, should be publicly acknowledged and regularly reviewed.

    — The timing of the publication of independent scientific advice is a matter for the advisory body but should be discussed with the Government beforehand.

    — Government should not prejudge the advice of independent advisers, nor should it criticise advice or reject it before its publication.

    — The timing of the Government's response to scientific advice should demonstrably allow for proper consideration of that advice.

    — Government should publicly explain the reasons for policy decisions, particularly when the decision is not consistent with scientific advice and in doing so, should accurately represent the evidence.

    — If Government is minded not to accept the advice of a Scientific Advisory Committee or Council the relevant minister should normally meet with the Chair to discuss the issue before a final decision is made, particularly on matters of significant public interest.


  Scientific Advisory Committees, Councils and government departments should consider the extent to which the Principles in this document are reflected in their operation and to make changes as necessary. Issues relating to the function and working of scientific advisory bodies that are not reflected in these high-level Principles are discussed in more detailed guidance such as the Code of Practice for Scientific Advisory Committees or the Guidelines on scientific analysis in policy-making.

  Government departments and their independent scientific advisers should raise issues of concern over the application of the Principles, or other guidance, with the relevant departmental Chief Scientific Adviser (CSA). If the matter of concern cannot be effectively resolved or is especially serious CSAs should approach the Government Chief Scientific Adviser (GCSA) and Ministers should approach the GCSA and the Minister for Science. The matter will be examined against a clear set of criteria, which include a breach of the Principles or CoPSAC.

previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 15 April 2010