Memorandum submitted by Ronald K Bolton
(CRU 25)
SUMMARY
1. I discuss the CRU's apparent faking of
scientific reports for the UN, as disclosed by leaked documents.
This incident, called "Climategate", has generated massive
shockwaves around the world for one reason only: that it is yet
another indication of the colossal fraud behind global warming.
2. It is now beyond reasonable doubt that
the only people supporting AGW are those who have a financial
or career interest in supporting it or who are not aware of the
real evidence.
3. The CRU's actions can only be understood
by realizing that AGW is a fraud. I explain AGW and that scientific
evidence to support AGW is non-existent or faked, and the reasons
this fraud is perpetrated.
4. I comment on the questions the committee
raise, and I make recommendations.
INTRODUCTION
5. I am a retired Public Health Inspector/Environmental
Health Officer. In addition to the scientific training for that,
I also studied public and social administration for an MA, and
business for an MBA. For the last dozen years, I have been researching
topics including anthropogenic global warming (AGW). I have no
conflicting interests in this matter.
6. The committee is investigating activities
at the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) rather than global warming
per se. And this memorandum deals with the matters the committee
is investigating about the CRU. However, it is imperative that
the committee understand the truth about global warming.
7. Apparently people in the CRU faked scientific
data about global warming, because they would be rewarded with
further funding.
8. If the committee confirm this, it may
consider why people at the CRU thought the IPCC wanted faked evidence
of global warming.
9. If there really is evidence for AGW,
why would the IPCC pay scientists to fake research?
10. Surely they would not want to mix real
evidence of AGW with faked evidence? I am sure they want faked
evidence because there is no real evidence.
11. It is lucky the emails and other documents
have been made public. "Climategate", as it is called
around the world, is the most important of a number of revelations
that have caused many people to disbelieve AGW.
THE FACTS
MANMADE GLOBAL
WARMING
12. Certain radiation from the sun strikes
the earth and bounces back, but some is trapped by "greenhouse
gases" and stays in the atmosphere as heat. This is natural
and essential to life on earth.
13. Proponents of the AGW hypothesis claim
that man's activities cause such an increase in these gases, principally
carbon dioxide (CO2), that the earth warms more than it should.
14. They paint pictures of land being flooded
or turned into desert, icebergs melting and polar bears swimming.
15. But these pictures are designed to scare,
and are entirely false. At the level of Al Gore and above, it
is not a mistake. People like Al Gore know their assertions are
lies. For example, a person accepts scientific consensus. So Al
Gore has for years been saying that all scientists except a handful
of deniers accept that global warming is real, that there is a
consensus, that the science is settled. Look up on Google "30,000 scientists".
You will see that in the US, more than 31,000 American scientists,
including more than 9,000 PhD's, signed a petition to the
US government protesting that, paraphrased, global warming is
a con that will have devastating effects.
16. The fact that Al Gore would patently
lie about scientific consensus suggests that he would lie about
the scientific facts themselves. And this is provably the case.
The facts disprove his claims. So people—as in the CRU—feed
data into computers and tweak it until their computer projections
"prove" AGW is real. They can make the data look like
a corrugated roof or a hockey stick. They could as easily prove
the earth is flat.
17. Warming hoaxers try to confuse policy-makers
with complexities, forcing them to rely on their experts. But
there are simple ways to show them up.
18. Why would Al Gore continually lie that
virtually all scientists support AGW?
19. Why can scientists who question AGW
not get funding for research, on the basis the science is settled,
but those supporting AGW can?
20. "He (Gore) had picked over the
literature for almost every extreme projection he could find,
then exaggerated them still further." (Booker and North).
Why?
21. The film "The Great Global Warming
Swindle", shown once on Channel 4, gives a good introduction
to this subject. There are many videos and books on this theme.
Just a few points:
22. Factors influencing the weather are
infinitely complex, which is why weather forecasts are often wrong.
But several unconventional weather forecasters study sunspot activity
and their forecasts are more accurate than those of official meteorologists.
23. The earth warms and cools naturally,
and the major factor is the Sun. When sunspot activity is high,
the earth warms. When sunspot activity is low, the earth cools.
24. Greenhouse gases account for a small
proportion of the atmosphere, but are essential to life on earth.
The main greenhouse gas is water vapour, which accounts for 95%
of the greenhouse gases. As natural and manmade greenhouse gases
of concern total just 5%, they have little effect. Man's activities
produce CO2, but more is produced by volcanoes, more still by
animals and bacteria, yet a greater amount by dying vegetation,
and the greatest amount is from the oceans.
25. CO2 is essential to life on earth,
as are oxygen and water. There is a cycle where people take in
the oxygen they need, and breathe out CO2, and plants and trees
take in the CO2 they need, and breathe out oxygen.
26. For much of the earth's history, it
was warmer than today. In the Mediaeval Warm Period, around 1000 AD,
people grew vines in London. There are today streets called Vine
Street, but (sadly) no vines. Much more recently there was the
Little Ice Age, where people skated and held ice fairs on the
Thames.
27. Al Gore's film, An Inconvenient Truth,
contains two lines on a graph, covering 650,000 years. One
line represents temperature, and the other represents CO2. The
lines are a close match. Al Gore asks: "Do they ever fit
together?" These lines are accurate, but presented to mean
the opposite of what they actually mean.
28. Al Gore says raised CO2 levels
cause warming. In fact, increased temperatures cause increased
CO2 levels. But there is a time lag of roughly 800 years.
When the sun heats the surface of the oceans, CO2 is given
out from the oceans, but very slowly. When sunspot activity is
low, the surface of the oceans cools, and CO2 in the atmosphere
is absorbed into the oceans, again very slowly.
29. So nearly all CO2 on earth is in
the oceans and the atmosphere, and CO2 either moves from
the oceans to the atmosphere, or vice versa. Which direction depends
essentially on whether the earth is warming or cooling.
30. Talking about changes in CO2 can
mislead. Really, the amount of CO2 is constant, but the CO2 constantly
moves from ocean to atmosphere and then back.
31. As Global Warmers shivered in the recent
cold, many pointed to the term Climate Change, designed to fool
people that any change in the weather proves the Climate Change
people right. But their hypothesis postulates the world getting
warmer, not colder.
32. In conclusion, all the evidence, looked
at reasonably, does not at all support the idea that man-made
greenhouse gases are likely to cause anything harmful to man.
All the evidence is that they will cause very little effect, and
that any effects are likely to be beneficial.
THE REAL
REASON THE
GLOBAL WARMING
HOAX IS
BEING FORCED
ON THE
WORLD
33. Al Gore and the UN's IPCC (Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change) are pushing this hoax. Because of that,
billions have flowed into this area. Al Gore's companies are likely
to make billions from carbon swaps. Others are frantically getting
involved to make their fortune. Researchers—as in the CRU—get
funding, but only if the research supports the myth. So there
is much money in Global Warming.
34. But at a higher level, the motive is
not mainly money. The real aim of the global warming con is to
create a totalitarian world government that will reduce the world
population by 90% and treat the remainder as slaves. To people
who get their news from the (controlled) mainstream media, this
will sound crazy. But global warming is just one of a number of
areas where what we are told is very different to the reality.
People who act for the public good, seek the truth, tell the truth,
and challenge the lies, are far more numerous than we are told,
because the controlled media present them as being a tiny number
of crazy flat-earthers.
35. Why the global warming hoax? To justify
frequent inspections of people's homes to "reduce CO2 generation".
The state will regulate and monitor everyone's CO2 emissions:
how many plants people can grow, (fallen leaves emit CO2); how
many children and pets and cows they can have; how far people
can travel in vehicles; and masses of other rules. These will
be gradually tightened, reducing quality of life, living space,
etc etc, with people financially and otherwise wiped out. The
planned punitive taxes will not go to "help the third world".
This money will go to the people like Al Gore, and those who control
them. In the third world, preventing the use of electricity, with
other measures, will quickly reduce the population.
36. This memorandum barely covers the basics
of global warming. There is no room to cover other areas, but
the following is relevant. The Rockefellers took control of the
pharmaceutical industry at the start of the 20th century, and
of the American Medical Association shortly after. The Rockefellers
funded eugenics research that was later used by Hitler. After
World War 2, the Rockefellers set up the UN, on land the Rockefellers
donated. The Rockefellers are major funders of the UN and its
agencies, such as WHO. The Rockefellers continued funding eugenics,
now called population control. The UN has population control programs,
including vaccinations under GAVI. In 2005, WHO set up a system
where it would take charge of disease control and vaccination
in member states in the event of a "pandemic". Then
WHO changed the definition, so that if certain numbers of people
get a cold, WHO can march in. Last year, Jane Burgermeister, an
Irish/Austrian journalist, discovered plots involving a Rockefeller
drugs company, Baxters, and WHO. Vaccines had been contaminated
so they would cause disease. This would increase fear and vaccine
uptake. She filed criminal charges. She also set up a website
at theflucase.com, where she lists mainstream newspaper articles.
Her website deals largely with swine flu and vaccines. It informed
me about this committee investigation. And the Rockerfellers are
intimately involved in the global warming hoax.
37. I am sure the Rockerfellers are very
nice, and I agree that growth of population and of the use of
resources cannot continue indefinitely, but I disagree with their
plan to kill off or enslave the world population, in which plan
the false global warming threat will be a key factor.
38. Now the Rockerfellers, and the others
forming the tiny group known as Illuminati, or banksters, are
pursuing this goal of world domination and are immensely wealthy
and immensely powerful. But they can fail, because their control
is at the top. Take as an example the military. The Rockerfellers
etc might control a prime minister, who in turn controls the generals,
and all the way down to the newest recruits. Soldiers follow orders.
Blindly. But only so far. Soldiers are people with families. They
know right from wrong. And they see their job as protecting the
nation from aggressors. When they are ordered to shoot innocent
people, or forcibly vaccinate people with a poison or microchip,
many will refuse, so the control stops. And if any of the officers,
in the long chain of command, refuses to pass on an order because
it is wrong, it also fails. Near the top, generals could seize
power. This is, after all, how many coups d'etat occur.
39. So this tiny number of banksters are
working to take over the world, and global warming is a key factor
for them. But many people are becoming aware. This puts at risk
the banksters' scheme. Ultimately they will succeed or fail. It
depends on what six billion people do. If the large majority apathetically
do as they are told, give up their money, take the vaccine and
die, then the banksters win. If the people who could do something,
decline because they are afraid, or they wait till other people
do something first, then the banksters win. If people say they
do not want to get involved, then the banksters win. The question
is not whether people get involved. They are involved. The question
is whether they are going to do something about it.
40. But if a significant minority get involved,
if there are people's representatives like Ron Paul, we stand
a chance. (He is the most respected US politician, with a massive
Internet following). If people, in whatever field or profession,
and at whatever level, do their best to defeat these banksters,
we stand a chance. In the second world war, people volunteered:
to fight, to make weapons, anything to help. That attitude won
then. We are in a war now. "What did you do, Daddy?"
THE POLITICIZATION
OF SCIENCE
41. Science has changed enormously over
the last few decades. In terms of technology, we are light years
more advanced today. We have vast computing power, and we can
see inside atoms.
42. But in terms of real discovery, and
integrity, we are much worse. The reason is simple.
43. 50 years ago, a scientist had a
back room, where he made his own equipment. He had ideas. He was
free to do as he liked. And he invented things.
44. Today, scientists are employees. Employed
only by drug or other companies, by government, or in academe.
They depend on funding, and have to conform. A scientist working
for a drug company making billions from selling Drug X, who said
the drug did not work and was dangerous, would not be employed
long. A climate academic who said global warming is a con, would
be pressured. Money to change his mind? Ostracized? Pressure on
the university?: "We will stop funding you if your scientists
continue with crazy ideas that are costing many lives." So
they choose between integrity and money.
Now to the specific questions the committee want
addressed
What are the implications of the disclosures for
the integrity of scientific research?
45. It seems likely that if the people in
the CRU deliberately falsified the scientific evidence they supplied
to the UN and others, they did so for mainly financial reasons.
46. Clearly, it is not in the public interest
for government policy to be dictated by would-be dictators who
use taxpayers' money to bribe scientists willing to prostitute
themselves. The people, and government, should be able to rely
on people telling the truth and acting within the law. Our body
of law should be based on sound science.
47. If the government want to achieve this,
they should use the law. If a man kills someone to get money,
he is charged with murder. Surely a scientist who tells lies to
get money, and whose actions are likely to result in many deaths,
is not less culpable.
Are the terms of reference and scope of the Independent
Review announced on 3 December 2009 by UEA adequate
(see below)?
48. The terms of reference chosen by UEA
are not bad. More important is how the investigator sees his job.
Is it to hide as much as possible? Or about full disclosure? He
can use the same words to very different effect.
49. The world is aware of Climategate at
UEA. Covering up the CRU's sins would harm the university's good
reputation. UEA should ensure that what happened is seen to be
properly investigated and all appropriate steps taken.
How independent are the other two international
data sets?
50. My words are limited, and I can not
add much here.
RECOMMENDATIONS
51. I suggest the committee's recommendations
should take account of points made above, together with the following:
52. Faking scientific results for the UN
to mislead the world should be treated as the serious crime I
believe it to be.
53. UEA should be persuaded that they should
take action to show that they will not tolerate corruption.
54. Government should recognize that an
increasing culture of corruption is bad for society in many ways.
55. Government should accordingly take action
to reduce corruption. It is probably self-defeating to lecture
people. People learn best by example. They learn that some people
can commit crimes and get away with them. Or they learn that crime
does not pay, even at the highest levels. Government is responsible
for influencing what people learn.
56. Government should recognize that the
real reason for this warming myth is as a way to introduce a world
totalitarian state and decimate and enslave the population, as
discussed above. This is a real possibility. So every member of
this committee should use every endeavour to prevent that happening.
A hero does what is right, not what is safe. The British Government
should take back power from Europe and the UN, consistently reduce
the vast streams of taxpayer money that end up in the banksters'
coffers, and end the private control of the Bank of England, which
enables the banksters to control the money supply and thus create
booms and busts at will.
February 2010
| 
