The management of the Crown Estate - Treasury Contents


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 220 - 226)

WEDNESDAY 3 MARCH 2010

MR ROGER BRIGHT, CB

  Q220  John Thurso: We had evidence from one of the Highland councillors, I think relating to Mallaig or somewhere, that the view is it is felt that the Crown Estate has, as it were, a ransom strip. In a situation like that when nobody has a clue how to value the seabed—it is almost impossible—how do you go about ensuring the public good of ensuring that a trust port is actually able to develop, balanced against your natural desire to accrue greater income?

  Mr Bright: There are two things really. The first one is—and you will know, Lord Thurso, there is quite often a lot of demand in the ports, particularly in Scotland, to buy a seabed from us rather than to rent it—as I think you know, we have a policy which is generally disposed against selling bits of seabed. It is not an absolutely inflexible policy but our predisposition is against, and the reason for that is bitter experience because in the past historically we had sold parcels of land in ports and harbours and we found that that stores up a problem for the future because somebody may come along 20, 30, 40 years later and want to construct a new development of some sort in the harbour and it can be extraordinarily messy if there is a patchwork quilt of ownership in the harbour. That is why we have generally followed policy of not now selling. That said, we grant long leases and generally speaking we will grant long leases of seabed in harbour situations up to 125 years, which we have never found has been an inhibition to development or the financing of development.

  Q221  John Thurso: When Dr Michael Foxley, the Leader of Highland Council, was here he made a very strong submission in favour of a socioeconomic fund to be created, and likened it to the Shetland Oil Fund for Orkney and, I guess, Caithness and the Mainland, and I know that you are currently discussing a Memorandum of Understanding with Highlands and Islands Council. But in press reports afterwards it talks of tens of millions being in this fund. Can I ask you, one: do you agree with the principle of a socioeconomic fund; and, two: are those sorts of numbers achievable?

  Mr Bright: I have no reason to disagree with a socioeconomic fund. I think it would be very difficult under the terms of our Act for us to put money straight into such a fund. I think it would almost certainly fall foul of the provisions in our Act. That said, I think that the main benefits that are likely to come out of offshore renewable energy, particularly in the Highlands and Islands, are likely to be economic activity in the communities, and we can certainly play a part there by working with the local authorities in terms of developing their strategies for taking advantage of the opportunities that arise. There are assets that we can, if you like, put into the mix that may be able to help the development of such strategies and plans, and certainly that is the focus of the Memorandum of Understanding that we actually initiated.

  Q222  John Thurso: Can I just be clear on this? If you put up an onshore wind farm at the moment part of your planning processes is community benefit, and typically for a 50 megawatt installation it will be a capital sum of £500,000 and an annual income of between £40,000 and £50,000 which will go to a community fund. Are you saying that the Crown Estate is prohibited from similar arrangements with communities that are hosting their activities?

  Mr Bright: I think it is fair to say that the Crown Estate Act would not allow us simply to make payments into a fund, but there are other ways in which we believe—

  Q223  John Thurso: Even if they were coming out of a portion of the rent that you are getting from people? Obviously, after it has been developed, not in the early stages.

  Mr Bright: Yes. But I would say that we do find other ways of working with communities and putting something back. You are probably aware that we have a marine stewardship fund where we channel funds into small local community schemes, pontoons and harbours—

  Q224  John Thurso: The worrying word there is "small". The Shetland Oil Fund has made the Shetlands a highly sustainable community and this is a vast resource; it could be in 20 years' time, 12, 13, 14 gigawatts, a quarter of Britain's installed capacity, and the poor blighters who live on the cliffs at either side just watch all the money going out. That is a bit of hard luck.

  Mr Bright: I understand that and no doubt the local authorities will have discussions with the developers as well; so I am sure that they will want to talk to us.

  Q225  John Thurso: You are talking about it coming from the developers direct rather than you having an involvement?

  Mr Bright: I think it would be difficult for us under our Act to put funds in directly.

  Q226  Chairman: We have the Minister waiting outside for our next session. You promised us a number of points in writing; we will need those within the next seven days of business and we may of course have other follow-up questions as well.

  Mr Bright: Of course.

  Chairman: In the meantime, thank you very much for your evidence today.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 30 March 2010