House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2010 - 11
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 3 February 2011                  

426

 

Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill, continued

 
 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

150

 

Schedule  8,  page  124,  line  38,  leave out ‘three quarters’ and insert ‘two thirds’.

 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

130

 

Schedule  8,  page  125,  line  1,  leave out paragraph 6.

 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

264

 

Schedule  8,  page  125,  line  10,  leave out ‘appear’ and insert ‘attend the meeting in

 

person’.

 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

265

 

Schedule  8,  page  125,  line  12,  leave out sub-paragraph (3).

 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

233

 

Schedule  8,  page  125,  line  22,  at end insert—

 

  ‘(2A)  

The appropriate authority must only appoint the candidate if the Secretary of

 

State approves the appointment.’.

 

Mike Crockart

 

Dr Julian Huppert

 

43

 

Schedule  8,  page  125,  leave out line 30.

 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

266

 

Schedule  8,  page  125,  line  30,  at end add—

 

‘(4)    

If the police and crime commissioner rejects the panel’s recommendation as to

 

whether or not the candidate should be appointed, the commissioner must give the

 

panel a response to any such recommendation, including the reasons for his

 

decision to reject the recommendation.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 3 February 2011                  

427

 

Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill, continued

 
 

(5)    

The police and crime commissioner must publish any response issued under

 

subsection (4).’.

 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

131

 

Schedule  8,  page  125,  line  33,  leave out ‘by paragraphs 3 to 8’ and insert

 

‘paragraphs 1 to 3’.

 

Mike Crockart

 

Dr Julian Huppert

 

44

 

Schedule  8,  page  125,  line  37,  at end insert—

 

  ‘(2A)  

The regulations may not make provision for the appointment of a candidate

 

whose appointment has been vetoed by the police and crime panel.’.

 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

132

 

Schedule  8,  page  125,  line  37,  at end insert—

 

    ‘(3)  

The regulations may confer functions on—

 

(a)    

police and crime panels,

 

(b)    

the Secretary of State, or

 

(c)    

any other persons.

 

      (4)  

That includes functions involving the exercise of discretion.’.

 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

133

 

Schedule  8,  page  125,  line  38,  leave out paragraph 10.

 

Mike Crockart

 

Dr Julian Huppert

 

45

 

Schedule  8,  page  126,  leave out lines 7 to 9.

 

Mike Crockart

 

Dr Julian Huppert

 

46

 

Schedule  8,  page  126,  line  17,  at end insert—

 

    ‘(1)  

The Police and Crime Commissioner must notify the relevant police and crime

 

panel of the proposed terms and conditions of appointment of a chief

 

constable.

 

      (2)  

The commissioner may not apply to an appointment any term or condition

 

vetoed by the panel.’.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 3 February 2011                  

428

 

Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill, continued

 
 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

134

 

Schedule  8,  page  126,  line  21,  leave out ‘commissioner’ and insert ‘panel’.

 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

269

 

Schedule  8,  page  126,  line  21,  leave out paragraph 11 and insert—

 

‘11(3)  

A police and crime panel must only suspend the relevant chief constable from

 

duty under section 38 when the following conditions “the suspension

 

conditions” are satisfied—

 

(a)    

an allegation comes to the attention of the police and crime panel

 

which indicates that the conduct of the chief constable may amount to

 

misconduct or gross misconduct;

 

(b)    

an investigation is ongoing; and

 

(c)    

it appears to the commissioner that either—

 

(i)    

the effective investigation of the case may be prejudiced

 

unless the chief constable concerned is so suspended; or

 

(ii)    

having regard to the nature of the allegation and any other

 

relevant considerations, the public interest requires that he

 

should be so suspended.

 

      (4)  

In determining whether the suspension conditions in sub-paragraph (1) are

 

satisfied, the police and crime panel must consult Her Majesty’s Inspector of

 

Constabulary.

 

11A(1)  

If the suspension conditions in accordance with paragraph 11 are satisfied, a

 

police and crime panel may suspend a relevant chief constable from duty under

 

section 38.

 

      (2)  

A chief constable’s suspension from duty under section 38 will have effect

 

from the date and time of notification.

 

      (3)  

Notification under sub-paragraph (1) shall be given either—

 

(a)    

in writing with a summary of the reasons; or

 

(b)    

orally, in which case the police and crime panel shall confirm the

 

suspension in writing with a summary of the reasons before the end of

 

three working days beginning with the first working day after the

 

suspension.

 

11B(1)  

A chief constable suspended under section 38 may make representations

 

against his suspension to the relevant police and crime panel—

 

(a)    

before the end of seven working days beginning with the first working

 

day after his being suspended;

 

(b)    

at any time during the suspension if he reasonably believes that

 

circumstances relevant to the suspension conditions have changed.

 

      (2)  

The police and crime panel shall review the suspension—

 

(a)    

on receipt of any representations under paragraph (1)(a);

 

(b)    

if there has been no previous review, before the end of four weeks

 

beginning with the first working day after the suspension;

 

(c)    

in any other case—

 

(i)    

on being notified that circumstances relevant to the

 

suspension conditions may have changed (whether by means


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 3 February 2011                  

429

 

Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill, continued

 
 

of representations made under paragraph (1)(b) or otherwise);

 

or

 

(ii)    

before the end of four weeks beginning with the day after the

 

previous review.

 

      (3)  

Where a review takes place under sub-paragraph (2), if the police and crime

 

panel reasonably believes—

 

(a)    

the suspension conditions continue to be satisfied, and

 

(b)    

suspension should continue,

 

            

it shall, and before the end of three working days beginning with the day after

 

the review, inform the chief constable, in writing, with a summary of the

 

reasons.

 

      (4)  

Where a review takes place under sub-paragraph (2), if the police and crime

 

panel reasonably believes that the conditions in either sub-sub-paragraph

 

(3)(a) or sub-sub-paragraph (3)(b) are no longer met, it must, and before the

 

end of the three working days beginning with the day after the review, inform

 

the chief constable, in writing, that his suspension has been lifted with a

 

summary of the reasons.’.

 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

270

 

Schedule  8,  page  126,  line  21,  leave out paragraph 11 and insert—

 

‘11(1)  

A police and crime commissioner must only suspend the relevant chief

 

constable from duty under section 38 when the following conditions “the

 

suspension conditions” are satisfied—

 

(a)    

an allegation comes to the attention of the police and crime

 

commissioner which indicates that the conduct of the chief constable

 

may amount to misconduct or gross misconduct;

 

(b)    

an investigation is ongoing; and

 

(c)    

it appears to the commissioner that either—

 

(i)    

the effective investigation of the case may be prejudiced

 

unless the chief constable concerned is so suspended; or

 

(ii)    

having regard to the nature of the allegation and any other

 

relevant considerations, the public interest requires that he

 

should be so suspended.

 

      (2)  

In determining whether the suspension conditions in sub-paragraph (1) are

 

satisfied, the police and crime commissioner must consult Her Majesty’s

 

Inspector of Constabulary.

 

11A(1)  

If the suspension conditions in accordance with paragraph 11 are satisfied, a

 

police and crime commissioner may suspend a relevant chief constable from

 

duty under section 38.

 

      (2)  

A chief constable’s suspension from duty under section 38 will have effect

 

from the date and time of notification.

 

      (3)  

Notification under sub-paragraph (1) shall be given either—

 

(a)    

in writing with a summary of the reasons; or

 

(b)    

orally, in which case the police and crime commissioner shall confirm

 

the suspension in writing with a summary of the reasons before the end

 

of three working days beginning with the first working day after the

 

suspension.

 

      (4)  

If a police and crime commissioner suspends a chief constable from duty under

 

section 38, the commissioner must notify the relevant police and crime panel


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 3 February 2011                  

430

 

Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill, continued

 
 

as soon as reasonable practicable and before the end of the second working day

 

after the suspension.

 

      (5)  

Notification under sub-paragraph (4) must include—

 

(a)    

written notification that the chief constable has been suspended;

 

(b)    

a copy of the reasons given to the chief constable in accordance with

 

sub-paragraph (3).

 

11B(1)  

A chief constable suspended under section 38 may make representations

 

against his suspension to the relevant police and crime panel—

 

(a)    

before the end of seven working days beginning with the first working

 

day after his being suspended;

 

(b)    

at any time during the suspension if he reasonably believes that

 

circumstances relevant to the suspension conditions have changed.

 

      (2)  

The police and crime panel shall review the suspension—

 

(a)    

on receipt of any representations under paragraph (1)(a);

 

(b)    

if there has been no previous review, before the end of four weeks

 

beginning with the first working day after the suspension;

 

(c)    

in any other case—

 

(i)    

on being notified that circumstances relevant to the

 

suspension conditions may have changed (whether by means

 

of representations made under paragraph (1)(b) or otherwise);

 

or

 

(ii)    

before the end of four weeks beginning with the day after the

 

previous review.

 

      (3)  

Where a review takes place under paragraph (2), if the police and crime panel

 

reasonably believes—

 

(a)    

the suspension conditions continue to be satisfied, and

 

(b)    

suspension should continue,

 

            

it shall, and before the end of three working days beginning with the day after

 

the review, make a recommendation for continued suspension to the police and

 

crime commissioner, in writing with a summary of the reasons.

 

      (4)  

Where a review takes place under paragraph (2), if the police and crime panel

 

reasonably believes that the conditions in either sub-paragraph (3)(a) or sub-

 

paragraph (3)(b) are no longer met, it must, and before the end of three working

 

days beginning with the day after the review, make a recommendation for the

 

end of the suspension to the police and crime commissioner, in writing with a

 

summary of the reasons.

 

      (5)  

Where a recommendation under paragraph (4) is made, the police and crime

 

commissioner must accept the recommendation.’.

 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

135

 

Schedule  8,  page  126,  line  25,  leave out ‘commissioner’ and insert ‘panel’.

 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

274

 

Schedule  8,  page  126,  line  25,  after ‘not’, insert ‘seek the Secretary of State’s

 

approval to’.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 3 February 2011                  

431

 

Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill, continued

 
 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

136

 

Schedule  8,  page  126,  line  26,  leave out ‘scrutiny’ and insert ‘consideration’.

 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

137

 

Schedule  8,  page  126,  line  27,  leave out subparagraph (2).

 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

275

 

Schedule  8,  page  126,  line  31,  after ‘should’, insert ‘seek the Secretary of State’s

 

approval to’.

 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

316

 

Schedule  8,  page  126,  line  34,  leave out from ‘of’ to end of line 35 and insert ‘his

 

decision to accept the panel’s recommendation.’.

 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

138

 

Schedule  8,  page  126,  line  37,  leave out ‘commissioner’ and insert ‘panel’.

 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

276

 

Schedule  8,  page  126,  line  37,  after ‘before’, insert ‘seeking the Secretary of

 

State’s approval for’.

 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

139

 

Schedule  8,  page  126,  line  39,  leave out ‘commissioner’ and insert ‘panel’.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 3 February 2011                  

432

 

Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill, continued

 
 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

285

 

Schedule  8,  page  126,  line  40,  leave out ‘reasons why the commissioner is’ and

 

insert ‘grounds for’.

 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

140

 

Schedule  8,  page  126,  line  40,  leave out ‘commissioner’ and insert ‘panel’.

 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

277

 

Schedule  8,  page  126,  line  40,  after ‘proposing’, insert ‘to seek Secretary of State

 

approval’.

 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

286

 

Schedule  8,  page  126,  line  40,  after ‘proposing’, insert ‘on grounds of gross

 

misconduct,’.

 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

141

 

Schedule  8,  page  127,  line  1,  leave out subparagraph (3).

 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

278

 

Schedule  8,  page  127,  line  3,  after ‘proposing’, insert ‘to seek Secretary of State

 

approval’.

 

Vernon Coaker

 

Diana Johnson

 

Clive Efford

 

Mark Tami

 

287

 

Schedule  8,  page  127,  line  5,  leave out ‘reasons’ and insert ‘grounds’.


 
previous section contents continue
 

© Parliamentary copyright
Revised 3 February 2011