Previous Section Index Home Page

Topical Questions

T1. [3014] Stephen Hammond (Wimbledon) (Con): If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities.

The Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport (Mr Jeremy Hunt): In my first month as Secretary of State, I have established key priorities for my Department, including boosting philanthropy to the arts and culture, introducing a network of new local TV companies, promoting super-fast broadband, creating an Olympic tourism legacy for 2012 and setting up an Olympic-style school sports competition, and we have made good progress in all areas.

Stephen Hammond: I welcome my right hon. Friend to his place; I am delighted to see him there. He will obviously be aware that a school tennis tournament is taking place in my constituency this fortnight. He will also be aware of the Davies review of listed events. Will he please ensure that the Davies review's proposal to alter the status of the Wimbledon tennis tournament, which both the Lawn Tennis Association and the All England Club have decried as affecting investment in grass-roots sport, will be looked at by his Department before it proceeds?

Mr Hunt: I thank my hon. Friend for his question. We are looking at the independent analysis of precisely the factors that he mentions. We have a strong desire not to do anything that would restrict investment in grass-roots sport, and we will announce a decision by July.

Meg Hillier (Hackney South and Shoreditch) (Lab/Co-op): We have heard a bit about the legacy for sport in the Olympics, but in my constituency we are seeking the legacy of skills post-2012. What discussions is the Secretary of State having with other Departments, because decisions taken by his Department now could have a major impact on the legacy delivered by others after 2012?

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport (Hugh Robertson): I thank the hon. Lady for that question. Indeed, it gives me the opportunity to pay tribute to the work of the right hon. Member for Dulwich and West Norwood (Tessa Jowell) in this regard. Someone told me about a month or so on from the election that, in terms of the greater legacy, it is not that nothing is happening but that we have possibly not got it into the right sort of story that people can understand. We are looking at all the different components of the legacy. We are working out how best to bring them together, and we will certainly take on board the points that the hon. Lady raises.

21 Jun 2010 : Column 15

T2. [3015] Dr Thérèse Coffey (Suffolk Coastal) (Con): I welcome the recent speech given by the Secretary of State on improving internet access right across our country, especially in rural areas. That is particularly welcome to my constituents in Suffolk who suffer from not-spots and slow spots. Will he meet me particularly to discuss the fact that fibre optics are available across parts of our country, but they have been paid for by the state, and there are concerns that European state-aid rules are blocking access to something that could be used to the benefit of people right across our country?

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport (Mr Edward Vaizey): I thank my hon. Friend for that question. I completely take on board the point that she makes. Indeed, I have raised it with officials. My understanding is that this is a grey area on which local authorities need some clarity.

Paul Goggins (Wythenshawe and Sale East) (Lab): Earlier, the Minister claimed that free swimming did not represent value for money, but in Wythenshawe, where many people are at the wrong end of health inequality, there has been a 56% increase in the use of the local pool by young people. Where is the value in cutting a scheme that helps to keep them healthy?

Hugh Robertson: I think that I said, when the figures were announced at the end of last week, that the scheme was a luxury that we could no longer afford. The fact remains- [Interruption.] I could get political about this. [Interruption.] Okay; right. One might ask some questions about a Government who, as the main plank of their sports legacy, approve a scheme that, when independently audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers, is shown to have an 83% dead-weight figure.

T3. [3016] Sir Alan Beith (Berwick-upon-Tweed) (LD): In the careful discussion of the summer time issue that the Minister mentioned, will he bear in mind not only the needs of northern Britain, but the unacceptability of a time zone boundary at Berwick, despite the potential advantage of my being able to arrive at my daughter's house at a time before I had set out?

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport (John Penrose): Such a thing would never do. I am happy to confirm to the right hon. Gentleman that the issue is not a delegated matter; it is therefore the responsibility of the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, and we agree that it should stay that way.

Chris Leslie (Nottingham East) (Lab/Co-op): Why did the Secretary of State not put in his manifesto that he was planning to axe free swimming for under-16s and pensioners?

Mr Jeremy Hunt: We did not put that in our manifesto, but why did the hon. Gentleman's party not put in its manifesto that it had £50 billion of uncosted spending commitments? If his party wants schemes such as free swimming, which in principle we like, the best thing that it could do is have a sustainable financial basis for this country.

21 Jun 2010 : Column 16

T4. [3017] Mr Laurence Robertson (Tewkesbury) (Con): The Secretary of State was right to refer to the football World cup and the Wimbledon tennis tournament, which are taking place at the moment. May I remind him of the sport that attracts the second highest number of spectators in the country-horse racing? It continues to produce a magnificent sporting product, including the Cheltenham gold cup in my constituency and Royal Ascot, which was last week, but horse racing does not get the publicity that it deserves. Is there anything that the Secretary of State can do to help it to increase its profile, because it has many good-

Mr Speaker: Order. Let me say to the hon. Gentleman that races must come to an end.

Hugh Robertson: Despite the fact that horse racing does not directly fall into my brief, I can answer my hon. Friend's question, for the simple reason that many of the races that attract the largest television audiences are, of course, part of the listed events review. As my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State has said, we have called for an independent economic analysis and are looking through it at the moment, and we hope to make an announcement at the beginning of July.

John Mann (Bassetlaw) (Lab): MPs from all parts of the House attended a seminar convened by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport on race hate and the internet. What is the next stage for the Department in this important initiative?

Mr Vaizey: I understand that we are working closely with Home Office colleagues on the initiative. I read a letter from the hon. Gentleman to me only today, and I shall meet him shortly to discuss the next stages of his important initiative.

T5. [3018] Mr David Burrowes (Enfield, Southgate) (Con): As we seek to host the World cup, will the Minister ensure that FIFA focuses less on excluding women in orange dresses, and more on including ordinary spectators, who are increasingly priced out of watching the beautiful game?

Mr Jeremy Hunt: I thank my hon. Friend for his excellent question. He is absolutely right that the great opportunity in hosting an event such as the World cup is the opportunity for people to go to these hugely exciting events who may otherwise not have the opportunity to do so. We talked about that to FIFA, and the big strength of our bid is that it will mean that 4.5 million more people play football; that every girl in the country gets the opportunity to play it; and that we have a disability football centre set up. So there are huge strengths in getting more people involved in the game.

Mr Speaker: Order. May I gently say to Ministers that while it is absolutely understandable that they look behind them, they must face the House? Otherwise, they are not as widely heard as they might be.

Ian Austin (Dudley North) (Lab): Cycling fans like me will be glued to the television over the next few weeks, cheering on Britain's competitors in the Tour de France. With more road races in this country being cancelled than ever before as a result of out-of-date
21 Jun 2010 : Column 17
regulations and other problems associated with police support and the rest of it, will the Secretary of State or the Minister with responsibility for sport, the hon. Member for Faversham and Mid Kent (Hugh Robertson), meet representatives from British Cycling and me, and make ironing out those problems their top priority?

Hugh Robertson: Not only can I give the hon. Gentleman that undertaking now, but I have already given it; British Cycling wrote to me as soon as I was appointed-it was a very nice letter, as he would expect-and asked if it could come and meet me to discuss exactly that issue.

T6. [3019] Andrew Rosindell (Romford) (Con): Would the Secretary of State be good enough to update the House on plans and preparations for the diamond jubilee of Her Majesty the Queen in 2012?

Mr Jeremy Hunt: I am delighted to tell my hon. Friend that, after questions, I have a meeting with the Queen's private secretary to progress discussions in that very area.

Thomas Docherty (Dunfermline and West Fife) (Lab): It is 15 years since the publication of the Bannister report, which looked at the vital role played by student sport in the Commonwealth games, which Glasgow will host, the London Olympics and the future World cup. What plan does the Secretary of State have for a second Bannister report to develop student sport?

Hugh Robertson: I have not had the chance to do so since becoming Minister, but in the five years in which I shadowed this brief in opposition, I met a number of university sports groups, although none of them asked me for a new review. What they wanted was a higher profile for their sport and increased opportunities. With London 2012, we have a magnificent opportunity, when this country's sport is in the eye of the world, to do precisely that.

T7. [3020] Chris Skidmore (Kingswood) (Con): My constituency of Kingswood in Greater Bristol is excellently served by the Bristol Evening Post, whose local reporters are well established and can get into the issues that matter to the local community, particularly people who do not often use the internet to get their news. Will the Minister assure us that we can support local print media better?

Mr Jeremy Hunt: The best way for us to support local print media is by not constraining them with regulations that prevent them from evolving new business models that work in the digital age. Those are exactly the plans on which my colleagues and I are working right now.

Pete Wishart (Perth and North Perthshire) (SNP): Will the Secretary of State commit his Government to pursuing the measures agreed in the Digital Economy Act 2010, or will he take advice from the hon. Member for Bath (Mr Foster), who rejected the measure with his hon. Friends and now have it as Liberal Democrat policy to repeal large sections of it?

Mr Hunt: The Act remains on the statute books, and it will be implemented. I remind the hon. Gentleman that the next stage, when Ofcom may decide to suspend
21 Jun 2010 : Column 18
connections, requires a decision by the Government. Parliament has to be consulted in that process. We will look at the progress of the earlier measures before deciding whether to proceed to that critical next stage.

Leader of the House

The Leader of the House was asked-

Backbench Business Committee

1. Chris Bryant (Rhondda) (Lab): What recent discussions he has had on the establishment of a Backbench Business Committee. [3022]

The Parliamentary Secretary, Office of the Leader of the House of Commons (Mr David Heath): As I am sure the hon. Gentleman will know, my right hon. Friend the Leader of the House heard the views of hon. Members from all parts of the House in the debate last Tuesday.

Chris Bryant: I am delighted that the Backbench Business Committee has been set up, and pay tribute to the Minister and to his colleague for doing so. Something that can be immensely frustrating for Back Benchers is having to take a ten-minute Bill or a private Member's Bill through the ludicrous shenanigans of a Friday morning. Will the Minister undertake to make sure that private Members' Bills are looked at by the Committee, so that we consider them on a Wednesday evening, for the greater convenience of all hon. Members?

Mr Heath: Again, as the hon. Gentleman may know, that was debated last Tuesday. We all share the frustrations of having private Members' legislation blocked in the extraordinary procedure that we use in the House for such legislation. The Chair of the Procedure Committee, the right hon. Member for East Yorkshire (Mr Knight), suggested that he wished to look at the whole process of private Members' legislation, and I hope that his Committee can do so as a high priority. We will certainly keep in touch with that Committee and with the Backbench Business Committee in the hope of finding a better way of doing that particular area of business.

House of Commons Commission

The hon. Member for Middlesbrough, representing the House of Commons Commission, was asked-

LED Lighting

2. Mr Philip Hollobone (Kettering) (Con): If he will bring forward proposals to introduce low-cost LED lighting across the House of Commons part of the parliamentary estate. [3023]

Sir Stuart Bell (Middlesbrough): Several trials of LED technology have been undertaken in the House of Commons, and LED lighting has been installed in the upper Committee corridor, the Commons Library, the Lower Waiting Hall, the New Palace Yard turnstiles and other places. Following those trials, we have included
21 Jun 2010 : Column 19
further installations of LED lamps in Parliament's low-energy lighting programme, such as at 1 Parliament Street and Derby Gate stairwells.

Mr Hollobone: I welcome the progress made by the House authorities. Given the fact that LED lighting uses just 5% of the electricity used by normal bulbs, hardly ever needs to be replaced, and contains no mercury, so it can be recycled very healthily, have they given any consideration to lighting Big Ben with LED technology?

Sir Stuart Bell: That is an intriguing question so early in the parliamentary Session, and one that the Commission would be happy to look into. As the hon. Gentleman knows, incandescent lighting on the parliamentary estate has been gradually replaced with lower energy lighting over the past five years. The majority of these replacements have occurred during routine lamp changes. Due to the size and complexity of the estate, detailed records of light bulbs are not kept and the proportion of low-energy lamps is not known. However, on the point that the hon. Gentleman makes, we keep developments in lighting technology under review and we will adopt low-energy solutions as they become available.

Mr Speaker: How very enlightening.

Leader of the House

The Leader of the House was asked-

Sittings Patterns

3. Simon Hughes (Bermondsey and Old Southwark) (LD): What proposals he plans to put to the House for the pattern of sittings of the House for the rest of 2010 and 2011. [3024]

The Parliamentary Secretary, Office of the Leader of the House of Commons (Mr David Heath): The House has already agreed to a sitting in September this year. My right hon. Friend the Leader of the House and I would welcome Members' views on how the pattern of sittings should be organised.

Simon Hughes: May I make an early bid for a pattern of fixed and family-friendly sittings that allows colleagues to be away some time for school holidays in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland as well as in England, and that gives us an annual regular cycle, with the wash-up at the end of the Session in September before the conferences, and a fixed date for the start of the parliamentary year every October?

Mr Heath: I recognise the issue of Scottish, English, Welsh and Northern Irish school holidays. Different local education authorities have different term dates, so it would be impossible to align the sittings of the House completely with the school terms, but I have a great deal of sympathy with the hon. Gentleman's suggestion. There is a case for a more fundamental review of the annual sitting patterns of the House.

21 Jun 2010 : Column 20

Huw Irranca-Davies (Ogmore) (Lab): Will the hon. Gentleman also take into account the extra-curricular activities of MPs of the better kind, such as contributing to VSO overseas? I have reluctantly cancelled a two-week engagement with VSO this summer because of the uncertainty. It is undoubtedly the case that the additional activities that MPs undertake-for example, on promoting workers' rights overseas-are to be protected. Will the hon. Gentleman take that into account as well, in looking at how we manage our timetable?

Mr Heath: I am not sure that we can guarantee to protect the timetable for all the extra-curricular activities of hon. Members, but the hon. Gentleman makes a valid point. We indicated at the earliest opportunity what we would be doing this summer, but hon. Members want a degree of certainty about the parliamentary calendar, so far as that is possible. I hope the hon. Gentleman will contribute to the review that we will set up to look at that.

Next Section Index Home Page