Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
7 Sep 2010 : Column 444Wcontinued
Graham Evans: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the cost to the public purse was of the Appointments Commission stand at Civil Service Live 2010. [12578]
Mr Simon Burns: The costs of the Commission's attendance at Civil Service Live July 2010 can be analysed as follows:
£ | |
Mr Baron: To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether the cancer patient experience survey will form part of the quality accounts of NHS trusts. [12774]
Mr Simon Burns: Quality accounts are annual statements based on the quality improvement objectives chosen by boards of organisations that provide care to national health service patients. Regulations oblige organisations to review all the data available to them. Organisations will be able to use information from the cancer patient experience survey if they identify this as an objective for their organisation.
For the future, quality accounts will evolve to reflect the Government's aim of developing a new culture of leadership and responsibility across the NHS. Following a formal evaluation over the summer, we will consult on how the potential of quality accounts can be better realised, including by:
relating the content to emerging outcome measures and quality standards;
building in third party assurance through external audit; and
extending Quality Accounts to primary and community care providers, following the evaluation of the pilots in North East and East Midlands strategic health authorities.
Proposals will be consulted on in the autumn, with updated regulations and guidance to follow later in the year.
Caroline Lucas: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what steps he plans to take to improve arrangements for chlamydia screening. [13171]
Anne Milton: Tackling chlamydia screening remains part of Tier 2 of the Vital Signs framework. The revised Operating Framework for 2010-11 published in June 2010 stressed the need for the national health service to ensure that it continues to deliver agreed plans with no reduction in the standards or quality of services, for the rest of the 2010-11 year.
Harriett Baldwin: To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will ask the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence to review its guidelines relating to the treatment of myalgic encephalomyelitis; and if he will make a statement. [12237]
Mr Burstow: The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) regularly reviews its published guidance. We understand that NICE is currently reviewing its clinical guideline on chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis to determine whether it needs updating and will consult on its review proposals later this year. Further information is available on NICE's website at::
Jim Dobbin: To ask the Secretary of State for Health when he expects the national audit of dementia services to be (a) completed and (b) published; and in what format it will be published. [12586]
Mr Burstow: The Department anticipates that the national audit of dementia services will be available in October 2010. The format and how the results will be published is yet to be decided.
Stephen McPartland: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what plans he has to reduce the use of antipsychotics for the treatment of dementia; and if he will make a statement. [12841]
Mr Burstow: The National Clinical Director for dementia is leading the work to implement the recommendations made by Professor Sube Banerjee in his report into the use of anti-psychotic medicines, which was published in November 2009. The Department is working with the NHS Information Centre to develop an audit of the prescribing of anti-psychotics for people with dementia.
Stephen McPartland: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people have been diagnosed with dementia in (a) Hertfordshire and (b) Stevenage constituency in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement. [12839]
Mr Burstow: The information is not held in the format requested.
The Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) gives the numbers of patients on the dementia disease register for the financial years 2006-07 to 2008-09. The available figures show the number of those with dementia who are on the register at the end of each year.
Figures are not available for earlier years. Figures for 2009-10 will be published in autumn 2010.
The following table shows the figures for the primary care trusts (PCTs) which cover Hertfordshire.
2006-07 | 2007-08 | 2008-09 | |
Notes: 1. The QOF figures are collected by national health service organisation rather by constituency and so it is not possible to give figures for Stevenage constituency. 2. Figures are not the number of newly diagnosed dementia patients but the number who are on the register at the end of each year. 3. The national QOF was introduced as part of the new general medical services contract on 1 April 2004. 4. Participation by practices in the QOF is voluntary, though participation rates are very high, with most personal medical services practices also taking part. 5. The published QOF information was derived from the quality management analysis system (QMAS), a national system developed by NHS Connecting for Health. 6. QMAS uses data from general practices to calculate individual practices' QOF achievement. QMAS is a national information technology system developed by NHS Connecting for Health to support the QOF. 7. The QMAS captures the number of patients on the various disease registers for each practice. Source: The Information Centre for health and social care |
Stephen McPartland: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many dementia patients have been prescribed anti-psychotics in (a) Hertfordshire and (b) Stevenage constituency in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement. [12840]
Mr Burstow: No patient details are recorded when a prescription is processed. It is therefore not possible to say how many patients receiving a prescription for an anti-psychotic drug have a diagnosis of dementia.
Information is collected on the number of prescription items for anti-psychotic drugs within sections 4.2.1 ('Antipsychotic drugs') and 4.2.2 ('Antipsychotic depot injections') of the British National Formulary, outlining the number of prescriptions written in the United Kingdom and dispensed in England.
Alun Cairns: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the (a) average and (b) highest daily rate paid to consultants by his Department was in each of the last five years. [13058]
Mr Simon Burns: The Department is unable to provide the average and highest daily rates paid to consultants in each of the last five years.
The preferred practice of the Department is to negotiate costs for a whole piece of work rather than agreeing individual day rates.
This process provides protection from the financial risks being exposed if day rate based contracting was used. In these instances, although considered when costing the work, commissions are awarded on a total fixed cost basis to reflect the appropriate skills mix and resource required to deliver the work.
Matthew Hancock: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much his Department spent on vacant properties in each year since 1997. [13029]
Mr Simon Burns: The information requested since 1997 is not available. The estimated expenditure excluding VAT by the Department on vacant properties for each of the past five years is:
£ | |
The main reason for the increase in 2009-10 is the rationalisation of estate in the arm's length body sector and surplus property being returned to the Department for disposal or sub-let.
The Department is actively seeking to dispose of its interest in those properties that remain vacant.
Matthew Hancock: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many chairs his Department has purchased in each year since 1997; how much it spent in each such year; and what the five most expensive chairs purchased in each such year were. [12809]
Mr Simon Burns: The Department does not hold separate records for the numbers and cost of chairs it has purchased since 1997. Information is held in our financial system under a general heading 'furniture and fittings'. To provide the information as requested would incur disproportionate costs.
Pete Wishart: To ask the Secretary of State for Health which IT contracts awarded by his Department in each of the last five years have been abandoned; and what the monetary value of each such contract was. [12721]
Mr Simon Burns: The Department abandoned two information technology (IT) contracts in the last five years.
These were the Fujitsu Local Service Provider contract, terminated in May 2008 with a value of £1,104 million over 10 years and the Fujitsu front line helpdesk, terminated March in 2009 with a value of £55 million over seven years. Both contracts were awarded as part of the National Programme for IT.
Owen Smith: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what information his Department holds (1) for benchmarking purposes on (a) emergency hospital readmittance rates for epilepsy, (b) median times for a first epilepsy specialist appointment, (c) rates of epilepsy misdiagnosis and (d) the incidence of deaths caused by epilepsy in (i) England and (ii) other EU member states; [12537]
(2) for benchmarking purposes on comparative and sudden unexpected death rates in epilepsy in (a) England and (b) other EU member states; [12538]
(3) on the emergency hospital readmittance rate for people with epilepsy. [12539]
Mr Burstow: Statistics on emergency hospital readmissions rates for epilepsy are not routinely produced. The hospital episodes statistics database contains information about admissions to hospital from which bespoke analyses about readmissions can be extracted. However the analysis necessary to calculate readmissions is particularly complicated and would incur disproportionate costs.
Information on the median time for first specialist appointment is not collected.
The rates of epilepsy misdiagnosis are not collected.
The Department does not routinely hold international comparative data. However, World Health Organization age-standardised death rates for epilepsy indicate that the United Kingdom has 1.5 deaths per 100,000 population,
compared with the median rate of a comparable set of European countries (the EU-15) of 1.07 deaths per 100,000.
All international comparisons should be interpreted with caution, due to differences in registration systems and coding conventions.
Andrew Stephenson: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what criteria the Food Standards Agency takes into account when selecting subjects for public awareness campaigns. [12669]
Anne Milton: The criteria taken into account by the Food Standards Agency when selecting subjects for public awareness campaigns (primarily salt, saturated fat and food hygiene between 2002 and 2010) are:
subject is a key part of the agency's strategic objectives;
subject has a clear public health benefit;
subject offers support to industry (for reformulation in terms of healthier eating and for safer and cleaner commercial kitchens in terms of food hygiene) and is suitable for partnership activity with both industry and non-governmental organisations; and
subject has clear potential for savings in public finance.
Mr Gray: To ask the Secretary of State for Health with reference to the proposals in the Health White Paper, how it is planned that GP consortia will be supported to commission appropriate services for (a) children with autism and mental health problems and (b) other people with complex needs. [12516]
Mr Burstow: To support general practitioner (GP) consortia in their commissioning decisions, we will create an independent NHS Commissioning Board. The board will provide leadership for quality improvement through commissioning. This will include setting commissioning guidelines on the basis of clinically approved quality standards developed with advice from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, in a way that promotes joint working across health, public health and social care.
GP consortia will be responsible for commissioning the great majority of national health service services. We will expect consortia to involve relevant health and social care professionals from all sectors in helping design care pathways or care packages that achieve more integrated delivery of care, higher quality, and more efficient use of NHS resources. We will be working with the NHS and professional bodies in the transition to the new arrangements to promote multi-professional involvement.
The White Paper also creates a new role for local government in setting the local strategic context for commissioning of health improvement, health and social care. This will be informed by Joint Strategic Needs Assessments which all commissioners will use to guide their commissioning activities.
It is proposed that the NHS Commissioning Board will be responsible for commissioning national and regional specialised services for patients with complex and rare disease. For less rare and complex services we
expect GP consortia to commission services for their populations. We are currently consulting on the most appropriate level at which some of these services are commissioned.
The NHS Commissioning Board will also host some clinical commissioning networks, for example for targeted health services for ill and disabled children, to pool specialist expertise.
Further details on the Government's intentions for commissioning and oversight of commissioning decisions can be found in the consultation documents "Commissioning for patients" and "Local Democratic Legitimacy in Health", published on 22 July. Copies have already been placed in the Library.
Hugh Bayley: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what estimate he has made of the number of GP commissioning teams which will be required in (a) York and (b) North Yorkshire to discharge the commissioning responsibilities currently assigned to the North Yorkshire and York primary care trust; what estimate he has made of the number of staff who will be employed by those teams; and what estimate he has made of the annual cost to the public purse of their operation. [12838]
Mr Simon Burns: We do not wish to be unduly prescriptive about the size of general practitioner (GP) commissioning consortia. There have been widespread variations in the size and population coverage of primary care trusts (PCTs), which are currently responsible for commissioning national health service health care services, and there is no evidence to suggest a single 'right' size. Practices will have flexibility within the new legislative framework to form consortia in ways they think will secure the best health care and health outcomes for their patients and locality. The NHS Commissioning Board will, however, need to satisfy itself that consortia are of sufficient size to manage financial risk effectively.
The White Paper laid out proposals for fundamental changes to the ways that the NHS is structured and run. The precise costs of the transition to the new system, and of running the new organisation, will not be known until the new organisations that will underpin the new system have been designed in more detail. We have launched a series of consultations on how the new organisations should be designed, and once the results of this are known we will publish a full impact assessment of the new systems.
The White Paper also makes a commitment to reduce NHS management costs by more than 45% over the next four years, freeing up further resources for front-line care.
The consultation document on new NHS commissioning arrangements "Liberating the NHS: Commissioning for patients", published on 22 July, seeks views on whether there should be a minimum or maximum population size for GP commissioning consortia. A copy has already been placed in the Library.
Jim Shannon:
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people have been diagnosed with motor neurone disease in (a) England, (b) Wales, (c) Scotland
and (d) Northern Ireland; and what steps his Department has taken to provide support services for such people. [12830]
Mr Burstow: Information on the number of people diagnosed with motor neurone disease is not collected. However, the National Service Framework for Long-term Neurological Conditions (the NSF) estimates that around two new cases of motor neurone disease are diagnosed each year per 100,000 population.
The NSF was developed to address the long-term health and social care needs of people living with neurological conditions, including those with rapidly progressing conditions such as motor neurone disease.
Graham Evans: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the cost to the public purse was of the NHS Choices stand at Civil Service Live 2010. [12835]
Mr Simon Burns: The NHS Choices stand at Civil Service Live 2010 was shared with Directgov and businesslink.gov.uk. The total cost of the stand was £12,165 plus VAT. NHS Choices' contribution to these costs was £4,055 plus VAT.
Graham Evans: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what estimate he has made of the cost to the public purse of the National Programme for IT in (a) 2007-08, (b) 2008-09 and (c) 2009-10. [12579]
Mr Simon Burns: The total cost of the national programme for information technology (IT) includes both central costs, and the costs managed by local national health service bodies incurred in implementing the systems, for example in training staff and upgrading computer hardware.
In its report "The National Programme for IT in the NHS: Progress since 2006", published in May 2008, the National Audit Office estimated that some £3.55 billion had been spent on the programme to 31 March 2008. This figure included an estimate for local NHS expenditure, which is not routinely collected in a way that differentiates expenditure on the national programme from other local IT-related expenditure.
Total cumulative expenditure, estimated on the same basis, to 31 March 2009 was £4.738 billion, and to 31 March 2010, £5.829 billion.
James Morris: To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will conduct an assessment of the effect of his proposed reforms to the NHS on local authorities, with particular reference to the potential merging of adult social care and health provision. [12628]
Mr Burstow: The Government have not proposed merging adult social care and health provision, although our White Paper, "Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS" does propose a new function for local authorities of joining up the commissioning of local national health service services, social care and public health.
The Government are currently consulting on how best to implement the reforms in the White Paper, and have published further details for consultation. As explained in an analytical strategy published alongside the White Paper, the Department is using the consultation period to inform the development of an impact assessment, which will provide a wide-ranging and robust analysis of the proposals, including their impact on local authorities. The impact assessment will be published alongside or shortly after the response to the consultation.
Ann Clwyd: To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the written ministerial statement of 20 July 2010, Official Report, column 12WS, on machinery of government changes, which nutrition programmes will transfer from the Food Standards Agency to his Department. [12614]
Anne Milton: The following nutrition policy work for England will be transferred to the Department:
lead on nutritional labelling and European Union negotiations;
health claims, dietetic food and food supplements;
calorie information in catering establishments;
reformulation to reduce salt, saturated fat and sugar levels in food and reducing portion size (including in catering);
nutrition surveys and nutrition research; and
scientific advice and secretariat to Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition.
Ann Clwyd: To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the written ministerial statement of 20 July 2010, Official Report, column 12WS, on machinery of government changes, if he will report annually on his Department's progress in respect of those nutrition policy programmes transferred from the Food Standards Agency to his Department. [12616]
Anne Milton: Information about the Department's programmes of work will be provided to Parliament in its annual report.
Ann Clwyd: To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the written ministerial statement of 20 July 2010, Official Report, column 12WS, on machinery of government changes, if he will make it his policy to continue the salt reduction programme when responsibility for that programme transfers from the Food Standards Agency to his Department. [12617]
Anne Milton: The Government recognise the extensive work already carried out to encourage the food industry to reduce levels of salt in food, and the significant achievements that have been made by all sectors of the food industry.
We are committed to improving public health, and we will continue to engage with the food industry on product reformulation.
Mr Knight: To ask the Secretary of State for Health in respect of how many venues his Department has issued an exemption from the ban on smoking in public places since the implementation of that ban. [12584]
Anne Milton: None. Exemptions are listed in the legislation, statutory instrument 2007 No. 765, Public Health England, The Smoke-free (Exemptions and Vehicles) Regulations 2007, and therefore cannot be issued on a discretionary basis.
Mr McCann: To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) how he plans to develop an indicator for venous thromboembolism reduction to reflect the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Quality Standard which can be used by the NHS Commissioning Board and GP consortia; [12512]
(2) what (a) evidence and (b) procedures will be used to define the indicators which will appear in the finalised NHS Outcomes Framework; [12513]
(3) if he will bring forward proposals to include reduced venous thromboembolism as an indicator for safe treatment within the first NHS Outcomes Framework. [12555]
Mr Simon Burns: The Government's White Paper 'Equality and Excellence: Liberating the NHS', published 12 July, set out how the improvement of health care outcomes for patients should be the primary purpose of the national health service.
On 19 July, we launched a public consultation on proposals for developing an NHS Outcomes Framework. 'Transparency in outcomes-a framework for the NHS', seeks views on the structure, and core principles that should underpin the development of the framework as well as the more specific outcome indicators that should be included. The consultation can be accessed via the following link:
and a copy has already been placed in the Library.
The consultation document puts forward proposals for a framework structured around five broad outcome goals or domains.
Domain 1: Preventing people from dying prematurely;
Domain 2: Enhancing the quality of life for people with long-term conditions;
Domain 3: Helping people to recover from episodes of ill health or following injury;
Domain 4: Ensuring people have a positive experience of care; and
Domain 5: Treating and caring for people in a safe environment and protecting them from avoidable harm.
Within domain 5, which looks at patient safety, venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been included as an example in the improvement area covering safe treatment. In Annex A (page 59, paragraph 3.63) of the consultation document, the example indicator for VTE measures the incidence of VTE through Hospital Episode Statistics data. To support the achievement of outcomes in all domains of this framework, there will be a suite of Quality Standards setting out what high quality care looks across all major pathways of care.
During the consultation period, the Department will be analysing potential outcome indicators against a set of criteria; which will lead to the selection of 20-30 evidence-based outcome indicators that are clinically relevant and reflect what is important to patients. In the
selection of the final indicators for the framework, reference will be made to Quality Standards. This process is described in chapter 3 (page 18, paragraph 3.3-3.63) of the consultation document.
The NHS Outcomes Framework will provide a mechanism by which the Secretary of State for Health can hold the proposed NHS Commissioning Board to account for the outcomes it is securing for patients through its role in allocating resources and overseeing the commissioning process that, in future, will be led locally by general practitioner consortiums. How consortiums are held to account for delivering these outcomes will be a matter for the NHS Commissioning Board to determine, subject to legislation.
Mr McCann: To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer to Baroness Thornton of 19 July 2010, Official Report, House of Lords, columns 170-1WA, on health: malnutrition, (1) what changes he plans to make to the nationally-defined goal in the Commission for Quality and Innovation scheme for acute providers for 2011-12 in respect of reducing the incidence of venous thromboembolism by increasing the percentage of patients who must be risk-assessed using the national risk assessment tool before payment is triggered; [12623]
(2) what plans he has to retain for 2011-12 the current proportion of one fifth of the financial value of each acute provider in respect of the Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN) scheme which is linked to nationally-defined CQUIN goals. [12624]
Mr Simon Burns: We expect to clarify any changes to the Commissioning for Quality and Innovation framework for 2011-12, including the financial value of schemes and whether there will be any nationally defined goals, later this year.
Philip Davies: To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what the cost was of his Department's tobacco policy team in the latest period for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement; [12277]
(2) pursuant to the answer of 15 July 2010, Official Report, columns 890-91W, on tobacco, what the job (a) title and (b) description is of the seven people employed in the tobacco policy team; and what recent estimate he has made of the annual cost to the public purse of employing those people. [12421]
Anne Milton: The grade titles and pay bands of the seven civil servants employed in the Department's Tobacco Programme are set out in the following table:
Grade | Whole-time equivalent civil servants in tobacco programme | Current inner London pay range (minimum-maximum) |
Civil servants in the Department's Tobacco Programme are based in London and support Health Ministers to achieve the Government's objectives in the area of tobacco control.
Pete Wishart: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what (a) refurbishment and (b) redecoration of the non-residential areas within 1 Carlton Gardens has been undertaken since his appointment; and what the cost to the public purse was in each case. [13206]
Alistair Burt: The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) has undertaken some required refurbishment and redecoration of the non-residential areas of 1 Carlton Gardens since the appointment of my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary.
The refurbishment and redecoration of the non-residential areas has been undertaken in accordance with lease obligations and as a result of the Quadrennial Inspection of 2009.
We are required under the terms of the fully repairing lease
"as often as necessary, well and substantially to repair, renew, uphold, clean and keep in repair the demised premises."
The cost for this essential upkeep was met from the FCO Estates maintenance budget as follows.
(a) Refurbishment costs for internal walls damaged by water ingress: £3,271;
(b) Painting, redecoration and some replastering of the stairwell covering three floors: £12,506.
Jeremy Lefroy: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent discussions he has had with the Government of Afghanistan on the extent of religious freedom in that country. [12041]
Alistair Burt: The Government strongly support the right to freedom of religion or belief. We are working to support all individuals who face discrimination and persecution on the basis of religion, wherever they are in the world. The Foreign and Commonwealth Office has a regular dialogue with the Afghan Government on human rights, including the need to ensure the security of all Afghans, regardless of religion. Article two of the Afghan Constitution provides for freedom of religion, and we expect the Afghan Government to fully implement this. In addition, we will also raise particular cases of concern with the Afghan Government as necessary.
Mr Bain: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what progress has been made in negotiations on establishing an International Arms Trade Treaty to limit the sales of arms to unsuitable states. [13228]
Alistair Burt: The UK actively supports the UN process to establish a strong, robust, legally binding Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) that will establish common international standards for the trade in conventional arms. Negotiation of an ATT began in New York from 12 to 23 July 2010 and good progress has been made. The meeting resulted in the chair of the process, Ambassador Moritan, producing a number of documents that will form a solid basis for negotiations to continue in February 2011. The timetable remains ambitious, but the UK will continue to support efforts to secure this important Treaty.
Stewart Hosie: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what proportion of invoices from suppliers his Department paid within 10 days of receipt in July and August 2010. [13298]
Alistair Burt: The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) supports the Government's Prompt Payment initiative and since its launch the Department and its agencies have continued to work hard to improve the percentage of supplier invoices paid promptly. This combined performance meant that the FCO paid 96.45% and 95.57% of supplier invoices within 10 days of receipt in July 2010 and August 2010 respectively.
The FCO is aware of the importance of paying suppliers promptly, and makes every effort to pay 80% of supplier invoices within five working days.
Angus Robertson: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will list those overseas properties which his Department shares (a) with other United Kingdom departments and (b) with foreign Governments. [12187]
Alistair Burt: The information is as follows:
(a) The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) shares its overseas office accommodation with other United Kingdom Government Departments and the British Council in the 164 posts listed as follows. Full address details for the overseas properties involved can be found on the Foreign and Commonwealth Office's website
Abu Dhabi, British Embassy
Abuja, British High Commission
Accra, British High Commission
Addis Ababa, British Embassy
Algiers, British Embassy
Alicante, British Consulate
Almaty, British Embassy Office
Amman, British Embassy
Amsterdam, British Consulate-General
Ankara, British Embassy
Ashgabat, British Embassy
Asmara, British Embassy
Astana, British Embassy
Athens, British Embassy
Baghdad, British Embassy
Bahrain, British Embassy
Baku, British Embassy
Bandar Seri Begawan, British High Commission
Bangkok, British Embassy
Banjul, British High Commission
Barcelona, British Consulate-General
Beijing, British Embassy
Beirut, British Embassy
Belgrade, British Embassy
Berlin, British Embassy
Berne, British Embassy
Bogota, British Embassy
Brasilia, British Embassy
Bratislava, British Embassy
Bridgetown, British High Commission
Brussels, British Embassy
Brussels, UK Permanent Representation to EU
Bucharest, British Embassy
Budapest, British Embassy
Buenos Aires, British Embassy
Cairo, British Embassy
Canberra, British High Commission
Caracas, British Embassy
Castries, British High Commission
Chennai, British Deputy High Commission
Chicago, British Consulate-General
Chisinau, British Embassy
Chongqing, British Consulate-General
Colombo, British High Commission
Copenhagen, British Embassy
Dakar, British Embassy
Damascus, British Embassy
Dar Es Salaam, British High Commission
Dhaka, British High Commission
Doha, British Embassy
Dubai, British Embassy
Dublin, British Embassy
Dushanbe, British Embassy
Dusseldorf, British Consulate-General
Erbil, Office of the British Embassy
Freetown, British High Commission
Gaborone, British High Commission
Geneva, British Consulate General
Geneva, UK Mission to the United Nations
Georgetown, British High Commission
Gibraltar, Office of the Governor
Guangzhou, British Consulate-General
Hanoi, British Embassy
Harare, British Embassy
Havana, British Embassy
Helsinki, British Embassy
Ho Chi Minh City, British Consulate-General
Hong Kong, British Consulate-General
Islamabad, British High Commission
Istanbul, British Consulate-General
Jakarta, British Embassy
Jerusalem, British Consulate-General
Kabul, British Embassy
Kampala, British High Commission
Karachi, British Deputy High Commission
Kathmandu, British Embassy
Khartoum, British Embassy
Kigali, British High Commission
Kingston, British High Commission
Kinshasa, British Embassy
Kolkata, British Deputy High Commission
Kuala Lumpur, British High Commission
Kuwait, British Embassy
Kyiv, British Embassy
La Paz, British Embassy
Lagos, British Deputy High Commission
Lashka Gah, Provincial Reconstruction Team
Lilongwe, British High Commission
Lima, British Embassy
Lisbon, British Embassy
Next Section | Index | Home Page |