Previous Section Index Home Page

7 Sep 2010 : Column 494W—continued


Departmental Contracts

John McDonnell: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what contracts his Department and its agencies have with each private sector company; on what date each such contract commenced; what the duration is of each such contract; what estimate he has made of the cost to the public purse of each such contract; and if he will make a statement. [12908]

Mr Blunt: The Ministry of Justice does not maintain central records of contracts held by the Department and its agencies with private sector companies. To obtain the information requested would require the manual collection of all records and associated data from each individual agency at a disproportionate cost.

Departmental Fines

Stewart Hosie: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many transport-related fines his Department has settled on behalf of its staff in each year since 2005; and what the cost to the public purse was in each year. [13291]

Mr Djanogly: It is not the Ministry of Justice's policy to settle any transport-related fines on the behalf of its staff.

There is no evidence held centrally to indicate since 2005 that the Ministry of Justice and its predecessor, the Department for Constitutional Affairs, has settled any transport-related fines on behalf of its staff. To provide absolute confirmation of this would incur disproportionate cost.

Departmental Training

Stewart Hosie: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many external training courses were attended by staff of his Department in the last 12 months; and what the cost to the public purse was of each such course. [13290]

Mr Djanogly: Responsibility for employee learning and development training is devolved to business groups within the Ministry of Justice (MOJ).

Most training occurs within the normal working environment in the form of on the job learning and development where employees receive detailed procedural and operational training, coaching, and day-to-day advice. Prison and probation officers, however, have to undergo extensive formal training to undertake their duties in accordance with professional standards.

The figures provided include both internal and external training courses. The MoJ's accounting systems do not separately quantify expenditure on internal and external training courses. Costs are subsumed within numerous categories of expenditure, for example training, training courses, training courses/event. It would incur disproportionate costs to scrutinise all the individual transactions which might potentially include external training costs across the Ministry and its executive agencies. Additionally, it would also incur disproportionate costs to identify the number of staff that attended these external training courses.

The following table shows expenditure on both internal and external training courses for the financial year ending 31 March 2010.


7 Sep 2010 : Column 495W
2009-10
Department £000

Ministry of Justice HQ

3,194

NOMS (excluding probation trusts)(1)

19,170

HMCS(2)

120

Tribunals Service

707

OPG

54

Total

25,245

(1) The expenditure on employee training for NOMS covers all staff training courses (including first aid) and further education courses. This also includes the purchase of associated materials and equipment.
Note:
Figures for MOJ HQ, HMCS and Tribunals exclude Magistrates and Judicial training.

Dogs: Animal Welfare

Mr Bain: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many people were (a) prosecuted for and (b) convicted of involvement in dog fighting in (i) 2006, (ii) 2007, (iii) 2008, (iv) 2009 and (v) 2010. [12647]

Mr Blunt: Section 8 of the Animal Welfare Act 2006 (which came into force 6 April 2007) created specific offences for involvement in animal fighting but not specifically dog fighting. The number of defendants proceeded against at magistrates courts and found guilty at all courts for this offence, England and Wales 2007 to 2008 (latest available) are shown in the following table.

Dog fighting offences prior to 6 April 2007 were prosecuted under the Protection of Animals Act 1911. As this Act does not separately identify animal fighting or dog fighting within the statute, the Ministry of Justice are unable to provide any figures for this period.

Court proceedings data for 2009 are planned for publication on 21 October 2010. Data for 2010 are planned for publication in the autumn, 2011.

Number of defendants proceeded against at magistrates courts and found guilty at all courts for animal fighting offences( 1) , England and Wales, 2007 and 2008( 2, 3, 4)
Proceeded against Found guilty

2007

-

-

2008

5

5

(1 )Animal Welfare Act 2006, section 8. Came into force on 6 April 2007. (Note: animals other than dogs may be included).
(2 )The figures given in the table on court proceedings relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences it is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe.
(3 )Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.
(4 )Excludes data for Cardiff magistrates court for April, July, and August 2008.
Source:
Justice Statistics Analytical Services-Ministry of Justice.

Expert Evidence: Social Work

Mrs Moon: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) what estimate he has made of the average payment per hour made to independent social workers as expert
7 Sep 2010 : Column 496W
witnesses in family proceedings in (a) magistrates courts, (b) county courts and (c) the High Court in each year since 2002; [13192]

(2) what estimate he has made of the average amount of payments to (a) child psychologists, (b) child psychiatrists, (c) adult psychologists, (d) adult psychiatrists, (e) play therapists, (f) radiologists and (g) paediatricians as expert witnesses to family courts in each year from 2002; and if he will make a statement; [13193]

(3) if he will reverse the decision to exclude independent social workers from the remit of the Expert Witnesses Review Group; and if he will make a statement. [13194]

Mr Djanogly: The Legal Services Commission (LSC) does not routinely collect or separately record the amounts paid to expert witnesses in legally aided cases because they do not contract with them directly. However, my Department recently asked the LSC to conduct a limited file review exercise of payments made to expert witnesses in legal aid cases to inform our Analysis of expert witness fees paid in legal aid work research project.

Independent social work (ISW) groups have been invited to see and to comment on any emerging findings from the expert witness fees project as part of a wider reference group.

As has always been made clear, however, the file review exercise did not collect information on payments to ISWs as these were consulted on as part of the joint Ministry of Justice LSC consultation 'Family Legal Aid Funding from 2010' which ran from 18 December 2008 to 3 April 2009. As a result of the consultation, new payment rates for ISWs will be implemented with the new civil contracts in October 2010.

Mrs Moon: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice if he will consult independent social workers who have provided expert witness reports to courts since 2002 to assess the financial effect on them of the proposed reduction of fees from 14 October 2010; and if he will make a statement. [13195]

Mr Djanogly: Changes to the rates paid for independent social work in civil legal aid cases will come into effect with the new civil legal aid contracts from 14 October 2010. From this date, the fees paid by the Legal Services Commission (LSC) for independent social work will be set at the same level as those currently paid by the Children and Family Court Advisory Service (CAFCASS) and CAFCASS Cymru. The new rates will apply to both public and private law children cases.

The changes were consulted on and agreed as part of the joint MOJ and Legal Services Commission (LSC) consultation, Family Legal Aid Funding from 2010 which took place between December 2008 and April 2009. It was not possible to assess the financial impact on individual independent social workers (ISW) as the LSC does not contract with them directly. However, full consideration was given to all written responses received from ISWs and the LSC met with several ISW groups during consultation. The consultation response document and impact assessment was published on 21 October 2009 and is available on the LSC website at:


7 Sep 2010 : Column 497W

First Offenders: Custodial Treatment

Philip Davies: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what proportion of defendants with no previous (a) convictions and (b) cautions was given a custodial sentence for a first offence in (a) magistrates
7 Sep 2010 : Column 498W
and (b) Crown courts in the latest period for which figures are available. [12415]

Mr Blunt: Figures for the number and proportion of offenders sentenced to immediate custody for indictable offences in 2008, the most recent data available, by court type and previous conviction or caution history, are presented in the following table.

The proportion of offenders who were sentenced to immediate custody for indictable offences in 2008 without previous convictions or without previous cautions by court type: England and Wales
Offenders who were sentenced for indictable offences in 2008
Without previous convictions Without previous cautions Without previous convictions/c autions
Immediate custody All % Immediate custody Alt % Immediate Custody All %

Magistrates courts

2,025

20,810

10

13,394

39,896

34

1,186

17,916

7

The Crown courts

10,361

43,470

24

22,852

76,755

30

8,341

15,561

54

All courts(1)

12,389

64,379

19

36,261

117,348

31

9,529

33,889

28

(1) The All courts figures include cases where the court is not recorded

The figures shown are a further breakdown of the criminal history statistics presented in chapter 6 of 'Sentencing Statistics, England and Wales 2008' which was published on 28th January 2010 and can be found at

'Sentencing Statistics, England and Wales 2009' with 2009 data will be published on 21 October 2010.

The figures have been drawn from the police's administrative IT system, the police national computer, which, as with any large scale recording system, is subject to possible errors with data entry and processing. The figures are provisional and subject to change as more information is recorded by the police.

Freedom of Information: Legislation

Mr Bain: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what steps he plans to take to extend the scope of the Freedom of Information Act 2000. [13237]

Mr Djanogly: The Government are considering a range of options to increase transparency, including extending the scope of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to additional public authorities. The Government will announce their intentions in due course.

Freedom of Information: Network Rail

Mr Weir: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice whether the Government plans to extend the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to Network Rail. [12196]

Mr Djanogly: The Government are considering a range of options for increasing transparency, including extending the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to additional public authorities.

The Government will announce their intentions in due course, including any in relation to Network Rail.

Independent Appeals Tribunal

Mr Davidson: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what the average time was between submission of an attendance allowance appeal to the Independent Appeals Tribunal in (a) Glasgow, (b) Scotland and (c) the UK and determination of the appeal in the last 12 months; and if he will make a statement. [12042]

Mr Djanogly: The average time from submission to determination of attendance allowance appeals between July 2009 and June 2010 (the most recent period for which figures are available) was:

Weeks

Glasgow

16.22

Scotland

15.05

UK

15.81


The Tribunals Service target is to deal with 75% of SSCS appeals within 16 weeks.

Juries: Crown Courts

James Wharton: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what information his Department holds on the average proportion of a juror's attendance time that is spent in court in Crown court cases. [12050]

Mr Djanogly: The information provided details the percentage of time jurors actually sat on trials in Crown court cases in the financial year 2008-09 and 2009-10 for each HMCS region in England and Wales.

HMCS juror utilisation figures in the Crown courts
Percentage
HMCS region 2008-09 2009-10

London

74.0

76.6

Midlands

55.4

65.3

North East

59.5

60.8

North West

59.8

64.3

South East

60.5

64.3

South West

54.0

59.7

Wales

59.1

63.2

England and Wales

62.8

67.2


Justices' Clerks: Surrey

Jonathan Lord: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many clerks to the justices who were qualified solicitors or barristers there were in Surrey between (a)
7 Sep 2010 : Column 499W
1979 and 1989, (b) 1990 and 1999 and (c) 2000 and 2009. [12914]

Mr Djanogly: The clerks to the justices for Surrey between 1979 and 2009 were:

The justices' clerk is the principal legal adviser to the magistrates and the provider of consistent legal advice throughout their clerkship. Decisions on the numbers of justices clerk before 2005 were taken by magistrates courts committees in consultation with magistrates. The position of justices clerks was reviewed in 2007 when the number of clerkships was reduced from 70 to 49.

Legal Aid: Compulsorily Detained Mental Patients

Karen Lumley: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what assessment his Department has made of the adequacy of the level of funding for legal aid for cases relating to mental health legislation compared to that for other legal sectors. [12597]

Mr Djanogly: The vast majority of spend in the mental health category of law is applied to clients seeking to challenge the terms of their detention under the Mental Health Act 2007 by applying to a mental health tribunal. Given the importance of this work it is provided without reference to a client's financial circumstances.

The Legal Services Commission (LSC) continues to ensure that demand for mental health legal services is met. Following the recent tender for new contracts from October 2010, they will be allocating approximately 1,500 more new matter starts in mental health in the 2010-11 contract year than were allocated in 2009-10. The mental health contract tenders were carried out on a non-competitive basis, and the number of applicants who have been provisionally offered a contract closely matches the number of existing providers. The LSC is confident that the overall provision of mental health services will remain good.

Legal Services Commission: Training

Mr Sanders: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what (a) training his Department has provided and (b) guidance his Department has issued to the Legal Services Commission in respect of procurement law and the Public Contracts Regulations 2006. [13069]

Mr Djanogly: The Ministry of Justice were engaged in the development and agreement of the policy that was implemented through the tender process. However, as the Legal Services Commission has managed the tender process, trained and qualified procurement and legal staff from the Commission have participated in the entire tender process and no further input from the Ministry was sought or offered in respect of procurement law and the Public Contracts Regulations 2006.


7 Sep 2010 : Column 500W

Magistrates Courts: Sentencing

Philip Davies: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) how many and what proportion of those sentenced in magistrates courts in the latest year for which figures are available were given a period of (a) immediate and (b) suspended custody; [12389]

(2) how many people have been given community sentences in each of the last three years. [12419]

Mr Blunt: The number of offenders and proportion of total offenders sentenced to immediate custody or suspended sentence at magistrates courts in England and Wales for 2008 are shown in table 1.

The number of offenders sentenced to a community sentence at magistrates courts in England and Wales 2006 to 2008 are shown in table 2.

This information is taken from chapter 1 (table 1.5) and chapter 3 (table 3.3) of Sentencing Statistics 2008, available at the following link:

Court proceedings data for 2009 are due to be published on 21 October 2010.

Table 1: Number and percentage of immediate and suspended custodial sentences given in magistrates courts, 2008
Number Proportion of the total sentenced (percentage)

Total sentenced

1,265,287

100

Immediate custody

50,348

4.0

Suspended custody

23,705

1.9

Other sentences

Fine

880,353

69.6

Community sentence

174,832

13.8

Otherwise dealt with

85,075

6.7

Conditional discharge

41,363

3.3

Absolute discharge

9,611

0.8


Table 2: Number of community sentences handed down at all courts, by year, 2006-08
Number

2006

190,837

2007

196,424

2008

190,171

Notes:
1. The category 'other' includes: one day in police cells, disqualification order, restraining order, confiscation order, travel restriction order, disqualification from driving, and recommendation for deportation and other miscellaneous disposals.
2. These figures have been drawn from administrative data systems. Although care is taken when processing and analysing the returns, the detail collected is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system.
3. These data have been taken from the Ministry of Justice Court Proceedings database. These data are presented on the principal offence basis. Where an offender has been sentenced for more than one offence the principal offence is the one for which the heaviest sentence was imposed. Where the same sentence has been imposed for two or more offences the principal offence is the one for which the statutory maximum is most severe.
4. Excludes data for Cardiff magistrates' court for April, July, and August 2008.
Source:
Justice Statistics-Analytical Services, Ministry of Justice


7 Sep 2010 : Column 501W

Magistrates Courts: Woking

Jonathan Lord: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) what expenditure his Department has incurred on Woking magistrates court in each of the last five years; [12769]

(2) what expenditure his Department has incurred on upgrading facilities at Woking magistrates court in each of the last 20 years. [12886]

Mr Djanogly: The total resource costs for Woking magistrates court for the last five financial years are shown in the table A. These resource costs exclude income but include non-cash costs, staffing costs and judicial costs and align with the data held on the MOJ accounting system.

The capital costs relating to improvement works for Woking magistrates court for the last five financial years are shown in table B.

Up until 1 April 2005 magistrates courts were the responsibility of locally managed magistrates courts committees who were statutorily independent. Whilst information from the last five financial years is readily available, it is not possible to collate information for the years prior to this without incurring disproportionate costs.

Table A: Woking magistrates court resource costs
£000
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Staff costs (wages and salaries)(1)

642.8

656.0

619.2

618.2

271.1

Agency staff

0.9

15.0

3.8

16.9

6.9

Property rent and rates

82.9

99.5

105.7

110.0

115.4

Maintenance and improvement

22.1

31.3

44.2

21.4

22.5

Other property costs (inc. security, cleaning, waste and refuse)

30.2

25.9

108.4

112.2

117.8

Other expenditure

9.8

5.8

4.0

10.0

9.1

Printing, postage and office expenditure

20.0

17.5

18.1

17.1

18.3

Staff travel and other

4.3

7.5

4.7

6.9

1.9

Depreciation and amortisation(2)

21.3

25.7

134.3

119.5

115.5

Diminution of fixed and intangible assets(2)

0.5

2.1

319.7

608.0

634.8

Fuel and utilities

19.7

44.1

65.9

55.5

44.4

Contracted out services

0.0

0.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

IT and telecommunications

5.8

5.9

8.9

8.1

7.4

Judicial costs

41.2

63.2

83.8

60.7

57.4

Total resource costs

901.5

999.8

1,520.9

1,764.4

1,422.5

(1) From 2009-10 Woking magistrates court legal staff were accounted for at an area level, thus decreasing the staff costs attributed to Woking magistrates court.
(2) In 2007-08 Woking magistrates courthouse was transferred on to the HMCS asset register as part of the property transfer, thus increasing depreciation and amortisation, and diminution costs of Woking magistrates court in the ensuing years.


7 Sep 2010 : Column 502W
Table B: Woking magistrates court capital costs
£000

2005-06

0

2006-07

0

2007-08

0

2008-09

0

2009-10

95.3


Magistrates: Surrey

Jonathan Lord: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what the average annual number of magistrates in Surrey was in the period (a) 1980 to 1989, (b) 1990 to 1999 and (c) 2000 to 2009. [12884]

Mr Djanogly: Data for the periods 1980 to 1995 are no longer retained. On average, there were 422 magistrates per year in Surrey during the period 1996 to 1999.

Despite an extensive search, it was not possible to locate data for the year 2000 in the archives. On average, there were 367 magistrates per year in Surrey during the period 2001 to 2009.

Offensive Weapons: Leeds

Greg Mulholland: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many people have been prosecuted for carrying an offensive weapon or bladed article in Leeds North West constituency in each of the last five years. [12244]

Mr Blunt: The number of persons proceeded against at magistrates courts in the West Yorkshire police force area for possession of offensive weapons or having an article with a blade or point in a public place, 2004 to 2008 (latest available) is shown in the following table.

Court proceedings data are not available at parliamentary constituency level.

Data for 2009 are planned for publication on 21 October 2010.

Persons proceeded against at magistrates courts in the West Yorkshire police force area for offences of possession of offensive weapons and having an article with a blade or point( 1) , 2004-08( 2,3)
Number

2004

581

2005

557

2006

512

2007

507

2008

563

(1) Includes offences under the following statutes:
Prevention of Crime Act 1953-section 1
Criminal Justice Act 1988-section 139(2) as added by Offensive Weapons Act 1996-section 4(1).
Criminal Justice Act 1988-section 139.
Criminal Justice Act 1988-section 139A(1) as added by Offensive Weapons Act 1996-section 4(1)
(2) The figures given relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offence for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences, the offence selected is the one for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe.
(3) Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.
Source:
Justice Statistics Analytical Services-Ministry of Justice.

7 Sep 2010 : Column 503W

Parliamentary Questions

Jeremy Corbyn: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice on how many occasions his Department and its predecessor has not provided answers to parliamentary questions on the grounds of commercial confidentiality in each of the last five years. [12879]

Mr Djanogly: The information requested could be provided only by manually checking each parliamentary questions folder on the PQ database at a disproportionate cost. However, the database has been adapted so that this information will be centrally recorded in the future.

Police: Fines

Philip Davies: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice if he will bring forward proposals to give police the power to collect fines imposed by courts. [12396]

Mr Djanogly: Financial penalties are currently collected and enforced by HMCS. Assistance from the police may occasionally be required to execute warrants for fine default.

There are no plans to provide the police with powers to collect fines.

Prison Service: Contracts

Jeremy Corbyn: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice which private finance initiative prison contracts have been re-financed since 1997; and what savings his Department achieved from each contract. [12700]

Mr Blunt: Of the nine private finance initiative prison (PFI) contracts currently in place, our records show none have been re-financed and therefore no savings in relation to refinancing has occurred.

Prisoners

Philip Davies: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many prisoners serving sentences on the latest date for which figures are available were born (a) in the UK and (b) outside the UK. [12368]

Mr Blunt: The Ministry of Justice does not record a prisoner's place of birth, only their nationality, which is self declared. As at June 2010, the most recent available data, there were 71,016 British nationals and 11,135 foreign nationals in prison (plus a further 2,851 had no nationality recorded).

The number of foreign national prisoners held in all prison establishments in England and Wales by nationality is published quarterly in the population in custody bulletin, found under the following link:

These figures have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.

Prisoners' Release: Housing

Mr Buckland: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what steps his Department is taking (a) directly and (b) through partnership working to ensure that former offenders have access to secure housing on release. [12081]


7 Sep 2010 : Column 504W

Mr Blunt: A range of housing advice is provided in prisons and in the community to help offenders to find suitable and sustainable housing. Initial needs assessments are provided both in custody and for those offenders serving community sentences. In prison, housing advice is either provided by an 'in house' team or by a voluntary sector body under contract. In the community, offenders with housing needs are signposted to appropriate housing support services.

Most of the local resources for housing provision lie outside the criminal justice system and so the Ministry of Justice and NOMS play an important role in promoting strong local partnerships to tackle housing needs among offenders. The recent establishment of the cross-Government ministerial group on homelessness is expected to consider what further action is needed to support housing provision for offenders.

Prisoners: Drugs

Greg Mulholland: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what estimate he has made of the number of prisoners who were drug addicts in the latest period for which figures are available. [12763]

Mr Blunt: The National Offender Management Service (NOMS) estimates that on average 55% of those entering prison are drug dependent.

Drug treatment need in prisons is determined on a local basis. Central estimates of treatment need are reliant on epidemiological surveys. The figures above are derived primarily from an Office for National Statistics (ONS) report(1) which followed a large psychiatric survey of morbidity among prisoners(2) in 1997.

A more recent source of information regarding prevalence of substance misuse among sentenced prisoners is 'The problems and needs of newly sentenced prisoners: results from a national survey', published by the Ministry of Justice in October 2008. This reviewed 1,457 newly sentenced prisoners from 49 prisons. It showed 62% of prisoners reporting some drug use and 41% of the sample reporting heroin, cocaine powder or crack cocaine (HCC) use during the four week period prior to custody.

In 2009-10, a total of 60,067 clinical interventions for drug dependency and 66,459 substance misuse triage assessments (undertaken by CARAT(3) services) were conducted in prisons(4).

Prisoners: First Aid

Philip Davies: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what recent estimate he has made of the annual cost to the public purse of (a) obtaining health and safety certificates and (b) first aid training for prisoners to enable them to work in prison. [12413]


7 Sep 2010 : Column 505W

Mr Blunt: Neither the National Offender Management Services (NOMS) nor the Skills Funding Agency routinely collect the information requested.

Prisons: Violence

John McDonnell: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many assaults by prisoners on (a) a prisoner and (b) a prison officer were recorded in each prison establishment in each year since 2002; and if he will make a statement. [12904]

Mr Blunt: The following table details the number of assault incidents, by establishment, of prisoner on prisoner and prisoner on prison officer from 2002 until 2009, the last full year for which we have figures. The National Offender Management Service does not record the number of assaults, rather it records assault incidents in which one or more persons have been assaulted.

Prisons have a responsibility to keep prisoners, staff and visitors safe. The management of violence and its reduction, including support for staff, is central to successful prison management. It is fundamental to NOMS' objectives and vital to achieving the broad aims of safer custody.


7 Sep 2010 : Column 506W

7 Sep 2010 : Column 507W

7 Sep 2010 : Column 508W
Table 1: Recorded prisoner-on-prisoner assaults by prison: 2002-09
Number of incidents
Prison 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Acklington

49

39

33

38

73

65

50

91

Albany

(1)-

(1)-

15

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

10

Altcourse

167

162

185

194

195

225

153

197

Ashfield

429

271

305

500

624

653

607

392

Ashwell

8

9

15

17

9

17

17

11

Askham Grange

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

Aylesbury

44

26

21

78

80

79

89

138

Bedford

49

44

49

41

55

36

55

62

Belmarsh

60

76

66

53

51

25

27

40

Birmingham

90

105

139

102

118

109

96

95

Blantyre House

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

Blundeston

36

39

26

14

15

33

30

42

Brinsford

281

304

326

344

187

187

324

148

Bristol

107

84

100

95

85

73

72

55

Brixton

130

122

106

73

40

60

78

83

Bronzefield

n/a

n/a

37

92

113

98

103

101

Buckley Hall

46

72

76

62

57

37

24

19

Bullingdon

59

40

36

59

44

68

87

85

Bullwood Hall

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

20

15

10

12

7

Bure

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Camp Hill

47

67

51

54

55

56

70

48

Canterbury

9

(1)-

12

15

13

20

30

32

Cardiff

46

51

53

50

47

25

19

14

Castington

363

312

384

361

360

385

431

424

Channings Wood

12

21

22

38

53

54

56

48

Chelmsford

60

63

84

68

105

32

39

135

Coldingley

(1)-

(1)-

17

8

20

11

13

27

Cookham Wood

9

13

7

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

19

95

Dartmoor

25

21

15

30

26

27

38

29

Deerbolt

154

167

204

164

152

160

180

214

Doncaster

87

39

77

94

144

127

192

412

Dorchester

9

13

11

19

18

33

26

25

Dovegate

40

56

75

66

66

55

44

51

Dover

14

16

9

9

23

64

47

38

Downview

13

6

14

28

25

12

12

24

Drake Hall

(1)-

13

7

9

6

21

8

21

Durham

65

59

79

89

146

127

120

84

East Sutton Park

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

Eastwood Park

15

26

33

51

47

15

10

14

Edmunds Hill

(1)-

47

26

23

27

27

21

34

Elmley

88

84

104

134

100

125

122

104

Erlestoke

6

10

26

26

22

35

38

23

Everthorpe

9

(1)-

20

42

65

69

61

56

Exeter

37

37

26

34

35

24

38

61

Featherstone

60

52

54

69

70

90

103

62

Feltham

459

568

573

547

475

427

551

604

Ford

7

(1)-

20

17

6

6

10

(1)-

Forest Bank

304

308

397

429

339

213

233

227

Foston Hall

17

19

26

26

23

28

10

14

Frankland

15

21

18

24

26

31

41

42

Full Sutton

9

15

27

36

45

52

52

49

Garth

36

23

26

59

63

65

92

77

Gartree

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

10

8

12

9

10

Glen Parva

222

240

230

269

341

364

464

538

Gloucester

56

36

62

41

56

47

63

66

Grendon

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

6

Guys Marsh

43

41

49

43

57

73

68

49

Haslar

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

8

15

9

Haverigg

19

17

22

30

41

68

80

73

Hewell Cluster

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

67

127

Hewell: Blakenhurst

271

258

192

149

151

213

87

(1)-

Hewell: Brockhill

23

25

19

28

20

8

7

(1)-

Hewell: Hewell Grange

(1)-

(1)-

6

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

High Down

85

98

119

101

134

118

157

117

Highpoint

130

82

92

73

74

80

82

87

Hindley

88

177

63

112

348

498

491

485

Hollesley Bay

179

45

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

Holloway

98

91

80

94

121

118

112

56

Holme House

71

89

69

86

98

124

96

106

Hull

84

91

168

166

121

140

87

107

Huntercombe

45

77

79

95

184

280

393

308

Kennet

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

(1)-

27

35

Kingston

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

Kirkham

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

Kirklevington

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

Lancaster

12

11

(1)-

10

10

20

13

9

Lancaster Farms

130

16

185

435

362

356

326

264

Latchmere House

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

Leeds

95

154

138

109

104

92

81

75

Leicester

70

59

53

42

51

34

40

58

Lewes

89

104

60

62

73

63

130

90

Leyhill

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

6

7

(1)-

(1)-

6

Lincoln

82

69

50

56

60

87

123

60

Lindholme

17

43

42

33

37

52

57

47

Littlehey

31

32

37

41

39

38

22

24

Liverpool

94

108

119

128

162

226

222

207

Long Lartin

16

17

16

36

38

43

29

29

Low Newton

94

117

88

62

68

65

74

54

Lowdham Grange

20

20

20

37

73

41

47

26

Maidstone

16

10

21

14

11

19

16

15

Manchester

191

218

187

142

172

127

143

144

Moorland

177

139

34

94

89

91

86

85

Moorland Open

28

11

(1)-

8

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

Morton Hall

7

13

16

9

15

12

8

14

Mount

17

25

16

55

48

45

77

68

New Hall

47

32

77

84

44

56

64

39

North Sea Camp

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

7

(1)-

(1)-

8

Northallerton

80

82

87

104

82

100

99

72

Norwich

132

128

11

20

40

13

(1)-

(1)-

Nottingham

61

66

74

64

55

85

83

74

Onley

516

509

161

152

153

216

222

170

Parc

198

233

227

247

241

314

381

376

Parkhurst

16

34

38

37

33

11

16

19

Pentonville

129

165

120

139

155

145

186

200

Peterborough

n/a

n/a

n/a

100

221

220

213

200

Portland

71

67

129

154

127

193

166

148

Preston

23

73

67

78

78

105

117

120

Ranby

39

38

19

30

52

42

67

75

Reading

7

23

25

76

57

45

25

46

Risley

44

63

110

103

104

108

112

64

Rochester

33

51

102

78

100

75

143

187

Rye Hill

10

19

40

54

65

66

35

19

Send

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

17

11

8

13

9

Shepton Mallet

10

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

Shrewsbury

35

44

41

50

29

39

40

21

Spring Hill

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

Stafford

11

19

41

58

39

76

62

60

Standford Hill

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

7

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

Stocken

37

38

34

39

43

60

58

47

Stoke Heath

239

137

239

438

505

526

500

409

Styal

17

9

29

25

39

58

39

22

Sudbury

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

Swaleside

31

26

29

33

41

52

57

54

Swansea

9

16

16

20

30

19

26

24

Swinfen Hall

127

110

96

104

89

88

88

56

Thorn Cross

56

43

7

19

143

84

42

31

Usk\Prescoed

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

(1)-

11

14

(1)-

Verne

10

13

16

22

9

10

18

14

Wakefield

10

8

18

25

24

17

36

20

Wandsworth

54

51

74

77

69

95

59

79

Warren Hill

(1)-

93

162

257

268

321

333

270

Wayland

25

65

51

59

49

58

56

54

Wealstun

9

14

7

9

28

24

41

26

Weare

48

52

55

23

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Wellingborough

12

17

12

31

49

35

77

122

Werrington

134

133

111

140

144

140

197

152

Wetherby

41

175

414

492

403

353

388

367

Whatton

(1)-

9

(1)-

(1)-

8

16

26

20

Whitemoor

30

18

18

21

22

31

27

24

Winchester

43

67

57

47

35

26

29

45

Wolds

52

27

41

23

30

49

50

31

Woodhill

7

27

51

66

57

52

93

57

Wormwood Scrubs

69

89

129

141

147

137

123

108

Wymott

(1)-

8

(1)-

9

24

30

28

44


Next Section Index Home Page