11 Nov 2010 : Column 405W

Written Answers to Questions

Thursday 11 November 2010

Scotland

Devolution: Scotland

Ann McKechin: To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland on what occasions he has discussed the devolution of council tax rebate with (a) the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities, (b) local authorities in Scotland, (c) the Scottish Executive and (d) the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions since his appointment. [23216]

Michael Moore: I am in regular contact with a range of stakeholders on matters concerning aspects of welfare reform. As was the case with previous Administrations, it is not the Government's practice to provide details of all such meetings.

Institute of Fiscal Studies

Robert Halfon: To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland how much his Department spent on services provided by the Institute for Fiscal Studies in each of the last 10 years. [23396]

David Mundell: In the last 10 years the Scotland Office has spent £60 on services provided by the Institute for Fiscal Studies, all in 2010.

Transport

AA

Mr Watson: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what discussions he has had with (a) the AA, (b) the RAC Foundation and (c) other motoring organisations on the appropriate weight limits for alloy wheels fitted to vehicles on UK roads; and if he will make a statement. [23348]

Mike Penning: Ministers have regular discussions with a number of organisations, including both the AA and the RAC Foundation, at which a wide range of road safety issues are discussed. However, the issue of the appropriate weight limits for alloy wheels has not been raised.

I also refer the hon. Member to my answer of 28 October 2010, Official Report, columns 460-61W.

Alloy Wheels

Mr Watson: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what recent discussions he has had with (a) ministerial colleagues and (b) his officials on proposals to introduce a legal weight limit for alloy wheels fitted to vehicles used on public roads; what recent representations he has received on weight limits for alloy wheels since his appointment; and if he will make a statement. [23296]


11 Nov 2010 : Column 406W

Mike Penning: The Secretary of State for Transport has not had any discussions with ministerial colleagues or officials on proposals to introduce a legal weight limit for alloy wheels fitted to vehicles used on public roads.

The Secretary of State for Transport has had one representation on weight limits for alloy wheels. I refer the hon. Member to my answer of 28 October 2010, Official Report, columns 460-461W.

Mr Watson: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport pursuant to the answer of 28 October 2010, Official Report, column 460W, on alloy wheels, if he will place in the Library a copy of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe regulation on alloy wheels. [23324]

Mike Penning: A copy of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Regulation 124 (Uniform Provisions concerning the Approval of Wheels for Passenger Cars and their Trailers) has been placed in the Libraries of the House.

Alloy Wheels: Imports

Mr Watson: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what recent representations he has received on defective alloy wheel imports; and if he will make a statement. [23349]

Mike Penning: The Secretary of State for Transport has had one representation regarding potentially substandard imported commercial vehicle wheels.

Existing legislation already requires new products, including wheels, which are placed on the market to be safe and fit for purpose. Action can be taken if a product is found to be unsafe.

BRB (Residuary): Land

Jonathan Edwards: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what plans he has for the land in the ownership of BRB (Residuary) Ltd when that body is abolished. [23264]

Mrs Villiers: BRB (Residuary) Ltd will continue its agreed programme to dispose of land that has been determined to have no further operational transport use on terms that deliver the best value for money to the taxpayer.

Any land still held by BRB (Residuary) Ltd when it is abolished will transfer to the direct ownership of the Secretary of State for Transport.

Bus Services: Finance

Andrew Gwynne: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport (1) what assessment he has made of the likely effects on the number of buses operating in rural areas of the reduction in Bus Service Operators Grant in combination with (a) likely levels of local authority spending on bus services and (b) the abolition of Rural Bus Subsidy Grant; [23196]

(2) what assessment he has made of the likely effects of the reduction in the Bus Service Operators Grant in combination with projected levels of local authority
11 Nov 2010 : Column 407W
spending on bus services on the number of buses operating in (a) rural, (b) non-metropolitan urban and (c) metropolitan areas. [23197]

Norman Baker: Outside London, around 80% of local bus services in England are provided by operators on a commercial basis. Local authorities procure the remaining 20%. It is up to local authorities to decide how they use their funding. As we do not know what the likely level of local authority spending on bus services will be in the future, we are not able to estimate what the effects will be on the number of buses. The impacts will vary according to each local authority's decision.

With regard to the potential impacts of the reduction in Bus Service Operators Grant, I refer the hon. Member to my answer of 2 November 2010, Official Report, column 702W.

Northern Hub

Andrew Gwynne: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what his most recent assessment is of progress in the development of the Northern Hub. [23464]

Mrs Villiers: Network Rail is developing the Northern Hub plans and will complete the next stage in spring 2011. We then expect Network Rail to include the Northern Hub in its initial strategic business plan.

This will enable us to consider in 2012 whether a Northern Hub scheme can be funded and what progress can be made on the project during the next Network Rail control period (2014-15 to 2019-20).

Rolling Stock: South East

Nicholas Soames: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport when he expects new rail rolling stock for the South East to be purchased; and on which lines it is expected to run. [23327]

Mrs Villiers: An announcement regarding Thameslink and rolling stock in the South East will be made in due course.

The South East will also benefit from the additional capacity provided by the Crossrail project, which was confirmed by the Government on the 20 October. On completion, this will deliver new trains on routes across London into Essex, Kent and Berkshire.

House of Commons Commission

Catering

Mr Frank Field: To ask the hon. Member for Middlesbrough, representing the House of Commons Commission, how many complaints the Commission has received on the operation of catering facilities in the House of Commons in each of the last five years. [22630]

Sir Stuart Bell: The Commission has not directly received complaints about the operation of catering facilities other than a letter about the recent price rises.
11 Nov 2010 : Column 408W
Complaints are received by the Director of Catering Services in various written or oral forms, including comment books in some of the catering outlets, but no record is kept of the overall number.

Mr Leech: To ask the hon. Member for Middlesbrough, representing the House of Commons Commission, (1) if he will estimate the contribution to annual UK greenhouse gas emissions of meat and dairy produce procured for sale in House of Commons catering outlets in the latest period for which figures are available; [23136]

(2) how much (a) meat and (b) dairy produce was disposed of unused by catering outlets in the House in the most recent year for which figures are available. [23137]

Sir Stuart Bell: The House of Commons Catering and Retail Service does not keep records that would enable these figures to be estimated.

Mr Leech: To ask the hon. Member for Middlesbrough, representing the House of Commons Commission, if he will review the amount of meat and dairy produce procured for sale in House of Commons catering outlets for the purpose of reducing the level of such produce consumed in the House of Commons. [23138]

Sir Stuart Bell: This is a matter for personal choice. All catering outlets in the House of Commons offer a menu that gives consumers the opportunity to eat vegetarian or fish dishes if they wish to avoid eating meat or dairy products.

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

British Waterways: Finance

Andrea Leadsom: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what consideration she has given to continuing her Department's funding of British Waterways. [23326]

Richard Benyon: The level of grant for British Waterways is currently being considered, following the outcome of the spending review. The reduction in British Waterways' grant will not be any greater because British Waterways is becoming a charity than it would otherwise have been, as the Government wish to get the charity off to the best start that we can afford. The move to charity status will require a long-term contract for continued Government support.

British Waterways: Scotland

Ann McKechin: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs whether she had discussions with the Scottish Executive on her proposal for the transfer to a mutual trust of assets held by British Waterways in Scotland. [23215]

Richard Benyon: British Waterways Scotland currently manage Scottish assets for the benefit of the inland waterways in Scotland. When British Waterways in
11 Nov 2010 : Column 409W
England and Wales becomes a charitable body, its non-operational property portfolio will transfer to the new body. The Scottish Executive has decided that British Waterways Scotland will remain in the public sector and use the existing legal structure to exercise its functions solely in relation to Scotland. Scottish assets will continue to be managed by British Waterways Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Executive. We will be discussing with the Scottish Executive and British Waterways other issues relating to assets.

Departmental Public Expenditure

Lisa Nandy: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs whether her Department has established processes to monitor any effects of proposed reductions in its expenditure. [21633]

Richard Benyon: The Department publishes equality/regulatory impact assessments for all proposals that impose or reduce costs on businesses or civil society, or which affect costs in the public sector. These assessments establish a basis for subsequent monitoring and ex-post evaluation and are updated at the relevant stages of the policy development cycle.

Food: Labelling

Gordon Birtwistle: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will take steps to require halal meat offered for sale to be labelled as such. [22813]

Mr Paice: I appreciate that this is an issue which people feel strongly about and we will be working with interested groups to find a way to address their concerns. People should know what they are buying in shops and when they are eating out, and I will be discussing with the food industry whether labelling and point of sale information can play a greater role in giving consumers a choice.

Sewers: Private Sector

Miss McIntosh: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) how many pumping stations there are; [22702]

(2) what estimate she has made of the monetary value of the private drains, sewers and pump stations that are due to transfer to sewerage companies from 1 October 2011; [22707]

(3) when she expects Ofwat to publish its plan for the transfer of private drains, sewers and pump stations to sewerage companies; [22708]

(4) what plans she has for the implementation of the transfer of private drains, sewers and pump stations to sewerage companies; [22709]

(5) what recent representations she has received from the drainage industry on the proposed transfer of private drains and sewers to sewerage companies; [22710]

(6) what estimate she has made of the likely effects on small and medium-sized enterprises in the waste-water sector of the transfer of private sewers and lateral drains to sewerage companies; [22711]


11 Nov 2010 : Column 410W

(7) what consultation her Department undertook with the pumping station industry prior to the publication of the draft Water Industry (Schemes for Adoption of Private Sewers) Regulations 2011; [22712]

(8) what assessment she has made of the likely effects on the incidence of flooding of the proposed transfer of private drains, sewers and pump stations to sewerage companies; [22713]

(9) what assessment she has made of the average change in water bills of the implementation of the proposed transfer of funding for private drains and sewers to sewerage companies; and if she will make a statement; [22714]

Richard Benyon: On 26 August the Government and the Welsh Assembly Government (WAG) jointly published a consultation paper on draft regulations for transfer to the ownership of the water and sewerage companies of private sewers and lateral drains which drain to the public sewerage system in England and Wales. The consultation, supplemented by a series of workshops held jointly with WAG, seeks final responses by 18 November. To date, DEFRA has received many representations from the drainage industry. The current consultation follows earlier consultations on the subject in 2003 and 2007, to which DEFRA also received many responses, and is available via the DEFRA website.

In addition to the formal consultation process, DEFRA has been working closely with a steering group including the water industry regulator Ofwat, the Environment Agency, Water UK, the Consumer Council for Water, WAG, other Government Departments and representatives of local authorities, the insurance industry, house builders and the drainage industry. DEFRA has also held meetings with more specialist groups including representatives of the pump installation and maintenance industry, to hear their views and gather evidence. Representations from the independent drainage sector have focused on concern about the approach taken by the water and sewerage companies to the procurement of maintenance services after transfer.

The current impact assessment was published with the August consultation paper. It estimates the transfer to result in an increase in annual sewerage bills in the range £3 to £14. This includes the cost of the transfer of private pumping stations, based on an estimated number of 22,000. It also contains a Small Firms Impact Test and considers the benefits to householders including reduced incidence of blockages, which can result in sewer flooding. It is not anticipated that incidence of surface water flooding will be significantly affected. The impact assessment will be updated in the light of the outcome of the consultation.

Justice

Criminal Proceedings: Translation Services

Mr Raab: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what estimate he has made of the cost to the public purse of compliance with the EU Directive on the right to translation and interpretation in criminal proceedings; and from which budget within his Department funding for such services will be drawn. [23213]


11 Nov 2010 : Column 411W

Mr Blunt: In my written ministerial statement on 16 September 2010, Official Report, columns 64-66WS, the Government announced proposed changes to arrangements for the provision of interpretation and translation services across the justice sector. The changes aim to reduce waste and cut costs whilst safeguarding quality. Until the work is complete it is not possible to provide an accurate assessment of any potential costs arising from the directive. Interpretation and translation costs are met from within a range of operational budgets across the justice sector.

Google

Robert Halfon: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what the (a) timescale and (b) terms of reference are for the audit of Google's Street View project announced by the Information Commissioner on 3 November 2010; and if he will make a statement. [22797]

Mr Djanogly: Google will be subject to an audit by the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) within nine months of signing an undertaking, which is intended to commit the company to take action ensuring that breaches of the Data Protection Act of the kind which have occurred do not occur again. Terms of reference will be agreed prior to the audit.

This information has been provided by the ICO.

Information Commissioner: Complaints

Robert Halfon: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what the average time taken was for the Office of the Information Commissioner to respond to complaints in latest period for which figures are available. [22799]

Mr Djanogly: The following table shows the average number of days taken by the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) to resolve complaints, broken down by data protection and freedom of information for the period 1 November 2008 to 31 October 2010.

Days

Data protection

73

Freedom of Information

155


This information has been provided by the ICO.

Robert Halfon: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many complaints the Office of the Information Commissioner has (a) received and (b) responded to in the last 24 months. [22800]

Mr Djanogly: The following table shows the number of data protection and freedom of information complaints received and finished by the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) for the period 1 November 2008 to 31 October 2010.

Data protection Freedom of information

Casework received

62,560

7,540

Casework finished

62,616

7,872


This information has been provided by the ICO.


11 Nov 2010 : Column 412W

Information Commissioner: Training

Robert Halfon: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice which training programmes in (a) information and communication technologies and (b) the internet staff of the Office of the Information Commissioner have attended in the last 24 months; how many staff attended each such course; and what accreditation they received in each case. [22798]

Mr Djanogly: In the last 24 months staff at the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) have attended the following courses:

Course title Accredited Number of delegates

Digital Identity Briefing

No

23

Core skills in data recovery and analysis

National Policing Improvement Agency

2

Internet data-RIPA or open source

No

10

Internet and Computer Related Crime

No

1


Staff have attended the following courses related to the internet, but focused on the use of the ICO's own website:

Course title Accredited Number of delegates

Google analytics workshop

No

1

Optimising your site using Google analytics

No

1

Google analytics interpretation

No

2


This information has been provided by the ICO.

Judges: Documents

Rehman Chishti: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) what steps he is taking to ensure that judges have access to all relevant documents; [23006]

(2) what recent representations he has received from Immigration Judges on access to copies of appellants' records of convictions. [23007]

Mr Djanogly: My officials have recently received a number of representations from members of the judiciary that the United Kingdom Border Agency is not always providing copies of appellants' records of convictions and other relevant documents for immigration and asylum appeals. The Tribunals Service will ensure that these issues are addressed as part of its regular liaison arrangement with the judiciary and the United Kingdom Border Agency considering what more could be done to ensure that the relevant documentation is provided by the respondent.

Prisoners' Release

Kelvin Hopkins: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) whether he plans to review the automatic release point for persons sentenced to determinate prison sentences; [22937]


11 Nov 2010 : Column 413W

(2) whether he plans to review the powers of courts to impose extended supervision in cases where individuals are sentenced to determinate prison sentences. [22938]

Mr Blunt: We are conducting an assessment of sentencing policy to ensure that it is effective in deterring crime, protecting the public, punishing offenders and cutting re-offending. That assessment includes consideration of the release and supervision of offenders serving determinate sentences. We will publish proposals for consultation in a Green Paper on sentencing and rehabilitation in December.

Prisoners: Heroin

John Mann: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many (a) drug caches including heroin, (b) needles used for drug taking, (c) prisoners testing positive for heroin use and (d) prisoners who on a first test did not test positive for heroin use but subsequently tested positive for such use were detected in each prison in the last 10 years. [23257]


11 Nov 2010 : Column 414W

Mr Blunt: NOMS records centrally the number of drugs and drug-taking paraphernalia seized in prisons but this cannot be disaggregated to provide the number of (a) drug caches, including heroin and (b) needles used for drug taking seized in each prison in the last 10 years without incurring disproportionate cost.

Data relating to (d) how many prisoners who on a first test did not test positive for heroin use but subsequently tested positive for such use are not available.

The data for how many samples tested positive for opiate use, including heroin, under the prison mandatory drug testing programme in each prison in the last 10 financial years are shown in the following table. To disaggregate the data to show those samples positive for heroin from those positive for other opiates would require a detailed investigation of every prison's locally held records, which would be at disproportionate cost.

The figures contained in the table have been drawn from administrative data systems. Although care is taken when processing data, the detail collected is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system. The data are not subject to audit. A space indicates that there was no testing in that period at that establishment.


11 Nov 2010 : Column 415W

11 Nov 2010 : Column 416W

11 Nov 2010 : Column 417W

11 Nov 2010 : Column 418W
Positive drug tests due to opiates across the prison estate from 2000 to 2010
Financial year 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Acklington

76

80

28

25

39

41

28

24

29

25

Albany

1

2

0

10

5

6

17

13

18

20

Altcourse

76

120

92

75

88

74

127

231

154

122

Ashfield

29

31

10

10

3

3

12

7

0

4

Ashwell

99

31

20

21

39

39

25

15

30

11

Askham Grange

13

20

6

0

15

9

13

9

3

6

Aylesbury

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Bedford

55

57

19

25

25

40

75

44

28

26

Belmarsh

102

91

68

22

35

24

38

33

25

21

Birmingham

273

96

29

141

172

124

203

121

94

91

Blakenhurst

305

216

396

214

287

378

245

237

-

-

Blantyre House

1

4

6

0

1

1

1

0

1

2

Blundeston

16

34

21

10

17

27

21

29

26

28

Brinsford

14

15

16

5

3

0

0

1

0

1

Bristol

40

41

25

18

52

26

44

57

56

48

Brixton

116

77

51

36

32

52

53

42

80

97

Brockhill

27

15

22

19

25

29

18

15

-

-

Bronzefield

-

-

-

-

26

28

33

18

8

13

Buckley Hall

72

57

30

33

33

21

86

139

57

27

Bullingdon

82

75

24

59

59

94

86

131

90

136

Bullwood Hall

25

16

24

1

3

1

1

0

0

1

Bure

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Camp Hill

88

60

17

17

27

20

25

29

43

31

Canterbury

66

55

47

26

17

43

21

1

2

0

Cardiff

55

45

32

42

33

60

99

101

48

48

Castington

3

6

7

3

3

5

2

0

2

0

Channings Wood

39

53

4

5

23

11

33

50

67

73

Chelmsford

23

38

13

12

37

44

35

39

34

22

Coldingley

18

25

25

18

44

46

42

44

53

70

Cookham Wood

23

7

9

2

15

12

13

2

0

0

Dartmoor

23

50

53

26

41

24

51

78

81

40

Deerbolt

9

8

4

1

2

1

0

1

0

0

Doncaster

224

318

177

222

154

144

236

133

63

72

Dorchester

24

28

13

22

15

21

29

23

2

13

Dovegate

-

57

70

74

84

120

139

185

103

80

Dover

2

0

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Downview

32

10

38

20

32

23

5

22

37

18

Drake Hall

11

31

21

10

26

13

33

23

7

12

Durham

110

80

38

20

20

34

41

57

43

44

East Sutton Park

8

11

0

6

3

7

0

2

4

2

Eastwood Park

60

15

6

25

21

37

47

38

34

23

Edmonds Hill

-

-

-

16

17

14

13

22

25

32

Elmley

192

136

79

37

75

55

74

158

162

122

Erlestoke

35

30

18

18

28

35

32

45

54

37

Everthorpe

98

91

39

33

40

41

103

97

50

34

Exeter

35

39

10

12

12

18

17

17

18

10

Featherstone

102

65

39

19

38

59

101

224

86

63

Feltham

2

4

1

0

2

5

8

3

2

5

Ford

21

24

38

32

29

63

64

74

30

31

Forest Bank

199

213

138

177

261

349

360

363

200

155

Foston Hall

89

35

5

9

29

25

22

19

8

19

Frankland

56

61

34

25

38

23

31

61

33

50

Full Sutton

48

60

29

28

34

20

39

48

37

30

Garth

99

85

29

18

48

88

74

76

97

81

Gartree

26

12

6

16

15

14

29

23

12

25

Glen Parva

78

50

13

3

6

4

1

4

1

2

Gloucester

25

18

33

11

30

20

29

50

23

20

Grendon

1

5

3

11

6

8

10

5

2

4

Guys Marsh

37

23

25

28

30

25

45

62

83

98

Haslar

3

0

0

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Haverigg

50

72

44

18

50

77

63

106

152

83

Hewell

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

115

59

Hewell Grange

18

4

7

17

19

19

8

6

-

-

High Down

208

77

42

44

65

59

23

31

31

65

Highpoint

55

63

42

22

38

50

104

76

77

28

Hindley

3

8

2

3

2

3

4

5

2

9

Hollesley Bay

14

5

10

13

9

17

9

14

27

16

Holloway

38

25

13

11

16

25

33

15

23

32

Holme House

116

77

59

71

50

31

48

80

50

61

Hull

51

43

35

19

48

52

27

34

15

6

Huntercombe

0

0

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

Kennet

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

31

29

21

Kingston

9

16

8

7

15

18

26

23

12

10

Kirkham

47

47

48

70

46

41

65

51

44

23

Kirklevington

7

5

5

0

18

3

7

7

6

7

Lancaster

46

71

66

20

30

14

29

43

27

20

Lancaster Farms

2

3

2

4

4

1

1

1

1

0

Latchmere House

13

0

2

5

3

3

3

2

2

1

Leeds

159

126

97

117

123

70

50

61

56

61

Leicester

58

39

13

16

23

15

23

14

15

23

Lewes

116

92

25

45

59

63

101

130

98

73

Leyhill

72

97

69

114

100

63

52

56

51

37

Lincoln

89

61

24

39

94

58

27

51

48

37

Lindholme

77

52

75

30

49

35

52

83

40

35

Littlehey

49

25

11

14

15

11

16

24

20

18

Liverpool

309

228

207

245

368

374

216

220

144

84

Long Lartin

116

125

90

73

64

76

77

82

44

32

Low Newton

79

58

29

16

31

40

12

16

9

6

Lowdham Grange

58

68

28

25

36

55

59

79

60

49

Maidstone

22

27

23

37

32

58

40

52

37

9

Manchester

249

243

214

190

153

161

102

126

104

160

Moorland

30

38

29

23

34

20

31

43

18

3

Moorland Open

6

10

3

11

16

32

7

6

3

5

Morton Hall

5

23

10

12

6

7

9

3

2

4

Mount

47

55

63

24

52

181

185

117

86

61

New Hall

44

32

12

16

36

28

21

21

8

21

North Sea Camp

20

26

18

44

30

36

30

8

8

12

Northallerton

8

6

6

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

Norwich

67

53

27

22

37

30

28

16

18

29

Nottingham

86

56

39

33

25

63

79

106

55

28

Onley

2

0

3

0

15

32

45

45

19

12

Parc

19

4

12

26

14

18

18

23

18

65

Parkhurst

57

34

37

30

21

37

25

26

27

15

Pentonville

103

173

85

53

92

115

105

130

109

100

Peterborough Female

-

-

-

-

-

52

48

31

31

19

Peterborough Male

-

-

-

-

-

55

133

178

90

113

Portland

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

Preston

110

69

35

35

93

115

95

84

69

50

Ranby

82

64

62

40

43

50

108

198

83

56

Reading

2

4

2

0

3

2

1

3

0

0

Risley

155

165

190

149

194

163

105

88

80

60

Rochester

9

8

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

0

Rye Hill

1

89

19

27

28

27

57

42

34

33

Send

12

14

4

5

15

3

14

23

13

5

Shepton Mallet

26

17

17

2

4

2

0

6

5

2

Shrewsbury

80

42

68

64

67

38

62

42

50

29

Spring Hill

13

9

7

9

20

33

15

16

18

10

Stafford

162

140

84

69

78

134

141

110

43

26

Standford Hill

23

38

28

23

31

46

70

24

23

16

Stocken

107

84

15

10

21

23

37

54

21

28

Stoke Heath

4

0

2

2

1

4

2

3

1

1

Styal

70

90

36

39

83

141

202

96

44

50

Sudbury

89

117

91

108

128

86

70

112

65

69

Swaleside

121

99

33

47

109

63

56

118

63

70

Swansea

7

22

20

21

21

12

9

24

22

16

Swinfen Hall

3

1

0

0

7

6

5

2

0

0

Thorn Cross

5

1

4

2

1

1

0

0

2

2

Usk/Prescoed

5

7

8

15

18

24

23

17

13

24

Verne

21

25

4

7

23

10

4

9

10

15

Wakefield

14

3

5

6

8

8

16

29

17

22

Wandsworth

101

108

55

74

86

61

52

49

75

65

Warren Hill

-

-

-

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Wayland

42

57

30

26

13

23

36

33

46

50

Wealstun

112

69

77

29

63

53

53

41

30

14

Weare

44

42

16

7

10

8

-

-

-

-

Wellingborough

129

65

17

11

31

26

31

55

42

43

Wellington

2

2

2

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

Wetherby

3

3

1

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

Whatton

5

2

2

2

3

3

4

9

9

8

Whitemoor

103

100

48

26

34

24

59

60

37

30

Winchester

72

39

10

27

35

24

20

29

36

68

Wolds

26

26

13

21

18

20

27

36

26

23

Woodhill

40

58

14

25

36

32

60

80

80

86

Wormwood Scrubs

38

30

24

54

73

57

72

44

70

53

Wymott

89

60

26

73

125

156

98

134

92

83


Next Section Index Home Page