Previous Section Index Home Page

2 Dec 2010 : Column 1020W—continued


Employment: Scotland

Margaret Curran: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office how many people were employed in the (a) public and (b) private sector in (a) Scotland, (b) Glasgow and (c) Glasgow East constituency in each of the last five years. [27771]

Mr Hurd: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.

Letter from Stephen Penneck, dated November 2010:

Table 1: Levels and proportions of the resident population of Scotland, Glasgow City Local Authority and Glasgow East Parliamentary Constituency employed in public and private sector
Scotland Glasgow City LA Glasgow East PC
Level (thousand) Proportion (percentage) Level (thousand) Proportion (percentage) Level (thousand) Proportion (percentage)
12 months ending Private Public Private Public Private Public Private Public Private Public Private Public

March 2006

1,728

712

70

29

174

73

70

30

28

11

72

28

March 2007

1,773

717

71

29

173

81

68

32

27

10

72

28

March 2008

1,807

708

72

28

195

72

73

27

21

7

75

25

March 2009

1,793

718

71

29

184

78

70

30

24

8

76

24

March 2010

*1,741

*711

71

29

*178

**75

70

30

***19

****5

78

22

Note:
Coefficients of Variation have been calculated for the latest period as an indication of the quality of the estimates, as described below:
Guide to Quality:
The Coefficient of Variation (CV) indicates the quality of an estimate, the smaller the CV value the higher the quality. The true value is likely to lie within +/- twice the CV-for example, for an estimate of 200 with a CV of 5% we would expect the population total to be within the range 180-220.
Key:
* 0 ≤ CV<5%-Statistical Robustness: Estimates are considered precise
** 5 ≤ CV <10%-Statistical Robustness: Estimates are considered reasonably precise
*** 10 ≤ CV <20%-Statistical Robustness: Estimates are considered acceptable
**** CV ≥ 20%-Statistical Robustness: Estimates are considered too unreliable for practical purposes
CV = Coefficient of Variation
Source:

Annual Population Survey.


2 Dec 2010 : Column 1021W

EU Law

Priti Patel: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office how many EU directives are pending transposition into domestic legislation by his Department; and what estimate he has made of the cost of each such transposition. [27480]

Mr Hurd: The Department does not have any EU directives pending transposition into domestic legislation.

Football: World Cup 2010

Graham Evans: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office how much his Department spent on entertainment activities related to the 2010 FIFA World Cup in respect of (a) the Prime Minister's Office and (b) the Deputy Prime Minister's Office. [27372]

Mr Hurd: Neither the Prime Minister's Office nor the Deputy Prime Minister's Office spent any money on entertainment related to the activities of the 2010 FIFA World Cup.

Population: Newham

Lyn Brown: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office what his most recent estimate is of the population of the London borough of Newham; and what methodology his Department used to make that estimate. [27630]

Mr Hurd: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.

Letter from Stephen Penneck:


2 Dec 2010 : Column 1022W

Public Sector: Procurement

Chi Onwurah: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office what the average monetary value was of a Government contract awarded to a (a) small enterprise and (b) medium-sized enterprise in 2009-10. [27641]

Mr Maude: This information is not held centrally. Under Government transparency commitments all Departments will be required to publish their contracts from January 2011. As part of this measure they will be required to state whether the contract has been awarded to an SME.

Education

Academies

Julian Smith: To ask the Secretary of State for Education whether selective grammar schools in the state sector which become academies may retain their current selective admissions criteria. [18940]

Mr Gibb: The Academies Act 2010 allows existing maintained grammar schools and partially selective schools to become academies and retain their selective arrangements. However, it specifically requires that all other academies admit pupils of all abilities. Academies which were not selective as maintained schools cannot, therefore, introduce selection by ability.

Academies: Finance

Mr Anderson: To ask the Secretary of State for Education how much funding has been allocated (a) for provision to schools of academy conversion expenses grants and (b) for other expenses incurred as a result of schools transferring to academies. [9100]

Mr Gibb: We recognise that schools converting to academies may incur costs, such as obtaining legal advice on the documents necessary for setting up an academy and advice on the process for transferring staff and other costs. As a contribution to these costs, a grant of £25,000 will be made.

Adoption

Geoffrey Clifton-Brown: To ask the Secretary of State for Education how many children have been put up for adoption following contested court hearings in each of the last five years. [26122]

Tim Loughton: Information on the number of children adopted during the years ending 31 March 2007 to 2010 where parental consent had been dispensed with, is shown in the table.

Information was not collected prior to the year ending 31 March 2007.


2 Dec 2010 : Column 1023W

2 Dec 2010 : Column 1024W

2 Dec 2010 : Column 1025W

2 Dec 2010 : Column 1026W
Children who ceased to be looked-after during the years ending 31 March by gender, age on ceasing, reason episode ceased, category of need and ethnic origin ( 1, 2, 3, 4) , years ending 31 March 2006 to 2010, England
Number/percentage
Number Percentage

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

All looked-after children who ceased to be looked-after

25,900

25,000

24,500

25,000

25,100

100

100

100

100

100

Gender

25,900

25,000

24,500

25,000

25,100

100

100

100

100

100

Male

14,000

13,600

13,100

13,700

13,700

54

54

54

55

55

Female

11,900

11,400

11,300

11,300

11,400

46

46

46

45

45

Age on ceasing (years)

25,900

25,000

24,500

25,000

25,100

100

100

100

100

100

Under 1

1,400

1,300

1,300

1,300

1,300

5

5

5

5

5

1 to 4

5,500

5,400

5,500

5,900

5,900

21

21

23

24

23

5 to 9

3,800

3,600

3,200

3,300

3,400

15

14

13

13

14

10 to 15

6,900

6,500

5,900

5,600

5,400

27

26

24

23

22

16 and over

8,200

8,200

8,500

8,800

9,100

32

33

35

35

36

Reason episode ceased

25,900

25,000

24,500

25,000

25,100

100

100

100

100

100

Adopted-application unopposed(5)

(10)3,700

1,700

1,700

1,800

1,700

(10)14

7

7

7

7

Adopted-consent dispensed with(5)

(10)-

1,600

1,500

1,500

1,500

(10)-

6

6

6

6

Died

60

70

50

50

50

-

-

-

-

-

Care taken by another LA

240

240

190

170

170

1

1

1

1

1

Returned home to live with parents or relatives

11,000

10,200

9,500

9,500

9,800

42

41

39

38

39

Residence order granted

930

1,000

910

930

1,000

4

4

4

4

4

Special guardianship order made to former foster carers(6)

(10)70

500

770

810

840

(10)-

2

3

3

3

Special guardianship order made to carers other than former foster carers(6)

(10)-

260

360

430

420

(10)-

1

1

2

2

Moved into independent living (with supportive accommodation)

2,400

2,400

2,500

2,200

2,300

9

10

10

9

9

Moved into independent living (with no formalised support)

960

940

1,000

1,000

1,000

4

4

4

4

4

Transferred to residential care funded by adult social services

470

500

480

530

470

2

2

2

2

2

Sentenced to custody(7)

n/a

250

360

350

310

n/a

1

1

1

1

Care ceased for any other reason

6,100

5,300

5,200

5,700

5,500

24

21

21

23

22

Category of need( 8)

25,900

25,000

24,500

25,000

25,100

100

100

100

100

100

Abuse or neglect

12,400

12,000

12,100

12,700

12,800

48

48

50

51

51

Child's disability

850

800

710

770

760

3

3

3

3

3

Parents illness or disability

1,700

1,600

1,400

1,300

1,100

6

6

6

5

5

Family in acute stress

2,800

2,600

2,600

2,500

2,800

11

11

11

10

11

Family dysfunction

3,300

3,300

3,200

3,300

3,600

13

13

13

13

14

Socially unacceptable behaviour

1,500

1,300

1,200

1,100

1,000

6

5

5

4

4

Low income

70

80

50

70

70

-

-

-

-

-

Absent parenting

3,300

3,300

3,100

3,300

3,000

13

13

13

13

12

Ethnic origin

25,900

25,000

24,500

25,000

25,100

100

100

100

100

100

White

19,100

18,100

17,500

17,300

17,300

74

72

71

69

69

White British

17,900

17,000

16,500

16,300

16,300

69

68

67

65

65

White Irish

200

180

130

150

140

1

1

1

1

1

Traveller of Irish Heritage(9)

n/a

n/a

n/a

10

10

n/a

n/a

n/a

-

-

Gypsy/Roma(9)

n/a

n/a

n/a

10

40

n/a

n/a

n/a

-

-

Any other White background

980

940

850

830

810

4

4

3

3

3

Mixed

2,000

1,900

2,000

2,000

2,000

8

7

8

8

8

White and Black Caribbean

730

620

670

690

690

3

2

3

3

3

White and Black African

200

180

190

230

240

1

1

1

1

1

White and Asian

270

290

300

340

270

1

1

1

1

1

Any other mixed background

810

760

810

740

810

3

3

3

3

3

Asian or Asian British

1,100

1,300

1,400

1,800

1,800

4

5

6

7

7

Indian

150

150

160

180

160

1

1

1

1

1

Pakistani

270

310

310

410

430

1

1

1

2

2

Bangladeshi

150

170

180

210

250

1

1

1

1

1

Any other Asian background

580

680

760

1,000

920

2

3

3

4

4

Black or Black British

2,800

2,800

2,700

2,700

2,500

11

11

11

11

10

Caribbean

730

670

700

720

710

3

3

3

3

3

African

1,600

1,600

1,500

1,500

1,400

6

6

6

6

6

Any other Black background

480

480

480

430

420

2

2

2

2

2

Other Ethnic groups

790

970

940

1,100

1,200

3

4

4

5

5

Chinese

120

160

130

120

120

-

1

1

-

-

Any other ethnic group

670

810

800

1,000

1,100

3

3

3

4

4

Other

n/a

n/a

n/a

130

270

n/a

n/a

n/a

1

1

Refused(9)

n/a

n/a

n/a

10

20

n/a

n/a

n/a

-

-

Information not yet available(9)

n/a

n/a

n/a

120

250

n/a

n/a

n/a

-

1

n/a = not applicable. - = negligible. Percentage below 0.5%. (1) Numbers have been rounded to the nearest 100 if they exceed 1,000, and to the nearest 10, otherwise. Percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. See Technical Notes for more information on rounding. (2) Only the last occasion on which a child ceased to be looked-after in the year has been counted. (3) Figures exclude children looked-after under an agreed series of short-term placements. (4) Historical data may differ from older publications. This is mainly due to the implementation of amendments and corrections sent by some local authorities after the publication date of previous materials. (5) Prior to 2006-07, the number of children looked-after who were adopted could not be disaggregated. (6) In 2005-06 the number of children who ceased to be looked-after due to the granting of a special guardianship order could not be disaggregated. (7) 'Sentenced to custody' was first collected in 2007. (8) The most applicable category of the eight "Need Codes" at the time the child started to be looked-after rather than necessarily the entire reason they are looked-after. (9) Ethnic origin classification collected for the first time in 2009. (10) Indicates brace. Source: SSDA 903.

Business: Education

Lorely Burt: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what recent discussions he has had with the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills on funding for enterprise education in schools and colleges; and if he will make a statement. [18819]

Mr Gibb: We have had no discussions to date with my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills on funding for enterprise education in schools and colleges. Department for Education Ministers are considering the future funding of enterprise education beyond financial year 2010-11 as part of the spending review process.

Children's Centres: Closures

Jim Dobbin: To ask the Secretary of State for Education how many (a) Sure Start children's centres and (b) other children's centres in each constituency in (i) Greater Manchester and (ii) Lancashire are (A) proposed for closure and (B) under consideration for closure. [21725]


2 Dec 2010 : Column 1027W

Sarah Teather: Children's centres are at the heart of the Government's vision for supporting families with young children and intervening early to prevent problems from becoming crises. That is why the recent spending review announced that there is funding available to maintain the current network of children's centres.

The Department for Education does not collect data on Sure Start Children's Centres which are proposed for closure or under consideration for closure. However local authorities have duties under the Childcare Act 2006 to consult before opening, closing or significantly changing Sure Start children's centres and to secure sufficient children's centres provision to meet local need.

Children's Centres: Stoke-on-Trent

Joan Walley: To ask the Secretary of State for Education how much ringfenced funding he has allocated to children's centres in Stoke-on-Trent in 2011-12; and if he will make a statement. [22836]

Sarah Teather [holding answer 9 November 2010]: The spending review announced that Sure Start funding will be protected in cash terms, including investment in health visitors. This means there is funding to keep the network of Sure Start children's centres as a universal service, whilst ensuring it reaches families in greatest need.

The hon. Member will appreciate that the Department is now working through the details of the spending review announcements. I am unable to confirm an allocation for Stoke-on-Trent at this time. Allocations for all local authorities will be announced in due course.

Discretionary Learner Support Fund

Lisa Nandy: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what estimate he has made of the proportion of those students receiving education maintenance in the (a) £30, (b) £20 and (c) £10 bands who would be eligible for financial assistance to undertake a course of study through the discretionary learner support fund in the academic year 2011-12. [26461]

Mr Gibb [holding answer 25 November 2010]: Decisions regarding the new discretionary fund will be made locally, enabling schools, colleges and training providers to target support at those young people in greatest need. The Government do not intend to prescribe how many young people should receive support under the new arrangements.

Current discretionary funds support around 200,000 young people each year. The new fund will be around three times greater than current funds.

Lisa Nandy: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what assistance his Department plans to provide to further education institutions to administer the discretionary learner support fund in the academic year 2011-12. [26462]

Mr Gibb [holding answer 25 November 2010]: We will work with representatives of schools, colleges and training providers to finalise the arrangements for the enhanced discretionary learner support fund, including how the funding will flow to institutions and what guidance is required to administer the fund effectively.


2 Dec 2010 : Column 1028W

Lisa Nandy: To ask the Secretary of State for Education whether travel costs for students undertaking a course at a further education institution may be met through the discretionary learner support fund in the 2011-12 academic year. [26463]

Mr Gibb [holding answer 25 November 2010]: Discretionary support funding may not currently be used routinely for transport to and from college. The statutory responsibility for making the necessary arrangements for transport to enable 16 to 18-year-olds (and 19 to 25-year-olds with a learning difficulty or disability) to attend education and training lies with local authorities.

We will consider this restriction as we develop the arrangements for the enhanced discretionary learner support funding.

Teresa Pearce: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what mechanisms are in place to ensure that discretionary learner support fund payments will be made available for eligible students at the start of the next academic year; and what penalties will be imposed in respect of institutions which are unable to meet the commitment to fund students at the start of the academic year. [26579]

Mr Gibb [holding answer 25 November 2010]: We plan to allocate the enhanced funding in line with the timetable for overall funding allocations for schools and colleges, which will be made by the end of March.

We will work with representatives of schools, colleges and training providers to finalise the arrangements for the enhanced fund, including how the funding will flow to institutions and what guidance is required to administer the fund effectively.

Teresa Pearce: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what mechanism will be in place to assist an institution which exhausts its discretionary learner support fund allocation and subsequently deems more students to require funding during the academic year 2011-12. [26580]

Mr Gibb [holding answer 25 November 2010]: We plan to seek the views of education providers as we finalise the details of how the enhanced discretionary learner support fund will operate. We would expect schools, colleges and training providers to use their allocation to target those who most need it to enable them to participate in education.

Arrangements for the current discretionary learner support fund provide for unused funds to be redistributed to providers which indicate they need more resource.

Mr Ward: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what guidance his Department plans to issue to schools on the allocation of the enhanced discretionary learner support fund. [27288]

Mr Gibb: We will work with representatives of schools, colleges and training providers to finalise the arrangements for the enhanced discretionary learner support fund, including how the funding will flow to institutions and what guidance is required to administer the fund effectively.


2 Dec 2010 : Column 1029W

Education Maintenance Allowance

Ann Coffey: To ask the Secretary of State for Education how many and what proportion of people in each (a) socio-economic and (b) ethnic group received education maintenance allowance in each constituency in the latest period for which figures are available. [26466]

Mr Gibb [holding answer 29 November 2010]: This is a matter for the Young People's Learning Agency (YPLA) who operate the education maintenance allowance for the Department for Education. Peter Lauener, the YPLA's chief executive, will write to the hon. Member with the information requested and a copy of his reply will be placed in the House Libraries.

Education Maintenance Allowance: Bradford

Mr Ward: To ask the Secretary of State for Education how many students normally resident in Bradford East constituency receive education maintenance allowance. [27291]

Mr Gibb: This is a matter for the Young People's Learning Agency (YPLA) who operate the education maintenance allowance for the Department for Education. Peter Lauener the YPLA's chief executive, will write to the hon. Member for Bradford East with the information requested and a copy of his reply will be placed in House Libraries.


2 Dec 2010 : Column 1030W

Education Maintenance Allowance: Coventry

Mr Jim Cunningham: To ask the Secretary of State for Education how many students normally resident in Coventry receive education maintenance allowance; and what estimate he has made of the number who will receive this allowance following implementation of proposals in the comprehensive spending review. [27461]

Mr Gibb [holding answer 1 December 2010]: This is a matter for the Young People's Learning Agency (YPLA) who operate the education maintenance allowance for the Department for Education. Peter Lauener the YPLA's chief executive, will write to the hon. Member with the information requested and a copy of his reply will be placed in Hansard and the House Libraries.

GCE A-level

Chris Skidmore: To ask the Secretary of State for Education how many pupils in further education colleges were entered for (a) history, (b) physics, (c) chemistry, (d) media studies and (e) psychology A-levels in each year since 1997; and what proportion this represented of the total number of pupils in such colleges entered for A-levels in each such case. [20231]

Mr Gibb: The information requested is given in the following table:

Number and percentage of students in further education colleges entered for selected A-level subjects, 1997-2010
History Media studies Psychology Chemistry Physics

Number entered for subject % of those entered for A- levels Number entered for subject % of those entered for A- levels Number entered for subject % of those entered for A- levels Number entered for subject % of those entered for A- levels Number entered for subject % of those entered for A- levels

1997

9,653

11.2

5,649

6.6

14,686

17.1

9,182

10.7

6,750

7.9

1998

8,741

10.3

6,662

7.9

14,441

17.0

9,076

10.7

6,789

8.0

1999

7,983

9.7

6,492

7.9

13,376

16.2

8,413

10.2

6,457

7.8

2000

7,992

10.1

6,660

8.5

13,221

16.8

8,079

10.3

5,903

7.5

2001

8,081

9.5

7,265

8.6

12,034

14.2

7,512

8.9

5,851

6.9

2002

7,895

8.2

8,358

8.6

14,336

14.8

6,773

7.0

5,729

5.9

2003

8,309

8.3

9,231

9.2

16,091

16.0

6,679

6.6

5,295

5.3

2004

8,559

9.1

9,268

9.8

17,341

18.4

6,886

7.3

4,950

5.2

2005

8,899

9.9

8,929

10.0

17,728

19.8

7,443

8.3

4,829

5.4

2006

9,339

11.0

9,172

10.8

18,257

21.5

7,813

9.2

4,769

5.6

2007

9,149

11.7

9,287

11.9

18,394

23.6

8,062

10.3

5,059

6.5

2008

9,631

12.1

9,120

11.5

18,314

23.1

8,374

10.6

5,269

6.6

2009

9,893

12.4

9,424

11.8

17,941

22.5

8,741

11.0

5,354

6.7

2010

10,182

12.4

9,267

11.3

18,827

23.0

9,283

11.3

5,746

7.0

Notes: 1. Figures for 2010 are provisional and are subject to change. 2. Percentages are based upon all students sitting A levels in further education college.

GCSE

Chris Skidmore: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what number and proportion of pupils achieving five A* to C grades including English and mathematics at GCSE achieved this by including an equivalent qualification in each year since 1997. [20225]

Mr Gibb: The number and percentage of pupils achieving five A* to C grades including English and mathematics at GCSE by including an equivalent qualification is given below:


2 Dec 2010 : Column 1031W

Number of pupils achieving 5 A*-C grades including English and mathematics by including an equivalent qualification Percentage of pupils achieving 5 A*-C grades including English and mathematics by including an equivalent qualification

1997

75

0.0

1998

113

0.0

1999

304

0.1

2000

350

0.1

2001

596

0.1

2002

1,225

0.2

2003

2,221

0.4

2004

1,671

0.3

2005

2,466

0.4

2006

3,849

0.6

2007

6,662

1.0

2008

8,239

1.3

2009

12,170

1.9

2010(1)

22,726

3.5

(1 )Provisional. Notes: 1. Figures counted as GCSEs from 1997 include GCSE short courses. 2. Figures counted as GCSEs from 2004 onwards include vocational GCSEs and GCSE double awards. 3. Figures from 1997 to 2004 relate to pupils aged 15 at the start of the academic year. 4. Figures from 2005 onwards are for pupils at the end of Key Stage 4. 5. The English and mathematics components of the published measures relate to GCSEs only. Therefore the pupils in this answer will have passed an equivalent qualification to make up all or part of the other three GCSEs required.

Geography: Education

Mr Amess: To ask the Secretary of State for Education how many and what proportion of pupils in each local authority were entered for geography (a) GCSE and (b) A level in each of the last three years for which information is available. [22051]

Mr Gibb: The information requested has been placed in the House Libraries.

Head Teachers: Powers

Mr Marcus Jones: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what powers headteachers have to dismiss poorly performing teachers. [27037]

Mr Gibb: Governing bodies working alongside head teachers are required to establish procedures for dealing with lack of capability on the part of staff at the school and may dismiss staff, including teachers, whose performance is unacceptable.

The current statutory capability guidance overlaps with the mandatory arrangements for the performance management of teachers. We want to make it easier for schools to tackle poor performance. As "The Importance of Teaching-the Schools White Paper 2010" makes clear, we will achieve this by simplifying the current arrangements and removing duplication between the performance management and the capability procedures for managing poor performance. This will allow schools to deal more swiftly and effectively with under-performing teachers.

Pupils: Disadvantaged

Laura Sandys: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what steps he is taking to reduce the attainment gap between pupils from affluent and poor backgrounds in (a) South Thanet constituency and (b) England. [24596]


2 Dec 2010 : Column 1032W

Mr Gibb: Reducing the attainment gap between pupils from affluent and poor backgrounds is at the heart of our policy for school improvement, in South Thanet as elsewhere.

We have made a clear commitment to narrowing attainment gaps between children from disadvantaged backgrounds and their peers through our recently announced £7.2 billion fairness premium. The fairness premium includes a £2.5 billion pupil premium for schools which will target extra funding at the most disadvantaged pupils wherever they live, reducing educational inequalities and ensuring that poorer students receive the support they need to reach their potential.

On 3 November, we also announced a new £110 million education endowment fund which will fund new and innovative ways of raising the attainment of disadvantaged pupils in underperforming schools. Lessons learned about what works to raise the attainment of disadvantaged children will be made available to all schools on an ongoing basis, to help inform their pupil premium funding decisions.

Pupils: Hearing Impairment

Kerry McCarthy: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what recent estimate he has made of the number of teachers of the deaf in the south-west; and what assessment he has made of the merits of steps to improve specialist support services for deaf children. [17175]

Sarah Teather: We do not routinely collect data about the number of teachers of the deaf by region. Local authorities are responsible for ensuring that teachers of the deaf possess the appropriate mandatory qualification to undertake the role and it is a matter for local authorities to ensure that they have enough qualified teachers to meet their statutory commitments.

The Government will be publishing a Green Paper on special educational needs and disabilities, which will explore how we can improve support for all children with special educational needs and disabilities, including those with hearing impairments. It is a priority to improve the educational outcomes for all children and we recognise the important role specialists, such as teachers of the deaf, play in meeting this goal.

Schools: Admissions

Rehman Chishti: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what research his Department has (a) commissioned and (b) evaluated on the effects on social inclusion of school admissions policies. [22403]

Tim Loughton: The Department has not commissioned or evaluated any research looking at the effects of social inclusion on school admissions policy.

However, the Department did commission a research project in December 2009 to look at the effect of changes in secondary school admissions on the social composition of schools. This was published on 30 September 2010 and has been placed in the House Libraries.


2 Dec 2010 : Column 1033W

Special Educational Needs: Pupil Exclusions

Mr Graham Stuart: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what his policy is on the role of (a) central Government and (b) local government in the reduction of exclusions from school of children with (i) special educational needs and (ii) autism. [25763]

Mr Gibb: The Government are clear that schools should, wherever possible, avoid excluding permanently any pupil with a statement of special educational needs (SEN). Where SEN, including autism, contribute to behavioural difficulties, those needs should be addressed, wherever possible, before problems arise.

The decision to exclude is one for head teachers to make and head teachers should not be prevented from excluding a child with SEN where that is the necessary and appropriate course of action. In making these difficult decisions, children with SEN should be treated sensitively by schools and the judgment of professionals should be trusted in this matter.

We are also considering options for changing the arrangements for reviewing permanent exclusions and will announce our decisions in due course.

Exclusion from school does not mean exclusion from education and local authorities have the duty to provide suitable full-time alternative education for any permanently excluded pupil of compulsory school age from the sixth day of the exclusion. The Government are currently developing policies to improve the environment in which excluded pupils are educated and to ensure that those organisations with a proven track record in turning young lives round are given the opportunity to expand their provision.


2 Dec 2010 : Column 1034W

Discretionary Learner Support Fund

Lisa Nandy: To ask the Secretary of State for Education with what frequency payments to students from the discretionary learner support fund will be made in the academic year 2011-12. [26973]

Mr Gibb [holding answer 29 November 2010]: Decisions regarding the new discretionary fund will be made locally, enabling schools, colleges and training providers to target support at those young people in greatest need. They will have the freedom to determine how frequently payments are made, and for what purpose.

In finalising the arrangements for the enhanced discretionary learner support fund, the Department will consult with schools, colleges and training organisations, including on what guidance is required to administer the fund effectively.

Teachers: Qualifications

Simon Danczuk: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what estimate he has made of the number of unqualified staff teaching lessons in schools in each local education authority area; what assessment he has made of effects of the number of unqualified staff on levels of unemployment among newly-qualified teachers; and if he will make a statement. [23036]

Mr Gibb: The information requested is shown in the following table.

With the exception of some overseas-trained teachers, maintained schools may only employ unqualified teachers as long as no suitable qualified or trainee teacher is available to fill the post. This allows maintained schools to cover exceptional temporary shortages, while ensuring that the employment of unqualified teachers does not affect the employment prospects of qualified teachers.


2 Dec 2010 : Column 1035W

2 Dec 2010 : Column 1036W

2 Dec 2010 : Column 1037W

2 Dec 2010 : Column 1038W

2 Dec 2010 : Column 1039W

2 Dec 2010 : Column 1040W
Full-time equivale nt regular teachers (excluding occasionals) in local authority( 1) maintained schools by phase, local authorities and Government office regions, January 2010, England
Nursery and primary Secondary

Qualified Unqualified( 2) Total Qualified Unqualified( 2) Total

England

197,000

3,860

200,860

201,240

9,020

210,260

Gateshead

760

-

770

830

10

840

Newcastle upon Tyne

950

10

960

990

20

1,010

North Tyneside

630

10

640

910

10

920

South Tyneside

530

-

530

670

10

680

Sunderland

1,260

10

1,280

1,100

40

1,140

Hartlepool

410

-

410

410

20

430

Middlesbrough

660

-

660

380

-

380

Redcar and Cleveland

560

20

570

640

30

660

Stockton on Tees

780

10

790

770

20

790

Durham

1,910

10

1,920

2,020

70

2,090

Darlington

400

-

410

350

10

360

Northumberland

880

10

890

1,590

30

1,610

North-east

9,730

90

9,810

10,640

280

10,920

Cumbria

1,930

20

1,950

2,020

30

2,060

Cheshire East

1,280

10

1,280

1,460

10

1,470

Cheshire West and Chester

1,200

10

1,210

1,320

20

1,340

Halton

510

-

510

510

10

520

Warrington

840

10

850

930

20

950

Bolton

1,100

10

1,110

1,120

40

1,170

Bury

750

10

760

720

10

730

Manchester

1,920

50

1,970

1,380

70

1,450

Oldham

1,040

20

1,060

1,100

30

1,140

Rochdale

910

10

920

840

50

890

Salford

890

20

900

680

30

710

Stockport

1,090

10

1,100

930

10

930

Tameside

910

10

920

800

20

820

Trafford

840

10

840

990

20

1,010

Wigan

1,200

10

1,200

1,340

10

1,350

Lancashire

4,510

30

4,530

4,590

80

4,670

Blackburn with Darwen

710

-

720

600

20

620

Blackpool

590

10

590

530

10

530

Knowsley

670

-

680

570

20

590

Liverpool

1,800

10

1,810

1,970

30

2,000

St Helens

670

-

680

730

-

730

Sefton

1,030

10

1,040

1,300

30

1,320

Wirral

1,180

10

1,190

1,610

30

1,640

North-west

27,560

260

27,820

28,050

610

28,650

Kingston upon Hull, City of

1,010

40

1,040

770

100

870

East Riding of Yorkshire

1,200

10

1,210

1,410

60

1,470

North East Lincolnshire

600

-

600

420

20

440

North Lincolnshire

600

10

610

570

30

600

North Yorkshire

2,140

30

2,170

2,570

70

2,650

York

580

10

590

700

20

720

Barnsley

830

10

830

770

20

800

Doncaster

1,200

20

1,220

1,170

60

1,230

Rotherham

1,090

10

1,100

1,340

30

1,370

Sheffield

1,900

40

1,940

1,760

100

1,860

Bradford

2,520

20

2,540

2,020

70

2,090

Calderdale

750

100

850

720

230

940

Kirklees

1,730

20

1,750

1,700

40

1,740

Leeds

2,860

20

2,890

2,830

30

2,860

Wakefield

1,230

20

1,250

1,250

50

1,300

Yorkshire and the Humber

20,250

340

20,590

19,990

940

20,930

Derbyshire

2,760

20

2,790

3,120

80

3,210

Derby

970

20

990

980

30

1,010

Leicestershire

2,300

40

2,340

2,740

130

2,870

Leicester

1,360

20

1,380

1,180

70

1,240

Rutland

120

-

130

140

-

140

Lincolnshire

2,410

70

2,470

2,940

220

3,160

Northamptonshire

2,740

40

2,780

2,580

120

2,700

Nottinghamshire

2,790

60

2,840

3,200

150

3,360

Nottingham

1,070

10

1,090

650

40

700

E ast m idlands

16,530

270

16,800

17,530

840

18,370

Herefordshire

640

-

640

650

20

660

Worcestershire

1,940

10

1,950

2,400

70

2,460

Shropshire

920

10

930

1,080

40

1,120

Telford and Wrekin

620

10

630

580

20

600

Staffordshire

2,910

60

2,970

3,730

150

3,880

Stoke on Trent

890

20

920

890

40

920

Warwickshire

1,880

20

1,900

2,120

90

2,210

Birmingham

5,420

120

5,540

4,500

460

4,960

Coventry

1,300

10

1,310

1,330

90

1,420

Dudley

1,320

10

1,330

1,310

30

1,340

Sandwell

1,350

10

1,350

1,040

10

1,050

Solihull

900

10

910

860

30

900

Walsall

1,190

10

1,200

1,150

50

1,210

Wolverhampton

1,080

10

1,090

1,070

60

1,120

West midlands

22,350

310

22,670

22,720

1,150

23,870

Cambridgeshire

2,170

30

2,200

2,050

140

2,190

Peterborough

760

20

770

570

40

610

Norfolk

2,870

80

2,950

2,960

220

3,180

Suffolk

2,220

10

2,230

3,280

120

3,390

Bedford Borough

480

10

490

940

50

1,000

Central Bedfordshire

900

30

930

1,450

50

1,500

Luton

930

30

960

660

50

720

Essex

4,940

90

5,030

5,160

330

5,500

Southend on Sea

650

50

700

820

140

960

Thurrock

620

30

650

380

50

430

Hertfordshire

4,550

100

4,650

5,260

280

5,540

East of England

21,080

470

21,560

23,540

1,470

25,010

London

30,370

1,460

31,830

27,630

1,720

29,350

Camden

570

40

610

750

20

770

City of London

10

-

20

-

-

-

Hackney

940

50

990

450

20

470

Hammersmith and Fulham

460

30

490

340

30

370

Haringey

1,000

40

1,040

830

60

900

Islington

740

50

790

490

20

510

Kensington and Chelsea

380

50

430

230

20

260

Lambeth

1,140

50

1,200

660

30

690

Lewisham

930

20

950

740

60

800

Newham

1,560

60

1,620

1,280

50

1,330

Southwark

1,100

100

1,210

390

40

430

Tower Hamlets

1,220

100

1,320

1,130

70

1,200

Wandsworth

970

50

1,020

740

50

790

Westminster

600

50

640

420

30

450

Inner London

11,630

690

12,320

8,440

520

8,960

Barking and Dagenham

840

40

880

870

70

930

Barnet

1,300

120

1,430

1,380

170

1,550

Bexley

850

-

860

1,050

30

1,080

Brent

1,060

40

1,110

1,040

90

1,120

Bromley

1,100

20

1,120

1,440

110

1,550

Croydon

1,360

50

1,400

1,010

70

1,080

Ealing

1,210

60

1,270

1,100

50

1,150

Enfield

1,400

60

1,460

1,380

60

1,440

Greenwich

1,060

20

1,080

970

70

1,040

Harrow

930

60

980

720

40

760

Havering

880

20

900

1,050

100

1,140

Hillingdon

1,180

30

1,210

1,130

70

1,190

Hounslow

900

20

920

1,130

40

1,180

Kingston upon Thames

580

20

600

650

30

680

Merton

670

40

710

400

10

410

Redbridge

1,100

70

1,170

1,390

100

1,490

Richmond upon Thames

630

10

650

450

20

470

Sutton

690

20

710

1,110

30

1,150

Waltham Forest

990

50

1,040

920

50

960

Outer London

18,750

770

19,510

19,190

1,200

20,390

Bracknell Forest

420

10

420

400

20

420

Windsor and Maidenhead

430

10

440

650

50

700

West Berkshire

650

10

660

830

50

880

Reading

530

10

540

380

20

390

Slough

580

30

620

620

50

670

Wokingham

610

10

620

730

20

740

Buckinghamshire

2,020

30

2,050

2,050

100

2,150

Milton Keynes

1,090

30

1,120

990

70

1,060

East Sussex

1,630

40

1,670

1,660

80

1,740

Brighton and Hove

800

10

810

790

20

820

Hampshire

4,750

20

4,770

4,500

50

4,550

Portsmouth

680

-

690

540

40

580

Southampton

810

-

810

600

20

620

Isle of Wight

310

10

330

710

40

750

Kent

5,530

90

5,620

5,790

470

6,260

Medway

1,110

20

1,130

1,170

90

1,260

Oxfordshire

2,320

40

2,360

2,250

110

2,360

Surrey

3,750

40

3,780

3,680

140

3,820

West Sussex

2,810

40

2,850

2,570

50

2,630

South-east

30,840

450

31,290

30,910

1,480

32,400

Isles of Scilly

30

-

30

-

-

-

Bath and North East Somerset

600

-

600

730

10

740

City of Bristol

1,500

20

1,520

830

50

880

North Somerset

710

-

720

830

10

840

South Gloucestershire

1,000

-

1,000

1,020

10

1,030

Cornwall

1,870

60

1,930

2,080

110

2,190

Devon

2,590

10

2,600

2,690

50

2,740

Plymouth

870

10

880

1,050

40

1,090

Torbay

430

10

440

550

10

560

Dorset

1,240

10

1,250

1,910

40

1,950

Poole

490

-

490

570

10

580

Bournemouth

460

10

470

600

40

640

Gloucestershire

2,140

20

2,150

2,750

40

2,790

Somerset

1,770

20

1,790

1,960

50

2,010

Wiltshire

1,730

30

1,770

1,970

30

2,000

Swindon

850

10

860

670

40

710

South-west

18,290

200

18,490

20,230

530

20,760


Next Section Index Home Page