Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
2 Dec 2010 : Column 1020Wcontinued
Margaret Curran: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office how many people were employed in the (a) public and (b) private sector in (a) Scotland, (b) Glasgow and (c) Glasgow East constituency in each of the last five years. [27771]
Mr Hurd: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.
Letter from Stephen Penneck, dated November 2010:
As Director General for the Office for National Statistics, I have been asked to reply to your Parliamentary Question asking how many people were employed in the (a) public and (b) private sector in (a) Scotland, (b) Glasgow and (c) Glasgow East constituency in each of the last five years. (027771)
Public sector employment statistics for local areas can be calculated from the Annual Population Survey (APS). Individuals in the APS are classified to the public or private sector according to their responses to the survey. As with any sample survey, estimates from the APS are subject to a margin of uncertainty.
Table 1 shows the levels and proportions of the resident population employed in the private and public sector in (a) Scotland, (b) Glasgow City Local Authority and (c) Glasgow East Parliamentary Constituency. Data has been provided for the April to March 2010, the latest period for which data is available, and April to March of the previous four years.
National and local area estimates for many labour market statistics, including employment, unemployment and claimant count are available on the NOMIS website at
Table 1: Levels and proportions of the resident population of Scotland, Glasgow City Local Authority and Glasgow East Parliamentary Constituency employed in public and private sector | ||||||||||||
Scotland | Glasgow City LA | Glasgow East PC | ||||||||||
Level (thousand) | Proportion (percentage) | Level (thousand) | Proportion (percentage) | Level (thousand) | Proportion (percentage) | |||||||
12 months ending | Private | Public | Private | Public | Private | Public | Private | Public | Private | Public | Private | Public |
Note: Coefficients of Variation have been calculated for the latest period as an indication of the quality of the estimates, as described below: Guide to Quality: The Coefficient of Variation (CV) indicates the quality of an estimate, the smaller the CV value the higher the quality. The true value is likely to lie within +/- twice the CV-for example, for an estimate of 200 with a CV of 5% we would expect the population total to be within the range 180-220. Key: * 0 ≤ CV<5%-Statistical Robustness: Estimates are considered precise ** 5 ≤ CV <10%-Statistical Robustness: Estimates are considered reasonably precise *** 10 ≤ CV <20%-Statistical Robustness: Estimates are considered acceptable **** CV ≥ 20%-Statistical Robustness: Estimates are considered too unreliable for practical purposes CV = Coefficient of Variation Source: |
Priti Patel: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office how many EU directives are pending transposition into domestic legislation by his Department; and what estimate he has made of the cost of each such transposition. [27480]
Mr Hurd: The Department does not have any EU directives pending transposition into domestic legislation.
Graham Evans: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office how much his Department spent on entertainment activities related to the 2010 FIFA World Cup in respect of (a) the Prime Minister's Office and (b) the Deputy Prime Minister's Office. [27372]
Mr Hurd: Neither the Prime Minister's Office nor the Deputy Prime Minister's Office spent any money on entertainment related to the activities of the 2010 FIFA World Cup.
Lyn Brown: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office what his most recent estimate is of the population of the London borough of Newham; and what methodology his Department used to make that estimate. [27630]
Mr Hurd: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.
As Director General for the Office for National Statistics, I have been asked to reply to your Parliamentary Question asking what the most recent estimate is of the population of the London Borough of Newham; and what methods are used to make that estimate (27630).
The ONS produces annual estimates of the resident population of England and Wales by local authority, as at 30 June each year. The latest available estimate of the resident population of the London Borough of Newham is for mid-2009 and is 241,200 people.
The resident population is defined by the standard United Nations definition for population estimates, and includes people who reside in an area for a period of at least 12 months whatever their nationality. The number of long-term international migrants (people who move into or out of the UK for at least 12 months) is estimated and included in the resident population. Visitors and short-term migrants (people who enter or leave the UK for less than 12 months) are not included as part of the resident population.
ONS Mid-Year Population Estimates are calculated using the cohort component method, which is an internationally recognised demographic method. The method takes the previous year's population estimate, ages the population by one year, adds in the number of births and takes away the number of deaths that have taken place during the year. The method also incorporates estimates of both international migration (moves to and from the UK for a period of at least one year) and internal moves within the UK.
A copy of the annotated flow-chart "Mid-year Population Estimates: England & Wales" providing a detailed summary of the cohort component method as used by ONS, is available in the House of Commons Library.
The local authority mid-year population estimates are published on the ONS website along with details of each of the estimated components of population change.
ONS is leading the cross-government Migration Statistics Improvement Programme which is developing improved methods for population estimation. Initial methodological improvements were incorporated in the population statistics that were published in May 2010. These represent a real improvement in the quality of the migration and population estimates. They are the result of extensive research by ONS and a large scale engagement programme with users.
Chi Onwurah: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office what the average monetary value was of a Government contract awarded to a (a) small enterprise and (b) medium-sized enterprise in 2009-10. [27641]
Mr Maude: This information is not held centrally. Under Government transparency commitments all Departments will be required to publish their contracts from January 2011. As part of this measure they will be required to state whether the contract has been awarded to an SME.
Julian Smith: To ask the Secretary of State for Education whether selective grammar schools in the state sector which become academies may retain their current selective admissions criteria. [18940]
Mr Gibb: The Academies Act 2010 allows existing maintained grammar schools and partially selective schools to become academies and retain their selective arrangements. However, it specifically requires that all other academies admit pupils of all abilities. Academies which were not selective as maintained schools cannot, therefore, introduce selection by ability.
Mr Anderson: To ask the Secretary of State for Education how much funding has been allocated (a) for provision to schools of academy conversion expenses grants and (b) for other expenses incurred as a result of schools transferring to academies. [9100]
Mr Gibb: We recognise that schools converting to academies may incur costs, such as obtaining legal advice on the documents necessary for setting up an academy and advice on the process for transferring staff and other costs. As a contribution to these costs, a grant of £25,000 will be made.
Geoffrey Clifton-Brown: To ask the Secretary of State for Education how many children have been put up for adoption following contested court hearings in each of the last five years. [26122]
Tim Loughton: Information on the number of children adopted during the years ending 31 March 2007 to 2010 where parental consent had been dispensed with, is shown in the table.
Information was not collected prior to the year ending 31 March 2007.
Lorely Burt: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what recent discussions he has had with the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills on funding for enterprise education in schools and colleges; and if he will make a statement. [18819]
Mr Gibb: We have had no discussions to date with my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills on funding for enterprise education in schools and colleges. Department for Education Ministers are considering the future funding of enterprise education beyond financial year 2010-11 as part of the spending review process.
Jim Dobbin: To ask the Secretary of State for Education how many (a) Sure Start children's centres and (b) other children's centres in each constituency in (i) Greater Manchester and (ii) Lancashire are (A) proposed for closure and (B) under consideration for closure. [21725]
Sarah Teather: Children's centres are at the heart of the Government's vision for supporting families with young children and intervening early to prevent problems from becoming crises. That is why the recent spending review announced that there is funding available to maintain the current network of children's centres.
The Department for Education does not collect data on Sure Start Children's Centres which are proposed for closure or under consideration for closure. However local authorities have duties under the Childcare Act 2006 to consult before opening, closing or significantly changing Sure Start children's centres and to secure sufficient children's centres provision to meet local need.
Joan Walley: To ask the Secretary of State for Education how much ringfenced funding he has allocated to children's centres in Stoke-on-Trent in 2011-12; and if he will make a statement. [22836]
Sarah Teather [holding answer 9 November 2010]: The spending review announced that Sure Start funding will be protected in cash terms, including investment in health visitors. This means there is funding to keep the network of Sure Start children's centres as a universal service, whilst ensuring it reaches families in greatest need.
The hon. Member will appreciate that the Department is now working through the details of the spending review announcements. I am unable to confirm an allocation for Stoke-on-Trent at this time. Allocations for all local authorities will be announced in due course.
Lisa Nandy: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what estimate he has made of the proportion of those students receiving education maintenance in the (a) £30, (b) £20 and (c) £10 bands who would be eligible for financial assistance to undertake a course of study through the discretionary learner support fund in the academic year 2011-12. [26461]
Mr Gibb [holding answer 25 November 2010]: Decisions regarding the new discretionary fund will be made locally, enabling schools, colleges and training providers to target support at those young people in greatest need. The Government do not intend to prescribe how many young people should receive support under the new arrangements.
Current discretionary funds support around 200,000 young people each year. The new fund will be around three times greater than current funds.
Lisa Nandy: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what assistance his Department plans to provide to further education institutions to administer the discretionary learner support fund in the academic year 2011-12. [26462]
Mr Gibb [holding answer 25 November 2010]: We will work with representatives of schools, colleges and training providers to finalise the arrangements for the enhanced discretionary learner support fund, including how the funding will flow to institutions and what guidance is required to administer the fund effectively.
Lisa Nandy: To ask the Secretary of State for Education whether travel costs for students undertaking a course at a further education institution may be met through the discretionary learner support fund in the 2011-12 academic year. [26463]
Mr Gibb [holding answer 25 November 2010]: Discretionary support funding may not currently be used routinely for transport to and from college. The statutory responsibility for making the necessary arrangements for transport to enable 16 to 18-year-olds (and 19 to 25-year-olds with a learning difficulty or disability) to attend education and training lies with local authorities.
We will consider this restriction as we develop the arrangements for the enhanced discretionary learner support funding.
Teresa Pearce: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what mechanisms are in place to ensure that discretionary learner support fund payments will be made available for eligible students at the start of the next academic year; and what penalties will be imposed in respect of institutions which are unable to meet the commitment to fund students at the start of the academic year. [26579]
Mr Gibb [holding answer 25 November 2010]: We plan to allocate the enhanced funding in line with the timetable for overall funding allocations for schools and colleges, which will be made by the end of March.
We will work with representatives of schools, colleges and training providers to finalise the arrangements for the enhanced fund, including how the funding will flow to institutions and what guidance is required to administer the fund effectively.
Teresa Pearce: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what mechanism will be in place to assist an institution which exhausts its discretionary learner support fund allocation and subsequently deems more students to require funding during the academic year 2011-12. [26580]
Mr Gibb [holding answer 25 November 2010]: We plan to seek the views of education providers as we finalise the details of how the enhanced discretionary learner support fund will operate. We would expect schools, colleges and training providers to use their allocation to target those who most need it to enable them to participate in education.
Arrangements for the current discretionary learner support fund provide for unused funds to be redistributed to providers which indicate they need more resource.
Mr Ward: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what guidance his Department plans to issue to schools on the allocation of the enhanced discretionary learner support fund. [27288]
Mr Gibb: We will work with representatives of schools, colleges and training providers to finalise the arrangements for the enhanced discretionary learner support fund, including how the funding will flow to institutions and what guidance is required to administer the fund effectively.
Ann Coffey: To ask the Secretary of State for Education how many and what proportion of people in each (a) socio-economic and (b) ethnic group received education maintenance allowance in each constituency in the latest period for which figures are available. [26466]
Mr Gibb [holding answer 29 November 2010]: This is a matter for the Young People's Learning Agency (YPLA) who operate the education maintenance allowance for the Department for Education. Peter Lauener, the YPLA's chief executive, will write to the hon. Member with the information requested and a copy of his reply will be placed in the House Libraries.
Mr Ward: To ask the Secretary of State for Education how many students normally resident in Bradford East constituency receive education maintenance allowance. [27291]
Mr Gibb: This is a matter for the Young People's Learning Agency (YPLA) who operate the education maintenance allowance for the Department for Education. Peter Lauener the YPLA's chief executive, will write to the hon. Member for Bradford East with the information requested and a copy of his reply will be placed in House Libraries.
Mr Jim Cunningham: To ask the Secretary of State for Education how many students normally resident in Coventry receive education maintenance allowance; and what estimate he has made of the number who will receive this allowance following implementation of proposals in the comprehensive spending review. [27461]
Mr Gibb [holding answer 1 December 2010]: This is a matter for the Young People's Learning Agency (YPLA) who operate the education maintenance allowance for the Department for Education. Peter Lauener the YPLA's chief executive, will write to the hon. Member with the information requested and a copy of his reply will be placed in Hansard and the House Libraries.
Chris Skidmore: To ask the Secretary of State for Education how many pupils in further education colleges were entered for (a) history, (b) physics, (c) chemistry, (d) media studies and (e) psychology A-levels in each year since 1997; and what proportion this represented of the total number of pupils in such colleges entered for A-levels in each such case. [20231]
Mr Gibb: The information requested is given in the following table:
Number and percentage of students in further education colleges entered for selected A-level subjects, 1997-2010 | ||||||||||
History | Media studies | Psychology | Chemistry | Physics | ||||||
Number entered for subject | % of those entered for A- levels | Number entered for subject | % of those entered for A- levels | Number entered for subject | % of those entered for A- levels | Number entered for subject | % of those entered for A- levels | Number entered for subject | % of those entered for A- levels | |
Notes: 1. Figures for 2010 are provisional and are subject to change. 2. Percentages are based upon all students sitting A levels in further education college. |
Chris Skidmore: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what number and proportion of pupils achieving five A* to C grades including English and mathematics at GCSE achieved this by including an equivalent qualification in each year since 1997. [20225]
Mr Gibb: The number and percentage of pupils achieving five A* to C grades including English and mathematics at GCSE by including an equivalent qualification is given below:
Mr Amess: To ask the Secretary of State for Education how many and what proportion of pupils in each local authority were entered for geography (a) GCSE and (b) A level in each of the last three years for which information is available. [22051]
Mr Gibb: The information requested has been placed in the House Libraries.
Mr Marcus Jones: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what powers headteachers have to dismiss poorly performing teachers. [27037]
Mr Gibb: Governing bodies working alongside head teachers are required to establish procedures for dealing with lack of capability on the part of staff at the school and may dismiss staff, including teachers, whose performance is unacceptable.
The current statutory capability guidance overlaps with the mandatory arrangements for the performance management of teachers. We want to make it easier for schools to tackle poor performance. As "The Importance of Teaching-the Schools White Paper 2010" makes clear, we will achieve this by simplifying the current arrangements and removing duplication between the performance management and the capability procedures for managing poor performance. This will allow schools to deal more swiftly and effectively with under-performing teachers.
Laura Sandys: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what steps he is taking to reduce the attainment gap between pupils from affluent and poor backgrounds in (a) South Thanet constituency and (b) England. [24596]
Mr Gibb: Reducing the attainment gap between pupils from affluent and poor backgrounds is at the heart of our policy for school improvement, in South Thanet as elsewhere.
We have made a clear commitment to narrowing attainment gaps between children from disadvantaged backgrounds and their peers through our recently announced £7.2 billion fairness premium. The fairness premium includes a £2.5 billion pupil premium for schools which will target extra funding at the most disadvantaged pupils wherever they live, reducing educational inequalities and ensuring that poorer students receive the support they need to reach their potential.
On 3 November, we also announced a new £110 million education endowment fund which will fund new and innovative ways of raising the attainment of disadvantaged pupils in underperforming schools. Lessons learned about what works to raise the attainment of disadvantaged children will be made available to all schools on an ongoing basis, to help inform their pupil premium funding decisions.
Kerry McCarthy: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what recent estimate he has made of the number of teachers of the deaf in the south-west; and what assessment he has made of the merits of steps to improve specialist support services for deaf children. [17175]
Sarah Teather: We do not routinely collect data about the number of teachers of the deaf by region. Local authorities are responsible for ensuring that teachers of the deaf possess the appropriate mandatory qualification to undertake the role and it is a matter for local authorities to ensure that they have enough qualified teachers to meet their statutory commitments.
The Government will be publishing a Green Paper on special educational needs and disabilities, which will explore how we can improve support for all children with special educational needs and disabilities, including those with hearing impairments. It is a priority to improve the educational outcomes for all children and we recognise the important role specialists, such as teachers of the deaf, play in meeting this goal.
Rehman Chishti: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what research his Department has (a) commissioned and (b) evaluated on the effects on social inclusion of school admissions policies. [22403]
Tim Loughton: The Department has not commissioned or evaluated any research looking at the effects of social inclusion on school admissions policy.
However, the Department did commission a research project in December 2009 to look at the effect of changes in secondary school admissions on the social composition of schools. This was published on 30 September 2010 and has been placed in the House Libraries.
Mr Graham Stuart: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what his policy is on the role of (a) central Government and (b) local government in the reduction of exclusions from school of children with (i) special educational needs and (ii) autism. [25763]
Mr Gibb: The Government are clear that schools should, wherever possible, avoid excluding permanently any pupil with a statement of special educational needs (SEN). Where SEN, including autism, contribute to behavioural difficulties, those needs should be addressed, wherever possible, before problems arise.
The decision to exclude is one for head teachers to make and head teachers should not be prevented from excluding a child with SEN where that is the necessary and appropriate course of action. In making these difficult decisions, children with SEN should be treated sensitively by schools and the judgment of professionals should be trusted in this matter.
We are also considering options for changing the arrangements for reviewing permanent exclusions and will announce our decisions in due course.
Exclusion from school does not mean exclusion from education and local authorities have the duty to provide suitable full-time alternative education for any permanently excluded pupil of compulsory school age from the sixth day of the exclusion. The Government are currently developing policies to improve the environment in which excluded pupils are educated and to ensure that those organisations with a proven track record in turning young lives round are given the opportunity to expand their provision.
Lisa Nandy: To ask the Secretary of State for Education with what frequency payments to students from the discretionary learner support fund will be made in the academic year 2011-12. [26973]
Mr Gibb [holding answer 29 November 2010]: Decisions regarding the new discretionary fund will be made locally, enabling schools, colleges and training providers to target support at those young people in greatest need. They will have the freedom to determine how frequently payments are made, and for what purpose.
In finalising the arrangements for the enhanced discretionary learner support fund, the Department will consult with schools, colleges and training organisations, including on what guidance is required to administer the fund effectively.
Simon Danczuk: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what estimate he has made of the number of unqualified staff teaching lessons in schools in each local education authority area; what assessment he has made of effects of the number of unqualified staff on levels of unemployment among newly-qualified teachers; and if he will make a statement. [23036]
Mr Gibb: The information requested is shown in the following table.
With the exception of some overseas-trained teachers, maintained schools may only employ unqualified teachers as long as no suitable qualified or trainee teacher is available to fill the post. This allows maintained schools to cover exceptional temporary shortages, while ensuring that the employment of unqualified teachers does not affect the employment prospects of qualified teachers.
Next Section | Index | Home Page |