2 Nov 2011 : Column 613W
2 Nov 2011 : Column 615W
Written Answers to Questions
Wednesday 2 November 2011
Health
Consultants
Mr Thomas: To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 19 October 2011, Official Report, column 1029W, on departmental procurement, how many contracts involved the provision of consultancy services; how many contracts involved the employment of a consultant within his Department; whether any such consultants remained in employment on the latest date for which information is available; and if he will make a statement. [77720]
Mr Simon Burns: None of the purchase orders awarded to third sector organisations between May 2010 and August 2011 that were set out in the answer of 19 October 2011 fall within the Government Procurement Service definition of consultancy:
“the provision to management of objective advice relating to strategy, structure, management or operations of an organisation, in pursuit of its purpose and objectives”.
Such advice will be provided outside the ‘business-as-usual’ environment when in-house skills are not available and will be time-limited. Consultancy may include the identification of options with recommendations, or assistance with (but the not the delivery of) the implementation of solutions.
Departmental Public Expenditure
Austin Mitchell: To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether he receives any external funding for (a) his ministerial office and (b) his advisers; and what the (i) source and (ii) amount is of any such funding. [78019]
Mr Simon Burns: All costs for the ministerial private office and special advisers are met by the Department.
Depressive Illnesses
Helen Jones: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people were diagnosed of suffering from (a) severe and (b) mild or moderate depression in (i) England, (ii) the northwest and (iii) Warrington in the latest year for which figures are available. [77652]
Paul Burstow: The national Quality Outcomes Framework (QOF) for England records the number of people on practice disease registers with a diagnosis of depression, for patients aged 18 years or over. There are no separate prevalence figures for depression by severity type.
2 Nov 2011 : Column 616W
The following table gives the number of patients on the depression register for the areas requested, from the latest release of the QOF, covering the financial year 2010 - 2011:
QOF 2010-11 | |
|
Number of patients (aged 18 years or over) on depression register |
Source: QMAS database—2010-11 |
Diseases: EU Action
Mr Andrew Smith: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what steps he has taken towards a UK plan for rare diseases as required by the Council of the European Union's recommendation on an action in the field of rare diseases published in June 2009 (2009/C151/02). [77532]
Mr Simon Burns: The United Kingdom response to the European Council’s recommendation on the development of a national plan for rare diseases is due by the end of 2013. As part of the work in developing the plan departmental officials are working very closely with the devolved Administrations and key partners to ensure that the plan responds to the actions identified in Recommendation 2009/C 151/02. A public consultation on the draft plan is expected to be launched before the end of this year.
Haemolytic Uremic Syndrome
Duncan Hames: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) children and (b) adults were diagnosed with atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome in each of the last three years; and how many of those diagnosed have died as a result of the syndrome. [77948]
Mr Simon Burns: Information is not available in the format requested. Information on the numbers of patients diagnosed in out-patient or other environments is not collected centrally. The information provided in the following table is the number of admission episodes where a primary diagnosis of haemolytic uremic syndrome (i.e. not just atypical) has been recorded.
Total number of finished admission episodes (1) with a primary diagnosis (2) of Haemolytic- uremic syndrome (ICD-10 code D59.3) by age group for 2007-08, 2008-09 and 2009-10 | |||
Age group | 2007-08 | 2008-09 | 2009-10 |
(1) Finished admission episodes A finished admission episode (FAE) is the first period of in-patient care under one consultant within one health care provider. FAEs are counted against the year in which the admission episode finishes. Admissions do not represent the number of in-patients, as a person may have more than one admission within the year. (2) Primary diagnosis The primary diagnosis is the first of up to 20 (14 from 2002-03 to 2006-07 and seven prior to 2002-03) diagnosis fields in the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data set and provides the main reason why the patient was admitted to hospital. Source s : 1. Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), The NHS Information Centre for health and social care 2. Activity in English NHS Hospitals and English NHS commissioned activity in the independent sector |
2 Nov 2011 : Column 617W
Information on deaths involving atypical haemolyticuremic syndrome is not directly available from the statistical information derived from death registrations.
Duncan Hames: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) children and (b) adults with atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome were treated with (a) plasma therapy and (b) dialysis in each of the last three years. [77968]
Mr Simon Burns: Information on the number of these treatments and procedures carried out outside a hospital is not collected centrally. The following table covers in-patient activity for haemolytic uremic syndrome (i.e. not just atypical).
Total number of finished admission episodes (1) with a primary diagnosis (2) of Haemolytic-uremic syndrome (ICD-10 code D59.3) and where a treatment or procedure (3) of plasma exchange (4) or plasma transfusion (5) or dialysis (6) has been recorded by age group for 2007-08, 2008-09 and 2009-10 | ||||
Treatment | Age group | 2007-08 | 2008-09 | 2009-10 |
(1) Finished admission episodes A finished admission episode (FAE) is the first period of in-patient care under one consultant within one health care provider. FAEs are counted against the year in which the admission episode finishes. Admissions do not represent the number of in-patients, as a person may have more than one admission within the year. (2) Primary diagnosis The primary diagnosis is the first of up to 20 (14 from 2002-03 to 2006-07 and seven prior to 2002-03) diagnosis fields in the HES data set and provides the main reason why the patient was admitted to hospital. (3) Number of episodes with a (named) main or secondary procedure The number of episodes where the procedure (or intervention) was recorded in any of the 24 (12 from 2002-03 to 2006-07 and four prior to 2002-03) procedure fields in a HES record. A record is only included once in each count, even if the procedure is recorded in more than one procedure field of the record. Note that more procedures are carried out than episodes with a main or secondary procedure. For example, patients undergoing a 'cataract operation' would tend to have at least two procedures—removal of the faulty lens and the fitting of a new one—counted in a single episode. (4) Plasma Exchange (OPCS 4.5 codes) X32.2—Exchange of plasma (single) X32.3—Exchange of plasma (2-9) X32.4—Exchange of plasma (10-19) X32.5—Exchange of plasma (>19) (5) Plasma Transfusion (OPCS 4.5 codes) X34.2—Transfusion of plasma (6) Dialysis (OPCS 4.5 codes) X40.1—Renal dialysis X40.2—Peritoneal dialysis NEC X40.3—Haemodialysis NEC X40.4—Haemofiltration X40.5—Automated peritoneal dialysis X40.6—Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis X40.7—Haemoperfusion X40.8—Other specified compensation for renal failure X40.9—Unspecified compensation for renal failure Sources: 1. Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), The NHS Information Centre for health and social care 2. Activity in English NHS Hospitals and English NHS commissioned activity in the independent sector |
2 Nov 2011 : Column 618W
Duncan Hames: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many patients with atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome were waiting for an organ transplant in each of the last 10 years; and how many received an organ transplant in each of the last three years. [77969]
Anne Milton: The information available is provided in the following tables.
Table 1: Patients on the United Kingdom kidney transplant list as at 31 March 2005-11, where the primary renal disease was atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome | |||
Status | |||
|
Active | Suspended (1) | Total |
(1) Suspended means the patient has been temporarily removed from the list. This happens for such reasons as being too ill to undergo the operation or being away on holiday. (2) NHS Blood and Transplant do not hold historical transplant list data with primary renal disease prior to 2005, therefore the transplant list data shown is for the last seven years. Source: NHS Blood and Transplant |
Table 2: Number of kidneys transplants in the UK, 1 April 2004 to 31 March 2011, where the primary renal disease was haemolytic uremic syndrome | |
Financial year | Transplants |
Note: The transplant data is provided for the same seven year time period as figures would be misleading for three years only, as the figures have fluctuated. Source: NHS Blood and Transplant |
Public Health
Mr Evennett: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what recent assessment he has made of local authorities' preparedness for the proposed transfer of public health responsibilities. [77534]
Anne Milton: The four Strategic Health Authority (SHA) Cluster Directors of Public Health have been charged with leading public health transitions at the local level. Primary care trusts and local government are responsible for planning the transition of public health responsibilities. Local transition plans are required to be submitted to SHA Clusters by 31 March 2012. Implementation of these plans will be monitored by the SHA Cluster Directors of Public Health. The Directors of Public Health will report progress against these plans to a joint Department of Health and Local Government Programme Board.
2 Nov 2011 : Column 619W
Health Services
Mr Bradshaw: To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) for what reason the cost of providing existing primary care support services was not included in the calculations for the assessment of the Shared Business Services; [77816]
(2) if he will ensure that no decision is taken on the bid from NHS Shared Business Services to operate primary care support services in the south west until the standardising primary care support services report has been published. [77817]
Mr Simon Burns: The decision to award services to NHS Shared Business Services is made locally, and the Department is not involved in the assessment process.
The Department does not intervene in matters which are for local determination because local organisations are best able to make decisions about their local services.
Hepatitis
Jim Fitzpatrick: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment he has made of the effect of a reduction in onward transmission of hepatitis C on NHS costs. [78156]
Anne Milton: We have not assessed the effect of a reduction in onward transmission of hepatitis C on costs to the national health service. However, a reduction in hepatitis C transmission appears likely to reduce NHS costs both by decreasing in the medium, term the need for drug therapy and in the long term, the burden of serious liver disease.
Influenza: Vaccination
Mr Crausby:
To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether he has any plans to reduce the age limit for free
2 Nov 2011 : Column 620W
influenza injections to 60 years; and if he will make a statement. [77477]
Anne Milton: Policy on national immunisation programmes, including seasonal influenza immunisation, is based on the advice of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI). JCVI has advised that the groups at greatest risk from flu eligible to receive flu vaccine on the national health service in the 2011-12 flu season are:
people aged 65 and over; and
people under 65 years in clinical risk groups(1), including pregnant women.
(1) Serious medical conditions, which put people at increased risk from flu, are:
chronic (long-term) respiratory disease, such as severe asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or bronchitis;
chronic heart disease, such as heart failure;
chronic kidney disease;
chronic liver disease;
chronic neurological disease, such as Parkinson's disease or motor neurone disease;
diabetes; or
a weakened immune system due to disease (such as HIV/AIDS) or treatment (such as cancer treatment).
JCVI is currently reviewing the evidence regarding a number of potential extensions to the flu vaccination programme for future years and will provide advice in due course.
NHS Blood and Transplant: Pay
John Healey: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much was paid to the directors of NHS Blood and Transplant in (a) salaries, (b) other benefits and (c) employer pension contributions in each of the last five years. [77780]
Anne Milton: The information is shown in the following table.
2 Nov 2011 : Column 621W
2 Nov 2011 : Column 622W
2 Nov 2011 : Column 623W
2 Nov 2011 : Column 624W
NHS: Older People
Mr Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what his most recent estimate is of the proportion of NHS expenditure which is spent on people aged 60 years and over; and if he will make a statement. [77524]
Mr Simon Burns: The most recent and partial analysis of national health service expenditure by age was supplied in departmental report 2006 (figure 6.2) based on analysis of financial year 2003-04 (for the hospital and community health sector (HCHS)). This analysis showed that 43% of total HCHS expenditure was on people aged 65 and over.
NHS: Social Enterprises
Mr Thomas: To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 18 October 2011, Official Report, column 839W, on the public sector, what the (a) name, (b) region, (c) size of contract from the NHS and (d) length of contract from the NHS is of each of the staff-led social enterprises; and if he will make a statement. [77512]
Paul Burstow: The Department has supported the right to request (R2R), which has enabled 45 staff-led social enterprises to be established as shown in the following table. This policy has supported approximately 25,000 staff to move out of the national health service into social enterprises with contracts worth roughly £900 million a list of these are also in the table.
The Department cannot provide details of individual social enterprise staff and turnover figures as they are commercial in confidence and belong to the social enterprises as they are now independent bodies. Contracts were negotiated between the new social enterprises and commissioners (ie primary care trusts). The Department's policy was the contracts should be for between three and five years, depending on services and the introduction of any qualified provider for their services.
2 Nov 2011 : Column 625W
2 Nov 2011 : Column 626W
2 Nov 2011 : Column 627W
2 Nov 2011 : Column 628W
2 Nov 2011 : Column 629W
2 Nov 2011 : Column 630W
Organs: Donors
Mrs Moon: To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will consider allocating responsibility to one individual for the Government's objective of improving rates of organ donation and transplantation; and if he will make a statement. [77727]
Anne Milton: Improving rates of organ donation and transplantation rests not with one individual but with a wide range of people. As Minister for Public Health, I am responsible for organ donation and transplantation for the Department of Health.
Therefore, work continues at national, regional and local levels across a number of organisations to support the excellent work of the national health service in identifying, referring and procuring donor organs. We have made good progress and are on track to meet the 50% improvement in deceased donor rates by 2013 anticipated by the Organ Donation Taskforce. A Transitional Steering Group, established in March 2011 is encouraging action at all levels and provides a clear reporting line to United Kingdom health ministers on progress. As we modernise the NHS we will continue our work to keep donation rates at a record high so that more people can benefit from a life-saving transplant.
Mrs Moon: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the percentage change was in the number of people (a) on the Organ Donor Register, (b) who died in circumstances suitable for organ donation and whose organs were donated and (c) requiring a transplant operation who received one in each of the last six years; and if he will make a statement. [77728]
Anne Milton: The information requested is provided in the following table.
Organ Donor Register (ODR) figures, 2005-06 to 2010-11 | ||||||
Financial year | Number on the ODR | Percentage change | Deceased organ donors | Percentage change | Deceased organ transplants | Percentage change |
Note: The percentage change figure for the overall increase, will not equal the total sum of the percentage change figures. The percentage change from year to year is calculated comparing one year with the previous year, whereas the overall increase is comparing the final year (2010-11) with the first year (2005-06). Source: NHS Blood and Transplant |
Sustained work to improve organ donation and transplantation rates continues at national, regional and local levels and we have made good progress and are on track to meet the 50% improvement in deceased donor rates by 2013 anticipated by the Organ Donation Taskforce. Significant resources have been made available, largely through NHS Blood and Transplant, to increase the number of specialist nurses for organ donation and appoint clinical leads, donation committees and donation chairs in acute trusts to drive improvement locally. This has helped donor rates to increase and for rates to continue to rise in 2011-12.
2 Nov 2011 : Column 631W
Chronic Pain
Mr Virendra Sharma: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what discussions he has had with the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence on the publication of a quality standard for chronic pain in adults. [78005]
Paul Burstow:
We wrote to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in December, asking for further scoping work on 11 topics, and for advice on their suitability for the development of quality standards. The list included a possible quality standard or standards on pain relief, including pain relief in children. This topic of ‘pain management’ was included
2 Nov 2011 : Column 632W
in the proposed list for the library of NICE Quality Standards that the National Quality Board will be considering shortly, following the completion of an engagement exercise hosted by NICE. An announcement will be made in due course.
Mr Virendra Sharma: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) elective and (b) emergency (i) admissions and (ii) bed days were recorded for patients with a primary diagnosis of chronic pain in each primary care trust in the last year for which figures are available. [78006]
Paul Burstow: The information requested is in the following table.
Number of finished admission episodes (1) and number of finished consultant episode (FCE) bed days (2) by method of admission (3) with a primary diagnosis of chronic pain (4) by primary care trust of residence (5) 2009-10 | ||||||
Activity in English NHS Hospitals and English NHS commissioned activity in the independent sector | ||||||
Finished admission episodes | FCE b ed days | |||||
Primary care trust | Elective | Emergency | Unknown | Elective | Emergency | Unknown |
2 Nov 2011 : Column 633W
2 Nov 2011 : Column 634W
2 Nov 2011 : Column 635W
2 Nov 2011 : Column 636W
2 Nov 2011 : Column 637W
2 Nov 2011 : Column 638W
(1) Finished admission episodes A finished admission episode (FAE) is the first period of inpatient care under one consultant within one healthcare provider. FAEs are counted against the year in which the admission episode finishes. Admissions do not represent the number of inpatients, as a person may have more than one admission within the year. (2) Episode duration (FCE bed days) Episode duration is calculated as the difference in days between the episode start date and the episode end date, where both are given. Episode duration is based on finished consultant episodes and only applies to ordinary admissions, ie day cases are excluded (unless otherwise stated). (3) Method of admission This is the sum of the episode duration for all finished consultant episodes that ended within the financial year. This field does not include bed days where the episode was unfinished at the end of the financial year. To identify bed days as emergency bed days we have filtered the total bed days figures by admission method indicating the admission was an emergency (codes 21 to 24 and 28). 21 = Emergency: via Accident and Emergency (A&E) services, including the casualty department of the provider 22 = Emergency: via general practitioner (GP) 23 = Emergency: via Bed Bureau, including the Central Bureau 24 = Emergency: via consultant outpatient clinic 28 = Emergency: other means, including patients who arrive via the A&E department of another healthcare provider" (4) Primary diagnosis The primary diagnosis is the first of up to 20 (14 from 2002-03 to 2006-07 and 7 prior to 2002-03) diagnosis fields in the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data set and provides the main reason why the patient was admitted to hospital. ICD-10 codes used: R52.1 - Chronic intractable pain R52.2 - Other chronic pain" (5) SHA/PCT of residence The strategic health authority (SHA) or primary care trust (PCT) containing the patient’s normal home address. This does not necessarily reflect where the patient was treated as they may have travelled to another SHA/PCT for treatment. Note: Small numbers To protect patient confidentiality, figures between 1 and 5 have been replaced with “*” (an asterisk). Where it was still possible to identify numbers from the total an additional number (the next smallest) has been replaced. Source: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), The NHS Information Centre for health and social care |