Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill

Memorandum submitted by Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee (LA 101)

I, Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee of 196 Tiptree Crescent, Ilford, Essex IG5 OST, Tell 020-8252-6462, do hereby make a complaint and persuant to Section 13 of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835.

 

1.  I request that Legal Aid Funding should be given to any person to be represented by a Counsel-Barrister when the HM Attorney General or HM Solicitor General authorises an Application for an Order under Section 42 of the SCA 1981.

 

2.    I request that Section 42 (4) of the SCA 1981 should be repealed, as this is a Breach of Article 13 of the Convention Treaties.

 

3.    Section 11 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990

 

Any County Court Judge does have the Power to ban any person when any person is misleading the Court or behaving in an unreasonable behaviour

 

The High Court Judge should not have Jurisdiction Power to ban any person from taking and defending any proceedings before any County Court, as they have equal powers but only the amount that is involved

 

Say if the Amount claimed is less than £10,000-00 than this should be commenced in the County Court, and should include for Permission of the Circuit Judge to bring and continue any legal proceedings.

 

 

4.    Section 42 Orders which are for Indefinate Period- without time limit

 

This should be replaced as between 2 and 5 Years since the Legislation does change every year which the Attorney General- Solicitor General and their Legal Representatives should take into consideration and inform the Court of Change of Legislation.

 

5.   There is a Judgment given in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom-Experts Immunity should be abolished

 

The Barristers and Solicitors who are insured with the Insurance Company- They should be prohibited and restrained from making any Application to have a claim form strike out-

either because they were not instructed by the person bringing the claim

 

As the Barrister or Solicitor might have misled the High Court in previous proceedings which causes miscarriage of justice, and unnecessary costs on any other third party person.

 

6.   STRIKING OUT A BARRISTER, SOLICITOR FROM THE ROLL OF BARRISTER OR SOLICITOR

 

ANY PERSON CAN MAKE AN APPLICATION BEFORE ANY COURT OF LAW IN ANY PART OF THE UNITED KINGDOM TO HAVE THE SOLICITOR, BARRISTER ANSWER THE ALLEGATIONS THAT HE/SHE SHOULD BE STRIKE OUT FROM THE ROLL OF BARRISTER OR SOLICITOR

AND FUNDING SHOULD BE GIVEN FOR A BARRISTER

 

7.    In the Proceedings Number HC 02 CO 2183, HC 02 CO 3111 AND HC 02 CO 3112

High Court of Justice

 

I did lodge the list of Authority Dunoon Developments Ltd Versus The Secretary of State and Poole District Council which was decided in the Court of Appeal in the year 1992.

 

I have provided the list of Authority to the Parliamentary Ombudsman Commissioner when making a complaint for Maladministration by the Government Department.

 

The Parliamentary Ombudsman Commissioner had refused to carry out the Investigation when evidence had been provided to them

 

The Information Commissioner Office had been given a copy of the list of Authority but they do not admit the facts which does amount to Official Misconduct in Public Office.

 

 

8.    If the Commitee does require a copy of Bundle 3 of the Document which was lodged in the High Court of Justice and in the Court of Appeal, than I am prepared and willing to send copy of the bundle 3 of the document.

 

9.    CIVIL RESTRAINT ORDERS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM  CPR 3-11.

THIS SHOULD BE ABOLISHED

AS ONLY THE HM ATTORNEY GENERAL OR SOLICITOR GENERAL SHOULD BE AUTHORISED TO ISSUE AN APPLICATION TO BAN ANY PERSON, AND CROSS-EXAMINATION AND JURY TRIAL SHOULD BE ALLOWED.

 

September 2011 

 

Prepared 11th October 2011