The New Local Enterprise Partnerships: An Initial Assessment - Business, Innovation and Skills Committee Contents


Written evidence from National Express East Anglia and c2c

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  As the principal train operator for the East of England, the development of the new LEPs and the introduction of the new RGF are of significant interest and importance to us. The rail transport network is a major contributor to the economic prosperity and sustainable development of the region. We therefore believe that the new LEP and Regional Growth Fund structures need to:

    1. Include rail and other transport modes as part of their remit in supporting economic development. 2. Ensure strategic and tactical transport needs are covered at a regional, sub-regional and local level.

    3. Support business case development for transport infrastructure and service improvements by providing the economic evidence which underpins the schemes.

    4. Deliver funding support for capital projects which have a wide impact but which could not be fully funded by other relevant players.

    5. Assist in securing European funding where appropriate.

    6. Act as helpful, informed advisors to government on key transport priorities as they affect business in their area.

  We are not advocating at this stage a particular proposal, as not all the potential proposals have been confirmed, given that the deadline for submissions (6 September) has not yet passed and we will, of course, work proactively with whichever LEPs emerge. However, we are highlighting the important points above, which should be integral to the development and operation of the new arrangements.

  This submission to the Business, Innovation and Skills Select Committee inquiry into Local Enterprise Partnerships from National Express East Anglia is a short summary aimed at highlighting some key considerations to be included in the evaluation of the framework for the new Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEPs) and the introduction of the new Regional Growth Fund (RGF). We are not advocating at this stage a particular proposal, as not all the potential proposals have been confirmed, given that the deadline for submissions (6 September) has not yet passed and we will, of course, work proactively with whichever LEPs emerge. However, we are highlighting some important points which must be integral to the development and operation of the new arrangements.

  As the principal train operator for the East of England, the development of the new LEPs and the introduction of the new RGF are of significant interest and importance to us. The rail transport network is a major contributor to the economic prosperity and sustainable development of the region. The East of England Development Agency's Transport Economic Evidence Study (2008) and Study into the economic impact of an upgrade for the Great Eastern Main Line (2010) have both demonstrated the vital role that the rail network plays in generating, facilitating and supporting business success.

  It is therefore essential that one of the roles of the LEPs and RGF should be to support transport developments which will help underpin economic growth and make it easier for people to travel around the region.

  Although at this stage it is not yet confirmed what shape and structures will be proposed, some points are worth considering:

    — Business activity is both within and across county boundaries.

    — Transport flows are both within and across county boundaries.

    — Economic activity is often along a particular corridor, between locations linked by key rail or road networks at regional, sub-regional and local levels, so for example in East Anglia you have regional corridors such as the Great Eastern Main Line (London—Chelmsford—Colchester—Ipswich—Norwich), the West Anglia route (London—Harlow Bishops Stortford—Stansted Airport/Cambridge—Kings Lynn) and the Felixstowe to Nuneaton route (via Ipswich, Peterborough and Leicester); sub-regional corridors such as Norwich—Cambridge, Ipswich—Cambridge and Southend—London; and local corridors wholly within counties such as Colchester—Clacton, Ipswich—Lowestoft, Norwich—Great Yarmouth.

    — There is often agglomeration of particular sectors of economic activity around key centres and along key corridors

  It is crucial that the LEPs and Regional Growth Fund are able to tackle and support priorities at both a strategic and a tactical level—addressing regional, sub-regional and local needs. In particular, it will be important that regional transport investment and upgrades which will have a major impact on business competitiveness are not delayed or stymied by an approach which ends up making it difficult for such schemes to be properly prioritised. The benefits (regionally and locally) of some major regional projects will be much greater than the sum of their individual parts or some smaller schemes.

  At the same time key local transport schemes can be just as effective in supporting business at a local level. The critical issue is having a framework which delivers at all levels.

  In summary, then, the new LEP and Regional Growth Fund structures need to:

    7. Include rail and other transport modes as part of their remit in supporting economic development.

    8. Ensure strategic and tactical transport needs are covered at a regional, sub-regional and local level.

    9. Support business case development for transport infrastructure and service improvements by providing the economic evidence which underpins the schemes.

    10. Deliver funding support for capital projects which have a wide impact but which could not be fully funded by other relevant players.

    11. Assist in securing European funding where appropriate.

    12. Act as helpful, informed advisors to government on key transport priorities as they affect business in their area.

19 August 2010





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 9 December 2010