Government Assistance to Industry - Business, Innovation and Skills Committee Contents


Written evidence from Furness Enterprise Ltd

1.  FURNESS ENTERPRISE

  1.1  This evidence is submitted by Furness Enterprise which was set up as a public/private sector partnership (in effect a Local Enterprise Partnership) in 1991 to help the largely self-contained Barrow in Furness Travel to Work Area, adjust to the consequence of massive job losses from the local nuclear submarine naval shipyard and job losses from other major local employers. Our views are based on extensive experience of working in partnership with the private sector and government to help businesses access "money and markets" in innovative ways.

2.  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  2.1  Government assistance programmes work most effectively when they are targeted to realise local opportunities. We have found that what matters is a clear, common understanding of the way in which the local economy works that, distinct roles for the different partnerships are clearly agreed, but with enough shared membership and communication to ensure coherence and effective delivery.

  2.2  There is now a well understood need to rebalance the UK economy away from its reliance on financial services and to reduce our structural balance of payments' deficit. We welcome this shift of emphasis towards wealth creating manufacturing and local economies that retain high levels of manufacturing.

  2.3  The role of the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills in supporting industry is changing as outlined in the July 2010 Government policy statement, "A Strategy for Sustainable Growth" and the "Green Paper on Business Finance". The key objective is to promote private sector enterprise and jobs.

  2.4  We believe that the Government through BIS should operate economic/enterprise policy in such a way as to distinguish between affluent self sustaining private sector job generating areas eg London and the South East and deprived areas with potentially good access to jobs created elsewhere eg Greater Manchester and job poor deprived areas remote from "engines of growth" eg Barrow in Furness.

  2.5  We are concerned that BIS may abandon the whole principle of direct assistance to businesses if the statement in "A Strategy for Sustainable Growth" that... "where we intervene we must do so to support businesses in general rather than individual businesses."... is implemented. We would like BIS to clarify whether this amounts to a Government policy to abandon Assisted Area discretionary Grants for Business Investment.

  2.6  Policy statements in "A Strategy for Sustainable Growth" raise issues of whether policy should attempt to enhance firms' capabilities and/or whether the major role of Government is to provide relevant infrastructure at the more aggregate level.

  2.7  We believe that "first and foremost it is at the firm level that capabilities and technology are advanced and therefore policy needs to relate to the specific needs of the firm if it is to be most effective" "Horizontal Aid" allowed for by the European Commission as part of a policy "to support businesses in general rather than individual businesses."... would be insufficient on its own to be able to assist with the growth of existing firms, attraction of inward investment and reinvestment. Horizontal Aid is available equally to prosperous regions and companies will tend to locate there first.

  Research Project on DTI Industrial Support Policies: An analysis of current DTI industry support patterns (dti April 2001)" which BIS refers to in its 26 August 2010 "Measurement of Drivers of Business Success and Failure"

  2.8  Government should continue with the current economic policy approach that distinguishes between deprived and affluent areas. The provision of loans and grants under programmes such as Assisted Areas is preferred for improving the chances of success for northern local economies over rather than relying instead on a more generic, favourable business environment approach.

  2.9  Continuation of Assisted Area status until 2013 is absolutely critical to the future economic prosperity of areas like Furness if they are to be able to continue to benefit from growth orientated companies of all sizes,New start up businesses, growing indigenous firms or inward investors. We would add that:

    — Assisted Area GBI support has, and is, being used very effectively to create private sector jobs.

    — There is clear evidence that Assisted Area GBI works as a private sector stimulus.

    — GBI should not be taken away.

    — If GBI is taken away, the UK will have an undifferentiated area based policy which will benefit prosperous areas and city regions at the expense of peripheral areas which often have significant industries capable of benefitting from GBI, thereby creating private sector jobs.

  2.10  The current freeze on its use in England is holding up development and jobs by the private sector. Evidence given to the House of Commons BIS Select Committee on 7 September stated that:

    "There are some unintended consequences of these decisions. I will give you two: businesses were looking forward to receiving GBI grants for business but we are unable to do that"

3.  OVERVIEW OF REGIONAL POLICY

  3.1  Ministers have confirmed that "All Solutions for Business (SfB) products are currently being reviewed, including the Grant for Business Investment (GBI)".

  3.2  UK and EU policy is to "promote economic development of certain disadvantaged areas within the EU"...."by supporting investment and job creation" and to "promote expansion and diversification of the economic activities of enterprises located in less favoured regions in particular, by encouraging firms to set up new establishments there".

  3.3  EU National Regional Aid Guidelines state that—"regional aid can only play an effective role if it is used sparingly and proportionately and is concentrated on the most disadvantaged regions", where "regional aid forms part of a well defined regional policy" which "produces a real incentive effort to undertake investments which would not otherwise be made in the Assisted Areas"). We urge government to retain Assisted area status and GBi grants because it is fits in with this principle.

  3.4  UK Regional policy aims to reduce economic and social disparities between regions. These disparities are usually defined in terms of unemployment rate and income per capita and are aggravated by structural changes which can have social as well as economic consequences (Armstrong and Taylor, 1993). In such cases regional policy can help prevent large scale labour migration from peripheral to core city region areas. The UK's policy traditionally involved "taking work to the workers" to obviate the need for the "workers to move to the work". Contemporary regional policy has been, and is, targeted at specifically designated Assisted Areas through discretionary policies such as Grants for Business Investment and the previous Regional Selective Assistance (RSA). EU policies also aim to reduce/remove disparities between regions/countries.

  The UK was amongst the first European countries to adopt an official regional policy with the 1934 Special Areas Act (Alden and Boland, 1996), and 60 years on, there is still a UK regional policy aiming to address issues of uneven regional incomes and growth.

  3.5  Research conducted for BIS predecessors DTI concluded:

    — "The conclusion from the 10 SFIE case studies is that the large scale investment that these grants support is something that makes an appreciable difference to the individual businesses concerned. In many cases, whilst the grant did not on its own tempt the firms into making these decisions, it acted to increase the size of the investment and to emphasize the growth element of the business decision".

    — "There is a high level of full additionality associated with the Scheme".

    — "Increasing the size of investment is important in areas such as Furness and West Cumbria".

    — "Our overall conclusion is that both the RSA and SFIE Schemes are delivering benefits to the UK economy through net additional employment, higher value added and a set of wider benefits that demonstrate linkage into other regional priorities such as regeneration, skill enhancement, supplier networks and broader environmental agenda

  3.6  Evidence from the local area shows that Assisted Area discretionary grant aid has been, and continues to be, a significant source of sustainable private sector jobs growth in businesses of all sizes, including fast growth new start firms, through organic growth and through inward investment or reinvestment. Assisted Area GBI is cost effective.

  3.7  Between 2007 and 2009, NWDA offered £21.8m of GBI grants to help 113 firms create/protect 3,274 jobs in NW England at a cost per job of £6,611 (2008-09).

  3.8  GBI continues to be an important source of finance for businesses particularly as banks remain reluctant to lend. The grants also help persuade firms to consider more peripheral areas as opposed to "engines of growth" such as the cities of Liverpool and Manchester.

  3.9  In Barrow in Furness TTWA between August 1993 and August 1998, Assisted Area status enabled 49 firms in Furness to invest £64.94 million and create and safeguard 1,821 jobs for £5.19 million of grant aid. The scheme helped support 6.4% of all employees in employment.

  3.10  After 2000 and up to 2006, a time when Furness and West Cumbria was further disadvantaged by only being eligible for a reduced grant rate under State Aid Rules, Regional Selective Assistance (RSA) and Selective Finance for Investment (SFI) created or safeguarded 2,717 jobs in 37 businesses at a cost of £10.04 million whilst levering in £85.4 million of private sector investment.

Figure One

FIVE CASE STUDIES ILLUSTRATE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ASSISTED AREA INCENTIVES

Kimberly-Clark, Barrow (USA)

  A £1.6 million SFI grant in 2005 enabled local management to secure HQ approval to a £15m investment as part of the Group's global competitiveness strategy safeguarding 149 jobs.

  The development resulted in the Barrow site footprint being reconfigured, so it is then regarded as a strategic investment location in Europe rather than one designated for streamlining or closure.

  Since completion of the GBI project the site has attracted a further £16 million of investment, with potential for more.

PartyLite Manufacturing, Barrow(USA)

  PartyLite are part of Blyth Inc. of USA.

  A £0.995 million RSA grant enabled the largest overseas inward investment into Cumbria for 20 years to go ahead at Sandscale Park, Barrow in 1997 instead of in Holland or Eire.

  The new plant manufactures candles with 80% of output destined for mainland Europe. The site now employs 150 people. Further expansion is being contemplated.

Robert McBride, Barrow(UK)

  RSA has secured a significant reinvestment project for the UK instead of it going to France.

  A £0.6 million RSA has enabled the company to secure a £9 million investment from the parent company which created 25 new jobs and protected 150.

  "Project 2000" increased capacity of the plant.

  The company subsequently undertook further investment.

Liberata

  A £0.8 million SFI grant in 2005 enabled Furness to attract a national Centre of Excellence in council tax and benefits processing, aimed at creating 200 jobs over three years.

  At the time it had 155 staff. It now employs 364 people.

  The development would otherwise have located in a large city in southern or central England.

Diamould Limited

  This company secured a small RSA grant when it started in 1999, a further offer was secured in 2002. SFI was offered in 2005.

  The company has grown to employ 107 people and is a market leader in subsea connectors.

  Schlumberger acquired the business in 2005, the recent SFI resulted in their commitment to sustain the business in Barrow, there is potential to grow it from the current 34,000 square feet of premises.

  3.8  We are also concerned that across the UK, inconsistent application of discretionary grant policy is disadvantaging peripheral English Assisted Areas such as West Cumbria and Furness. Scotland is still benefitting!

Figure Two

SCOTTISH AREAS STILL BENEFIT FROM ASSISTED AREA GRANTS

    "More than £2 million of grant support has been secured by two firms in moves that will safeguard or create almost 300 jobs, Scotsman 8 September 2010 First Minister Alex Salmond revealed the support for the Ayrshire economy as the Scottish cabinet met in Kilmarnock yesterday morning."

    Commenting on the two awards, he said: "This investment shows Scotland has a high-quality manufacturing base and is testament to the talent and skills of the Ayrshire workforce." (Source: The Scotsman, September 2010)

  3.9  All other EU countries are still offering grants so England's Assisted Areas are competitively disadvantaged. Wider implications mean English deprived areas are disadvantaged in seeking to attract investment if EU supported Assisted Area grants are frozen as now.

  3.10  The Grants for Business Investment (GBI) scheme which provides financial support to businesses to create or protect jobs is effectively suspended following the decision to scrap RDAs. The decision to curtail RDA funding led to NWDA suspending any new offers for GBI,as the nWDA chief Executive said on 7 September "There are some unintended consequences of these decisions. I will give you two: businesses were looking forward to receiving GBI grants for business but we are unable to do that". Here In Furness two planned inward investment projects were adversely affected by that decision.

  3.11  If the Government wishes to save money as part of the CSR it could continue to fund GBI in Tier 1 and Tier 2 Assisted Areas, eliminating Tier 3 support. It should also require the new Regional Growth Fund to be top sliced so GBI can still be offered. See below.

4  PROPOSED REGIONAL GROWTH FUND

  4.1  The proposed Regional Growth Fund, will amount to much smaller resources than the total funding currently deployed on regeneration through the RDAs. It obviously offers some potential resource, but it is going to be critical that the Regional Growth Fund is focused on encouraging private sector enterprise and sustainable private sector employment, particularly in those areas and communities currently dependent on the public sector.

  4.2  We understand that a key aim of the Fund is to help the areas and communities that are likely to be hardest hit by public sector job cuts and we would add it should include areas highly reliant on public sector contracts or at risk from loss of them. In areas like Furness and West Cumbria this will matter most because it is an area where the private sector is currently weakest.

  4.3  BIS officials will need to address whether the Regional Growth Fund will take over responsibility for GBI, and for other forms of financial aid to companies (eg: gap funding) that is permitted under EU State Aid Rules and was previously disbursed by RDAs and was designed to help the Assisted Areas. The committee may wish to seek the Department's views on this.

  4.4  It is unclear how GBi could be integrated into Regional Growth Fund and the process might be made to work at the sub-regional scale of the proposed LEPs, bearing in mind the cyclical nature of major private sector investment projects and the fact that expertise resident in RDAs and regional industrial development boards to administer the scheme may disipate. The Committee may wish to ask BIS how they will address this challenge, perhaps inviting them to clarify whether pooling some grant-giving activities between neighbouring LEPs will occur.

Appendix A

  Barrow in Furness was designated as an Assisted Area in 1993, renewed in 2000 and in 2007.

  Ekosogen North West Index of Economic Resilience Report 1997-2007, which identified major improvements in Barrow between 1997-2007 in Enterprise, the Labour Market and Economic Dynamism

  It is the 29th most deprived local authority in England with high concentrations of worklessness, particularly Incapacity Benefit claimants.

  Experian's 9 September resilience study for BBC Regions shows the town to be one of the bottom 7 district council areas.

  As the area is remote from the "engines of growth" in the North West, tackling worklessness has depended very much on seeking to work locally with the private sector to create jobs and diversify the economy.

  Barrow is an integral part of "Britain's Energy Coast" which is a programme designed to exploit the wide range of energy opportunities in the area from nuclear to wind.

  We also have a significant reliance on public sector jobs and public sector contracts with the shipyard in Barrow employing 5,041 people out of a workforce of 36,000. Energy intensive manufacturing industries and a cluster of companies involved in energy efficient LED or solid state lighting offer growth opportunities.

  Assisted Area status and hence the ability to attract investment and job creation using financial incentives, has meant that significant private job creation has been achieved and these results have been confirmed in the.

  The results from Furness Enterprise demonstrate that a local public/private sector partnership with resources can work effectively with the private sector to create jobs even in a deprived area.

  Between 1992 and the end of 2009, the local enterprise partnership helped companies create 9,416 jobs and to safeguard a further 3,399.5 jobs.

  Organic growth of local firms accounted for 2,955 new and 1,100.5 safeguarded jobs.

  New start businesses provided 1,887.5 jobs.

  Inward investment and reinvestment 4,583.5 new jobs and 2,299 safeguarded jobs.

  "Government assistance" to industry has had a significant role to play in the delivery of this.

25 September 2010





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 18 February 2011