Session 2010-11
Publications on the internet

EXPLANATORY

MEMORANDUM

Main Estimate

 

20 1 0 - 20 1 1

Table of Contents

Section

Paragraph

Introduction

1-3

A. Summary of the Estimate

4-9

B. Detailed Explanation of the Estimate

10- 1 4

C. Planned expenditure by Departmental objectives .

1 5 - 2 2

D. Departmental Expenditure Limits ( DEL )

2 3 - 3 2

E. End Year Flexibility (EYF)

3 3 - 3 4

F. Administration Budget

3 5 - 3 8

G. Provisions and Contingent Liabilities

39 - 4 6

H. Process for Preparation & Approval of Memorandum

4 7

Explanation of Key Terms and Glossary of Abbreviations

Annex A

The Alignment ("Clear Line Of Sight") Project

Annex B

A note on the European Regional Development Fund

Annex C

I NTRODUCTION

1. The purpose of this memorandum is to provide the Select Committee with an explanation of how the resource and cash requirements sought in the Main Estimate will be applied, how this compares with previous years and plans, and how the expenditure planned will relate to Departmental O bjectives .

2. Departments are expected to clear "For Press" versions of Main Estimates and Supplementary Budgetary Information b y 16 June . The se documents set out the planned expenditure by the Department for Communities and Local Government in 20 1 0 - 1 1 .

3. The Comprehensive Spending Review 2007 (CSR07) set out the Government’s spending plans for the three years 2008-09 to 2010-11 . Other spending announcements were made in autumn 2008 , April 2009 and following the 2010 General Election ; details of how this year s Main Estimate relates to those announcements can be found at Section D . Further details of how spending plans relate to objectives are given in section s A and C below.

A) SUMMARY OF THE ESTIMATE

4. The Main Estimate cover s two Request s for Resources (RfRs) :

.

· RfR1 (Improving the quality of life by creating thriving, inclusive and sustainable communities in all regions) covers the Department s m ain programme expenditure ; and

· RfR2 (Providing for effective devolved decision making within a national framework) covers l ocal g overnment e xpenditure.

5. RfR1 is structured so that it broadly reflect s the Objectives of the Department over the Spending Review period . The objectives are :

· T o free-up and devolve power to local government , communities and individuals ;

· T o meet people's housing aspirations ;

· T o create economically strong communities which enhance national prosperity and provide opportunities for everyone ;

· T o create and maintain united, attractive, economically thriving communities and neighbourhoods ;

· T o provide a planning system which gives local people far more ability to determine the shape of places in which they live ; and

· T o work with local fire and rescue authorities and in partnership with the Fire and Rescue Service and other agencies to deal with major emergencies .

6. Note: these objectives have been abbreviated for the purposes of the Main Estimate for reasons of space . The full objectives can be found at http://www.communities.gov.uk/newsroom/whatwedo/

7. The Department for Communities and Local Government's Main Estimate for 20 1 0 - 1 1 requests :

Table 1

£ millions

Compared to position after Spring Supplementary:

 

2010-11

2009-10

Total Net Resource Requirement of:

3 5 , 3 34 . 2

39,507.3

of which:

Request for Resources 1

8,962.6

13,337.0

Request for Resources 2

26, 371.6

26,170.3

 

Net Cash Requirement

35 , 357.4

39,547.1

Net Voted Capital

5 6.1

64.3

8. Most of the expenditure within the Net Resource Requirement or Voted capital also falls within budgetary Departmental Expenditure Limits (DEL) . But the totals (total DEL compared to total Voted R f R plus capital) are not the same because:

· S ome expenditure within DEL is N on-Voted, while some Voted expenditure is outside DEL . T he Departmental Expenditure Limits consolidate expenditure of the Department with that of the Non-Departmental Public Bodies (NDPBs) which the Department sponsors. Voted expenditure in the Estimate , however, records expenditure by the Department and its executive agencies only, which includes grant in aid to NDPBs, but not NDPB expenditure itself ;

· Some voted expenditure is within Annually Managed Expenditure (AME) rather than DEL ; and

· Supported borrowing falls within the DELs, but is not voted. Departmental Unallocated Provision - a small reserve - is also not voted.

9. Further details of the Departmental Expenditure Limits are given in Section D .


B) DETAILED EXPLANATION OF THE ESTIMATE

RfR1 - Improving the quality of life by creating thriving, inclusive and sustainable communities in all regions

10. The individual budgets included within each of the Sections of the Estimate are as follows (all figures in £ million s ) :

Table 2

20 10 -20 1 1 £ millions

Compared to 200 9 -20 1 0 £ millions

Total net resource requirement

35 , 3 34 . 193

39,507.229

Request for Resources 1

8,962 . 616

13,336.972

Spending in D epartmental Expenditure Limits

4,606 . 524

5, 949.383

DEL Central Government spen ding

1,559 . 460

2,410.686

Section A : Meeting people's housing aspirations

33.602

104.799

Capacity Building & Efficiency Improvements in Housing

0.364

0.964

Choice Based Lettings

0. 100

0.2 00

Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment

6. 6 9 0

6.9 40

Disabled facilities grant

0.2 00

0.2 00

Growth Areas , New Growth Points and ECO Towns

5 .268

1.884

Gypsy site grant

0.245

0.295

Homelessness & Housing Reform

18.7 35

18.350

Homeowners mortgage support

2.000

3.850

Homes and Communities Agency (*capital grant transfer)

-4 .000 *

0.300

Housing Defects Grants

0.100

0.1 00

Housing Strategy for Older People

1.472

1.564

Housing Management

3.394

1.405

Housing Mobility Services

0.987

3.530

Implementing E uropean U nion Energy Performance of Building Directives

1.440

2.100

National Housing and Planning Advice Unit

1. 219

1.4 34

Payments to Audit Commission for Registered Social Landlord inspections

1.8 00

1.8 00

Rent officer services and pensions liabilities

2.4 40

2 . 440

Residential Property Tribunal Service

11. 590

13.548

Support for Voluntary & Community Sector Sustainability

41. 734

29.085

Sustainable Buildings

4.794

6.020

Sustainable Communities Bill

0.250

0. 40 0

Supporting People administration

4.100

4.140

Thames Gateway (direct funding)

1 .600

2.600

Valuation Office Agency right to buy charges

1.6 00

0.900

Zero Carbon Buildings

6.000

0. 750



Request for Resources 1 (continued)

(all figures in £ millions)

2010-2011

Compared to 2009-2010

Section B : Creating economically strong communities which enhance national prosperity and provide opportunities for everyone

1,361.200

2,223.829

Analytical Services

10.375

11.547

Decent Mixed Communities

0.000

30.322

Olympics Contributions

414.100

552.800

Coalfields Enterprise Fund

0.000

0. 550

Coalfields Regeneration Trust

17 .650

17. 650

Housing & Planning Group Communications

0.451

0.313

Housing Design Awards

0.049

0.049

Mersey Basin

0.000

0.5 20

New Horizons research

0. 6 7 4

0. 656

Regeneration Monitoring and Digital Inclusion

1.300

2.219

Regeneration Strategy

0.230

0.524

Regional Chambers

0.000

0.1 50

Regional Development Agencies

901 .326

1,591 . 097

Renewing Neighbourhoods

14.875

15.432

Su b National Economic Development

0.1 70

0.000

Section C : Creating and maintaining united, attractive, economically thriving communities and neighbourhoods

44.100

50.401

Cohesion and race equality

6. 604

5.843

Community empowerment

19.997

20.108

Community policy

10.334

11.950

Adults facing chronic exclusion (gross £1 m expenditure less £1m receipts fro m other Government Departments )

0. 00 0

0. 500

Migration Impacts Fund

0 .000

0.400

Tenant empowerment

1. 171

1.100

Tackling Extremism

5.994

10.500

Section D: Providing a planning system which gives local people far more ability to determine the shape of places in which they live

81.168

80.836

Planning Inspectorate Agency

47 .251

46.697

Implementing planning reforms

1 8 . 40 2

15.158

E-planning

5.7 5 5

8.000

Leaders Boards

9.760

0.000

Regional Assemblies

0.000

10. 981



Request for Resources 1 (continued)

(all figures in £ millions)

2010-2011

Compared to 2009-2010

Section E : Working with local fire and rescue authorities and in partnership with the Fire and Rescue Service and other agencies to deal with major emergencies

74.362

93.330

New Dimension

8.686

0.000

Firelink

17.637

42.811

Fire Regional Contro l R ooms

31.726

31.884

Fire service statistics

0.271

0 . 264

Emergency fire service

0.070

0 .0 90

Fire Centre of Excellence

0.520

0. 800

F ire and R escue S ervices Improvement Programme

15. 452

17.481

Section F: Central A dministration

173.541

172.711

Central administration, within Administration Budget

158 . 337

163.380

Central administration, outside Administration Budget

2.000

8.529

C entral department & G overnment O ffice Restructuring

13.204

0.802

Section G: Government Office A dministration

103.659

106.903

Government Office administration, within Administration Budget

101.707

106.903

Government Office administration, outside the Administration Budget

1.952

0.000

Section H: European Structural Funds – net (expenditure and income relating to old programmes)

0.001

0.001

ERDF net income and payments to Regional Development Authorities of ERDF under old programme

0.001

0.001



Request for Resources 1 (continued)

(all figures in £ millions)

2010-2011

Compared to 2009-2010

Section I : European Structural Fund s – income relating to 2007-13 programme s

-508.371

-525.760

North East New Programmes

-51.805

-48.788

North West New Programmes

-133.777

-147.274

Eastern New Programmes

-15.305

-14.412

South East New Programmes

-3.273

-3.080

South West New Programmes

-80.349

-75.670

East Midlands New Programmes

-37.024

-34.866

West Midlands New Programmes

-55.140

-51.929

Yorkshire and Humberside New Programmes

-106.497

-119.036

London New Programmes

-25.201

-30.705

Section J: European Structural Fund s - Communities and L ocal Government

96.137

70.05 1

ERDF losses and write offs

92.400

67.00 1

INTERREG ( I nter reg i onal assistance - an ERDF programme)

3 . 737

3.050

Section K : Ordnance Survey

20 . 9 50

5.112

Payments for mapping data and services (net, after contributions from other government Departments)

8.790

5.132

Ordnance Survey Trading Fund

12.16 0

-0 .020

Section L : Q ueen E lizabeth II Conference Centre Executive Agency

-1.409

-2.232

QEII Conference Centre Executive agency trading fund short term loans

-1.4 09

- 2. 232



Request for Resources 1 (continued)

(all figures in £ millions)

2010-2011

Compared to 2009-2010

DEL Support for Local A uthorities:-

3, 047.064

3,568.582

Section M : Meeting people's housing aspirations

5 8 7. 99 3

2,341.610

Choice Based lettings

0.400

0.562

Extend Social Housing Regulations to Local Authority Stock

1 .000

2.000

Capital P ooled Housing Receipts

-13.2 00

- 23.200

Disabled facilities grants

168.800

158.300

Growth Areas , New Growth Points and ECO Towns

23.800

0.000

Homelessness & Housing Reform

74.107

59.5 08

Homeowners Mortgage Support

0.000

20.000

Housing Management

1 1 . 6 38

13.323

Housing Mobility Services

1.068

3.200

Housing Strategy for Older People

18 . 528

13.436

PHR Private Housing Renov ation

0.000

2.719

Regional Housing Pot Grant

301.752

425.662

Rent officer services and pensions liabilities

0.100

0. 1 00

Supporting People programmes

0.000

1,66 6. 00 0

Section N : Creating economically strong communities which enhance national prosperity and provide opportunities for everyone

119.068

221.053

New Deal for C ommunities

7 8. 419

179.426

Local Enterprise Growth Initiative

18.649

23.9 1 3

Olympics Contributions

17.000

0.000

Regeneration Strategy

0.000

5.600

Regeneration Monitoring and Digital Inclusion

0.000

0.230

Renewing Neighbourhoods

5.000

6.864

Free Swimming

0 .0 00

5 .0 00

Sub National Economic Development

0.000

0.0 2 0

Section O : Creating and maintaining united, attractive, economically thriving communities and neighbourhoods

12.250

41.122

Community Policy

0.000

5.500

Community Empowerment

0.000

6.300

Migration Impacts Fund

12 .250

29.322

Section P : Providing a planning system which gives local people far more ability to determine the shape of places in which they live

10.810

147.530

Housing and Planning Delivery G rant

0 . 00 0

134.250

Implementing Planning Reforms

4.570

6.261

Leaders Boards

6.240

0.000

Regional Assemblies

0.000

7.019



Request for Resources 1 (continued)

(all figures in £ millions)

2010-2011

Compared to 2009-2010

Section Q : Working with local fire and rescue authorities and in partnership with the Fire and Rescue Service and other agencies to deal with major emergencies

129.086

111.814

New D imension

35 .986

45.907

Fire Regional Control R ooms

38.100

20.846

Firelink

10 . 000

10 .0 00

Fire services improvement

4 5 . 00 0

34.061

Floods recovery

0.000

1.000

Section R : Area Based Grant

2,162.655

675.567

Area Based Grant (CLG element)

2, 1 6 2 . 6 55

675. 5 6 7

Section S: European Structural Funds - net (expenditure and income relating to old programmes)

0.001

0.001

European Regional Development Fund expense

0.001

0.001

Section T: European Structural Funds - payments to London Development Agency for 2007-13 programme

25.201

30.705

European Regional Development Fund payments to London Development Agency (income from EU covering this and Section AC is shown against section I)

25.201

30.705



Request for Resources 1 (continued)

(all figures in £ millions)

2010-2011

Compared to 2009-2010

Spending in Annually Managed Expenditure

764. 9 2 8

1,323 . 838

AME Central Government spending:-

47 5 . 1 2 8

754.638

Section U : Meeting people's housing aspirations

469.811

697.800

Housing Revenue Account S ubsidy

469. 711

697.8 00

Residential Property Tribunal Service

0.100

0.000

Section V : Working with local fire and rescue authorities and in partnership with the Fire and Rescue Service and other agencies to deal with major emergencies

0.156

0.077

Fire service superannuation (support to the local authority schemes)

0.156

0.077

Section W : Central Administration

4.940

4.520

Central administration for accounting provisions

4.940

4.520

Section X : Government Office Administration

0.060

0.080

Government Office s administration accounting provision

0.060

0.080

Section Y : Providing a more efficient, effective and transparent planning system

0.161

0.161

Planning Inspectorate Agency for accounting provisions

0. 161

0.161

European Structural Funds - Communities and Local Government

-

52.000

ERDF losses and write offs

-

52.000

AME Support for Local Authorities

289.800

5 69.200

Section Z: Working with local fire and rescue authorities and in partnership with the Fire and Rescue Service and other agencies to deal with major emergencies

289.800

269.200

Fire service superannuation (support to the local authority schemes)

289.800

269.200

Overhanging debt repayment (Meeting people's housing aspirations)

0.000

300.000

Overhanging debt repayment (finishes in 2009-10)

0.000

300.000



Request for Resources 1 (continued)

(all figures in £ millions)

2010-2011

Compared to 2009-2010

Non budget

3, 591.164

6,063.751

Section AA : Meeting people's housing aspirations

3,099.142

5,560.506

Homes and Communities Agency : grant in aid

2,981 .8 57

5,422.700

Leasehold advisory services: grant in aid

1.4 82

1. 3 2 5

Loan charge s on Defective Housing G rants

7. 00 0

0 .200

Othe r growth areas- West Northants D evelopment C orporation

11 . 2 65

17.141

Tenant Services Authority : grant in aid

3 3 . 2 3 8

36. 640

Thames Gateway- London Development Corporation

38 . 7 00  

46.300

Thames Gateway- Thurrock D evelopment C orporation

2 5 . 6 00  

36.200

Section AB : Working with local fire and rescue authorities and in partnership with the Fire and Rescue Service and other agencies to deal with major emergencies

2.586

3. 288

Firebuy

1. 16 3

1.582

Community Development Foundation

1. 423

1. 706

Section AC : European Structural Funds - payments to Regional Development Agencies for 2007-13 programme (income from EU covering this and section T is shown against section I)

483.170

495. 055

North East New Programmes

51.805

48. 78 8

North West New Programmes

133.777

147. 274

Eastern New Programmes

15.305

14.4 12

South East New Programmes

3.273

3. 080

South West New Programmes

80.349

75. 6 7 0

East Midlands New Programmes

37.024

34. 866

West Midlands New Programmes

55.140

51.9 29

Yorkshire and Humberside New Programmes

106.497

119.0 36

Section AD : Area Based Grant

0.001

0.001

Area Based Grant (CLG element)

0.001

0.001

Section AE : Providing a more efficient, effective and transparent planning system

6.265

4.901

Infrastructure Planning Commission

6.265

4.9 01



Request for Resources 1 (continued)

(all figures in £ millions)

2010-2011

Compared to 2009-2010

Request for Resources 2

26, 371 . 57 7

26,170.257

Spending in Depart mental Expenditure Limits

2 5 ,8 77 . 6 74

25,672.822

DEL Central Government spending:-

162 . 7 46

190.896

Section A: Valuation S ervices

150 .196

166.8 23

Valuation Office Agency rating services repayment

150 .196

166.823

Se ction B: Best Value Inspection S ubs idies to public corporations & Best Value I ntervention costs

9.772

21. 356

Best Value Inspectorate

9. 772

21. 356

Section C: Local G overnment research and publicity, boundary reviews: mapping costs

2 .7 78

2.7 17

Local government research

2. 0 66

2. 003

Local government publicity

0.6 12

0.6 14

Local Government Commission mapping costs

0.1 00

0.1 00

Request for Resources 2 (continued)

2010-2011

Compared to 2009-2010

DEL Support for Local Authorities

25,714 . 9 28

25,481.926

Section D : Revenue Support Grant s

4,076.008

5 , 36 8.4 31

Revenue Support Grant

3,167.008

4,547.431

National Non Domestic Rate/Revenue Support Grant

0.000

0.000

P rivate F inance I nitiative special grant

9 09.00 0

821.000

S ection E : Non-D omestic Rates P ayments

21,500.000

19,500.0 00

N ational n on- d omestic r ates p ayments

21 ,500. 00 0

19, 500.0 00

Section F : London governance

48.136

48. 068

General G reater L ondon A uthority grant

48.136

48.0 68

Section G : Other grants and payments

90.784

565.4 27

PSA performance fund

0 .000

379.000

Improvement, Transformation and Efficiency

8 2. 7 78

116.664

Local authority business growth incentive scheme

0. 00 0

50.000

Emergency financial assistance to local authorities

8.006

10.463

Non-Domestic Rates Payments collection costs

0.000

5.800

LG Management Info Systems

0.000

3.500

Spending in Annually Managed Expenditure

463.000

463.000

AME Support for Local Authorities

463.000

463.000

Section H : Non-D omestic Rates outturn adjustments and Local Authority Business Growth Incentive

463.000

463.0 00

Non-Domestic rates outturn adjustments

463.0 00

463.0 00

Non budget

3 0 . 0 9 3

34.435

Section I : Non-Departmental Public B odies

30.903

34.4 35

Valuation tribunals

10. 2 35

10.850

Local Government Standards Board

6 . 00 9

7. 726

The Commission for Local Administration in England

14.659

15. 859

Voted Capital

2010-2011

Compared to 2009-2010

Request for Resources 1

5 6.119

65.755

Section B : Creating economically strong communities which enhance national prosperity and provide opportunities for everyone

5.000  

0.000  

Coalfields Enterprise Fund

5 . 00 0

0 . 00 0

Section D : Providing a planning system which gives local people far more ability to determine the shape of places in which they live

3 .331  

3.550

Planning Inspectorate

2 .331

2.000

E-planning

1.000

1.550

Section E : Working with local fire and rescue authorities and in partnership with the Fire and Rescue Service and other agencies to deal with major emergencies

- 6.136

36.844

Fire Regional Control R ooms

-11.001

31.867

Firelink

2.200

3.1 00

New D imension

1.5 82

1.541

Fire services improvement

1. 083

0.336

Section F : Central A dministration

16.064  

22.001  

Central administration : outside admin costs limit

16 . 064

22.00 1

Section G : Government Office A dministration

2.860  

2. 860  

Government Office s administration : outside admin costs limit

2. 860

2. 860

 

 

 

Section J : European Structural Funds - Communities and Local Government

0.000 

0.500 

INTERREG

0.000

0.500

 

 

 

Section K : Ordnance Survey

35 . 0 00  

0.000

Ordnance Survey Trading Fund

35 . 0 00

0.000

 

 

 


Comparison with 200 9 - 1 0 : RFR1

11. Overall budgetary p rovision sought for RFR1 is 26 % below th e final, S pring Supplementary E stimate, budget for 200 9 - 1 0 . The Main E stimate 20 1 0 reflects spending cuts implemented after the General Election as well as the changes made for FY 2009-10 in which the September 2008 Housing P ackage, Pre Budget Report 2008 and B udget Report 2009 brought forward funding from FY 2010-11 to support the housing sector in response to the economic downturn . The se were the main contributor s for this de crease in budget ( See section D for further information) .

12. Explanations of the large variations ( those £ 10 m or more , unless lower than 10 % ) from 200 9 - 1 0 budgets which T able 2 highlights are as follows:

· Section A: Meeting people's housing aspirations : £9 million (9%) increase. This section change is narrowly de minimis for the "large" variation criteria stated above, but is included because it contains a £13m increase in Support for Voluntary and Community Sector Sustainability. This is a planned increase to expand policy into areas such as community participation and social finance. The increase in budget for the Support for Voluntary and Community Sector is to support the sector through the newly established Community Builders Fund (to support cross-cutting community organisations) and other initiatives to take forward the community empowerment agenda. Also in section A the funding allocation for Zero Carbon Buildings is due to increase by £5m as a response to the Climate Change impact of domestic buildings. During the year, as decisions are made on the allocation of funding, the balance of funding between different delivery vehicles may alter, and we would expect to reflect such changes at Supplementary Estimates.

· Section B: Creating economically strong communities which enhance national prosperity and provide opportunities for everyone : £ 863 million ( 39 %) decrease . This is mainly in capital brought forward from 2010-11 to 2009-10, as part of Pre Budget Report 2008, in Regional Development Agencies (£ 690m ) for projects to provide a fiscal stimulus to regional and national economic development ; in Olympics capital contributions (£ 139m ) to the Department for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport (DC O MS) – in line with the original CSR plan and ring-fenced ; and in Decent Mixed Communities (£30m) which has ended.

· Section E: Working with local fire and rescue authorities and in partnership with the Fire and Rescue Service and other agencies to deal with major emergencies : £ 19m ( 20 %) decrease. This is mainly in Firelink (£25m) in line with expectations as the programme progresses .

· Section J: European Structural Funds - Communities and Local Government : £ 26m ( 37 %) increase. This is due to the need for ongoing cover for potential closure adjustments in European Regional Development Funding (ERDF) 2000-2006 programmes.

· Section K: Ordnance Survey: £16m (310%) increase. This is for the cost of OpenData – providing data free of charge.

· Section M: Meeting people's housing aspirations : £1,754m (75%) decrease . This is mainly in Supporting People programmes (£1,666m) that are now being paid in Area Based Grant; and in Regional Housing Pot Grant (£124m) reduced as part of the contribution to Housing Pledge.

· Section N: Creating economically strong communities which enhance national prosperity and provide opportunities for everyone : £ 102m ( 46 %) decrease : This is mainly in New Deal for Communities (£ 101 m) ( where the programme is winding down ) .

· Section O: Creating and maintaining united, attractive, economically thriving communities and neighbourhoods : £ 29m ( 70 %) decrease : This is mainly in Migration Impacts Fund (£ 17m ) where budget will increase back to baseline when contributions from Other Government Departments have been agreed.

· Section P: Providing a planning system which gives local people far more ability to determine the shape of places in which they live: £137m (93%) decrease : This is mainly the reduction, announced after the 2010 General Election, in Housing and Planning Delivery Grant (£134m) , where activity will be funded through other mechanisms .

· Section Q: Working with local fire and rescue authorities and in partnership with the Fire and Rescue Service and other agencies to deal with major emergencies: £ 17m ( 15 %) increase : This is mainly in Fire Regional Control Rooms (£17m) which is entering a key delivery phase .

· Section R: Area Based Grant: £1, 487m ( 220 %) increase : This increase in Area Based Grant is mainly in the transfer of the Supporting People Programme into this grant (see section M above).

· Section U : AME: Meeting people's housing aspirations : £228m (33%) decrease : This is in Housing Revenue Account Subsidy. Sums payable as Housing Revenue Account Subsidy vary between years, and during the year, for a number of reasons. For example the sums payable depend on the formula grant calculated relating to the size and condition of local authority council housing stock and therefore not controllable by the Department. This programme is included by Treasury in Annually Managed Expenditure due to the difficulties there would be in managing variations in expenditure within fixed Departmental Expenditure limits.

· Section not lettered (below section Y on page 11) : AME: European Structural Funds - Communities and Local Government : £52m (100%) decrease from £52m: The £52m in 2009-10 was funding allocated at the last Supplementary Estimate in the year to cover the latest estimate of liability for European Regional Development Fund closing programmes (2000-2006) adjustments. During 2010-11 the liability will continue to be reviewed so an estimate of any 2010-11 funding requirement in this section will be possible by the time of the next Supplementary Estimate.

· Section not lettered (below section Z on page 11) : AME: Meeting people's housing aspirations : £300m (100%) decrease from £300m: The £300m funding line in 2009-10, for the Overhanging Debt Repayment on disposal of local authority housing stock, was planned by Spending Review 2007 to be the final funding for this activity.

· Section A A : Non-budget: Meeting people's housing aspirations : £2, 461m ( 44 %) decrease: This is in grant-in-aid to the Homes and Communities Agency (£2, 441m ) in line with reduced spending plans which were further lowered by the Housing Pledge and fiscal stimulus re-profiling in 2009 - 10; and Thames Gateway Development Corporations ( where the £ 18m reduction mainly relat es to transfer of £17m resource to the Olympics Public Realm (land regeneration around Olympics venues) – see section N ) . Again the decrease in 2010-11 is due to the Budget Report 2009 bringing forward funding to FY 2009-10 to support the housing sector in response to the economic downturn. The main direct impact is on the National Affordable Housing Programme (NAHP) element of the Homes and Communities Agency.


Comparison with 2009-10: RFR2

13. Section D : DEL Support for Local Authorities: Revenue Support Grants : £ 1,292 m ( 24 %) decrease: There is a decrease of £1.3 80 billion for Revenue Support Grant s in consequence to the increase in national non-domestic rates (NNDR) (please see below at Section E). This decrease, t ogether with NNDR payments , make s up formula grant determined in the annual Local Government Finance Settlement. With the amount of NNDR payments set to increase, the amount of RSG reduces. Also within Section D the f unding for PFI Special Grant for 2010-11 was increased at CSR07 reflect ing the then expected level of PFI schemes for 2010-11.

14. Section E : DEL Support for Local Authorities: Non Domestic Rates : £2, 000 m ( 10 %) in crease: This funding line is the amount of NNDR available to be redistributed to authorities as part of the annual Local Government Finance Settlement. The amount of non-domestic rates is dependent on a) the amount of non-domestic rates expected to be collected in the year for both local & central list properties less any reliefs and repayments in respect of previous years, b) the balance brought forward in respect of the Distributable Amount (DA) calculations for previous years, and c) an amount to allow for fluctuations in collection – normally attributable to downward revaluations of properties within the year. It is worth noting that the DA is the amount of money that will be redistributed to local authorities and it is not the amount of money we expect to collect from them.


C) PLANNED EXPENDITURE BY D EPARTMENTAL OBJECTIVE

15. The Estimate structure reflect s Departmental Objectives at the end of the CSR07 period.

16. Service a greements w ere revised for the whole of Government for the CSR07 period. Most agreement s are cross-cutting and reflect shared objectives across a number of Departments. CLG has lead responsibility for two agreement s relating to: :

· f acilitat ing housing growth and improv ing affordable housing ; and

· decentralis ing power to people and communities to build a stronger society.

17. CLG also contribute s to a wide variety of other agreements . For some our direct contributions will be limited , whereas for others we will support delivery more directly - for example, our work on planning will impact on Transport and Climate Change.

18. In many cases it is not practical to attempt to directly relate spending in a particular area to a specific outcome . However, we have highlighted below where the department makes a substantial and clearly quantifiable financial contribution:

· much of the expenditure shown against meeting people's housing aspirations and providing a planning system which gives local people far more ability to determine the shape of places in which they live (Sections A, D, M, P, U, Y and AA of RFR1) will contribute towards facilitating housing growth and improv ing affordable housing . This includes expenditure on the Thames Gateway, growth areas/points and eco towns; on improving the planning system and delivery; and on grant- in-aid to the Homes and Communities Agency;

· much of the expenditure shown against creating and maintaining united, attractive, economically thriving communities and neighbourhoods (Sections C and O of RFR1) will contribute towards decentralising power to people and communities to build a stronger society . This includes expenditure on cohesion and race equality programmes; and community empowerment;

19. The Department’s investment also indirectly supports the delivery of a number of agreement s . It is not meaningful to attribute expenditure or relate particular programmes to these .

20. Agreements d o not cover the full range of activities undertaken by the Department. These are, however, covered by Departmental Objectives.

21. It should also be noted that where the Department makes payments to local authorities, it is the Department's policy, wherever possible, to make these through non-ringfenced general grants, either Revenue Support Grant or Area Based Grant, which authorities are free to use in support of local, regional and national priorities as they see fit.

22. There are a number of funding streams contributing to the Area Based Grant programme for 20 1 0 -1 1 . In total Communities and Local Government are contributing over £ 2, 1 6 2 million to Area Based Grant (Section R ) from te n individual funding streams which for clarity are set out below.

Table 3

Area Based Grant (RFR1, Section R ): CLG contributions

£ million

Cohesion

1 3 .0

Economic assessment duty

11.0

Supporting People

1,636.0

LEGI

5 7 . 8

Stronger safer communities

4 . 9

Working Neighbourhood Fund

4 13 . 6

Preventing Violent Extremism

17 . 1

Climate Change

7.3

NI160 Status Survey

1.5

Familiarisation costs of new statutory guidance on social housing allocations

0.5

Total

2,162.7


D) DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURE LIMITS ( DEL )

23. The programme DELs covering RfR 1 and RfR2 at the start of 20 1 0 - 1 1 are set out in the following tables:

Main programme budgetary DEL (where voted, within RFR1 )

Table 4

DEL

£ million

20 1 0-1 1

Voted

Non voted

Total

Resource

3,345.5

473.7

3,819.2

of which:

Administration budget

260.0

1.7

261.7

Capital

1,317.2

4,874.8

6,192.0

less depreciation

-38.5

-35.5

-74.0

Total

4,624.2

5,313.0

9,937.2

24. The following Table shows how the DEL was arrived at taking the Comprehensive S pending R eview 200 7 ( C SR0 7 ) s ettlement for 200 9 - 10 as the baseline:

Table 5

20 1 0-1 1

 

£ million

Main DEL

Notes

Resource

Capital

T otal

CSR07 settlement

4,631

7,524

12,155

Clear Line Of Sight non-cash reclassifications

-137

-137

Transfers to and from other government departments (see further details in section 29 )

10

-25

-15

Various DEL surrenders

1

-100

-100

Transfer from Treasury - HCA transition

2

30

30

Sept 2008 Housing Package

3

-920

-920

Pre Budget Report 2008

3

-600

-600

April 2009 Budget changes

4

-50

344

294

Housing Pledge

35

35

Budget cuts (part of the £6 billion savings)

5

-455

-336

-791

Additional fund for the HCA in respect of social renting

6

170

170

Efficiency savings

-100

-100

Transfers to LG Local Government RfR2

-10

-10

total DEL (including depreciation)

3,819

6,192

10,011

less depreciation

-74

-74

total DEL

3,745

6,192

9,937

N otes

1. D EL surrenders include £ 89m for Council rents, £ 6m for the Energy Performance Certificate , £4 .6 m for H ousing R evenue A ccount S ubsidy (HRAS) AME (see section 28 ) and £0.7m for Infrastructure UK .

2. These are f inancial adjustments, approved by HM Treasury, for the Department’s DEL over the CSR period to take account of the transition to the Homes and Communities Agency.

3. See Section 2 7 .

4. The April 2009 Budget changes included further funding for the housing programmes (see section 2 7 ) as well as a re-profile of £200m from the f iscal s timulus from 2009-10 to 2010-11 and £50m brought forward from 2010-11 to 2009 -10 for Area Based Grant.

5. £791m budget cuts to support delivery of the £6 billion 2010-11 spending cuts as announced by the Government on 24 May for spending control.

6. £170m of capital funding for 2010-11 to safeguard delivery of around 4,000, otherwise unfunded, social rented homes to start on site this year as part of the Housing Pledge. This is in respect to the £500m (of the £6bn of savings) announced by the Government on 24 May that would be used to invest in improving Britain ’s growth potential and building a fairer society

25. Depreciation, which forms part of the Resource DEL, is excluded from total DEL since capital DEL includes capital spending and to include depreciation of those assets would lead to double counting .

26. The non-cash element in DEL resource has been removed by the Clear Line of Sight (Alignment) Project. Non-cash has been either reclassified to AME (e.g. creation and release of balance sheet provisions), reclassified within DEL (e.g. depreciation, which is ring-fenced in 2010-11), or removed entirely (the charge for cost of capital).

Relationships to announcements made since September 2008

27. The funding sought in the Main Estimates derives from decisions announced in the CSR07 settlement , the September 2008 Housing Package, the Pre B udget R eport 2008 , the Budget Report 2009 , the Housing Pledge , and following the 2010 General Election . 1

Transfers into Annually Managed Expenditure

28. Where Departmental policy decisions impact upon Annually Managed Expenditure forecasts, Departments are required to make switches from Departmental Expenditure Limits into Annually Managed Expenditure . Reductions to DEL of £4.6 million have been made, reflecting the increase in forecast for AME for the Housing Revenue Account Subsidy (see table 5 above) .

29.
Transfers to and from other government Departments

Transfers to other government Departments

o £5 million under arrangements for the Pan-Government A greement for mapping services that are now being made more consistent and transparent. Previously some Departments had transferred DEL baseline to CLG, whereas other Departments retained their DEL to make payments to CLG. Departments that had previously transferred DEL to CLG, are now transferring it back so that all can make payments to CLG for services provided.

o £1 million, as part of Machinery of Government changes, to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills for the Northern Way programme.

o £1 million to the Office for National Statistics for a 4th page of the 2011 Census.

o A total of £0.5 million for small transfers e.g. £0.2 million to the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs for the Min ing Waste Directive.

o £25 million (capital) transfer to the Department for Transport in respect of two road improvement projects.  The first is the A19 funding at a total of £3.975m that is included in the Highways Agency business plan and the second is for Postwick Hub, Norwich Scheme at a cost of £21m announced in December 2009.

Transfers from other government d epartments

o £ 8 million, for the Migration Impact s Fund, from the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.

o £ 7.5 million for the Ordnance Survey OpenData scheme; being £2.5 million each from the Home Office, the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs .

o £2 .4 million, as part of Machinery of Government changes, from the Department for Work and Pensions for the functional responsibilities of the Rent Office Services.

RfR1/Main Programmes DEL expenditure over last three years

30. E xpenditure against budget for RfR1/Main Programmes DEL for the financial years since 2007-08 is set out in the table below :

Table 6

Previous years' expenditure against Departmental Expenditure Limits £ million

Year

Voted

Non voted

Total DEL

Outturn

Variance

%

Resource

2007-08

4,118

218

4,336

4,198

-138

3.2%

2008-09

3,716

369

4,085

3934

-151

3.7%

2009-10

3,942

610

4,552

*4,360

-192

4.2%

Capital

2007-08

2,445

3,624

6,069

6069

0

0%

2008-09

2,103

5,225

7,328

7,095

-233

3.2%

2009-10

2,128

7,015

9,143

*8,933

-210

2.4%

Total

2007-08

6,563

3,842

10,405

10,267

-138

1.3%

2008-09

5,819

5,594

11,413

11,029

-384

3.4%

2009-10

6,070

7,625

13,695

*13,293

-402

2.9%

* F orecast outturn as at March 2010 (excluding c hange for Alignment/Clear Line Of Sight )


Local Government DEL (where voted, within RFR2 )

Table 7

DEL

£ million

2010-11

Voted

Non voted

Total

Resource

25,865

116

25,981

of which:

 

 

Administration budget

 

 

Near cash

25,865

116

25,981

Capital

12

0.4

13

less depreciation

 1

1

Total

25,878

115

25,993

The following Table shows how the DEL was arrived at taking the C SR0 7 Settlement for 2010-11 as the baseline:

Table 8

2010-11

DEL

 

£ million

LG DEL

Resource

Capital

total

CSR07 settlement

26,407

91

26,498

Transfers to and from other government departments and 2009 Budget reductions

-101

1

-100

2010 Savings

-325

-79

- 405

total DEL (including depreciation)

25,981

13

25,994

less depreciation

 -1

 

-1

total DEL

26,980

13

25,993

31. Changes since the last spending review settlement comprise:

Transfers in:

· £8.1 million resource and £1.6 million capital grant from the Department for Culture, Media and Sport to GLA General Grant for Museum of London funding.

· £0.2 million from Communities and Local Government (Main DEL) to GLA General Grant in support of the Mayor’s planning powers

· £2.5 million resource from the Department of Health for the IDEA (Improvement and Development Agency) Healthy Communities programme into Revenue Support Grant.

· £3.7 million resource from the Home Office for "Stray Dogs" into Revenue Support Grant

· £1.2 million resource from the Food Standards Agency for "Food Hygiene on Farms" into Revenue Support Grant

· £0.6 million resource from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs for "Contaminated Land" into Revenue Support Grant

· £0.084 million resource from the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform for "Services Directive" into Revenue Support Grant

· £0.1 million resource from Communities and Local Government (Main DEL) for "Community Empowerment" into Revenue Support Grant

· £0.150 million resource from Communities and Local Government (Main DEL) for the "Electronic Service Delivery" (ESD) Toolkit" into Revenue Support Grant

· £2.1 million resource from the Department of Health to the Commission for Local Administration in England for health related complaints

· £0.7 million resource from Communities and Local Government (Main DEL) for Community Empowerment to the Commission for Local Administration in England

· £9 million resource from Communities and Local Government (Main DEL) for Regional Improvement Partnerships to the Improvement, Transformation and Efficiency programme

Transfers out:

· £27.9 million resource from Revenue Support Grant to the Department for Children, Schools and Families for "Student Finance"

· £0.3m resource from Tribunal Services to the Ministry of Justice for Valuation Tribunal appointments;

· £1 million capital from Local e-Gov (Local Electronic Government) to the Department for Work and Pensions for Government Connect;

· £0.3m resource from the Standards Board to the Ministry of Justice for Adjudication Panel for England costs.

· £45 million resource baseline reduction for LAA Reward Grant as part of budget 2009 savings

· £50 million resource baseline reduction for Local Area Business Growth Incentive as part of budget 2009 savings

· £5 million resource baseline reduction for Valuation Office Agency as part of budget 2009 savings

· £0.5 million for research projects in Communities and Local Government (Main DEL

· £405m contribution to the £6bn savings in 2010


Past expenditure

32. The DEL expenditure for RfR2/Local Government DEL for the financial years since 2007-08 is set out in the table below:

Table 9

Previous years' expenditure against Departmental Expenditure Limits £ million

Year

Voted

Non voted

Total DEL

Outturn

Variance

%

Resource

2007-08

22,711

104

22,815

22,751

-64

-0.3%

2008-09

24,615

103

24,718

24,651

-67

-0.3%

2009-10

25,446

118

25,565

*25,504

-62

-0.2%

Capital

2007-08

126

4

130

64

-98

-75%

2008-09

175

1

176

122

-54

-31%

2009-10

226

1

227

*242

15

6.2%

Total

2007-08

22,838

107

22,945

22,783

-162

-0.7%

2008-09

24,789

104

24,893

24,773

-120

-0.5%

2009-10

25,672

119

25,792

*25,746

-47

-0.2%

* F orecast outturn as at March 2010 (excluding change for Alignment/Clear Line Of Sight) .


E) END YEAR FLEXIBILITY (EYF)

33. The Department uses its EYF to fund ongoing programmes where slippage has occurred and for the management of unbudgeted pressures which arise. The EYF available to the department for 2010-11 will not be finally known until the Public Expenditure Provisional Outturn White Paper is published, usually in July. The forecast EYF available for 2010-11 is made up of the sum of underspends accumulated in years to 2009-10, less EYF drawn down, plus the current forecast underspend for 2009-10, and is set out in the following tables:

Main DEL

Table 10

End Year Flexibility

£ million

Resource

Capital

Total

Admin

Other Resource

Total Resource

of which near cash

 

 

Balance of accumulated End Year Flexibility (EYF) not yet drawn down

99

226

325

261

631

956

of which ring-fenced:

Olympics Contingency

214

214

Regional Development Agencies

3

3

3

9

12

Estimated additional EYF consistent with forecast outturn

19

173

192

110

210

402

of which ring - fenced:

Olympics Contingency

65

65

Total estimated EYF

118

399

517

371

841

1,358

34. From 2010-11, the ring-fenced programmes include the Olympics, tackling violent extremism and the Regional and London Development Agencies.

LG DEL

Table 11

End Year Flexibility

£ million

Resource

 

 

 

Capital

Total

Admin

Other Resource

TOTAL Resource

of which near cash

 

 

Balance of accumulated End Year Flexibility not yet drawn down

 

177

177

177

292

469

of which ring fenced:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Local Government PSA performance fund

 

122

122

122

253

375

Invest to Save special grant

 

4

4

4

1

5

Research, publicity and Valuation Office Invest to Save

 

1

1

1

1

Capacity building and local e-Government

 

1

7

Estimated additional EYF consistent with forecast outturn

 

45

45

45

0

47

total estimated EYF

0

222

222

222

292

514

F) ADMINISTRATION BUDGET

35. The Administration DEL Budget for 20 1 0- 1 1 is £ 261 .7 m illion .

36. The following Table shows how the Administration Budget was arrived at taking the CSR07 Settlement for 20 1 0 -1 1 as the baseline:

Table 1 2

20 1 0- 1 1

£ million

Admin i stration Budget (part of main DEL )

Resource

CSR07 settlement

267 .0

Transfers to other government departments

-0.4

Reclassification of administration to programme

-0.4

Transfers to AME for Clear Line Of Sight

-0.1

Cost of capital adjustment for Clear Line Of Sight

4.5

Post election contribution to savings

- 9.0

Total DEL

261.7

The apparent difference in the total is due to roundings in component numbers.

37. The administration budget covers the costs of staff and related overheads in the core department and Government Offices .

38. The main changes were:

· the transfer of £0.4million of resources to cover the accommodation costs of the newly created Government Equalities Office;

· the £0.4 million reclassification of the Crown Premises Inspection Group from administration to programme as agreed with Treasury;

· adjustments to baselines as part of the Alignment/Clear Line Of Sight Project comprising a net £0.1million transfer to AME and a forecasting adjustment for removal of £4.5 millions cost of capital ; and

· £9 millions reduction s to the baseline for the contribution to the new Government’s £6bn savings announcement.


G) PROVISIONS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

Provisions

39. The department provides for legal or constructive obligations, which are of uncertain timing, or amount, at the balance sheet date on the basis of the best estimate of the expenditure required in settling the obligation. The following table sets out the provisions made by the Department and the Government Offices for the start of 2010-11 :

Table 13

Provisions

E stimated 1 April 2010 position

£ million

Early departures

20.8

European Regional Development Fund corrections

113.4

Dilapidations

7.0

Compensation payments (mainly ex-Property Services Agency asbestosis claims)

4.4

Rent Assessment Panels’ p residents’ pensions

2. 6

Firefighters' pensions

2. 2

Total

150.4

Early Departure Costs

40. The department meets the additional costs of benefits beyond the normal Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme (PCSPS) benefits in respect of employees who retire early, by paying the required amounts annually to the PCSPS over the period between early departure and normal retirement date. The department and its agencies provide for this in full when the early retirement programme becomes binding by establishing a provision for the estimated payments discounted by the Treasury discount rate of 2.2% in real terms.

Other Costs

European Regional Development Fund Correction

41. This relates to the closure of the 2000-06 programme on 31st March 2010 and estimates the cost of a number of issues expected to be resolved in the 2010 - 11 financial year, including European Commission Hearings on specific audits, collection of disallowed claims from grant recipients, and some points of principle on the calculation of financial corrections .

Dilapidations

42. The provision relates to complying with lease clauses for buildings occupied by the Government Offices.


Compensation Payments

43. These relate to claims made by staff and third parties against the department. The majority represent claims by ex Property Services Agency employees who have contracted lung disease following exposure to asbestos in the workplace. It is expected that nearly half of these cases may be settled in 2010-11 with the remainder settled in the following 2 years.

Rent Assessment Panels’ Presidents’ Pensions

44. The Rent Assessment Panels’ Presidents’ Pension Scheme is a small scheme that has similar conditions to the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme in respect of 33 serving and retired presidents, vice-presidents and their widows.

Firefighters’ Pensions

45. The Firefighters’ Pension Scheme is a small scheme that has similar conditions to the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme and which was inherited from the Home Office in respect originally of 18 (now 1 4 ) ex-firefighters and their widows.

Contingent Liabilities

46. Contingent liabilities are those liabilities where the likelihood and amount of payment are uncertain so they are not provided for in operating costs , being only disclosed in a note. The department s estimated contingent liabilities for 20 1 0- 1 1 are:

Table 1 4

 

 

Nature of Liability

£'000

 

 

 

Statutory

Homeowners Mortgage Support Scheme (HMSS):

Statutory Contingent Liability taken on under the provisions of the Banking Act 2009 in respect of Homeowners Support Scheme

500,000

Payments to Local Authorities under the Defective Housing grant scheme. Claims for repair or repurchase of defective Right To Buy homes sold by local authorities between 1980 and 1985

250-750

The Department has also entered into the following quantifiable contingent liabilit y by offering an indemnity. This is not a contingent liability within the meaning of IAS 13 since the likelihood of a transfer of economic benefit in settlement is too remote

Indemnity given by CLG for the Land Stabilisation Project to proceed in Northwich under Section 1 of the Derelict Land Act 1982.

150,000

 

 

Nature of Liability (continued)

£'000

 

 

 

Non-Statutory

Potential contingent liabilities arising from the closure, in March 2010, of the 2000-2006 ERDF programmes in England .

25, 400

Potential contingent liabilities arising from the 1997-99 ERDF programmes in England , relating to items which are still under discussion with the European Union .

36 , 50 0

Treasury Solicitor: Claim lodged with High Court by Devon County Council and Norfolk County Council in February on decisions on local government restructuring. The Secretary of State is the defendant so will have to pay the Department's costs and those of the claimants if the challenge is upheld by the Court.

200

Indemnity given to the Nationwide Building Society as lender for claims relating to the treatment or removal of asbestos in connection with housing stock transfers

Unquantifiable

Housing Management : Potential contractual liability arising from the Tenant Deposit Protection Scheme

Unquantifiable

Indemnity given to the Fire and Rescue Services in respect of possible incidents because of mass decontamination.

Unquantifiable

H) PROCESS FOR PREPARATION & APPROVAL OF MEMORANDUM

47. This Memorandum has been prepared in accordance with guidance in the Estimates Manual provided by HM T reasury and that found on the H ouse of C ommons website. This has been approved by the Department’s Principal Accounting Officer, Irene Lucas .


ANNEX A

EXPLANATION OF KEY TERMS AND GLOSSARY

DEL - Departmental Expenditure Limit

This is spending within the department's direct control, which can be planned over a Spending Review period and includes programme and administration expenditure. The Department for Communities and Local Government has two DELs- Main, which covers main programme spending and Local Government .

RfR - Request for Resources

These are the resource element s of the Departmental Estimates. The department has two RfRs:

RfR 1: Improving the quality of life by creating thriving, inclusive and sustainable communities in all regions.

RfR 2: Providing for effective devolved decision making within a national framework.

The RFR covers the central Department and the Government Offices, and unlike the DEL does not consolidate NDPB spend, showing instead payments of grant in aid to the NDPBs. Capital grants are included within the Requests for Resources.

DUP - Departmental Unallocated Provision

The Department's (non voted) contingency reserve, which can be accessed to meet pressures or to deal with in year management of resources by means of Main and Supplementary Estimates

EYF - End Year Flexibility

This enables the department to plan the use of resources over a Spending Review period as it allows the carry forward of unspent DEL resources into future years. The department allows the carry forward of EYF for specific ringfenced programmes. The remainder is used as a central resource to meet pressures arising in year. Take-up of EYF in a specific financial year is subject to Treasury consent and P arliamentary approval.

Voted and Non-Voted Expenditure

Voted expenditure is that expenditure which has been approved in Main or Supplementary Estimates. Non-voted expenditure has not been through this Parliamentary process. Voted expenditure includes the Requests for Resources and voted capital. Examples of non-voted expenditure are the resource and capital expenditure by NDPBs. The grant-in-aid which the department pays NDPB s is voted.

Voted capital

The capital element of the Estimate, which covers the direct capital expenditure of the Department and the Government Offices , effectively leads to the creation of an asset on the Department’s balance sheet . Note that capital grants by the Department do not impact on this total, but score as resource within the Request for Resources.

Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR)

A fundamental look at resources by the Treasury which (usually) takes place every two years and, usually, covers a three year period. The budgets for 20 10-11 cover the last year of CSR07 that also included 200 8 - 09 and 20 09-10 .

Other Abbreviations

B IS - Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (formerly the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform )

DCOMS – Department for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport

DCSF - Department for Children, Schools and Families

DWP - Department for Work and Pensions

ERDF - European Regional Development Fund

HCA – Homes and Communities Agency

HRAS – Housing Revenue Account Subsidy

INTERREG - Inter regional assistance- an ERDF programme

MOG - Machinery of Government i.e. changes to the structure of government

NDPB - Non Departmental Public Body

NNDR - National Non-Domestic Rates

OGA - Other Growth Areas

OGD - Other Government Department

PFI - Private Finance Initiative

RDA – Regional Development Agency

RSG - Revenue Support Grant

TSA – Tenant Services Authority


ANNEX B

The Alignment ("Clear Line Of Sight") Project

The Alignment (or ‘Clear Line of Sight’) Project seeks to simplify government’s financial reporting to Parliament by better aligning the recording of government spending in departmental budgets, Estimates and resource accounts. Full details of the alignment reforms were set out in Cm 7567 published in March 2009.

Changes to the budgetary framework resulting from the Alignment Project have been implemented in 2010-11. The main change is that the separate near-cash and non-cash controls within resource budgets have been removed. Of those transactions previously recorded in non-cash budgets:

· cost of capital charge has been removed from budgets, Supply Estimates and Resource Accounts;

· provisions, revaluations, write-off of bad debt and exchange rate gains/losses have been moved from DEL budgets into AME; and

· depreciation, impairments and notional audit fees have remained in Resource DEL.

All figures were re-forecast before the classification changes were made.

These classification changes, which are reflected in all departmental Estimates, have the effect of reducing DEL budgets across departments in all years. However, the adjustments have no impact on the purchasing power of departments or the planned level of expenditure.

A NNEX C

A note on the European Regional Development Fund

The European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) is a structural fund of the European Union. In normal circumstances, income from the EU covers expenditure on grant payments to recipients, leading to no overall cost to the Request for Resources or Departmental Expenditure Limit. Losses (including foreign exchange losses) , write offs or fines by the EU are, however, costs to the DEL and RFR.

ERDF operates in programmes ; each programme covering a range of years:

· The 2000-2006 programme was administered by Government Offices , which form part of the Department.

Expenditure and income under this programme is recorded as follows:

o RFR1, Section H: net expenditure and income relating to old programmes

o RFR1, Section J : losses, write offs and other payments or income shortfalls not funded by the EU ; and

o RFR1, Section S: net expenditure and income relating to London programmes

All of these lines fall within the Departmental Expenditure Limit (DEL)

· The 2007-2013 programme ("New programmes") is being administered by the Regional Development Agencies , which are Non-Departmental Public Bodies, apart from the London Development Agency (LDA) , which is a local authority body. The Department continues to make claims to the EU, but passes on that funding to the RDAs in order to cover the grant payment costs incurred by the RDAs.

Expenditure and income under this programme is recorded as follows:

i. RFR1, Section I : income from the EU (within DEL ) ;

ii. RFR1, Section T : payments by the LDA (within DEL ) ;

iii. RFR1, Section AC : payments to RDAs (not LDA) (outside DEL ) ;

iv. Non voted : expenditure by RDAs (not LDA) on grant payments (within DEL )

This recording is necessary to comply with Treasury and Estimate rules that require payments to an NDPB to be scored within the RFR but outside DEL ; while the expenditure funded by those payments must be recorded in DEL but is non - voted. Norm ally both amounts (i.e. items i ii ) and i v) above) would be the same, although timing differences may occur.


[1] Details of the CSR07 settlement were reported in the Explanatory Memorandum of the Main Estimates 2008-09. Details of the September 2008 Housing Package, the Pre Budget Report 2008 and the Budget Report 2009 were reported in the Explanatory Memorandum of the Main Estimates 2009-10.

[1]