The role and performance of Ofsted - Education Committee Contents


Memorandum submitted by Katharine Birbalsingh

Below are my thoughts on the ways in which Ofsted could develop for the better.

1.  Inspectors need to have more respect for the teacher and her choices on how to teach. She should be free to do what is necessary for the children in her classroom. The expectation of a prescriptive lesson plan must be abandoned. A teacher should be able to stand in front of the class and have the children answer questions. We need to move away from the idea that the teacher is a "facilitator of learning" who moves around the class instead of teaching up at the front.

2.  We need to reduce the emphasis on group work and games. This must change if we are to see more learning take place in lessons. This trend is destructive to real learning and real development of our children. That isn't to say that group learning does not have its place in lessons, but the expectation should not be that all good lessons should have group work and games, whatever the topic, whatever the subject.

3.  Behaviour is not held up to a rigorous standard. Ofsted says behaviour is good when it isn't. Inspectors need to raise their standards.

4.  Inspections should be done without warning. Otherwise, inspectors are simply watching a performance. Schools are able to hide their worst children on the inspection days.

5.  Judging schools entirely on results and little else means teachers teach to the test and the whole child is abandoned. We need to have more breadth and depth in the league tables—behaviour, kindness, manners, rigour etc need to be judged. Anthony Seldon has written extensively on this. These values are difficult to quantify and qualify and so clever thinking is needed to establish ways to judge them.

6.  Inspections should be testing the ability of the Senior Team to observe lessons and get it right. This is done to a certain extent already. But inspectors should roam the school with members of the Senior Team, to get a sense of the understanding the Senior Team has of the school. Then a greater trust could be built with schools and inspections would not have to take place so often.

7.  Inspectors should monitor Senior Teams by looking for consistency and leadership. This can be done by clever questioning of leadership figures and ordinary staff. Do they match up? Is there a vision? Is the school being properly led? This should be done at random, involving a wide variety of teachers. Inspectors should be looking for consistency.

8.  Ofsted should judge how competitive schools are - how they instil competition in their children.

9.  Inspectors should judge motivation and aspiration in the children. This should not only be judged (as it currently is) in lessons, to see how engaged the children are. This should be judged overall in the school, to see what systems the school has in place to encourage motivation and aspiration in its children.

10.  Ofsted should judge the level of the excuse-culture and balance this against how well the children are supported. So yes, it is good to have anger management classes, but how far does this then allow the children to behave badly? Do members of the Senior Team understand this tension?

11.  While Ofsted judges the curriculum offer schools give to children, it should not just look at the range of the offer but also at how academic the offer is. Are children left to choose what they like? Or are they given the right kind of direction to choose what will later benefit them in life?

12.  We need radical and creative work around the expectation of inspectors to see new fads being implemented. Starters, plenaries, AFL, personalised learning, targets, independent learning etc. Inspectors need to be shaken out of this box-ticking mentality. There should be an overall sense: Are the children learning? Are they happy? Is there consistency amongst the teachers? Do the systems work? Is the school being led well? Inspectors need to move away from judging minutiae and allow schools the freedom to make their own decisions. Inspectors should then judge the outcomes. This requires a massive shift in culture.

The problem Ofsted has, in the main, is that it tends to judge that which can be easily quantified and qualified. But leadership, consistency, culture (behaviour and motivation) and teaching are the main things that make for a successful school. These are what we should be judging in our inspections, and judging them by criteria that are meaningful, not just to tick a box, but to inspire real change for the better.

December 2010


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 17 April 2011