Future Flood and Water Management Legislation - Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee Contents


Written evidence submitted by Staffordshire County Council

CREATION OF UNIFIED ACT

  It is considered that a Unified act is still required in order to simplify and rationalise the existing drainage legislative regime.

INDUSTRY WIDE STANDARDS

  It would be beneficial if industry wide design standards for flood risk management could be agreed. A standard process to record flooding incidents shared by all key partners would also assist with flood investigation work and production of Preliminary Flood Risk Assessments. Consistent methods of recording and assessing flood risk would also promote collaborative working between organisations to find integrated solutions to problems and assist government with making decisions over future investment.

ASSET DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES

  A process should be introduced to resolve asset liability disputes for drains/sewers etc. At present there is currently no formal process to resolve such disputes leading to a stand off position between organisations as to ownership and maintenance liabilities.

  We have recently identified three separate locations which due to lack of appropriate legal documentation the process of determining asset liability is proving difficult to resolve. In one particular case a WA has informed the District Council that, despite maintaining an asset for over 40 years, it is longer prepared to do so and has put the onus on the District Council to produce legal documentation even though such records may not exist or would have been transferred to the WA following the termination of the Drainage Agency Agreement.

  This issue also relates to the proposals for Water Companies to take over responsibility for private drains. We have situations where private drains are connected to pipes in the carriageway which also take the discharge from the highway drains before discharging into either a river or natural watercourse. What is the status of these pipes should they become public sewers under the new arrangements?

CONSENTING FOR WORKS TO ORDINARY COURSES

  It is considered that the consenting process for all works on ordinary water courses should be retained by the Environment Agency until such time as Lead Local Authorities FRM capabilities are sufficiently developed.

DUTY TO COOPERATE AND SHARE INFORMATION

  At present the process of obtaining & sharing information is proving difficult and time consuming due to lack of co-operation from certain organisations. It would be helpful if agreement could be reached on essential data requirements and for this information to be made available via web portals where via password controls organisations could download relevant data.

SUSTAINABLE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

  Robust funding mechanisms need to be established for the long term maintenance of SUD's. The proposals for a property drainage charge seem an appropriate mechanism to overcome this problem and funding also needs to be sufficient to maintain the standards which will be forthcoming via the SUD's National Guidance.

CURRENT FUNDING STRUCTURE

  The proposals to fund Local Authorities new responsibilities based upon risk criteria are supported. It is considered that the use of the EA local Levy should be expanded to include works to resolve Local Flooding issues including property protection/resilience schemes and works to Ordinary Watercourses.

REDUCING PROPERTY OWNERS' AND OCCUPIERS' IMPACT UPON LOCAL FLOOD RISK

  There is a need to introduce a simplified and effective enforcement process to deal with surface water runoff & flooding problems caused by change of land use or other activities which exacerbate flooding on adjacent land. Whilst LLA have the powers to investigate flooding problems the powers to resolve such problems appear to be limited. The draft Bill contained proposals for statutory nuisance powers which were seen as a positive step to simplify the enforcement process.

  We have recent occasions where tented poly tunnels have caused flooding to adjacent properties due to lack of measures to deal with the fast runoff. Other examples relate to inappropriate ploughing across contours and change in land use which have resulted in an A Class road being flooded on regular basis and requiring emergency road closures and diversions to be set up. Actions to help promote the upkeep of road side ditches by farmers would also be welcomed, as run off from fields regularly contributes significantly to highway flooding, and it can sometimes be difficult to encourage farmers to undertake the necessary work on an ongoing basis.

October 2010






 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 22 December 2010