2 The Commission for Rural Communities
8. The Commission for Rural Communities (CRC),
a Defra-funded non-departmental public body, was created by the
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006. The CRC received
£6.48 million Grant in Aid from Defra in 2009-10 and employed
74 staff.[17] There are
currently ten Commissioners in addition to the Chairman. Under
the Act, the Commission's purpose was to promote awareness of
rural needs among relevant authorities and the general public
and its three main functions were: representation, advice and
monitoring; research; and information services.[18]
The CRC also supported Defra's role of encouraging other Government
departments to take into account rural matters when developing
policy and designing delivery. The process, known as 'rural proofing',
requires policy-makers to consider the impact of rural issues
such as more dispersed population, fewer service outlets, greater
travel needs or smaller economic markets on the effectiveness
of new policy, legislation or delivery mechanisms.[19]
9. On 29 June 2010, the Secretary of State for
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Rt Hon Caroline Spelman MP,
announced that the CRC would be abolished in March 2011 and that
rural policy would be subsumed back into the department.[20]
Defra anticipates that the abolition of the CRC will cost approximately
£2.5m in redundancy costs and save around £18m. Understandably,
Dr Burgess, Chairman of the CRC, expressed sadness at the decision
to abolish the Commission.[21]
He told us that he expected the CRC's evidence-based work and
working with stakeholders would be taken into Defra.[22]
Professor Shucksmith, Commissioner at the CRC, told us that he
would wish the Rural Communities Policy Unit to take on the Commission's
focus on rural disadvantage and that its advice would be transparent
to the public.[23]
10. Following the announcement disquiet was expressed
about whether and how the Government would sustain the work done
by the CRC.[24] The NFU
welcomed the decision to bring policy-making back into Defra but
identified two risks resulting from the demise of the CRC. First,
whether Defra would be as good as the CRC had been at listening
to farmers and local communities and second, ensuring Defra was
influential within Whitehall. Several rural and upland issues
are the primary responsibility of other Government departments.
Dr Clark, Head of Policy at the National Farmers' Union (NFU),
told us that:
"The uplands are not led just from [Defra HQ];
they have to be led from CLG, DECC, the Home Office and also the
MoD, which has important landholdings. All these different groups
need to be brought together, so we depend on the champion being
able to influence all of those policy levers".[25]
11. Defra's Ministers have argued that their
knowledge and experience of rural issues enable them to be effective
advocates for rural communities and issues within Government.
Mr Paice, for example, told us that:
...there is a great wealth of knowledge within the
ministerial team, for a start, but also within the Department
and on the Government benches in the House of Commons [...] We
feel that the understanding of the problems of rural areas is
there already. [26]
At the time of the announcement of the CRC's abolition,
the Secretary of State said that "focusing rural policy making
within the department will give rural communities and interest
groups a direct link to central policymakers and a stronger champion
for rural issues at the heart of Government".[27]
However, given that Defra is supposed to be taking on the breadth
of the CRC's advocacy role within Government, it was disappointing
that the Minister of State felt unable to comment on several issues
raised in the CRC's report, for example, on rural housing, tourism
and broadband.[28]
12. The department intends to reinforce its capacity
to undertake rural policy work by strengthening its Rural Communities
Policy Unit. The unit, which will have a complement of 33 staff,
came into being on 1 December 2010, when 14 staff were formally
transferred from the CRC to join Defra's existing rural team.[29]
The Secretary of State has said that the new unit would work across
Government to ensure that the interests of rural communities were
reflected.[30] Defra
did not produce a rural impact assessment of the Government's
Spending Review, but its Rural Statistics Unit produced a "one
page summary entitled 'Carrying out rural-urban distributional
analysis of spending decisions' [which] included a link to the
Commission for Rural Communities Rural Proofing Toolkit...",
which was circulated to all departments in late August 2010.[31]
Defra's Rural Statistics Unit and Rural Communities Policy Unit
have also provided advice to Government departments in response
to requests for assistance.[32]
13. The CRC was not only able to provide independent
expert advice and analysis to Government on rural issues, but
also took the initiative in bringing concerns to the attention
of departments, Ministers and the Prime Minister. Defra describes
itself as "the rural champion within Government", but
we are yet to see any evidence that it will provide the same vigour
as the CRC in pursuing solutions to rural problems.[33]
The decision to abolish a source of external challenge and expertise
should not be justified on the basis of whether or not the current
Defra Ministers have experience of rural issues. It is not clear
to us that abolishing the CRC will result in an improvement in
Defra's rural policy development functions, or that rural issues
will receive greater attention across Government.
14. We are concerned that, following
the abolition of the Commission for Rural Communities (CRC), there
is a real risk of a diminution in rural expertise within Defra
and across Government.
15. The Secretary of State told
us that the new arrangement would provide "a stronger champion
for rural issues at the heart of Government". However, we
recommend that Defra set out in clear and unambiguous terms how
its Ministers and Rural Communities Policy Unit will build their
capacity and expertise in relation to rural issues and how they
will provide the degree of 'challenge' across Government to act
as effective advocates for rural communities. We further recommend
that Defra's Rural Communities Policy Unit be required to:
- work across
Government to ensure policy is 'rural proofed',
- make its work accessible to
the public, and
- continue the data collection
and analysis work of the CRC.
Fulfilling these requirements should
be included in the objectives of the Head of the Rural Communities
Policy Unit.
16. Defra should, within six
months of the final winding up of the CRC, publish an assessment
of the work of its Rural Communities Policy Unit and an analysis
of the overall savings achieved in providing Defra's rural policy
and statistical work as a result of abolishing the CRC. Following
publication of that report this Committee will wish to scrutinise
the work of Defra's Rural Communities Policy Unit.
17 Commission for Rural Communities Annual Report
and Accounts 2009-10, 20 July 2010, HC 200 Back
18
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006, sections 18-21 Back
19
See http://ruralcommunities.gov.uk/category/our-work/impact4/ruralproofing/ Back
20
For the written ministerial statement, please see: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmhansrd/cm100629/wmstext/100629m0001.htm Back
21
Q 7 Back
22
Q 8 Back
23
Q 8 Back
24
Ev 53; CPRE responds to scrapping of Commission for Rural Communities
(CRC), 29 June 2010, http://www.cpre.org.uk/news/view/686; The
countryside will be the poorer, The Daily Telegraph, 2
July 2010 Back
25
Q 101 Back
26
Q 166 Back
27
"Spelman announces agencies shake up" Defra press notice,
29 June 2010. Back
28
Qq 219, 220, 235, 183 Back
29
HC Deb, 13 December 2010, col 531W; Q 168 Back
30
HC Deb, 29 June 2010, col 36WS; "Spelman announces agencies
shake-up", Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
press release, 29 June 2010 Back
31
This has yet to be published. The uncorrected transcript of this
evidence session can be found at http://www.parliament.uk/efracom/publications Back
32
This has yet to be published. The uncorrected transcript of this
evidence session can be found at http://www.parliament.uk/efracom/publications Back
33
This has yet to be published. The uncorrected transcript of this
evidence session can be found at http://www.parliament.uk/efracom/publications Back
|