The draft National Policy Statement (NPS) on Waste Water - Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee Contents


6  Environmental aspects

44. For the purposes of the EU Habitats Directive, [86] an NPS is considered to be a 'plan' and therefore subject to an assessment to confirm that it will have no adverse affect on a European protected site.[87] However, plans or projects where Imperative Reasons of Overriding Public Interest (IROPI) are shown to outweigh the impacts on habitats and wildlife are permitted under the Directive. The draft NPS states that the Government has presented a case for IROPI since it "cannot rule out the potential for adverse impacts" on European sites resulting from the NPS, and has concluded that there are no alternatives which would "better respect the integrity of European sites and deliver the objectives of this plan".[88] Defra's IROPI case is that the NPS is needed to ensure there is no further deterioration in surface water quality which would "lead to increased risk to human health and safety and consequences of primary importance for the environment".[89] However, this section of the draft NPS does not provide detail as to how an improved planning regime for waste water projects can assist in delivering such objectives.

45. The statement of Imperative Reasons of Overriding Public Interest (IROPI) justifying development of this NPS should be strengthened to reflect the considerable environmental benefits which a streamlined planning regime can deliver through enabling timely completion of necessary waste water infrastructure projects.

Climate change

46. Many waste water projects are carried out to meet environmental requirements yet the projects themselves can have climate change impacts, for example through increased energy usage in construction and ongoing operation of infrastructure. The Institution of Civil Engineers noted that, although applications would have to demonstrate their adaptability to climate change, there was no requirement for a project to incorporate measures to mitigate climate change through low-carbon approaches to their design, construction and operation.[90] According to Ofwat, the draft NPS was deficient in its treatment of climate change mitigation and should have recognised that projects necessary to adapt to climate change could have "significant carbon impacts which may undermine mitigation efforts". It considered that the scope for energy and carbon savings of any alternatives to projects should be made explicit.[91]

47. The EA also considered that clearer guidance should be included on how proposed developments could contribute towards reducing greenhouse gas emissions, in line with Defra's climate change plan, including generating renewable energy from methane. It also recommended that the NPS should require information on greenhouse gas emissions to be included in Environmental Statements accompanying project applications.[92] Southwark Council also suggested improvements to the section on climate change mitigation, for example by including a requirement on applicants to increase tree canopy cover and expand green infrastructure.[93]

48. The draft NPS should be revised to make more detailed reference to increases in greenhouse gas emissions that waste water infrastructure projects could cause and to provide stronger guidance to decision makers on the mitigation measures they should consider imposing on project applicants.


86   Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Flora and Fauna, also known as the EU Habitats Directive, requires EU Member States to introduce a range of measures for the protection of habitats and species as listed in its Annexes.  Back

87   The EU has established a Europe-wide network of Natura 2000 sites including Special Areas of Conservation and Special Protection Areas to protect habitats and species of European importance. Back

88   Draft NPS, p 6, para 1.5.2. Back

89   Draft NPS, p 6, para 1.5.3. Back

90   Institution of Civil Engineers, Submission to Defra NPS Consultation, February 2011. Back

91   Ev 46 Back

92   Environment Agency, Submission to Defra NPS Consultation, February 2011, p 4.  Back

93   London Borough of Southwark, Submission to Defra NPS Consultation, February 2011. Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 5 April 2011