Commissioning - Health Committee Contents


Written evidence from the British Heart Foundation (COM 73)

  1.  The British Heart Foundation (BHF) is the UK's leading heart charity. We are fighting against heart and circulatory disease—which is the UK's biggest killer and claims around 200,000 lives each year.[125] Our vision is of a world where no-one dies prematurely of heart disease.

SUMMARY

    — Partnership working between public sector commissioners and the voluntary sector is vital. Charities can:

    — provide a wealth of intelligence on patients' needs and wishes;

    — facilitate the engagement of patients, carers and health professionals in commissioning;

    — provide valuable support and advice to commissioners on service design;

    — and help disseminate evidence on best practice and innovation.

    — Commissioning policy should recognise the role of charities as co-commissioners and co-investors in the health and wellbeing of local communities, and should involve charities throughout commissioning processes.

    — Clinical networks also engage patients, carers and health professionals in commissioning, promote coordinated, innovative, and cost effective care, and can provide a valuable bridge during the period of transition. Their vital work must continue and develop.

    — Patients and carers should be involved in shaping services along the whole patient pathway; the NHS Commissioning Board should have representation from and genuine engagement with patients, carers, and voluntary sector organisations.

    — Research and education and training should be given appropriate status in the new system, and there should be research representation on the NHS Commissioning Board.

    — The crucial role of the NHS in promoting healthy lifestyles and preventing ill-health must be reflected in the NHS Outcomes Framework and commissioning frameworks.

    — Investments in the health and wellbeing of local communities by charitable organisations that are currently administered by PCTs should not be put at risk during the period of transition to alternative organisational structures.

    — Patients and carers should be fully engaged in specialised commissioning to ensure integrated health and social care services for small and scattered patient groups.

Q.   How will commissioners access the information and clinical expertise required to make high quality decisions about the shape of clinical services?

  2.  Clinical networks play a valuable role in engaging patients and carers in commissioning, as well as providing expert clinical advice and support for commissioners. This support will be particularly important as GP consortia and the NHS Commissioning Board take on their new roles. We would urge the Government to ensure that the increasing competition between providers and the financial challenges facing the NHS, do not threaten the vital work of cardiac and stroke networks.

  3.  Multi-professional engagement in commissioning will be crucial to delivering high-quality, patient-centred, cost-effective care. Charities that support and engage with health professionals can help to facilitate this. The BHF fully funds 112 specialist cardiac health professional posts, and part funds 361 posts,[126] and supports these professionals to become expert practitioners. We believe that specialist cardiac nurses and Community Resuscitation Development Officers (CRDOs) could make a particularly valuable contribution to commissioning.

BHF SPECIALIST NURSES

  4.  BHF specialist heart nurses cover a range of specialties such as heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, paediatrics, arrhythmia, adults with congenital disease, genetics and palliative care. BHF specialist heart failure nurses, for example, monitor symptoms, titrate medication, and support patients to understand and manage their condition and to stay in their homes. An evaluation found that heart failure nurses reduce all cause admissions by an average of 35%, saving approximately £1,826 per patient.[127] Specialist heart nurses would be well placed to advise GP consortia on the commissioning of high-quality, patient-centred, cost-effective, multi-disciplinary services, and to achieve the best outcomes across acute, chronic, and palliative care.

COMMUNITY RESUSCITATION DEVELOPMENT OFFICERS

  5.  The BHF has established new Community Resuscitation Development Officer (CRDOs) (or "responder manager") posts within emergency services to improve survival from out of hospital cardiac arrest. Most cases of sudden cardiac death are potentially reversible by giving the heart a type of electric shock (defibrillation), but treatment is needed within four or five minutes of the event. Ambulances rarely reach a victim in this time but the window of opportunity can be doubled if bystanders give "basic life support" in the form of chest compressions and rescue breathing.

  6.  CRDOs assess a local community's capacity for resuscitation, ensure the placement of defibrillators in public places, provide training and support for volunteer community first responders (trained to use defibrillators), and deliver emergency life support training for the public. Evaluation has shown that CRDOs are dynamic and enthusiastic developers of community capacity for resuscitation,[128] recruiting volunteers and boosting initiatives such as emergency life support training. They also have an important role in developing information systems, sharing best practice, conducting research, promoting innovations, and encouraging partnership working. The involvement of CRDOs in commissioning community resuscitation services would enable their valuable knowledge and expertise to be shared, and would ensure services are properly specified and costed, explicitly contracted for, and integrated into NHS services.

Q.   How will commissioners address issues of clinical practice variation?

  7.  Access to robust and comparable data is crucial to identifying and addressing variations in care. Data will need to be available on a local basis so population outcomes can be compared between different areas, and so the NHS Commissioning Board can hold GP consortia to account. We have concerns about the impact the new right to free choice of GP will have on the comparability of geographical population data.

  8.  The use of benchmarking techniques, such as the Advancing Quality programme begun in the North West Strategic Health Authority region and now extending to other regions, can also help to identify variations in practice.

  9.  Clinical networks can also play a crucial role in enabling patients, clinicians, managers, and commissioners from different organisations to work together to standardise the quality of services through joint quality assurance, audit and benchmarking. The Government should also ensure that support is made available so the valuable work of national independent, clinically-led audits can continue.

Q.   What arrangements will be made to encourage the Third Sector (both) as commissioners (and as providers)?

  10.  Charities can play a valuable role in providing advice and support to commissioners on service design and innovative models, and in disseminating evidence and best practice to professionals. The BHF recently joined with nine other leading health charities to present consensus solutions to delivering coordinated, high-quality, patient-centred, cost-effective care that supports self-management, delivers effective prevention, early diagnosis and intervention, and provides emotional, psychological and practical support.[129] The NHS Commissioning Board should have representatives from, and genuine engagement with voluntary organisations.

  11.  The BHF has also recently worked closely with the Department of Health (DH) and NHS Improvement on a cardiac rehabilitation commissioning pack for commissioners and a patient friendly document to sit alongside it. This is an excellent example of a charity working to improve the commissioning pathway in a vital area that has previously been overlooked.

  12.  In addition, leading charities like the BHF play a key role as co-commissioners and co-investors in the health and wellbeing of local communities. Although the BHF does not supply services under contract to the NHS or local authorities, we are a significant contributor to the health and well-being of local populations. For example, we have invested £9 million in selected communities across the UK through our Hearty Lives programme which aims to reduce the high levels of cardiovascular disease in targeted communities.

  13.  Hearty Lives is a valuable example of joint commissioning between a charity and the NHS. However, at present, commissioning policy often fails to take sufficient account of this, focusing instead on charities as providers of services under contract. The NHS Commissioning Board should ensure that commissioners involve charities throughout commissioning processes.

  14.  The Hearty Lives programme has also highlighted the need for commissioning policy to more clearly distinguish between taxation and charitable expenditure as sources of funding. Charitable work is funded to a large degree through donations from people, businesses and philanthropic organisations, and these funds should not be subject to undue bureaucracy which negates the flexibility and speed of response for which the voluntary sector is valued.

Q.   How will patients make their voice heard or their choice effective?

  15.  The BHF welcomes the aspiration in the NHS White Paper to promote a local voice for patients, and to create an NHS which is more responsive to patients' needs and wishes. The work of the NHS Commissioning Board should be informed by patients and carers' experiences. The Board must have representation and genuine engagement with patients, carers, and voluntary sector organisations. Charities like the BHF can share a wealth of information on patients' needs and experiences, and can facilitate engagement with patients and carers.[130]

  16.  The new local HealthWatch services should be fully independent, whilst having adequate authority and sufficient resources to carry out their functions. It will also be important that there is absolute clarity about the remit and mandate of HealthWatch, and that they are recognised by commissioners as the legitimate voice of patients. Awareness raising will be needed to champion their role among local people.

  17.  Local HealthWatch should build on learning from LINks. In many places LINks are not yet properly established, and we would like assurance that the new structures will be given time to embed—continuity is essential to maintaining public confidence in patient and public involvement processes.

  18.  Advocacy work can be demanding, time-consuming and high profile. It is essential that this does not detract from patient and public involvement in designing and developing services.

  19.  Many heart patients are already involved in shaping services through cardiac and stroke networks. Local HealthWatch should establish close links with clinical networks, and ensure that relevant information about services is communicated to National HealthWatch within the Care Quality Commission.

  20.  The move to a mixed economy of providers and the extension of personal health budgets will make it even more essential that patients receive support in making choices about providers. Patients need advice about what to look out for when choosing providers, clear information about the full range of services available, support in understanding, interpreting and translating this information, and practical advice about how to access services. This support is particularly important for vulnerable groups. Information must be accessible to all patients, whatever their literacy skills and mental capacity, and should be available not just online but also face-to-face and via the telephone.

  21.  We believe that patients are likely to seek advice about providers and treatments from their local GP or other health professional, who they deem to have the appropriate clinical knowledge and with whom they already have a relationship, rather than from staff at local HealthWatch. The role of HealthWatch should therefore be to drive and support progress locally with clinicians, including GPs, and to link with any national initiatives. Local HealthWatch may also have a role in providing practical information, for example about transport to services.

Q.   What will be the role of the NHS Commissioning Board?

  22.  Clinical research is critical to improving the quality of patient care, and the NHS Commissioning Board should have a role in ensuring that research is given appropriate status in the new system. There should be research representation on the NHS Commissioning Board, and participation in research should be reflected in the NHS Outcomes Framework and commissioning frameworks.

  23.  The role of the NHS Commissioning Board in providing strategic oversight of national workforce planning and of healthcare providers' funding plans for training and education, will also be essential.

  24.  We have concerns about how the NHS Commissioning Board will hold GP consortia to account for their performance, and also provide the necessary support for consortia in taking on their new roles. A great strength of clinical networks is their ability to provide independent expert advice and support to commissioners. We urge the Government to ensure that the financial challenges facing the NHS do not threaten the vital work of cardiac and stroke networks (for more information, see our response to the question on access to information and clinical expertise).

Q.   How will commissioning interface with the Public Health Service?

  25.  It is essential that the creation of the Public Health Service and the greater role for local authorities in public health do not result in NHS commissioners and staff no longer seeing public health as part of the role of the NHS. The crucial role of the NHS in promoting healthy lifestyles and preventing ill-health must be reflected in the NHS Outcomes Framework and commissioning frameworks.

  26.  While we welcome the Government's proposal to establish a Public Health Service, there is a risk that this will perpetuate the disjunction between public health-led needs assessment, and service planning and delivery. Effective joint planning and integrated delivery should be a requirement placed on both GP consortia and the new Public Health Service. Joint Strategic Needs Assessments should produce useable results at GP consortia level, and commissioning plans should demonstrably flow from the needs assessment.

Q.   Will the new arrangements safeguard current examples of good practice?

  27.  Through the BHF Hearty Lives programme, the BHF has invested £9 million over three years in selected communities across the UK with the aim of reducing the high levels of cardiovascular disease in targeted communities. This investment has largely been through posts and projects currently administered by PCTs. Investments in the health and wellbeing of local communities by charitable organisations that are currently administered by PCTs should not be put at risk during the period of transition to alternative organisational structures.

Q.   Who will drive innovation during the transitional period?

  28.  During the transitional period, there should be significant engagement with charities to help disseminate and mainstream voluntary sector innovations in service delivery.

  29.  The BHF is the single biggest funder of heart-related research in the UK, contributing more than the Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust put together. The BHF invests a total of £28 million in prevention and care programmes each year consisting of public education, professional training and support, and new service model research, pilot testing, evaluation and audit.

  30.  The BHF recently joined with nine other leading health charities to present consensus solutions and innovative examples of delivering coordinated, high-quality, patient-centred, cost-effective care.[131]

Q.   What arrangements are proposed for the commissioning of specialist services?

  31.  At present there is significant variation between regions in terms of the commissioning of specialised services, with the same service being commissioned at a local level in some regions and at a regional level in other regions. The DH should conduct a survey to establish a clear national picture of what services are currently being commissioned at what level.

  32.  If GP consortia are to take on new responsibilities for commissioning specialised services which are currently commissioned regionally, the DH should ensure that during the transitional period they are equipped with the necessary skills to do this. The DH should take into account that where a specialised service is currently being commissioned by a lead PCT for a region, the burden of transferring skills to GP consortia will fall on this PCT (as the others will not have the necessary experience and knowledge).

  33.  Patient and carer involvement is crucial to specialised commissioning. At present, specialised commissioning is mainly clinician led, and there is insufficient involvement of patients and carers. Involving patients and carers in specialist commissioning is essential to ensure that health, social care and other services for small and scattered patient groups are still developed and delivered in a holistic way and around the needs of patients. For example, patients could be involved in developing contract service specifications. The NHS Commissioning Board should also build on the work of the National Specialised Commissioning Group to bring together disparate user involvement groups at a national level.

CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE WITH CONGENITAL AND INHERITED HEART CONDITIONS

  34.  The BHF estimates that there are 32,000 young people between 12 and 19 currently living with a heart condition in the UK.[132] At a local level, Children's Trusts are currently working towards holistic commissioning of health, education and social care within a local area. However, children and young people with heart conditions are scattered in small numbers across the country, and health services are therefore currently commissioned at multiple levels, including nationally and regionally. This can make it difficult to ensure that health, social care, and education services are properly integrated. The NHS Commissioning Board should work with charities like the BHF to ensure that small and scattered patient groups do not suffer from fragmented care because they do not all live in one community.

PEOPLE WITH INHERITED HEART CONDITIONS

  35.  Inherited cardiac conditions are estimated to result in between around 140-540 deaths in England every year among those aged under 65.[133], [134]In 2009, the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee report on genomic medicine found significant inequalities in the provision of genetic services in the NHS in England with regards to tests for single-gene disorders and for single-gene subtypes of common diseases due to the lack of a national policy on commissioning of genetics services.

  36.  A DH-led initiative for inherited heart disorders is now underway. One component of this is the joint DH and BHF Genetic Information Service (GIS) which helps families to get an expert assessment in a specialist clinic for inherited heart conditions, and to deal with being diagnosed with an inherited heart condition or losing a loved one. It is not clear whether the commissioning of genetic testing will rest with the NHS Commissioning Board, or whether it will be part of the new Public Health Service. We are calling for a single national system for cascade screening and would be very concerned about any arrangements which make screening more fragmented and less effective.

  37.  The BHF is providing detailed responses to the NHS White Paper consultations which will be available on our website from 11 October.[135] We would welcome the opportunity to support the Committee in its enquiry and would be pleased to provide any more information. If you have any questions please contact Beatrice Brooke, Policy Manager. (brookeb@bhf.org.uk).

October 2010







125   www.heartstats.org Back

126   For more information see BHF Specialist Nurses-Changing face of cardiac care. Back

127   BHF (2010), BHF Specialist Nurses-Changing the face of cardiac care. Back

128   For more information please see: Matrix Research and Consultancy (2006), British Heart Foundation and the Department of Health, An evaluation of the Community Defibrillation Officer role. Back

129   Kings Fund (2010), How to deliver high-quality, patient-centred, cost-effective care, Consensus solutions from the voluntary sector. Back

130   The BHF has a network of more than 300 affiliated Heart Support Groups, set up by patients for patients. We also run Hearty Voices programmes, free one-day training courses delivered across the country that help heart patients develop the knowledge and skills to confidently represent the voice of heart patients and carers and to get involved in influencing the health service, both locally and nationally. Back

131   Kings Fund (2010), How to deliver high-quality, patient-centred, cost-effective care, Consensus solutions from the voluntary sector. Back

132   Stefanie Lillie, Diane Card. Meet@TeenHeart: Working with teenagers with heart disease. British Journal of Cardiac Nursing, Vol 3, Iss 5; 7 May 2008, pp 190-192. Back

133   Bowker TJ et al (2003) Sudden unexpected cardiac or unexplained death in England: a national survey. Q J Med 96:269-279. Back

134   Behr ER et al (2007) Sudden arrhythmic death syndrome: a national survey of sudden unexplained death. Heart 93:601-605. Back

135   www.bhf.org.uk Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 21 January 2011