Commissioning: further issues - Health Committee Contents


Written evidence from the Muscular Dystrophy Campaign (CFI 34)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

—  We welcome the Committee's follow-up inquiry into commissioning, particularly the review of proposals for integrating the full range of clinical expertise into the commissioning process. We are encouraged by the Committee's focus on commissioning but remain concerned about proposed structures for specialised commissioning for people with rare and very rare conditions.

—  As our evidence had shown, patients with neuromuscular conditions face a "postcode lottery" in accessing the specialist multidisciplinary care they require. This has had devastating consequences, with young men with Duchenne muscular dystrophy dying on average 10 years earlier in some parts of the country compared with others, due to a lack of specialist care.

—  We therefore strongly believe that specialist neuromuscular services must be commissioned by the National Commissioning Board and robust sub-national structures must be set up to enable continued commissioning at a regional level.

—  Putting in place structures to commission specialist services as part of the proposed restructure of the NHS would not only help to reduce the "postcode lottery" that people with neuromuscular conditions find when they attempt to access vital services, but would also lead to a significant reduction in the estimated £68 million currently spent on unplanned hospital admissions in England.

—  Neuromuscular conditions are complex multisystem disorders, requiring care through tertiary and sometimes quaternary services, as well as primary and secondary care. Clinical evidence is clear that such multidisciplinary care at all of these levels can not only can dramatically extend life-expectancy and transform quality of life for patients with these conditions but also save vital funds by preventing unplanned emergency admissions and through reducing the length of hospital stays.

—  We urgently seek clarification as to how the National Commissioning Board will interface with the rest of the system commissioned by GPs to provide the essential elements of this multidisciplinary care. We recommend that GP consortia be required to work closely with sub-national commissioning structures to overcome the gaps in their knowledge of rare and very rare conditions.

INTRODUCTION

1.  The Muscular Dystrophy Campaign represents the 71,000 people in the UK with muscular dystrophy or a related neuromuscular condition. There are more than 60 different types of muscular dystrophy and related neuromuscular conditions, many of which are low incidence, orphan conditions and indeed some are very rare and are regarded as ultra orphan. Neuromuscular conditions can be genetic or acquired and, with the exception of a couple of acquired conditions, there are no known effective treatments or cures.

2.  As these are rare and very rare conditions, they are currently the responsibility of the 10 regional Specialised Commissioning Groups in England, and are listed in the Specialised Services National Definition Set (SSNDS).[79] The ultra-rare conditions (affecting less than 400 patients each) are the responsibility of AGNSS (Advisory Group for National Specialised Services).[80]

3.  We welcome the Committee's follow-up inquiry and particularly the intention to review the arrangements proposed for integrating the full range of clinical expertise into the commissioning process. Whilst we welcome the decision to set up the National Commissioning Board for regional and national specialised services, it is vital that neuromuscular conditions continue to be recognised on the Board's list of specialised services and that specialised services are commissioned regionally and nationally for the rarest conditions.

4.  People with neuromuscular conditions will also need to access vital non-specialised services such as physiotherapy, hydrotherapy and psychological support. It is essential that GP consortia have access to the expertise they need to commission non-specialised services for people with neuromuscular conditions.

THE IMPORTANCE OF SPECIALISED COMMISSIONING FOR NEUROMUSCULAR CONDITIONS

5.  Neuromuscular conditions are complex, progressive multi-system conditions which require multidisciplinary pathways of care. These pathways are recommended by the leading clinicians in this field as drastically improving the quality of life and need for emergency care: "Specialist multi-disciplinary care has been developed by leading clinicians as the best model for delivering effective care for such complex, multi-system diseases. The provision of expert physiotherapy, orthotics, early cardiac monitoring and intervention and corticosteroids has been shown to improve muscle function and maintain independent mobility. The judicious use of spinal surgery and expert respiratory services (including non invasive positive pressure ventilation) helps to improve quality of life, delay the onset of respiratory failure and prolong the life of these patients."[81]

6.  In addition to improving life expectancy and quality of life for neuromuscular patients, specialist neuromuscular care has been shown by clinical audit data to reduce the likelihood of patients with neuromuscular conditions being admitted to hospital as an emergency. Dr R. Quinlivan, Specialist Neuromuscular Consultant at the Centre of Inherited Neuromuscular Disorders at the Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District Hospital, Shropshire (until November 2010) has shown that of her 700 patients only eight were admitted to hospital as unplanned admissions during the 2009—2010 financial year. Of these eight admissions, half were unrelated to the patient's neuromuscular condition.

7.  Analysis of unplanned emergency admissions data provided by a number of Specialised Commissioning Groups suggests that £68 million was spent last year in England on such admissions by people with neuromuscular conditions. We estimate that this figure could be substantially reduced through investment in specialised multidisciplinary care.

8.  Taken together, the factors above strongly set out the case for specialist neuromuscular care to be commissioned at a regional level. We welcome the decision to set up the National Commissioning Board for regional and national specialised services. It is imperative that specialised services for patients with rare and very rare neuromuscular conditions are not left to be commissioned by GP consortia, which will not have the patient numbers, knowledge or expertise to commission these complex and costly services. However, the Health and Social Care Bill gives no guidance on any sub-national structures of the National Commissioning Board, which will be vital in ensuring that the Board is able to carry out its direct commissioning functions effectively. Without this sub-national co-ordination, patients with neuromuscular conditions are at risk of facing a worsening 'postcode lottery'.

Life expectancy for those with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) varies significantly between regions in the UK. The most recent study by Eagle et al[82], found a mean age of death of almost 30 years in patients with DMD receiving specialist multidisciplinary care, as reported by the Newcastle group. This compares to an audit of 40 sequential DMD deaths over ten years in the South West region which showed a median age of death of 18 years.

9.  The National Commissioning Board must therefore take a leading role in commissioning specialised services for neuromuscular conditions, supported by a robust sub-national structure with responsibility for regional commissioning. This is vital to ensure that patients with neuromuscular conditions do not experience worsening outcomes and, in some cases, reduced life expectancy.

10.  We also seek reassurance that sufficient funding will be provided to ensure that the National Commissioning Board is able to commission all 35 definitions in the current SSNDS. We seek further clarification as to how the funding will be delivered for the National Commissioning Board. Currently the funding for specialised services is top-sliced from Primary Care Trust budgets, leading to severe difficulties for the commissioning of these services. We would recommend that funding is delivered at a national level to the National Commissioning Board, and not delivered via GP consortia.

11.  We urge the Government to set a firm timescale for the migration of specialised services to the National Commissioning Board. There is continued confusion as to the future role of regional Specialised Commissioning Groups and that this is having a negative and delaying impact on the commissioning of specialised neuromuscular services. It is crucial that patients are not subjected to planning paralysis in the commissioning and delivery of these services during this period. The urgent and continuing needs of patients with life-limiting conditions cannot be placed on hold due to the NHS reorganisation.

THE ROLE OF GP CONSORTIA IN COMMISSIONING SERVICES FOR PEOPLE WITH NEUROMUSCULAR CONDITIONS

12.  Whilst the majority of services for people with neuromuscular conditions will need to be commissioned by the National Commissioning Board, as outlined above, people with these conditions will also require essential non-specialised neuromuscular primary care, which will be commissioned by GP consortia.

13.  Already patients and their families can experience severe and substantial difficulties accessing diagnosis and subsequent specialist care through their GP. In 2010 we surveyed 2,000 people living with muscular dystrophy or related neuromuscular conditions to uncover their experiences of accessing the appropriate medical services for their conditions. Our survey revealed that over half of people with muscle disease feel their GP has a poor understanding of their condition and many of those surveyed said they felt they knew more than the GP. Furthermore, many patients who responded told shocking stories of some GPs' ignorance of the condition, which included being labelled a "lazy hypochondriac" and patients having to teach doctors about muscle disease.

14.  This lack of understanding can lead to a delay in appropriate referrals and diagnosis which is correlated to life quality and in some circumstances impacts on life expectancy. Our survey revealed that 50 per cent of people with neuromuscular conditions did not receive a correct and prompt diagnosis. Our patient survey further reported a severe difficulty in accessing non-specialised services, such as physiotherapy, hydrotherapy and psychological support. Primary Care Trusts have been extremely unwilling to fund these vital services on an ongoing basis - instead only allowing patients access for a six week or six session basis. This fails to recognise both the long-term and progressive nature of neuromuscular conditions. Further, such short-term thinking regarding costs leads to much higher costs in the medium-term, through not only unplanned emergency admissions, but greater need of wheelchairs and mobility equipment, community nursing following falls, and social care costs.

15.  A sub-national specialised commissioning structure, as described above, would enable the engagement and input of GP consortia in the commissioning process, alongside the effective provision of those primary care services best commissioned at a local level for people with rare and very rare neuromuscular conditions. We would also recommend that consideration be given to requiring each GP consortium to appoint an expert in rare conditions to ensure that they had the necessary expertise to commission primary care services and co-ordinate these with the necessary specialised services for this patient group.

February 2011


79   National Specialised Commissioning Group Specialised Services National Definition Set http://www.specialisedservices.nhs.uk/info/specialised-services-national-definitions Back

80   AGNSS: http://www.specialisedservices.nhs.uk/info/agnss Back

81   Professor Michael G Hanna, Consultant Neurologist, Institute of Neurology, London; et al. (2007) Building on the Foundations: The Need for a Specialist Neuromuscular Service Across England  Back

82   Eagle M et al (2007) Managing Duchenne muscular dystrophy - The additive effect of spinal surgery and home nocturnal ventilation in improving survival. Neuromuscular Disorders, Volume 17, Issue 6 pp.470 - 475 Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 5 April 2011