The 2010 Millennium Development Goals Review Summit - International Development Committee Contents


Written evidence submitted by the Department for International Development

INTRODUCTION

  1.  The memorandum focuses on:

    (i) Key outcomes from the Summit, including:

    — DFID's role in delivering agreed strategies;

    — the role of the UN, World Bank, European Commission and NGOs in securing and delivering Summit outcomes, and how these organisations will be held accountable for achieving them; and

    — the role of developing countries in securing and delivering Summit outcomes.

    (ii) Looking ahead to after the MDG deadline of 2015.

KEY OUTCOMES FROM THE SUMMIT

  2. The  UN Millennium Development Goals Summit was held in New York 20-22 September, co-chaired by the former and current Presidents of the General Assembly. The International Development Secretary led the UK Delegation on 20-21 September, gave more than a dozen speeches and co-chaired a major event on malaria. The Deputy Prime Minister led the UK Delegation on 22 September and addressed the plenary.

  3.  Prominent participants included President Obama (USA), Premier Wen (China), Prime Minister Zapatero (Spain), President Sarkozy (France), Chancellor Merkel (Germany), Prime Minister Meles (Ethiopia), President Johnson-Sirleaf (Liberia), Queen Rania (Jordan), President Kagame (Rwanda), the heads of the World Bank, IMF and major UN agencies, and leading philanthropists such as George Soros, and Bill and Melinda Gates. UK MDG Advocate Bob Geldof played a prominent role throughout. The outcome document, negotiated in advance, was adopted at the closing plenary:

  (http://www.un.org/en/mdg/summit2010/pdf/Draft%20outcome%20document.pdf).

  4.  The Summit reinforced the UK's reputation as a serious and committed leader on development. The Deputy Prime Minister reiterated the UK's commitment to reaching 0.7% of GNI in aid from 2013 and challenged others to live up to their promises. Ban Ki Moon praised the UK's decision to spend 0.7% GNI on aid from 2013 and urged others to meet their commitments, arguing that "we must not balance the books on the backs of the poor".

  5.  The Summit resulted in real gains in the reallocation of existing budgets to the most off-track MDGs, especially maternal health—on which Ban Ki-moon had focused most of his effort with the launch of his Global Strategy for Women's and Children's Health, aimed at saving the lives of more than 16 million women and children.

  6.  Various ministerial participants remarked on the quality and seriousness of the policy debate between developed and developing countries, especially on health, education and nutrition. Also notable was the degree to which a growing number of developing country ministers were well-informed by economic analysis and independent evaluation of what works and what doesn't. Developing country commitments were also striking. Afghanistan and Yemen pledged to increase access to family planning and safe births and Nigeria committed to spend a share of oil revenues on healthcare. Significant new commitments also came from the private sector, charities and NGOs and international organisations.

  7.  UK pressed and secured an annual review mechanism through ECOSOC as part of the Summit's Outcome Document. Work is underway to record all of the policy and financial commitments, not just from governments, made at the Summit and there was a clear commitment from the Ban Ki-moon to ensure that all sides will be held accountable.

Role of the UK in delivering Summit outcomes

  8.  UK took up a leadership position throughout preparations for and during the Summit itself. Specific top UK objectives were:

    (i) To galvanise international partners (civil society, foundations, private sector and other governments) by championing the cause of international development, urging donor countries to deliver on their commitments and recipients to be accountable to their citizens for both the aid they receive and for the use of their own resources.

    (ii) To play a direct leadership role on the most off-track MDGs, announcing new outcome commitments on maternal and child health, malaria, and nutrition.

    (iii) To make the case for aid and development to the UK taxpayer, highlighting both the moral case and the argument that the UK's long term national interests will be best served in a prosperous and stable world.

  9.  The Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Minister and Secretary of State for International Development engaged in extensive lobbying with other governments, both donors and developing countries, as well as the private sector and foundations, in the months leading up to the Summit. The purpose of this was to galvanise momentum amongst partners, encourage world leaders to attend the Summit and secure specific commitments on UK priority areas.

  10.  UK emphasis on the need to demonstrate the results of aid was well received, by both developed and developing countries. There were a number of significant UK announcements, expressed in terms of the results we will help to achieve. Key messages included:

    (i) Doubling of the number of maternal, newborn and children's lives saved through UK aid. Over the next five years, this will save the lives of at least 50,000 more women in pregnancy and childbirth, and 250,000 more newborn babies, and enable 10 million more couples to access to family planning.

    (ii) UK will help halve the number of deaths caused by malaria in at least 10 African countries, through an increased focus on boosting prevention and treatment, backed by an increase in funding to as much as £500 million per year by 2014.

    (iii) UK support for the Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) "1,000 days" campaign launched at a side event co-hosted by Hilary Clinton.

  11.  The media coverage both in the UK and internationally was extensive and positive. The UK Governments key message on the MDGs and development more broadly were carried extensively in the tabloid and broadsheet press, and all major broadcast outlets. Social media such as facebook, twitter and mumsnet were also used to convey HMG messages to build support for development in the UK.

Role of the UN

  12.  UK encouraged the Secretary General, President of the General Assembly and other parts of the UN system to provide leadership and galvanise poltical momentum in the run-up to the Summit. The UK also seconded a development expert to the UN Secretary Generals office to support efforts on the Global Strategy for Women and Children's health.

  13.  The UN Secretary General made two main contributions to galvanising momentum: the first and most significant was his leadership on the Global Strategy for Maternal and Child Health, which secured over US$ 40 billion worth of commitments from partner countries, including the UK. The second was his establishment of the MDG Advocates Group, which the UK supported. The Advocates engaged in mobilizing global action to make the MDG Summit a turning point in our collective effort to achieve the Goals by the 2015 target date.

  14.  In the run up to the Summit and to help build the evidence base, UNDP produced the International Assessment of what is needed to meet the MDGs, an assessment carried out on evidence from over 50 country studies drawing out 8 principles for MDG achievement, which the UK and Canada supported and which significantly influenced the shape of the Summit's Outcome Document.

  15.  The President of the General Assembly and the co-facilitators Denmark and Senegal played a critical role in building consensus amongst donor countries and the G77 in order to reach timely agreement on the Summit's Outcome Document. The Outcome Document was formally adopted at the end of the Summit.

  16.  Our priority going forward will be to ensure the UN follows up on the commitments made both in the outcome document and at side events. Work is underway to record all of the policy and financial commitments, not just from governments, made at the Summit and there was a clear commitment from the Ban Ki-moon to ensure that all sides will be held accountable through ECOSOC.

  17.  The UK pressed and secured an annual review mechanism as part of the Summit's Outcome Document and will continue to make sure that the international community lives up its promises—as the UK will do.

Role of the European Commission

  18.  The EU agreed a joint position for the MDG Summit in June, advocating for an action agenda to be adopted at the Summit. The EU Commission subsequently led the coordination of the EU position in the negotiations on the Summit's outcome document in New York, during the Belgium Presidency.

  19.  During the Summit, Jose Manuel Barroso announced an MDG-Initiative—€1 billion of EDF unallocated funds to make progress on those goals we are furthest from achieving.

Role of the World Bank

  20.  At the GCE education event the World Bank announced an additional $750 million over the next five years, which represents a 40% increase in basic education lending directed at the 79 poorest countries which are off track. In sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, this will support innovative interventions such as girls' scholarships, conditional cash transfers, grants to schools.

Role of NGOs and civil society

  21.  UK civil society played a critical role in building political momentum behind and public support for the NGOs in the run-up to and during the Summit itself.

  22.  "Stand Up Against Poverty", an annual public rally organised by the Global Campaign Against Poverty, took place the week before the Summit in various locations around the world to raise public awareness of the MDGs and galvanise action at the political level.

  23.  The Deputy Prime Minister and the International Development Secretary attended an NGO event hosted by BOND and a British Youth Council event the week before the Summit to set out what they hoped to achieve and engage the views of key partners on what "success" would look like to them.

  24.  Both the Deputy Prime Minister and the International Development Secretary hosted meetings with NGOs during the Summit so that they could report back on progress and assess what else could be done to secure ambitious outcomes.

  25.  Save the Chlidren have funded a series of art installations throughout the world to raise awareness of MDGs 4&5. This project is ongoing and included an event at Grand Central Station, in New York on 20 September which the Secretary of State lent his support to.

  26.  At the Summit significant new commitments came from the private sector (Johnson & Johnson committed $200 million—one of many private sector contributions), foundations (Gates and others), civil society and international organisations.

  27.  Together with BRAC, Care, Save The Children and many other national and international NGOs, World Vision has made a combined commitment of more than five billion dollars between now and 2015.

  Role of developing countries

  28.  Unlike previous summits, there were significant new commitments by developing countries, including, for example: Tanzania's commitment to spend 15% of the national budget on health, and Liberia's promise to implement universal coverage of bed nets to combat malaria by the end of this year. Afghanistan and Yemen pledged to increase access to family planning and safe births and Nigeria committed to spend a share of oil revenues on healthcare.

LOOKING AHEAD TO AFTER THE MDG DEADLINE OF 2015

  29.  DFID has been clear that the focus should remain on accelerating progress against the current framework over the next five years. This was clearly our primary objective in New York. However, we recognise that the current MDGs were the product of a long and complex process of lesson learning, consensus building and negotiation. It is therefore important that we start to look now at what will come after the MDGs in 2015.

  30.  At the close of the Summit the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon announced his intention to initiate a consultation process on what would come after the MDGs post 2015. The UK will play a full part in these discussions.

Department for International Development

October 2010





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 19 December 2010