Department for International Development Annual Report & Resource Accounts - International Development Committee Contents


Written evidence submitted by Christian Solidarity Worldwide - Nepal

INTRODUCTION

1.  This submission to the International Development Committee is in response to their inquiry on DfID's work in 2009-10. It focuses on Nepal wherein Christian Solidarity Worldwide (CSW) has two specific areas of concern. First, CSW has for fifteen years been closely involved in an educational project, in the construction and development of a new all-age school in Hetauda. During this period, CSW has been concerned with educational disadvantages caused not only by the caste system and disparities in family wealth, but by the status of girls and women in Nepali society. Second, CSW is also concerned with progress towards a new constitution in Nepal, which complies fully with the provisions of the international human rights conventions to which Nepal is a State Party.

PROGRESS TOWARDS MDG 2

2.  Providing uplift to the poor and the most socially-excluded is essential to Department for International Development (DfID) work. In its response to "Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 2", DfID rightly includes the need to provide good educational opportunities to Dalits, and particularly Dalit girls.

3.  This is something which the Solidarity International Academy, a high-quality independent school at Hetauda, has been doing for fifteen years, with equal numbers of free places for Dalit and tribal boys and girls for up to 400 children at any one time. At least 100 of these children are boarders who come from poor rural villages in the Terai, and would never have such opportunities. All independent schools in Nepal are expected to give at least 2% free places to children in need, but the academy gives 30%.

4.  This is Commended as a Higher Target to which DfID Subsidies Could Aspire.

PROGRESS TOWARDS MDG 3

5.  MDG 3 aims to promote gender equality and empower women, and, in particular, to "Eliminate gender disparity in primary and secondary education… and at all levels of education by 2015." The indicators by which progress is to be judged are:

  1. ·  Ratios of girls to boys in primary, secondary and tertiary education;
  2. ·  Share of women in wage employment in the non-agricultural sector;
  3. ·  The proportion of seats held by women in national parliament.

6.  Although progress at a national level in women's status has been given a huge boost by the electoral system which has resulted in 33% of the seats in the Constituent Assembly being filled by women, progress for women in other spheres has been painfully slow.

7.  DfID is committed to promoting gender equality in Nepal. However, the Annual Report makes no mention of secondary education, where the proportion of girls entering and continuing in secondary education still lags behind boys. Recent evidence from practitioners working in the field is consistent with the Nepal Demographic and Health Survey in 2006, which showed 45.7% of boys were attending secondary schooling compared to 37.8% of girls, and with UNESCO statistics from 2007, which showed the ratio of boys to girls as 29% to 25%. While statistics reported for primary education are clearly an improvement on statistics from earlier years, the discrepancy between boys and girls in education stubbornly remains throughout the age ranges. It is consistently asserted by Nepali educationalists that, in a family with both boys and girls, priority will always be given to a boy's education, and if family income is a problem, girls are less likely to be allowed to stay on into secondary schooling.

8.  It is not yet clear that DfID funding of state education in Nepal has had a distinct impact on the continuing imbalance in boys and girls in secondary education, nor whether DfID has a clear plan to address such gender inequalities. These questions merit Parliamentary scrutiny.

9.  There is also an unaddressed problem in Nepal of access to quality education for girls from poor and "low"-caste backgrounds. The previous United Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) Minister for Women and Girls, Pampha Bhusal, suggested that a rapid boost to the position of women might arise from a special pilot initiative (which could be seen as a scholarship scheme) for able girls from the "lowest" caste backgrounds, by which girls' hostels were established in ten suitable independent schools, by which 1,000 girls might be given a strong education to higher secondary level. Although this could be regarded as a selective system, the fact that it was suggested by a member of the UCPN (Maoist) might commend it as a practicable solution to the absence of well-qualified women from the socio-economically weakest sections of Nepali society, and so help to promote an inclusive society from which no persons are excluded by virtue of their class or caste origin.

10.  DfID might consider supplementing its support for state education with additional measures to provide educational opportunities to girls from the Dalit and tribal populations which make up a significant proportion of Nepal's population.

SUPPORTING THE CONSTITUTION-DRAFTING PROCESS

11.  There is no mention in the Annual Report of DfID's contributions to the successful promulgation of a new constitution in Nepal. This process is being supported by the British Embassy and EU Missions. However, DfID could have a stronger role in supporting grassroots awareness of human rights. This would help to make protections of human rights as meaningful as possible.

12.  It has been CSW's experience that the activities of the BBC World Service Trust in producing and broadcasting radio and television programmes on elements of the constitution have proven valuable.

13.  The further development of human rights education amongst civil society could be supported by DfID, and there are numerous civil society groups capable of implementing such education, if they were to receive the requisite funding.

SUPPORTING SECULAR DEMOCRACY

14.  Nepal's transition from a Hindu monarchy to a secular republic requires strong institutions to support and protect religious pluralism. Religiously-motivated violence and discrimination remains commonplace across south Asia. This is why the Inter-Religious Council has an important role in Nepal, which has been officially recognized by the government, but it has not been officially funded.

15.  The protection of freedom of religion or belief in the new constitution has been strongly supported by the FCO. However, if this freedom is to be implemented, institutions such as the Inter-Religious Council require the resources to be effective and influential.

16.  In a country where religious plurality and tolerance has yet to be firmly established, what support can DfID offer in future to help this inter-religious co-operation element, so vital to a stable and pluralist democracy?

September 2010



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 3 February 2011