Government's proposed reform of legal aid - Justice Committee Contents


Supplementary evidence from the Ministry of Justice (AJ 61)

TRENDS IN LEGAL AID EXPENDITURE 2000-01 TO 2009-10

Overall expenditure

1.1  In the period from 2000/01 to 2009/10, expenditure on legal aid rose by almost 3% in real terms. While the cost of civil legal aid has gone down by 6% the cost of criminal legal aid has risen by 9%.
£m cash (at 2009-10 prices) 2000-012001-02 2002-032003-04 2004-052005-06 2006-072007-08 2008-092009-10
Civil998905 9721,044956 923869882 928941
Criminal1,1011,211 1,3101,3701,348 1,3301,2581,232 1,2071,205
Total Legal aid2,099 2,1172,282 2,4142,3042,253 2,1282,114 2,1352,146

1.2  As can be seen from the above table, expenditure peaked around 2003/04, and having fallen back has been broadly flat in the last four years.

1.3  In 2000-01, civil and family legal aid comprised 48% of expenditure. In the intervening years the proportion of expenditure on criminal legal aid increased significantly so that by 2007-08 it comprised 48% of spend, thereby reducing civil legal aid to 42%. However, in the last two years the balance has again shifted so that it now consumes almost 44% of the legal aid budget.

CIVIL AND FAMILY LEGAL AID

2.1  Figure 1 below shows that in real terms expenditure on civil representation has declined by around 10%, mainly as a result of a reduction in scope (the Access to Justice Act 1999 removed personal injury and other money claims). However, in the last three years there has been an 8.3% increase, mainly from public law children cases where volumes have increased significantly in the wake of the Baby Peter case. Legal Help has risen by almost 19% in the last year where we have seen increased demand in areas such as housing, debt, employment and welfare benefits driven by the recession. Spending on immigration has been flat since 2006/07 as volumes continued to fall.

Figure 1

£m cash (at 2009-10 prices) 2000-012001-02 2002-032003-04 2004-052005-06 2006-072007-08 2008-092009-10
Civil Rep706587 577597554 608589610 661639
Legal Help182170 194219208 202193182 179213
Immigration110148 201228193 1138790 8889
Total Civil (CLS)998 905972 1,044956923 869882 928941

2.2  The large increase seen in social welfare law categories in recent years (Debt, Housing, Employment and Welfare Benefits) have been driven by the recession, where the previous Government was keen to ensure the provision of early advice. The increase in family expenditure in the last three years was primarily due to growth in both volumes and costs per case in public law children cases (volumes up 33% since 2008-09 from 30k to 40k per annum, as a result of the Baby Peter case); costs per case remain relatively high (c £10k) and taken together these have exerted a pressure of around £100m per annum. The decline in immigration spend, despite an increase in volume, reflects a shift from more expensive asylum cases to cheaper immigration and nationality cases. Although volumes of Mental Health cases have risen sharply, expenditure has declined substantially as a result of the introduction of the new fees schemes in January 2008.

2.3  MoJ and LSC have no evidence of increasing complexity being a cost driver on the civil and family side. For example, the LSC care proceedings file review (December 2008) did not show a strong link between factors said to be driving complexity in care cases (such as parents under 25, multiple local authority involvement, child born during proceedings) and case costs. More generally, when most cases are covered by fixed fees, as they are in the majority of civil and family work, it is numbers of cases that drive expenditure.

CRIMINAL LEGAL AID

3.1  Figure 2 shows that there has been, in real terms, a marked shift from Crime Lower (down 6%) to Crime Higher (up 9%)

Figure 2

£m cash (at 2009-10 prices) 2000-012001-02 2002-032003-04 2004-052005-06 2006-072007-08 2008-092009-10
Crime Higher532585 680750771 773690723 712734
Crime Lower569627 630621577 556568509 495471
Total Criminal (CDS)1,101 1,2111,310 1,3701,3481,330 1,2581,232 1,2071,205

3.2  Expenditure on VHCCs peaked at £125 million in 2007-08, but has now stabilised at c £98 million.

3.3  Since 2006, there have been some significant shifts in the workloads of the Crown Court and magistrates' courts:

  • the number of cases received for trial in the Crown Court increased by over 26% (around 20,000 cases), to 98,000 cases. The majority of the increase is accounted for by either way cases committed for trial, which increased by 15,750, or 33%. The increase in the volume of indictable only cases was 4,400, or 14%; in contrast, the number of defendants proceeded against in the magistrates' courts fell by 13% between 2007 and 2009; and
  • the proportion of Crown Court cases that resulted in a plea of guilty also rose by 35% between 2006 and 2009. The average overall expenditure on guilty pleas and cracked trials within the Advocates' Graduated Fee Scheme (AGFS) has increased by 103% and 67% respectively since 2007, taking into account changes in the volume of cases.

3.4  As discussed in the Consultation Paper on Legal Aid Reform:

  • While there are likely to be a number of factors behind these trends, it is notable that almost 60% (around 39,000) of defendants in either way cases sentenced in the Crown Court received a sentence on conviction that a magistrates' court could have imposed. This suggests that although more cases are being committed to the Crown Court, it is not necessarily more serious work, and most could appropriately have been dealt with in the magistrates' courts.
  • In 2008-09, 63,000 either way cases were committed for trial in the Crown Court. Of those cases, nearly three quarters (73%) entered a guilty plea at an average total cost of both litigation and advocacy of over £1,700 (for guilty pleas) or just over £3,200 (for cracked trials). In comparison, MoJ has estimated that the average fees available for all either way cracked trials and guilty pleas in the magistrates' court is around £295 (excluding VAT and disbursements). There has therefore been a significant cost to the legal aid fund in cases which might more efficiently have been handled in the magistrates' courts.

3.5  It has been argued that the complexity of criminal cases has increased in recent years for several reasons. For example, it has been suggested that changes to criminal justice legislation (eg on hearsay and bad character) have increased the time that cases take to pass through the court system and created additional avenues of appeal. In addition, changes in digital technology have seen the amount of evidence in criminal cases increase. For example, between 2004-05 and 2010-11 the average page count in Crown Court trials increased by 65%.

KEY POLICY CHANGES

4.1  A number of initiatives aimed at reducing costs have been implemented in recent years. These include:

  • The introduction and gradual extension of Crown Court Advocates' Graduated Fees, first introduced in 2001, extended to cracks and guilty please in 2005 and revised in 2007.
  • Putting all VHCCs under individual case contracts from 2004-05.
  • Re-introduction of means testing in magistrates' courts 2006-07.
  • Introduction of civil and family fixed fees and revised Magistrates' Court standard fees in 2007.
  • Introduction of Crown Court Litigators' Fees and new Police Station Duty Solicitor Fees in 2008.
  • Re-introduction of Crown Court Means Testing April to June 2010.
  • Extension of Advocates Graduated Fees Scheme to encompass cases of up to 60 days duration July 2010.

February 2011


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 30 March 2011