Constitutional implications of the Cabinet Manual - Political and Constitutional Reform Committee Contents


6  Conclusion

91. In publishing the draft Cabinet Manual, the Cabinet Secretary wrote:

    Where there is doubt or disagreement, we hope consultation will help clarify the position and achieve a common understanding.[122]

92. Our inquiry has revealed a fair measure of doubt and disagreement about the purpose and content of the draft Cabinet Manual. The next version of the Manual should be considerably improved as a result of the consultation that has been undertaken, and as a result of parliamentary scrutiny. It need not be perfect, however, provided that there are future opportunities to refine it, as it has been refined in New Zealand over the years.

93. We welcome the Cabinet Manual and the transparency it brings to the workings of government, and we look forward to future involvement in its development.


122   Draft Cabinet Manual, Foreword Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 29 March 2011