Postal Services in Scotland - Scottish Affairs Committee Contents


Written evidence from James Hall

Until I retired, I was the Operation Controller in the Scottish Region and the operation and future of all our services, particularly in rural areas, were some of my main concerns. I therefore believe that I can reasonably submit myself as an expert contributor, with a wide understanding of all the factors which need to be met to retain a good, acceptable service all round. I have set out my thoughts in accordance with the list you issued.

DEMAND AND HOW IT MIGHT VARY

The postal service ie the Letter and parcel services jointly, can reasonably be classed as essential—much immediate material, letters and parcels, is conveyed, while in rural areas, mail is the prime contact with the rest of the country.

There will always be changes, as there have been since its inception, but competition, such as telegraph, telegrams, the telephone, telex and mobile phones have been overcome. The service is flexible and can, as before, always introduce change as needed. The biggest danger now starting to be mentioned would be loss of Universal Pricing, which would escalate prices in the remote parts to the extent of virtually killing the postal service and with it a great swathe of the rural population. The wrongly structured, wrongly introduced "competition" is the real danger in this respect as at present there is no way that Royal Mail can avoid making a huge loss with this mail. However, if this can be corrected, as it MUST, then traffic should not vary greatly, especially if RM markets its wares as it now appears to be doing brightly under its new head.

HOW RANGE OF SERVICES COULD BE EXPANDED

The Luff Committee made a number of excellent suggestions in respect of Counter services. Regrettably, however, the recommendation made that ALL government departments should urgently seek and introduce services using the Post Office to meet their needs, does not seem to have produced much response. For instance, National Savings display marketing literature at all PO counters but never mention this in the hugely expensive advertising they use on Classic FM radio station. This sensible Committee recommendation MUST be chased up and action taken.

There are indeed many government services which could be offered but the government had already moved some away eg Television Licences; this plus the associated enquiry work to find non-payers was a good source of funds.

There are certainly many services which could be operated for local authorities, eg collection of rents and Council Tax, especially in country areas.

There are already several elements of banking, including a PO Bank, run by Bank of Ireland. Is this really the best we can do, given the financial problems in Ireland at present? When I was a lad, the PO Savings Bank was a very popular way of teaching children about money. One's own PO Savings Bank book was greatly used and we learned a lot about money. This could be resurrected.

Much of the confusion about how to help seems to come from a misunderstanding about the real purpose of the Counter Network. It is not there as a chain of shops—its prime task is to be the point of access for the public to the two mail services. It is for this reason that it has for a long time been directly a part of the single PO structure, its costs absorbed in the mail receipts. It is to the credit of past generations of postal managers that they set out, and succeeded, to attract, as you are trying to do now, subsidiary services which could help meet the costs of this network, so highly praised in the Luff Report.

So far as the mail services are concerned, it now appears that the new management are alive to the need to maintain good levels of traffic and a number of new ideas are now being introduced.

One service, now floundering, with which I was closely involved—it was almost completely confined to Scotland—was the Postbus service in rural areas. I was in at the beginning of this conversion of our delivery vehicles into passenger carriers. These ranged from mini-buses to small estate cars and four-wheel drive cars. They were very popular locally, but also more widely spread—a considerable number of visitors visited places where they operated and were charmed by the really wonderful scenery they could see from the bus which visited so many places off the beaten track. Many drivers built up a range of tales about their area—I know they were not always strictly accurate…!

The finances of these services were sound. For any service to be upgraded, we simply costed the van service and the replacement bus service and asked the Council to pay the difference. They each had a commitment to provide transport in all areas and were glad to join with us. At one time, there were nearly 200 Postbuses running in Scotland. Since the division of the services, the RM people have been less enamoured with this service and a high percentage have now been ceased despite much local complaint.

We also introduced a local service which we called "Rural Parcels". This carried items which were not normal parcels. Local shops could send unsealed boxes of groceries, TV sets were taken to a local engineer for repair, similarly shoes, etc. There was no set price, but we set out a list of acceptable charges and let local managers, then called Head Postmasters, to fix a price similar to our suggestion. We made regular visits to every "Head Post Office" for general liaison and audit and the income form this service was checked (a matter of a few minutes)-- we never found any significant deviation from our suggested pricing. In some places this service was a godsend. In Lewis where the famous tweed is woven in local cottages, we replaced the van which made weekly visits to the weavers with this service on a daily basis. This greatly speeded up the work and proved to be a major factor in helping to save the product which was then in a bit of financial difficulty. Thought might be given to restoring this service, which was quickly withdrawn on the introduction of the bean-counters of the present regime.

ROLE OF SUB -OFFICES

I have really covered this above. A Counter should be located wherever there are sufficient people needing the service for information about mails. Also, now, since pension payments are widely collected at Post Offices, there should be an office wherever this traffic justifies it.

For mails, a sub-office should exist to locate one or more postmen(full- or part-time), when the amount of mail—letters and parcels—justifies them. The sub-postmaster will be in charge of them.

UNIVERSAL SERVICE

I have already mentioned the dire effect of any reduction or removal of the Universal postage rate. The cost of letters and parcels would soar to a level totally outside the means of the population, except, perhaps any wealthy people residing in large Lodges or mansions. We could close the Post Office entirely then, to the great detriment of the entire population. The effect would be worse than the much-maligned Highland Clearances. I cannot imagine that any government would be so stupid as to cease this essential factor.

COMMUNITY OR MUTUALLY-OWNED POST OFFICE

This thought goes back to the recognition of the essential organisation of the Post Office as a whole. Concerning sub-offices alone, then I can assure you that it would have absolutely no effect whatever, since we have had sub-post offices of that very sort in many places, usually tiny villages or clachans. There have also been other venues eg in visitable stately homes where the shop is a sub-office, or in police stations when there has been no candidate for a postmaster vacancy. This is not a serious problem.

PARCELFORCE IN REMOTE AREAS.

Again, this comes back to the organisation of the PO as a whole. The separation of Parcels from Letters was a poor and costly move. Before that split, the two services ran in parallel with maximum use of common accommodation, transport and staff. So the simple answer to this query is simply that parcels should be sent, along with letters to a sub-office to be delivered by the same van (or Postbus?). This is not a major problem.

IMPACT OF POSTAL SERVICES IN SCOTLAND ON BUSINESS

The short answer is "exactly the same as it has been in England." Although clock-times might vary eg some mail from Devon might be delivered later in Aberdeen than in Truro, users soon adapt to the timetable as it affects them.

WIDER ECONOMIC IMPACT OF POSTAL SERVICE ON RURAL AREAS.

There probably is a greater impact on rural areas in Scotland than in some other parts of the UK, because of the distances involved, a lot of mail does not arrive until 12-24 hours after a similar in the Home Counties for example. It is the case, however, that people have become used to this difference and adapt their practices, indeed their whole life-style, to the difference, of which they are all very well aware.

13 December 2010


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 9 January 2011