Written evidence submitted by Bob Critcholow
(UEA Reviews 05)
I have been following the actions of this committee
in the hopes that there would be a proper investigation into Climategate
and it appears that the committee wants to sweep the issue under
the rug. Where is the scientific consensus? There is none and
a lot of the work cannot be replicated. You should know that by
dragging your feet the public will never believe you. Were emails
destroyed from UEA? The answer is we don't know since there was
investigation into that. Did the "so called" scientists
interfere with Peer Review? The answer is quite obvious when they
said in the emails they would redefine what peer review was. Are
we just supposed to sit back pay more money than is necessary
on a science that can't be proven and some of the "so called"
scientists wish to have their research remain in the dark. The
public will continue to fight you until you wake up and smell
the coffee and realize there must be real investigation done.
None of the crap we have seen thus far. You have completely wasted
the people's time. I'm not paying out money to help the third
world countries. I'm on a limited income and be damned if I'll
see politics and science get into bed with each other. You will
simply have to wake up and do a proper investigation none have
done anything thus far to make the public agree with the climate
wackos. Climate does change, but since they can't predict weather,
then how are they going to predict climate? They can't.
Bob Critcholow
September 2010
|
