The UK Space Agency - Science and Technology Committee Contents


Memorandum submitted by Andy Green (UKSA 01)

1.THE SPACE INNOVATION AND GROWTH STRATEGY

  This input is written from my perspective of Chair of the Executive Steering Committee of the Space Innovation and Growth Strategy 2010 and subsequently co-chair of the Space Leadership Council.

2.  INTRODUCTION

  In June 2009 the Minister for State for Science Defence and Innovation requested the sector to form an Innovation and Growth Team to produce a plan for growth for Space covering the forthcoming 20 years.

The sector responded with over 200 experts from Industry, Academia and Government contributing to a short but intense eight month activity delivering a progressive vision of the growth possible within the UK. In parallel there was a BIS Ecomics report which confirmed that the sector was growing at around 9% per year, which it has done all through the recession.

  In the Strategy we identified that Space has been one of the hidden success stories of British industry over the past few decades. In 2007, it generated revenues of £5.9 billion in the UK, of which £2.8 billion contributed directly to the nation's Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The sector also accounted for 19,100 jobs as a direct result of its activities, with employee productivity more than four times the national average. It consequently contributes some £145,000 per worker to UK GDP. The overall world market for the Space industry is likely to grow from £160 billion in 2008 to at least £400 billion by 2030—a 5% annual growth rate in constant 2007 values.

  Our strategy was to set ourselves a clear challenge to firmly establish the UK as one of the World's leading Space nations and grow the UK's share of the global market to 10% over the next 20 years. This drives Space in the UK from a £6 billion to a £40 billion sector and will produce 100,000 new jobs. We will not achieve this overnight, and the scale of the investment needed to achieve this will only be manageable if it is selective. But, what we need to do now is set a trajectory for growth and it is vital that we create the right business support environment and seize the market opportunities to deliver the national benefits.

  We are at a crossroads in terms of the strategic direction for the UK. The UK's share of the world Space market in 2007 was around 6%. This substantial figure is about twice the size of many other major UK industrial sectors, but less than that of our leading industries. However, if we take a positive decision to go for growth, we can raise the market share significantly. But, if we fail to step up our efforts there is a strong likelihood that the sector will slide back to around the 3% mark.

  Our Strategy identified 16 recommendations:

    1. Develop a National Space Policy.

    2. Ensure the UK Space Agency is sufficiently resourced and empowered to drive economic and social benefits from Space.

    3. Develop a National Space Technology Strategy.

    4. Ensure credit is available for satellite procurement and launch.

    5. Procure a sovereign Earth Observation (EO) capability.

    6. Take a leadership role in climate-change monitoring, mitigation and agreement verification.

    7. Develop Space as a complementary ICT infrastructure to fibre-optic and wireless superfast broadband.

    8. Use Space capabilities to help achieve UK CO2 emissions reductions from ICT systems.

    9. Reflect Space capabilities in future defence/security planning.

    10. Promote Space in future UK/EU emergency mobile networks.

    11. Secure sufficient future satellite radio frequency spectrum and orbital slots.

    12. Train the next generation of Space engineers and scientists and promote STEM subjects in schools, colleges and businesses.

    13. Initiate and lead three Space exploration or science missions by 2030.

    14. Establish a hub and spoke model for Space in the UK, and an International Space Innovation Centre at Harwell.

    15. Invest earlier, and more consistently, in ESA programmes.

    16. Establish a Space Leadership Council to implement this strategy.

3.  RECOMMENDATION 2 RELATED TO THE UK SPACE AGENCY

  The Strategy recommended that:

The UK Space Agency (UKSA), when established, should be resourced and empowered to maximise the growth opportunities for the UK Space sector. It should lead on all UK Space-related activities including national and international negotiations and delivery of the National Space Policy. It should have a remit including civil, defence and security Space domains.

  The UK Space Agency (UKSA), which will replace the British National Space Centre (BNSC), should provide the mechanism for delivering a National Space Policy that maximises opportunities for the UK Space sector. It is therefore absolutely vital that it is sufficiently resourced and empowered, as a lack of these vital elements resulted in the BNSC's inability to fully achieve this goal. The UK Space Agency should aim to develop itself into an organisation capable of being a champion for the UK's Space industry both at home and internationally, and in terms of functions it should:

    — be empowered to lead on all Space-related activities for the UK in national and multinational negotiations and in prioritising programmes;

    — have a broad remit which includes civil, defence and security requirements, particularly where these will develop crosscutting technologies and applications;

    — be responsible for the administration of a national Space budget and provide the backing for the UK to lead national and multi-national programmes;

    — be responsible for procuring Space and Space-related programmes wherever the procurement budget is held within Government; and

    — promote the UK's Space sector.

4.  SPECIFIC QUESTIONS RAISED BY THE SELECT COMMITTEE

1.   What progress has been made in setting up the UK Space Agency?

  Although I am aware that there are changes being planned there is no external communication of what they are and so it is difficult to answer if any progress has been made. From a position of being external to the Agency and indeed Government, I can only say the perception is that the team involved, and the method of working, appears to have changed very little and therefore the Agency has been unable to raise its game to that expected.

In the Space Leadership council, which I co-chair, an action was raised at the last meeting (in July) for the Acting CEO to report to subsequent SLC meetings the progress being made in the development of the new Agency, the next meeting is on the 14 October when a first report to the SLC will be made.

One of the recommendations in the IGS, recommendation 2, refers to strengthening the agency and asks industry to support. Industry has responded by seconding three senior people to the agency to work on the IGS implementation. Any wider involvement or assistance from industry will not be possible until there is an ability to discuss the proposed organisation and gaps in the skills of the Agency. This dialogue has been planned for the autumn at UKSA's request.

  One particular divergence of the UKSA from the IGS requested perimeter is that there appears no intention for the UKSA to have any responsibility for the MOD/Security side and the rhetoric appears to continue to only talk about a Civil space responsibility.

2.   How does the UK Space Agency work with other bodies (national and international) on space issues?

  It is expected that the UKSA will be the government body able to work closely with all other Government bodies, both nationally and internationally. It is expected the UKSA will use these links to promote the sector and continually explore how the sector can address the social and policy needs of the country and give international leadership.

In order to be able to fully represent the sector it will be important that the staff are recognised as experts that all other Government departments accept the UKSA to operate on their behalf, therefore it should be incumbent on the Government or Agency to do surveys to confirm this.

3.   Is the UK Space Agency more effective at coordinating space policy than its predecessor, the British National Space Centre?

  This is the IGS vision of the future, not only will it co-ordinate but it will lead and steer the policy. In this way it should deliver smarter Government, save funds, and address some of our social problems of the future whilst building an export led sector to grow to a £40 billion annual revenue by 2030.

It is inconceivable that this would happen overnight but the plans to enable this should be discussed.

4.   What should the UK Space Agency's priorities be for the next five years?

  Achieving growth and delivering economic wealth should be its focus. To achieve this will require a technically competent and articulate team able to convince other government departments to be flexible in their approach to encourage and allow the UK space sector to be first to market and therefore capture the export growth, also, when dealing internationally to be able to convince other countries who perhaps spend more than us in space to let the UK take a leading position.

The IGS recommendations identified above give a good start to the priorities.

5.   Is the UK Space Agency adequately funded?

  Until the CSR outcome is known, we do not know the answer to this. But achieving the growth goal to 10% of a growing world-wide market will require a huge commitment and substantial increases in investment from everyone: companies, financial institutions, and the public sector. It will require a major uplift in UK funding for Space-related programmes and technologies to enable the UK to maintain its competitiveness in commercial, institutional and exploration capabilities. Most importantly, the UK must maximise the economic and social benefits from its funding. It is unrealistic to believe that the UK can achieve its growth goal without this increase in public sector investment. Therefore the IGS proposed that the Government plan a doubling of UK spend, in real terms, including national programmes, over the next 10 years. This would raise the UK from its worldwide current position of 21st to 10th in Space funding as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

The sector fully recognises that this will be a slow trajectory of increase whist the current deficit is addressed, but we are at a crossroads in terms of the strategic direction for the UK. The UK's share of the world Space market in 2007 was around 6%. This substantial figure is about twice the size of many other major UK industrial sectors, but less than that of our leading industries. However, if we take a positive decision to go for growth, we can raise the market share significantly. But, if we fail to step up our efforts there is a strong likelihood that the sector will slide back to around the 3% mark.

Andy Green

August 2010





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 22 November 2010