Technology and Innovation Centres - Science and Technology Committee Contents


Written evidence submitted by the University of Edinburgh (TIC 32)

INTRODUCTION

i.  We are pleased to participate in this important process and to comment on the Fraunhofer model and its relevance to research in the UK. We believe that, as one of the leading research-intensive Universities in the UK with a long heritage and exceptional track record in commercialisation, the University of Edinburgh is well placed to comment on these issues. In 1969, the University of Edinburgh recognised that it needed to formalise the way it transfers new discoveries into industry to ensure that society can benefit, and hence established the Centre for Industrial Consultancy and Liaison, now known as Edinburgh Research and Innovation, to promote and encourage collaborations with industry. In the past 40 years, there has been an accelerating pace of scientific research underway at the University with significant technology discoveries that have been translated from the laboratory into industry.

ii.  The University of Edinburgh can lay claim to a notable series of research and innovation "firsts" during the past 40 years. These achievements have all made a major impact on the industrial world:

  1. The first automated industrial assembly robot
  2. The first genetically engineered vaccine against Hepatitis B, still being used to save lives to this day
  3. The first miniature digital camera which led to mobile camera phones.
  4. The first prototype sensor-assisted "SMART" wheelchair for children with severe and multiple disabilities - developed in 1987 by Paul Nisbet in the Communication And Language Learning (CALL) Centre.
  5. The largest ever spin-out from a Scottish university - MTEM Ltd which raised initial funding of £7.4M and was subsequently sold for $275M to PGS Ltd.

iii.  One of the highlights of the University of Edinburgh's commercialisation activities has been the creation of new companies, and in the past 40 years over 200 new companies and businesses have been formed by the University, including a record total of 40 new companies in 2009/10.

iv.  In its annual survey comparing the exploitation performance of Scottish Universities against US Universities, the University of Edinburgh regularly outperforms key US universities when comparing key commercialisation statistics (including numbers of companies formed and numbers of licences concluded, per $M of research income received[36]).

RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS

1.  What is the Fraunhofer model and would it be applicable to the UK?

1.1  We welcome the UK Government's initiative in allocating a substantial sum of money to the development of Technology Innovation Centres, and are keen to be involved in any trial of this or a related concept in Scotland. Nonetheless, the research landscape of the UK is quite distinct from that of Germany and a simplistic translation of the Fraunhofer model to the UK might be unwise. In Germany, universities focus on higher education and basic research, and Fraunhofer Institutes undertake applied R&D and provide technology development services. In addition, Helmholtz Research Centres focus on long-term strategic research on issues of national importance in areas such as energy, health, space, transport and the environment, and Max Planck institutes focus on specific areas of cutting-edge interdisciplinary research and large-scale research facilities.

1.2  In the UK we have a system that has the major research intensive Universities, of which Edinburgh is one, with a growing culture of spin-outs and start-up companies. It is an expansion of this process and the appropriate development of discovery science to a state that can be readily adopted by industry that is required. It is therefore possible for Scotland and the UK to build on and adapt, rather than simply adopt, the Fraunhofer concept, perhaps in a more integrated and agile way.

2.  Are there existing Fraunhofer-type research centres within the UK, and if so, are they effective?

2.1  In the UK while there are no specific Fraunhofer institutes there are a variety of specialist research centres more generally within the Universities. Indeed, this embedding enables a strong connection between the staff doing the fundamental research and those developing the outputs into commercialisable propositions.

2.2  The University of Edinburgh hosts a number of research centres which embody characteristics of Fraunhofer research centres, in that they undertake fundamental research as well as applied and collaborative research with business partners, support technology development, as well as providing incubators for spin-out companies and small high-tech start-ups. Below are examples of centres that have been particularly effective in working with industry:

Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh

  1. 2.2.1  The MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine (MRC-CRM) at the University of Edinburgh brings together world-leading basic stem cell research with established clinical excellence aimed at developing new treatments for major diseases including cancer, heart disease, diabetes, degenerative diseases such as multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's disease, and liver failure. The centre stands next door to Edinburgh's new teaching hospital (the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh) providing the perfect basis for "bench-to-bedside" translational development.
  2. 2.2.2  The MRC-CRM is committed to building both strong industrial collaborative links, specifically companies who are seeking to develop technologies in any area of stem cell biology and therapy, interested in derivation and GMP production of new stem cell lines or interested in the development and use of stem cells for drug screening. In addition, Edinburgh is home to two complimentary companies specialised in the GMP manufacture of stem cells, Roslin Cells and Angel Biotechnology, the latter of which recently manufactured the product for Reneuron's first fully regulated clinical trial of a neural stem cell therapy for stroke taking place in Scotland.
  3. 2.2.3  The Hauser Report intimated that stem cells and regenerative medicine was an obvious area where a UK TIC could lead the world. Scotland is currently ranked 1st in the world for citation impact of stem cell research; Edinburgh alone is 3rd.

Scottish MicroElectronics Centre (SMC)

  1. 2.2.4  The SMC is a world class Centre for Incubation, Research & Development in the semiconductor sector. A joint venture between the University of Edinburgh and Scottish Enterprise. The SMC provides a dynamic environment that links academia and hi-tech companies. This successful collaboration is at the leading edge of Scotland's semiconductor and MEMS activity. It aims is to provide a hothouse of companies and activity to supply the UK with a leading Centre of Excellence in the semiconductor field. The SMC delivers services in four key areas: Incubation, Analytical, Processing & Assembly.

Informatics - ProspeKT

  1. 2.2.5  The School of Informatics at the University of Edinburgh is the largest and arguably the best research grouping in the UK with worldwide alliances with Stanford, MIT and Cambridge in entrepreneurial education. The commercialisation and Knowledge Transfer effort within Informatics has been reinforced through a partnership with Scottish Enterprise in the ProspeKT Programme. ProspeKT ensures that the research delivers value to major IT companies as well as generating spin-outs and start ups and seeks to deliver a complete innovation ecosystem.
  2. 2.2.6  The ProspeKT programme offers support in commercialisation through a dedicated support team and has delivered the creation of 33 start up companies over a four year period with a total investment of £11 Million.

Edinburgh BioQuarter (EBQ) - Translational Medicine

  1. 2.2.7  Translational medicine is not a speciality, but rather a way of approaching science to speed translation of medical knowledge to health and wealth gain. It has yet to be adopted widely by academics and companies in practice, but represents the current best approach to Cooksey's first "translational gap" that has bedevilled successful drug development in pharma/biotech. The US Government is expected imminently (Dec 2010) to announce investment of around $1 billion in developing major centres in translational medicine to address this. EBQ provides an ideal infrastructure that drives translation of products from the laboratory bench to the clinic ("bench-to-bedside"). Specifically it affords the near unique combination of a major acute teaching hospital, new medical school, massive interdisciplinary research institutes and commecial incubator and development space on a single cohesive integrated campus. In addition, mindset and approach are equally important as there is considerable commonality of process for translation between organ-based specialities. EBQ is designed with these goals in mind and in this respect, can function as a showcase, or centre of excellence driving best practices.
  2. 2.2.8  EBQ has built a commercial management team with over 100 years of pharmaceutical and biotechnology company experience between them. This team is on hand to help bridge that gap between academic research and development of commercial clinical products. As well as helping to commercialise technology coming out of EBQ, this team is also actively courting industry to accelerate the commercialisation process. EBQ has already attracted major venture and private capital to support its efforts (>£12m) EBQ expects to spin-out 11 companies over the next two years.

3.  What other models are there for research centres oriented toward applications and results?

3.1  There is no one-size-fits-all model for such centres; consequently it is clear that for any model to be successful flexibility will be key. This flexibility should allow for a variety of structures, for example a hub and spoke model that acknowledges regional strengths and exploits the strengths of multiple Universities as well as those associated with a single University; in areas where the UK has no significant indigenous strength but where we have potential to grow significant businesses as well as those areas where the UK has companies of scale.

3.2  While connectivity with Universities that carry out world-class research is vital, such centres focus on translating such research through to application. They should not focus only upon today's industry but have an eye to what comes beyond. It should be a requirement that innovation centres promulgate the mechanisms used by them in the transfer of innovation.

3.3  It is necessary that such centres be located in proximity to and be connected with established world standard academic groups which have sufficient scale to grow and support such completely new structures and can provide the necessary well trained human capital.

3.4  Strong partnerships with both international Universities, research centres and companies, which acknowledge the existence of the UK in the global economy, will be necessary to ensure successful centres. In this respect, the development in Scotland of the various research pools, and their particular shift into knowledge exchange and engagement activities in the most recent phase, show a strong record of success.

4.  Whose role should it be to coordinate research in a UK-wide network of innovation centres?

4.1  It is clear that appropriate mechanisms for the inputs of both public and private organisations will be necessary. This input should not constrain the flexibility that will be required for these centres to be autonomous or require unnecessary and duplicate reporting. There are two aspects to co-ordination.

  1. 4.1.1  Co-ordination nationally across all such centres.

It is clear that Technology Strategy Board is the appropriate body to provide this level of co-ordination in collaboration with agencies such as RCUK, OSCHR and Scottish Enterprise as required. This co-ordination will also need to take account of the major research intensive Universities who have considerable strength and experience in delivering innovation from their research base.

  1. 4.1.2  Co-ordination within a centre.

The co-ordination within a centre is the responsibility of the management of the centre with oversight from appropriate partners, both public and private.

5.  What effect would the introduction of Fraunhofer-type institutes have on the work of Public Sector Research Establishments and other existing research centres that undertake Government sponsored research?

5.1  There are a variety of existing centres within the UK which are in general publicly funded and which often have a focus on fundamental research. As such they have strong links with existing research-intensive Universities. Where appropriate these centres will clearly be an integral part of innovation centres. However, we should not seek to divert the primary purpose of such centres, which is to drive innovation and accelerate the commercialisation of fundamental research.

University of Edinburgh

1 December 2010



36   http://www.research-innovation.ed.ac.uk/information/Exploitation-Efficiency-Report-2009.pdf Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 17 February 2011