Technology and Innovation Centres - Science and Technology Committee Contents


Written evidence submitted by United Kingdom Science Park Association (UKSPA) (TIC 53)

1.  INTRODUCTION

1.1  Over the last two decades, the emergence and growth of science parks throughout the UK has helped create many thousands of scientific, technical knowledge-based businesses. These companies locate in a science park (or innovation centre/ innovation-based Incubator) to take advantage of a variety of services ranging from financial advice through to marketing support.

1.2  Science parks nurture, support and provide their tenant companies with access to the very best information, knowledge and expert advice that helps to deliver their tenants future growth and expansion. UKSPA is keen to stress that the Association, Science Park Managers and Developers are therefore ideally placed to contribute to Government ambitions to continue to exploit science and technology through commercialisation.

2.  ABOUT UKSPA AND SCIENCE PARKS

2.1  The United Kingdom Science Park Association is the UK's authoritative body on the planning, development and creation of Science, Technology and Innovation Parks that support and develop innovative, high-growth, knowledge-based companies.

2.2  Members of UKSPA have been in the business of creating the right environment to support both the creation and growth of technology-based businesses for over 25 years. The origins of UKSPA date back to the early 1980s when a number of universities in the UK recognised that the era of the knowledge-based business had arrived, and pooled their experience so that they could guide others pursuing similar interests.

2.3  Science parks nurture, support and provide their tenant companies with access to the very best information, knowledge and expert advice that helps to deliver their tenants future growth and expansion.

3.  EXISTING UK SCIENCE AND INNOVATION PARKS

3.1  UKSPA member parks are actively engaged in innovation-led incubation, providing space for specialist groups of companies that want to work with the UK's research base and so helping technology companies develop using the UK's immense skills in science and technology. Our members are helping to build the UK's corporate tax base by supporting the formation and growth of new generations of technology based firms.

3.2  We would like to stress that existing Science and Technology Parks are uniquely placed to help the Coalition Government meet the need to continue to exploit science and technology through commercialisation.

3.3  Our member parks provide the environment for specialist groups of companies that want to work with the UK's research base and helping technology companies develop using the UK's immense skills in science and technology. Our members are helping to build the UK's corporate tax base by supporting the formation and growth of new generations of technology based firms.

3.4  Science and Technology Parks perform a key function acting as an interface between business and centres of knowledge such as universities, government funded laboratories, hospitals, and in some instances corporate laboratories, with the purpose of helping to commercialise ideas that arise from the UK's research base.

4.  THE FRAUENHOFER MODEL

4.1  As Herman Hauser stressed in his initial Report to the Department for Business Innovation and Skills "The remit of this review does not therefore include the important role played by University Technology Transfer Offices, Science Parks, centres and labs that support public policy …. or clusters, each of which have a key role in the innovation ecosystem."

4.2  The Frauenhofer model may be applicable to the UK, but care has to be taken not to simply introduce another "initiative", no matter how well it might be working in other countries. We strongly advise that Interested Parties work with the United Kingdom Science Park Association to audit the capacity of the existing science parks, technology parks and research parks to deliver the innovation agenda before investing in any future models of delivery.

4.3  We believe there are existing science and research parks delivering customer-led innovations, but they are not referred to as Frauenhofer centres. We do not believe it is necessary, nor valuable to try to identify other models focussed on applications and results. The current market-led science parks in the UK have a wealth of tenants undertaking research that by its nature is focussed on commercial imperative.

4.4  The United Kingdom Science Park Association met with all Science Park Associations from all over the world in Madrid two weeks ago, and it was interesting to note that all but Germany and the UK were supported either directly or indirectly by their respective governments, and that all recognised and readily welcomed the value of their national Association activities in supporting the delivery of the innovation agenda.

4.5  As the UK makes the transition from one innovation landscape to another, we are concerned that the government use the tools, knowledge and twenty five years' experience that are resident within the current UKSPA Membership. We have developed "ASPECT" - a structured quality assurance mechanism that enables our Members to work toward a standard that should be applied to any future investment that is made by the private sector or the government. We strongly advise that this standard is applied to any future investment made by the government in supporting capital projects.

4.6  The current network of science, technology and research parks in the UK although professionally managed, urgently requires a professional and recognised management qualification to drive the sector to the next level of development. UKSPA strongly urges the government to support the development of a qualification in this sector, and we offer our technical support and experience in the development of these new industry-wide qualifications.

4.7  To fully understand whether the Frauenhofer model would be relevant in the context of the United Kingdom innovation landscape there is the requirement to fully understand the research currently being undertaken by all 3000+ tenants in our science parks and research centres. The United Kingdom Science Park Association holds a live database of tenants on our Member Parks that includes technology and application areas, and we strongly urge the government to maximise the use of pre-existing knowledge to inform their decision making process. The UKSPA Board would be delighted to work with the Government on extending the use of this data with a view to stimulating further joint venture and collaborative activities.

Paul Wright
Chief Executive
United Kingdom Science Park Association

2 December 2010



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 17 February 2011