Transport and the Economy - Transport Committee Contents


Written evidence from Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd (TE 25)

INTRODUCTION

1.  Virgin Atlantic Airways welcomes the Committee's inquiry into Transport and the Economy and is pleased to submit comments for consideration.

2.  Virgin Atlantic was established in 1984 to provide a competitive alternative for business and leisure passengers on long-haul routes between the UK and major destinations. We now serve 29 destinations in the US, the Caribbean, Africa, India, Asia and Australia from Heathrow, Gatwick, Manchester and Glasgow. We operate 38 long-haul aircraft, employ over 7,500 people and carry more than 5 million passengers and 200,000 tonnes of high-value exports and imports each year.

3.  Successive authoritative studies have confirmed the compelling link between effective transport systems and economic prosperity and have recognised the particularly vital role of aviation in delivering global connectivity. The 2003 Aviation White Paper, the 2006 Eddington review and the Transport Select Committee's own 2009 The Future of Aviation report all came to a similar conclusion: that aviation plays a "crucial role in the UK economy and in the lives of many residents and visitors." [53]

4.  The importance of aviation to the British economy is not in doubt, yet policy-makers, politicians, and to an extent the country as a whole, take the sector somewhat for granted. It sometimes takes something bad to happen, such as the insolvency of a big company, to make people truly realise the importance of an industry. For aviation it took the eruption of the Icelandic volcano Eyjafjallajökull in April to starkly demonstrate just how reliant our everyday lives are on air travel. From cancelled business meetings and stranded tourists, to wasted perishable goods, thinning supermarket shelves and disrupted production lines, the crisis was a potent reminder that air travel is integral to modern economic life.

5.  The Department of Transport is facing major public expenditure reductions that will inevitably impact on its ability to improve the road and rail networks to support the economy. Unlike road and rail transport, air transport is largely private sector-funded. Most airports are privately owned and other costs, such as air traffic control, airport security and the Civil Aviation Authority, are recovered through fees and charges to the industry.

6.  The Department does not use public expenditure to deliver air transport improvements; it instead relies on setting an effective policy framework. Get policy right and aviation will make an even greater contribution to economic growth. Virgin Atlantic and our British competitors are revenue raisers for the UK. We are the engines and catalysts of the economic recovery. So, at a time when public spending is about to be severely constrained, Virgin Atlantic calls for public policy to support British aviation.

AVIATION'S CONTRIBUTION TO THE UK ECONOMY

7.  The Transport Select Committee's 2009 The Future of Aviation report found the industry was both important in its own right and vital to the wider economy:[54]

  • directly contributed £11.4 billion, or 1.1% of UK GDP in 2004;
  • supports the wider economy including inbound tourism, finance, knowledge and technology intensive industries and fresh produce;
  • 25% of the UK's trade by value travels by air; and
  • directly employs 200,000 people and 520,000 jobs either directly or indirectly dependant.

8.  Virgin Atlantic directly employs over 7,500 people. Our positions are not just based at Heathrow and Gatwick - we are currently recruiting 150 people to a new call centre in Swansea and 150 crew, many of whom will support our Manchester and Glasgow operations. Our Engineering Training School has trained hundred of engineers in the industry and our award-winning engineering apprenticeship scheme takes school leavers with a minimum of four GCSE's at Grade C and turns out highly competent technicians with great career prospects.

9.  Our operations, particularly our procurement function, support thousands of other jobs right across the country in our diverse supply chain - from high-skilled engineers at Rolls Royce in Derby and aircraft manufacturers at Airbus in Bristol and North Wales, all the way through to our new uniform supplier located just outside Birmingham.

10.  The most recent economic study of aviation's contribution to the UK economy was produced by Oxera Consulting Limited in November 2009.[55] It was the first such assessment since the Oxford Economic Forecasting report of 2006. The study found that aviation and its supply chain had a total "economic footprint" of £18.4 billion in 2007.

11.  In August, the Prime Minister delivered a major speech on tourism, emphasising its importance to the UK economy. He described it as one of the fastest ways of generating jobs and "fundamental to the rebuilding and rebalancing of our economy." [56]

12.  Aviation is absolutely vital to driving UK inbound tourism. 73.9% of overseas visitors in 2009 came to the UK by air. Inbound tourism is also an essential contributor to the revenue of UK airlines. Overseas residents spent £2.9 billion on fares to UK carriers in 2009.[57]

AIR PASSENGER DUTY AND THE UK ECONOMY

13.  Virgin Atlantic shares the Prime Minister's desire to increase inbound tourism to deliver growth in the UK economy. His speech identified correctly the need to be more internationally competitive. He committed to "remove some of the obstacles that put people off coming here"[58] but failed to mention perhaps the biggest financial disincentive; UK Air Passenger Duty (APD).

14.  It is no coincidence that the UK has been falling down the World Economic Forum's Travel and Tourism Competitiveness Ratings when at the same time APD has been increasing so dramatically.

15.  In 2006, an American family of four paid £80 in APD to travel in economy to the UK. From November this year they will pay £240 - a 300% increase in just four years. APD payable by the Chinese tourists that the Prime Minister cited in his speech will have increased, by 1 November this year, by 200% since 2006, and is increasing by 50% this year alone.

Figure 1

AIR PASSENGER DUTY INCREASES SINCE 2006
BandClass Increase since 2006Increase since 2007 Increase from Nov 2009 to Nov2010
AAll140% 20%9%
BAll200% 50%33%
CAll275% 87.5%50%
DAll325% 112.5%55%

16.  We cannot expect to continue increasing APD without impacting on the number of visitors to Britain. We have a history, natural beauty and attractions of which we are rightly proud, but we should not assume that these will somehow override the cost of visiting. Overseas visitors have many other alternative options.

17.  It is not just the disincentive effect on tourists that means ever-increasing APD is bad for the economy. APD is also a significant addition to the cost of business travel. The Government is seeking to show that the UK is open for business and is encouraging international trade and investment. Increasing the cost of travelling to the UK for business by air contradicts this policy agenda.

18.  We understand the need to raise revenue from the aviation sector and have always agreed that aviation should cover its environmental costs. The Department of Transport's Aviation Emissions Cost Assessment 2008 concluded that following the 2007 APD increases, aviation would cover its climate change costs with an excess of £100m. Despite that independent assessment APD has continued to rise steeply. As a British company operating in a truly international marketplace, our concern is that the level of APD is internationally uncompetitive.

19.  The Government is committed to reducing corporation tax to ensure Britain is internationally competitive, but the very same rationale applies to air passenger taxes. We understand that the UK has the least competitive aviation tax rates in the G20 and EU. We are not aware of any other country that taxes air passengers more than the UK. Virgin Atlantic does not seek special favours for UK aviation, but we do call for a more level playing field to enable us to compete fairly.

Figure 2

COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL AVIATION TAXATION IN OTHER G20 COUNTRIES
  • Argentina, Canada, China, India, Indonesia, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Turkey - None.
  • Australia - Air Passenger Tax 47AUD per passenger (£28).
  • Brazil - VAT on fuel for internal flights.
  • France - "Solidarity Tax" - 1 Euro economy within EU, 4 Euro economy non-EU, 10 Euro First and business within EU, 40 Euro First and business non-EU.
  • Germany - has announced plans for per passenger "Departure Tax" (less than 2,500kms EUR 8, 2,500-6,000kms EUR 25, 6,000+kms 45 EUR).
  • Italy - "Government Fund Levy" - 4 euro per passenger.
  • Japan - VAT Air Transportation ("Consumption Tax") - 5%.
  • Mexico - Tourist Tax - MXN 261.89 (£14).
  • South Africa - VAT on fuel 14% internal flights only & Air Levy on Cargo of 12p per litre.
  • Republic of Korea - Departure Tax on international flights of 10,000 KRW (£5.74).
  • USA - Air Transportation Tax on international flights of $16.10.

20.  We understand the Government needs tax revenue to tackle the deficit and that it is difficult to unpick tax decisions hard-wired into the Budget numbers, but this Government and future governments should resist the temptation to make any further increases beyond the new November rates.

21.  Virgin Atlantic is opposed to a Per-plane Duty as an alternative policy solution. By incentivising passengers to fly long-haul via Continental hub airports and by taxing transfer passengers for the first time, a Per-plane Duty threatens the viability of direct long-haul services from the UK and would be subject to carbon and tax leakage. This will damage British long-haul haul airlines and business. The main beneficiaries would be our European and Gulf competitor airlines and airports.

22.  The APD banding system can be reformed to deliver the Government's desired economic and environmental policy objectives. Adjusting the banding system so that domestic and short-haul journeys (where alternative transport options are more likely to be available) would encourage a shift to lower carbon travel at the same time as raising the same amount of revenue for the Treasury.

CONCLUSION

23.  A constrained public spending environment represents an opportunity to concentrate on aviation policy because it rarely involves public money and a successful aviation sector is integral to a successful economy.

24.  This submission has concentrated on Air Passenger Duty. By being massively out of kilter with aviation tax regimes in other countries, APD places the UK economy at a competitive disadvantage with its international rivals.

25.  The need to create a more level playing field is not limited to aviation taxation. Different international regulatory frameworks and constrained airport capacity are just two other policy areas that limit our ability to play our part in delivering economic growth.

26.  We would be pleased to provide oral evidence to expand on the points made in this submission.

September 2010


53   HC 125-I, House of Commons Transport Committee, The future of aviation, First Report of Session 2009-10, 2 December 2009, p.3 Back

54   Ibid, p.8-9 Back

55   http://www.aoa.org.uk/admin/uploader/UploadedDocuments/Oxera%20report%20-%20What%20is%20the%20contribution%20of%20aviation%20to%20the%20UK%20economy.pdf Back

56   http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/speeches-and-transcripts/2010/08/pms-speech-on-tourism-54479 Back

57   http://www.visitbritain.org/Images/Inbound%20Tourism%20Facts%20Sept%2010tcm139-195878.pdf Back

58   http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/speeches-and-transcripts/2010/08/pms-speech-on-tourism-54479 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 2 March 2011