Transport and the economy - Transport Committee Contents


Written evidence from the West Midlands Regional Sustainability Forum (TE 109)

BACKGROUND

Involved in the Transport Debate in the West Midlands over 20 years.

Chairman of the Alliance Against the Birmingham Northern Relief Road during the M6 Toll Debate.

On Steering Group for West Midlands and Midlands to North West Multi-Modal Studies.

On Steering Group for Black County Study and Western Access to the Black Country Study.

Engaged in development of RSS Policies and Member of Regional Planning Executive.

Vice-chair of the Regional Transport Partnership, involved in Regional Funding Allocation process.

KEY POINTS

We need to address economic failure in the region, particularly in urban areas such as Stoke on Trent and the Black Country, which lag behind the rest of the region. In seeking to improve economic performance we need to ensure the environment is protected and everyone benefits. Transport funding should underpin urban regeneration and resources should not be diverted away from this.

We need to invest in smaller scale schemes, such as walking and cycling, which are effective at unlocking economic potential but which also support the environmental regeneration of areas.

The types of transport interventions we pursue have impacts on the attractiveness of areas and transport lifestyles of residents and this is not given enough weight. Transport investment is not an end in itself.

We are concerned that too much weight is given to promoting and funding road schemes and long distance rail and that the role of buses is significantly undervalued, even though they are the workhorse of public transport. Changes to public funding that would reduce support for rural and less used bus services would undermine the network and its attractiveness to users.

Congestion, particularly in Peak Hours, is endemic in our urban areas and may never be reduced without significant increases in the cost of driving. Too much attention is paid to removing it rather than managing it. The emphasis should be on increasing journey time predictability and modal shift to more space efficient modes of transport.

Obtaining revenue funding as well as capital remains an issue. Local authorities should be encouraged to generate revenue through parking charges and levies, as well as taking up existing powers to decriminalise enforcement of parking and other minor contraventions.

SPECIFIC SCHEMES

M6 Toll

The evidence that objectors to the scheme gave to the Public Inquiry in the mid-1990s has been vindicated. Perceived benefits are often not real and it is largely a white elephant. The toll road is particularly poorly used by heavy goods vehicles. A reduction in toll rates is unlikely because there is insufficient traffic to make that economically attractive.

Reducing the toll rates or buying back the road would not deal with congestion on the M6 because 1. most M6 traffic is local/regional, 2. the M6 would refill with new traffic if some existing traffic were to be attracted away from it.

We would like to see greater use of the toll roads by Heavy Goods Vehicles. We were the only people who argued that lorry tolls should be pegged to car tolls at the Public Inquiry.

Access to the Black Country

This should continue to be via the M5 and M6. There is no alternative which would not be more expensive, environmentally damaging and damage attractive areas of the Black Country. Improvements to M5 Junctions 1 and 2 would help improve access, but in the long term investment in public transport is needed.

Managed Motorways

A stop gap measure that should not be seen as a long term solution as traffic is allowed to increase causing jams elsewhere. While there can be some immediate congestion and carbon benefits these are likely to be undermined over time. Allowing increased traffic on motorways in congested areas is also likely to exacerbate congestion in those areas if nothing else is done.

Other Road Schemes

A number of towns are pursuing road schemes, some of which have been around for a long time. Notable are the Hereford Outer Relief Road/Shrewsbury North West Relief Road. They are often linked with new green field housing and employment sites. There are cheaper alternatives which we believe should be pursued rather than spending time and energy on outdated proposals.

Rail

Increasing rail provision is important across the region. There has been a failure to fully capitalise on some opportunities. Development of rail in the Black Country, for example, where a new hub could be developed at Walsall using existing underused assets, could change perception as well as bring transport benefits. However it can be a chicken and egg situation - ie rail access leads to retail/housing prioritisation which leads to social regeneration while lack of access leads to decline. Double tracking to Hereford from Great Malvern is another important example.

High Speed Rail

Note that CENTRO say that many economic benefits rely on additional public transport investment. Essential that any services goes to the centre of Birmingham and is integrated into a step change in the West Midlands' public transport network without which many of the economic benefits will not materialise. Parkway Station likely to generate significant new regional road trips. Accept the need for more capacity to London but is this the right line, will it take money from other transport investment and does the carbon equation add up?

Midland Metro (Tram)

Support investment in Metro but needs to be balanced against cost. There is also a need to integrate Metro with heavy rail investment on corridors such as Wednesbury to Merry Hill.

Bus

Concerned that changes to bus grants and free bus passes could affect viability of services. Once lost they do not return. Buses play a key role in urban regeneration and in supporting rural communities.

Aviation

The economic impact of aviation tends to be exaggerated. It represents, after all, a two way street, for example in creating a tourism deficit. We accept the Birmingham International should be the main airport in the region. However, we do not support unrestrained expansion, especially a second runway. It is not a solution to simply transfer London flights to Birmingham via High Speed Rail.

November 2010



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 2 March 2011