Written evidence from the Institute of Transport and Tourism (AWC 22)
Summary of Preliminary Results from Survey of Winter Weather and Travel
1)
The on-line survey was launched on 6th December and was circulated to the users of as many organisations concerned with travel that we could contact. It was closed on January 20th with 1089 responses, reporting 791 trips which were affected by the weather.
2)
Respondents
There were responses from all regions of the UK, although the response was very uneven. Figure 1 gives the proportions.
Figure 1: Respondents’ Regions
|
Numbers
|
% of Valid Responses
|
London
|
81
|
8
|
Scotland
|
87
|
8
|
Wales
|
41
|
4
|
Northern Ireland
|
16
|
1
|
North West
|
324
|
30
|
North East
|
38
|
4
|
Yorkshire and Humberside
|
204
|
19
|
West Midlands
|
17
|
2
|
East Midlands
|
35
|
3
|
East Anglia
|
63
|
6
|
South West
|
108
|
10
|
South East
|
65
|
6
|
Total
|
1079
|
0
|
Region not given
|
10
|
0
|
|
1089
|
100
|
For every region the problems reported by most people were ‘icy’, ‘extreme cold’ and snow, with varying degrees of heaviness (light, medium and heavy).
3)
Modes used
The survey covered journeys by all modes. Figure 2 indicates the number of journeys the percentage of trips using each mode. The percentage exceeds 100% as it includes trips using more than one mode. The following sheets summarise some of the data for trips by different modes.
Figure 2: Modes used
Mode
|
Numbers using mode
|
% of journeys
|
Walk
|
142
|
18.0
|
Car
|
403
|
50.9
|
Bus
|
133
|
16.8
|
Train
|
216
|
27.3
|
cycle
|
92
|
11.6
|
Coach
|
2
|
0.3
|
Plane
|
31
|
3.9
|
Taxi
|
7
|
0.9
|
Other
|
16
|
2.0
|
4)
Mode data
These sheets give information about trips made by different modes. Cycling, coach and taxi travel has not been included because of the small numbers of journeys reported
Most of the terms are self-explanatory. Others are explained here
Mode: Number of trips using that mode, including multi-modal trips
Minimum number of trips disrupted: Respondents were asked how many of their trips had been disrupted, with a multiple choice answer (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, more than 5). This figure is obtained by multiplying the numbers of trips by the number of respondents and using six trips for those replying ‘more than 5’.
Inconvenience and Distress Caused Index: Respondents were asked how much inconvenience/distress did this cause you/other people with the possible answers: None, Very Little, Some, A Great Deal. Giving these numerical values (1, 2, 3 and 4) allows us to work out an average, which is reported here.
Mode Walk, Number of Trips reported 142, Minimum number of trips disrupted: 505 Looked for information before journey: 75%
|
|
% of total trips for walking
|
Main Journey Purposes
|
Shopping
|
4
|
|
Getting to education
|
6
|
|
Getting to work
|
72
|
Most Important problems
|
Public Transport unpredictable
|
14
|
|
Difficult driving/walking conditions
|
18
|
|
Dangerous pavements
|
31
|
Main Consequences
|
Used a different travel method
|
28
|
|
It was cancelled
|
38
|
|
It took longer
|
64
|
Inconvenience and Distress Caused Index
Inconvenience to Self?
|
Inconvenience to other people?
|
Distress to self?
|
Distress to other people?
|
3.06
|
2.78
|
2.35
|
2.21
|
Mode: Car Number of Trips reported 402 Minimum number of trips disrupted 1,118 Looked for information before journey: 83%
|
|
% of total trips for mode
|
Main Journey Purposes
|
Business travel
|
7
|
|
Visiting/Meeting Friends and Relations
|
11
|
|
Getting to work
|
62
|
Most Important problems
|
Blocked roads
|
8
|
|
Difficult driving/walking conditions
|
28
|
|
Dangerous roads
|
35
|
Main Consequences
|
It was cancelled
|
29
|
|
Didn't travel
|
39
|
|
It took longer
|
52
|
Inconvenience and Distress Caused Index
Inconvenience to Self?
|
Inconvenience to other people?
|
Distress to self?
|
Distress to other people?
|
2.87
|
2.69
|
2.22
|
2.17
|
Mode: Bus Number of Trips reported: 133 Minimum number of trips disrupted: 411 Looked for information before journey: 85%
|
|
% of total trips for bus trips
|
Main Journey Purposes
|
Shopping
|
4
|
|
Reaching health care
|
4
|
|
Getting to work
|
71
|
Most Important problems
|
Public Transport unpredictable
|
18
|
|
Public Transport delayed
|
22
|
|
Public Transport not running
|
31
|
Main Consequences
|
It was cancelled
|
23
|
|
Used a different travel method
|
26
|
|
It took longer
|
66
|
Inconvenience and Distress Caused Index
Inconvenience to Self?
|
Inconvenience to other people?
|
Distress to self?
|
Distress to other people?
|
3.05
|
2.81
|
2.29
|
2.18
|
Mode: Train Number of Trips reported: 216 Minimum number of trips disrupted: 633 Looked for information before journey 93%
|
|
% of total trips for mode
|
Main Journey Purposes
|
Visiting/Meeting Friends and Relations
|
9
|
|
Business travel
|
17
|
|
Getting to work
|
59
|
Most Important problems
|
Public Transport unpredictable
|
19
|
|
Public Transport not running
|
23
|
|
Public Transport delayed
|
31
|
Main Consequences
|
Used a different travel method
|
29
|
|
It was postponed
|
34
|
|
It took longer
|
61
|
Inconvenience and Distress Caused Index
Inconvenience to Self?
|
Inconvenience to other people?
|
Distress to self?
|
Distress to other people?
|
3.13
|
2.95
|
2.40
|
2.29
|
Mode: Plane Number of Trips reported: 31 Minimum number of trips disrupted: 50, Looked for information before journey 81%
|
|
% of total trips for mode
|
Main Journey Purposes
|
Business travel
|
19
|
|
Visiting/Meeting Friends and Relations
|
23
|
|
Holiday or day out
|
32
|
Most Important problems
|
Public Transport delayed
|
2
|
|
Other
|
5
|
|
Runways blocked
|
20
|
Main Consequences
|
It took longer
|
45
|
|
It was delayed
|
45
|
|
It was postponed
|
48
|
Inconvenience and Distress Caused Index
Inconvenience to Self?
|
Inconvenience to other people?
|
Distress to self?
|
Distress to other people?
|
3.45
|
3.16
|
3.03
|
3.00
|
5)
The majority of respondents said they looked for information before travelling. Plane travel disruptions appear to cause the most distress and inconvenience to both the traveller and other people, disruptions to car travel appear to cause the lest inconvenience and distress.
6)
Opinions
Respondents were given statements about the winter weather and asked to indicate their opinion. On the following scale:
Disagree Strongly, Disagree. Neutral, Agree, Agree Strongly and Don’t know.
The statements were:
1.
Britain always seems unprepared for bad weather.
2.
Preparing for weather that only occurs a few days a year would be too expensive.
3.
I would be willing to pay higher fares/road tax for better preparation.
4.
Clearing pavements of snow and ice is as important as clearing roads.
5.
Climate Change means we can expect more extreme weather more often.
6.
Bad weather brings out the best in people.
Figure 3 shows the percentage of valid responses agreeing and disagreeing with each statement. The columns below the line represent the percentage of people disagreeing and disagreeing strongly to the statement, those above, the percentage who agreed or agreed strongly to the statement. The responses of people who said they were neutral or did not know have been included in the percentages, but not shown on the chart.
Figure 3: Opinions
This indicates that over 80% of valid responses agreed that clearing pavements of ice and snow was as important as clearing roads. Most people disagreed that they would be willing to pay more in road tax or higher fares to be more prepared for bad weather, although nearly 70% of valid responses agreed that Britain always seemed unprepared. Opinion was most closely split on the question of whether it would be too expensive to prepare for conditions which might only last a few days a year with 46% of valid responses agreeing with the statement and 39% disagreeing. There were statistically significant differences between the answers from different regions and genders for some of the questions.
7)
Conclusions
This is a short summary of the survey findings, much of the analysis remains to be completed. It illustrates how the scale and scope of the disruption varies with the local weather, the journey purpose, frequency and length. We hope soon to have more findings about the consequences of the disruption, including people who found they could not make journeys because of the closure of facilities such as schools requiring them to care for others or because of cancellation of events or closure of destinations.
February 2011
|